Hemodynamics and pharmacokinetics of tezosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients with cirrhosis.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of tezosentan, a parenteral dual ET receptor antagonist, on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics in patients with cirrhosis. In addition, the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of tezosentan were evaluated. METHODS: The population consisted of patients with cirrhosis with clinically significant portal hypertension. This was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. The patients were randomized 3:1 to tezosentan (3 mg/h for 2-3 h) or placebo. HVPG, hepatic blood flow (HBF, ICG method), and systemic arterial pressures were measured before and after tezosentan administration. Plasma concentrations of tezosentan and ET-1 were determined peripherally and in the hepatic vein. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received tezosentan and six placebo. Baseline clinical, biochemical, and hemodynamic characteristics were balanced between the two groups. There was no significant treatment effect on HVPG. The extraction ratio (0.31), the plasma clearance of ICG (280 ml/min), and the HBF (1,430 ml/min) did not show any relevant changes during the infusion of tezosentan, and there were no differences between placebo- and tezosentan-treated patients. A linear relationship was observed between the maximum-fold increase in ET-1 concentration and the steady-state tezosentan plasma concentration (r = 0.82). There was a strong correlation (r = 0.88) between plasma clearance of ICG and that of tezosentan (10.2 l/h). Arterial pressure and heart rate did not significantly change in either group. CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis, a 2- to 3-h tezosentan infusion was safe and well tolerated but did not change the HVPG. Tezosentan infusion had no influence on the extraction ratio and plasma clearance of ICG and did not change HBF.

Effect of the urotensin-II receptor antagonist palosuran on secretion of and sensitivity to insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To investigate the effects of palosuran, a nonpeptidic, potent and selective antagonist of the urotensin-II receptor, on insulin and glucose regulation in 20 diet-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover, proof-of-concept study. METHODS: After 4 weeks' oral treatment with 125 mg palosuran or placebo b.i.d.,effects on insulin secretion and sensitivity and blood glucose levels were assessed by means of a hyperglycaemic glucose clamp, meal tolerance test, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance score, and daily self-monitoring of blood glucose. Plasma concentrations of palosuran were determined for 12 h on the last day of intake. RESULTS: Palosuran did not affect second-phase insulin response (primary end-point) during the hyperglycaemic glucose clamp in comparison with placebo [paired difference of -1.8 microU ml(-1), 95% confidence interval (CI) -7.8, 4.2]. Likewise, no effects of palosuran were detected on the first-phase insulin response, or on insulin secretion and blood glucose levels during the meal tolerance test or on homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance score. No clinically significant effects on daily blood glucose profiles were observed during the study. Geometric mean C(max) and AUC(tau) (95% CI) and median t(max) (range) in this patient population were 180 ng ml(-1) (125, 260), 581 ng.h ml(-1) (422, 800) and 3.0 h (0.67, 4.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that antagonism of the urotensin-II system does not influence insulin secretion or sensitivity or daily blood glucose levels in diet-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Bosentan therapy in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Eisenmenger syndrome is characterized by the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension with consequent intracardiac right-to-left shunt and hypoxemia in patients with preexisting congenital heart disease. Because Eisenmenger syndrome is associated with increased endothelin expression, patients may benefit from endothelin receptor antagonism. Theoretically, interventions that have some effect on the systemic vascular bed could worsen the shunt and increase hypoxemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Bosentan Randomized Trial of Endothelin Antagonist Therapy-5 (BREATHE-5) was a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, on systemic pulse oximetry (primary safety end point) and pulmonary vascular resistance (primary efficacy end point) in patients with World Health Organization functional class III Eisenmenger syndrome. Hemodynamics were assessed by right- and left-heart catheterization. Secondary end points included exercise capacity assessed by 6-minute walk distance, additional hemodynamic parameters, functional capacity, and safety. Fifty-four patients were randomized 2:1 to bosentan (n=37) or placebo (n=17) for 16 weeks. The placebo-corrected effect on systemic pulse oximetry was 1.0% (95% confidence interval, -0.7 to 2.8), demonstrating that bosentan did not worsen oxygen saturation. Compared with placebo, bosentan reduced pulmonary vascular resistance index (-472.0 dyne.s.cm(-5); P=0.0383). The mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased (-5.5 mm Hg; P=0.0363), and the exercise capacity increased (53.1 m; P=0.0079). Four patients discontinued as a result of adverse events, 2 (5%) in the bosentan group and 2 (12%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In this first placebo-controlled trial in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome, bosentan was well tolerated and improved exercise capacity and hemodynamics without compromising peripheral oxygen saturation.

Orexin receptor antagonism: an ascending multiple-dose study with almorexant.

The objectives of this study were to investigate the multiple-dose tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the dual orexin receptor antagonist almorexant. Healthy subjects received daily doses of almorexant (100, 200, 400 or 1000 mg) or placebo in the morning for four days followed by two days with evening administration (Days 5-6). Each dose level was investigated in a new group of 10 subjects (eight active, two placebo, 1:1 sex). Dose-dependent increases in frequency and intensity were observed for somnolence and other adverse events. Pharmacokinetics at steady state showed rapid absorption, low concentrations eight hours post-dose, and minimal accumulation. Following evening, administration absorption was delayed and C(max) decreased. Almorexant at 400 and 1000 mg administered in the morning reduced vigilance, alertness, visuomotor coordination, and motor coordination assessed in a psychometric test battery. Polysomnography recordings following evening administration showed a trend towards shorter latency to sleep stages 3 and 4, and shorter latency to, and longer time in, rapid-eye-movement sleep at higher doses when compared to placebo. Whether these findings in healthy subjects translate into relevant sleep-enabling effects in insomnia patients needs to be investigated in future studies.

Atrial septal defects versus ventricular septal defects in BREATHE-5, a placebo-controlled study of pulmonary arterial hypertension related to Eisenmenger's syndrome: a subgroup analysis.

BACKGROUND: Eisenmenger's syndrome (ES) is the most advanced form of pulmonary arterial hypertension related to congenital heart disease. Evolution of pulmonary vascular disease differs markedly between patients with atrial septal defects (ASD) versus ventricular septal defects (VSD), potentially affecting response to treatment. We compared the effects of bosentan and placebo in patients with isolated ASD (ASD subgroup) versus patients with isolated VSD or both defects (VSD subgroup). METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed. Fifty-four patients (13: ASDs, 36: VSDs, 5: VSD+ASD) were randomized to bosentan 62.5 mg bid for four weeks (uptitrated to 125 mg bid thereafter) or placebo. Main outcome measures were: indexed pulmonary vascular resistance (PVRi), exercise capacity, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary blood flow index (Qpi), and changes in oxygen saturation (SpO2). RESULTS: Placebo-corrected median (95% CI) treatment effects on PVRi were -544.0 dyn·s·cm⁻5 (-1593.8, 344.7) and -436.4 dyn·s·cm⁻5 (-960.0, 167.0) in the ASD and VSD subgroups, respectively. Effects of bosentan on exercise capacity and mPAP were similar in both subgroups. No changes in SpO2 or Qpi were observed in either bosentan or placebo subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in exercise capacity and cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, without desaturation, were observed in ES patients with both ASDs and VSDs. Although not reaching statistical significance, improvements were similar to those in the BREATHE-5 analyses, suggesting that the location of septal defects is not a key determinant of treatment response. These data further support the use of bosentan for the treatment of ES, independent of shunt location.

Longer-term bosentan therapy improves functional capacity in Eisenmenger syndrome: results of the BREATHE-5 open-label extension study.

BACKGROUND: Bosentan, an oral endothelin ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist, improves hemodynamics and exercise capacity in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome but longer-term effects are unknown. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of bosentan up to 40 weeks in these patients. METHODS: Following the 16-week, double blind, placebo-controlled BREATHE-5 study of bosentan in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome, an open-label extension (OLE) was performed. Patients who completed BREATHE-5 received bosentan for an additional 24 weeks (62.5 mg b.i.d. for 4 weeks, then 125 mg b.i.d.) and were analyzed in two groups; ex-placebo and ex-bosentan, according to BREATHE-5 treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with Eisenmenger syndrome who participated in BREATHE-5 were included in the OLE. At week 24, the 6-minute walk distance (mean+/-SE) increased from OLE baseline for the ex-placebo (+33.2+/-23.9 m) and ex-bosentan group (+6.7+/-10.0 m). The overall improvement from baseline of BREATHE-5 was +61.3+/-8.1 m (95% confidence interval: [44.7, 78.0]) for the ex-bosentan group. WHO functional class was improved in both groups. Bosentan did not reduce systemic arterial blood oxygen saturation; safety profile was comparable to previous trials. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, these longer follow-up data support the efficacy and safety profile reported in the preceding BREATHE-5 study of bosentan treatment of Eisenmenger syndrome, challenging the notion that pulmonary vascular disease and severe functional impairment in these patients are not amenable to therapy.