The Natural History of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast - An Overview.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a heterogenous disease and its natural history cannot be directly observed as surgical removal is part of the current standard of care. Studies of incompletely excised breast lesions that were considered benign after biopsy, but at review years later were recognized as DCIS, offers some insight to the natural history of DCIS. Summarizing these retrospective data; 14-53 % of the cases retrospectively diagnosed as DCIS progressed to invasive breast cancer (IBC) during follow-up. While observations from retrospective re-evaluation of biopsies and autopsies adds epidemiological input for understanding the natural history of DCIS, the most important results are still awaited from the ongoing prospective studies on active surveillance of DCIS. These studies with collected data on patient characteristics, life-style and environmental factors, as well as tumor and stromal metabolomics and genomics, will probably further elucidate the natural history of DCIS and how the disease should be treated in the future.

Local Recurrence after Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Comprehensive Overview.

Patients with DCIS have an excellent long-term prognosis with a 10-year breast cancer-specific survival around 98%. Treatment has the goal to prevent the development of an invasive breast cancer and to minimize the risk for a second breast cancer event, and published studies have shown a substantial decrease in invasive local recurrence rates over time. Approximately 50% of the local recurrences after BCS for a primary DCIS are invasive and 8.5% of them node-positive. Experiencing an ipsilateral invasive recurrence after a primary DCIS does significantly increase the risk of breast cancer death, while this is not seen after a DCIS recurrence. Radical surgery remains crucial to minimize the risk of local recurrence, and adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the risk of local recurrence by at least 50%. At recurrence, a repeat-BCS should be considered as it offers a good local control in properly selected patients and an overall and breast cancer-specific survival comparable to that seen after mastectomy.

Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy (OPBC-02/ PREPEC): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial.

INTRODUCTION: The emphasis on aesthetic outcomes and quality of life (QoL) has motivated surgeons to develop skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy (SSM/ NSM) for breast cancer treatment or prevention. During the same operation, a so-called immediate breast reconstruction is performed. The breast can be reconstructed by positioning of a breast implant above (prepectoral) or below (subpectoral) the pectoralis major muscle or by using the patients' own tissue (autologous reconstruction). The optimal positioning of the implant prepectoral or subpectoral is currently not clear. Subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is still standard care in many countries, but prepectoral IBBR is increasingly performed. This heterogeneity in breast reconstruction practice is calling for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to guide treatment decisions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: International, pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial. The primary objective of this trial is to test whether prepectoral IBBR provides better QoL with respect to long-term (24 months) physical well-being (chest) compared with subpectoral IBBR for patients undergoing SSM or NSM for prevention or treatment of breast cancer. Secondary objectives will compare prepectoral versus subpectoral IBBR in terms of safety, QoL and patient satisfaction, aesthetic outcomes and burden on patients. Total number of patients to be included: 372 (186 per arm). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval has been obtained for the lead investigator's site by the Ethics Committee 'Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz' (2020-00256, 26 March 2020). The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, independent of the results, following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials standards for RCTs and good publication practice. Metadata describing the type, size and content of the datasets will be shared along with the study protocol and case report forms on public repositories adhering to the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse) principles. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04293146.