Comparison between TightRail rotating dilator sheath and GlideLight laser sheath for transvenous lead extraction.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the comparative analyses of TightRail rotating dilator sheath (Philips) and laser sheath for lead extraction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the TightRail sheath as a primary or secondary tool for transvenous lead extraction (TLE). METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of 202 consecutive patients who underwent TLE using either TightRail sheath and/or GlideLight laser sheath (Philips) in our hospital. The study population was divided into three groups: Group A underwent TLE with laser sheath only (N = 157), Group B with TightRail sheath only (N = 22), and Group C with both sheaths (N = 23). RESULTS: During this period, 375 leads in 202 patients were extracted, including 297 leads extracted by laser sheath alone, 45 leads by TightRail sheath alone, and 33 by both TightRail sheath and laser sheaths. The most common indications included device infection (44.6%) and lead-related complications (44.1%). The median age of leads was 8.9 years. TightRail sheath (Group B) achieved similar efficacy as a primary extraction tool compared with laser sheath (Group A), with complete procedure success rate of 93.3% (vs. 96.6%, P = .263) and clinical success rate of 100.0% (vs. 98.1%, P = .513). Among 32 leads in which Tightrail was used after laser had failed (Group C), the complete procedure success rate was 75.8%. No significant difference in procedural adverse events was observed. CONCLUSION: Our single-center experience confirms that the TightRail system is an effective first-line and second-line method for TLE. Further investigation is required to guide the selection of mechanical and laser sheaths in lead extraction cases.

Management of patients with interrupted inferior vena cava requiring electrophysiology procedures.

BACKGROUND: Interrupted inferior vena cava (IVC) is a rare venous anomaly that complicates the treatment of patients who require electrophysiology (EP) procedures. METHODS: We describe five consecutive cases of patients with interrupted IVC who presented to the EP laboratory requiring interventional procedures including catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and supraventricular tachycardia and left atrial appendage closure. All cases were successfully completed utilizing a variety of approaches to vascular access including transseptal puncture via transhepatic and internal jugular approaches. CONCLUSION: Procedures in the EP lab can be performed successfully in patients with interrupted IVC.

Effect of Novel Programming on Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Very Low Ejection Fraction (from A MADIT-RIT).

The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial - Reduce Inappropriate Therapy showed a significant reduction in the risk of inappropriate therapy in patients with a programmed high-rate cutoff ≥200 beats per minute or delayed therapy for events ≥170 beats per minute compared with conventional programming. We aimed to characterize outcomes by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ranges for patients with high-rate, delayed, or conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming. We assessed the effect of LVEF (LVEF <15%, LVEF 15% to 25%, LVEF >25%) on the risk of inappropriate conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and death in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial - Reduce Inappropriate Therapy. Inappropriate therapies and death were independently evaluated by the adjudication committee. Statistical methods involved Kaplan-Meier time-to-event graphs and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. The study involved 140 patients (9%) with LVEF 15%, 585 with LVEF 15% to 25% (39%), and 774 with LVEF >25% (52%). High-rate or delayed programming significantly reduced the risk of inappropriate therapy compared with conventional programming in patients with all LVEFs (p <0.001 for all LVEF). Patients with LVEF <15% had an exceptional 97% lower risk of inappropriate therapy, with high-rate programming than conventional programming (hazard ratio 0.028, p = 0.001), without an increase in mortality. High-rate and delayed programming is superior to conventional programming in all LVEF ranges, without adverse effects.

Effect of a Reminder Statement on Echocardiography Reports on Referrals for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention.

Numerous trials show the benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention in patients with low ejection fraction (EF), a class I indication. However, underutilization is well documented. We retrospectively reviewed charts to see whether placing a reminder statement into echocardiogram reports for appropriate patients increased adherence to guidelines. From January through June 2013, a brief reminder of the ICD guidelines was automatically inserted into echocardiogram reports with EF ≤ 35% (reminder period). Charts were reviewed to determine if these patients (1) were referred to Electrophysiology (EP) within 6 months of the index echo and (2) received an ICD within 6 months of EP referral. Chart review of all patients who had an echocardiogram performed between March and August 2012 with an EF ≤ 35% provided a control period. More patients were referred to EP in the reminder period compared with control period, 68% (54 of 80) versus 51% (53 of 104), p = 0.03. There was also a higher rate of discussions in the reminder period between patients and physicians about ICD therapy (71% vs 54%, p = 0.02). Among patients appropriate for ICD, 52% of patients during the reminder period received an ICD versus 38% of patients during the control period (p = 0.11). A simple reminder statement on echocardiography reports led to a significant improvement in appropriate EP referrals and a trend toward increased ICD implantation in appropriate patients.

Clinical characteristics and prevalence of early repolarization associated with ventricular arrhythmias following acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Early repolarization (ER) on a 12-lead electrocardiogram has recently been associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs) in patients without structural heart disease and in patients with healed myocardial infarction (MI). An association between ER and VTAs in the setting of acute ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) has not been explored. In a single-center retrospective case-control design, 50 patients with STEMI complicated by VTAs (cases), defined as ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia within 72 hours of the index hospitalization, were matched for age and gender with 50 subjects with STEMI without VTAs (controls). Electrocardiograms obtained an average of 1 year before STEMI were analyzed for ER pattern, defined as notching or slurring of the terminal QRS complex or J-point elevation >0.1 mV above baseline in ≥ 2 contiguous leads. A higher prevalence of ER was associated with VTAs overall in cases compared to controls (26% vs 4%, p = 0.01) and localized to anterior (16% vs 0%) and inferior (14% vs 2%, p = 0.07) leads but not lateral limb leads. Notching (10% vs 2%, p = 0.1) and J-point elevation (16% vs 0%) were more common in cases. Slurring was uncommon. ER was associated with VTAs (odds ratio [OR] 6.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 28.8, p = 0.01), even after adjustment for creatine kinase-MB (OR 9.2, 95% CI 1.6 to 53.4, p = 0.01) and ejection fraction (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 27.1, p = 0.03). In conclusion, ER is associated with VTAs in patients with STEMI even after adjustment for left ventricular ejection fraction or creatine kinas-MB levels. Larger prospective studies exploring potential associations and mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmogenesis with ER pattern are needed.

Electrical impedance measurements of cochlear structures using the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique.

In individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss, cochlear implants (CIs) bypass normal inner ear function by applying electrical current directly into the cochlea, thereby stimulating surviving auditory nerve fibers. Although cochlear implants are able to restore some auditory sensation, they are far from providing normal hearing. It has been estimated that up to 75% of the current injected via a CI is shunted along scala tympani and is not available to stimulate auditory neurons. The path of the injected current and the consequent population of stimulated spiral ganglion cells are dependent upon the positions of the electrode contacts within the cochlea and the impedances of cochlear structures. However, characterization of the current path remains one of the most critical, yet least understood, aspects of cochlear implantation. In particular, the impedances of cochlear structures, including the modiolus, are either unknown or based upon estimates derived from circuit models. Impedance values for many cochlear structures have never been measured. By combining the hemicochlea preparation, a cochlea cut in half along its mid-modiolar plane, and the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique, impedances can be measured for cochlear tissues in a cochlear cross section including the modiolus. Advantages and disadvantages of the method are discussed in detail and electrical impedance measurements obtained in the gerbil hemicochlea are presented. The resistivity values for the cochlear wall in Omegacm are, 528 (range: 432-708) for scala media 3rd turn, 502 (range: 421-616) for scala tympani 3rd turn and scala vestibuli 2nd turn, 627 (range: 531-759) for scala media 2nd turn, 434 (range: 353-555) for scala tympani 2nd turn and scala vestibuli basal turn, 434 (range: 373-514) for scala media basal turn, and 590 (range: 546-643) for scala tympani basal turn. The resistivity was 455Omegacm (range: 426-487) for the modiolus.

Early repolarization associated with ventricular arrhythmias in patients with chronic coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Early repolarization, indicated on the standard 12-lead ECG, has recently been associated with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation in patients without structural heart disease. It is unknown whether there is an association between early repolarization and ventricular arrhythmias in the coronary artery disease (CAD) population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with CAD with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the healed phase of myocardial infarction were analyzed. In a case-control design, 60 patients who had ventricular arrhythmic events were matched for age and sex with 60 control subjects. ECGs were analyzed for early repolarization, defined as notching or slurring morphology of the terminal QRS complex or J-point elevation ≥0.1 mV above baseline in at least 2 lateral or inferior leads. Results were adjusted for left ventricular ejection fraction. Overall, early repolarization in 2 or more leads was more common in cases than control subjects (32% versus 8%, P=0.005). Early repolarization was noted more commonly in inferior leads (23% versus 8%, P=0.03), and a trend was noted in leads V(4) through V(6) (12% versus 3%, P=0.11). Early repolarization was uncommon in leads I and aVL in cases and control subjects (3% versus 0%). Notching was more common in cases than control subjects (28% versus 7%, P=0.008). Slurring and J-point elevation were not associated with ventricular arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: Early repolarization and, in particular, notching in the inferior leads is associated with increased risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CAD, even after adjustment for left ventricular ejection fraction. Our findings suggest early repolarization, and a notching morphology should be considered in a risk prediction model for arrhythmias in patients with CAD.