Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJPsych Open ; 8(4): e120, 2022 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35770420

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders (MDcpg2015 and MDcpg2020) provide evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for managing mood disorders. AIMS: We examined Australian real-world prescribing habits to determine whether management in clinical practice aligned with MDcpg2015 recommendations. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients ≥16 years old who had been dispensed a Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)-listed antidepressant between July 2013 and June 2019 was conducted using Australian Commonwealth Department of Human Services PBS 10% sample data. RESULTS: Between July 2013 and June 2019, 239 944 patients in Australia commenced antidepressant treatment. Of these, 22% (52 694 patients) received a second treatment (a new class of treatment after a period of discontinuation or additional antipsychotic therapy) and 6% (15 741 patients) received a third treatment. Patients were initially prescribed primarily selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; 52% of prescriptions) or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs; 25%), even though TCAs are not recommended for first-line treatment. Fewer than one-quarter of patients were prescribed serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (13%) or other agents (10%). General practitioners (GPs) were more likely to initiate TCAs than psychiatrists (22% v. 7%).Once initiated, the overall median time patients remained on treatment was 4.5 months; this was highest with SSRIs (5.8 months) and lowest with TCAs (0.9 months). CONCLUSIONS: First-line prescribing broadly follows guidelines. GP and psychiatrist prescribing patterns differ, perhaps reflecting different patient groups and the need to tailor treatment to individuals. Future guidelines should aim to capture the different presentations and complexity of depression.

2.
J Affect Disord ; 319: 40-47, 2022 12 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36096374

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Determining the proportion of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) among patients with unipolar depression receiving adequate pharmacological treatment (pharmaceutically treated depression [PTD]) is clinically important and may affect health care utilization. In Taiwan, these issues can be assessed by analyzing population-based data. METHODS: The present study included data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2010 to 2017. Among patients with depression, PTD was defined by the receipt of at least one adequate antidepressant treatment, and TRD was defined as receiving a third adequate antidepressant treatment after failure to respond to two prior treatments. Time of progression from PTD to TRD was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier function. A propensity-matched case-comparison cohort approach was used to compare resource utilization between patients with non-TRD PTD and TRD. RESULTS: TRD was defined in 11.2 % of patients with unipolar depression and 37.1 % of PTD patients. The time of progression from PTD to TRD was approximately 1 year. Most TRD patients were women, middle-aged, and treated in general practice clinics. Antidepressant monotherapy, followed by antidepressant with augmentation, was the most common treatment strategy applied to TRD patients. Medical utilization was significantly higher in patients with TRD than those with non-TRD PTD across most aspects. LIMITATIONS: TRD was defined based on pharmacological treatment patterns, as the reasons for changes in antidepressant regimens were not available. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of patients with PTD developed TRD, often soon after receiving adequate pharmacological treatment. Patients with TRD used more medical resources than patients with non-TRD PTD.


Assuntos
Depressão , Transtorno Depressivo Resistente a Tratamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Taiwan , Transtorno Depressivo Resistente a Tratamento/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo Resistente a Tratamento/epidemiologia , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Seguro Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Biologics ; 15: 237-245, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34163137

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Real-world treatment persistence to ustekinumab for Crohn's disease (CD) was studied using Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data. Demographic and treatment pattern characteristics were also investigated. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort analysis included PBS 10% sample data for ustekinumab from September 2017 to March 2020, and for other biologics from October 2007 to capture earlier line(s) of therapy. Included patients received ustekinumab for CD prescribed by a gastroenterologist. Treatment persistence overall and by prior biologic experience, mono- or combination therapy, sex and age were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of age, sex and line of therapy on persistence. RESULTS: Data were available for 301 patients. Of these, 58.8% were female and 76.7% were aged 26-65 years. Median follow-up from first ustekinumab dispense was 16 months. Median persistence to ustekinumab had not been reached. Twelve-month persistence to ustekinumab was 82.6% (95% CI 78.1-87.5%). Patients receiving ustekinumab as their first biologic therapy had 12-month persistence of 88.0% (80.8-95.9%) compared to 80.6% (75.0-86.6%) for patients who had previously received other biologic therapies (p=0.059). The adjusted analysis showed a trend to longer persistence for patients receiving ustekinumab as their first biologic therapy compared to biologic experienced patients (HR 1.86 (95% CI 0.95-3.63), p=0.070). Males had higher persistence to ustekinumab than females (HR 0.36 (0.20-0.66), p<0.001). Receiving ustekinumab as a monotherapy or in combination with azathioprine, mercaptopurine, 5ASAs, methotrexate, or corticosteroids had no effect on persistence (p=0.22). CONCLUSION: In an Australian real-world setting, persistence to ustekinumab was demonstrated to be over 80% at 12 months. Use as monotherapy or in combination with other therapy for CD did not affect persistence. Differences in treatment persistence by gender and previous biologic use warrant further investigation as further long-term data becomes available.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA