Timing of endoscopy in patients with elevated lactate levels and acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: While current guidelines recommend performing endoscopy within 24 h in case of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB), the precise timing remains an issue of debate. Lactate is an established parameter for risk stratification in a variety of medical emergencies. This study evaluated the predictive ability of elevated lactate levels in identifying patients with UGIB, who may benefit from emergent endoscopy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with elevated lactate levels, who presented to our emergency department between 01 January 2015 and 31 December 2019 due to suspected AUGIB. RESULTS: Of 134 included cases, 81.3% had an Charlson comorbidity index of ≥3 and 50.4% presented with shock. Fifteen (11.2%) patients died and mortality rates rose with increasing lactate levels. Emergent endoscopy within 6 h (EE) and non-EE were performed in 64 (47.8%) and 70 (52.2%) patients, respectively. Patients who underwent EE had lower systolic blood pressure (107.6 mmHg vs. 123.2 mmHg; p = 0.001) and received blood transfusions more frequently (79.7% vs 64.3%; p = 0.048), but interestingly need for endoscopic intervention (26.6% vs 20.0%; p = 0.37), rebleeding (17.2% vs. 15.7%; p = 0.82) and mortality (9.4% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.7) did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our findings support the recommendations of current guidelines to perform non-EE after sufficient resuscitation and management of comorbid illnesses.

Long-Term Postsurgical Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation (CROSS) Versus Chemotherapy (FLOT) for Multimodal Treatment of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Esophagogastric Junction.

BACKGROUND: The question of the ideal neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma has not been answered to date. Multimodal treatment has become a standard treatment for these adenocarcinomas. Currently, perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CROSS) is recommended. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective analysis compared long-term survival after CROSS versus FLOT. The study enrolled patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) or the esophagogastric junction type I or II undergoing oncologic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy between January 2012 and December 2019. The primary objective was to determine the long-term outcome in terms of overall survival. The secondary objectives were to determine differences regarding the histopathologic categories after neoadjuvant treatment and the histomorphologic regression. RESULTS: The findings showed no survival advantage for one or the other treatment in this highly standardized cohort. All the patients underwent open (CROSS: 9.4% vs. FLOT: 22%), hybrid (CROSS: 82% vs. FLOT: 72%), or minimally invasive (CROSS: 8.9% vs. FLOT: 5.6%) thoracoabdominal esophagectomy. The median post-surgical follow-up period was 57.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 23.2-109.7 months), and the median survival was longer for the CROSS patients (54 months) than for the FLOT patients (37.2 months) (p = 0.053). The overall 5-years survival was 47% for the entire cohort (48% for the CROSS and 43% for the FLOT patients). The CROSS patients showed a better pathologic response and fewer advanced tumor stages. CONCLUSION: The improved pathologic response after CROSS cannot be translated into longer overall survival. To date, the choice of which neoadjuvant treatment to use can be made only on the basis of clinical parameters and the patient's performance status.

Efficacy of endoscopic therapy and long-term outcomes of upper gastrointestinal tumor bleeding in patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) from malignancies is associated with a poor outcome. Only a small number of studies on gastrointestinal tumor bleeding have been published so far, focusing mainly on bleeding from gastric cancer. Since the information on patients with UGIB from esophageal cancer appears insufficient, this study aimed to present clinical and endoscopic findings, treatment options as well as clinical outcomes such as rebleeding and survival of those patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all patients admitted with UGIB from esophageal cancer at our university hospital during a 10-year period. RESULTS: 45 patients were analyzed of whom 26 (57.8%) already had cancer stage IV at index bleeding. 22 (48.9%) patients presented with hemodynamic instability and 30 (66.7%) patients received blood transfusions. Active bleeding was present in 24 (53.3%) patients, of whom 20 (83.3%) received endoscopic therapy. Successful hemostasis was achieved in 18 (90%) of 20 patients with Argon plasma coagulation used most frequently (52.4%). Early and delayed rebleeding occurred in 5 (12.5%) and 11 (27.5%) of all inoperable patients, respectively. Intake of anticoagulation or anti-platelet drugs were risk factors for delayed rebleeding and the median overall survival after index bleeding was 1.2 months. CONCLUSION: UGIB from esophageal cancer occurred most frequently in advanced tumor stages and was associated with significant blood loss. Even though initial endoscopic therapy was effective, rebleeding occurred in a significant number of patients. Those taking anticoagulants or anti-platelet drugs should be closely monitored for rebleeding. The overall survival after index bleeding was poor.

Outcome of endoscopic vacuum therapy for duodenal perforation.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal defects are complex clinical situations, and their management is challenging and associated with high mortality. Besides surgery, endoscopic treatment options exist, but the size and location of the perforation can limit their application. We present a retrospective study, demonstrating a successful application of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) for duodenal leaks. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent EVT for duodenal perforations between 2016 and 2021 at two tertiary centers. We analyzed demographic and clinical patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, leak characteristics, sponge-related complications, and success rate. RESULTS: Indications for treatment with EVT in the duodenum consisted of leak after duodenal suture of a perforated ulcer (n = 4), iatrogenic perforation after endoscopic resection (n = 2), iatrogenic perforation during surgery (n = 2), and anastomotic leak after upper gastrointestinal surgery (n = 2). EVT was used as a first-line treatment in seven patients and as a second-line treatment in three patients. EVT was successfully applied in all interventions (n = 10, 100%). Overall, EVT lead to definitive closure of the defects in eight out of ten patients (80%). No severe EVT-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: EVT is safe and technically feasible, so it emerges as a promising endoscopic treatment option for duodenal leaks. However, multidisciplinary collaboration and management are important to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, and to improve recovery rates.

Time to endoscopic vacuum therapy-lessons learned after > 150 robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies (RAMIE) at a German high-volume center.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: In esophageal surgery, anastomotic leak (AL) remains one of the most severe and critical adverse events after oncological esophagectomy. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) can be used to treat AL; however, in the current literature, treatment outcomes and reports on how to use this novel technique are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with an AL after IL RAMIE and to determine whether using EVT as an treatment option is safe and feasible. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study includes all patients who developed an Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) type II AL after IL RAMIE at our center between April 2017 and December 2021. The analysis focuses on time to EVT, duration of EVT, and follow up treatments for these patients. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients underwent an IL RAMIE at our hospital. 21 patients of these (13.4%) developed an ECCG type II AL. One patient died of unrelated Covid-19 pneumonia and was excluded from the study cohort. The mean duration of EVT was 12 days (range 4-28 days), with a mean of two sponge changes (range 0-5 changes). AL was diagnosed at a mean of 8 days post-surgery (range 2-16 days). Closure of the AL with EVT was successful in 15 out of 20 patients (75%). Placement of a SEMS (Self-expandlable metallic stent) after EVT was performed in four patients due to persisting AL. Overall success rate of anastomotic sealing independently of the treatment modality was achieved in 19 out of 20 Patients (95%). No severe EVT-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: This study shows that EVT can be a safe and effective endoscopic treatment option for ECCG type II AL.

Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: The most common functional complication after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is the delayed emptying of the gastric conduit (DGCE) for which several diagnostic tools are available, e.g. chest X-ray, upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and water-soluble contrast radiogram. However, none of these diagnostic tools evaluate the pylorus itself. Our study demonstrates the successful measurement of pyloric distensibility in patients with DGCE after esophagectomy and in those without it. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Between May 2021 and October 2021, we performed a retrospective single-centre study of all patients who had an oncological Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and underwent our post-surgery follow-up programme with surveillance endoscopies and computed tomography scans. EndoFlip™ was used to perform measurements of the pylorus under endoscopic control, and distensibility was measured at 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml balloon filling. RESULTS: We included 70 patients, and EndoFlip™ measurement was feasible in all patients. Successful application of EndoFlip™ was achieved in all interventions (n = 70, 100%). 51 patients showed a normal postoperative course, whereas 19 patients suffered from DGCE. Distensibility proved to be smaller in patients with symptoms of DGCE compared to asymptomatic patients. For 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml, the mean distensibility was 6.4 vs 10.1, 5.7 vs 7.9 and 4.5 vs 6.3 mm2/mmHg. The differences were significant for all three balloon fillings. No severe EndoFlip™ treatment-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Measurement with EndoFlip™ is a safe and technically feasible endoscopic option for measuring the distensibility of the pylorus. Our study shows that the distensibility in asymptomatic patients after esophagectomy is significantly higher than that in patients suffering from DGCE. However, more studies need to be conducted to demonstrate the general use of EndoFlip™ measurement of the pylorus after esophagectomy.

A convolutional neural network for bleeding detection in capsule endoscopy using real clinical data.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to develop a convolutional neural network for the detection of bleedings in capsule endoscopy videos using realistic clinical data from one single-centre. METHODS: Capsule endoscopy videos from all 133 patients (79 male, 54 female; meanage = 53.73 years, SDage = 26.13) who underwent capsule endoscopy at our institution between January 2014 and August 2018 were screened for pathology. All videos were screened for pathology by two independent capsule experts and confirmed findings were checked again by a third capsule expert. From these videos, 125 pathological findings (individual episodes of bleeding spanning a total of 5696 images) and 103 non-pathological findings (sections of normal mucosal tissue without pathologies spanning a total of 7420 images) were used to develop and validate a neural network (Inception V3) using transfer learning. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of the model for the detection of bleedings was 90.6% [95%CI: 89.4%-91.7%], with a sensitivity of 89.4% [95%CI: 87.6%-91.2%] and a specificity of 91.7% [95%CI: 90.1%-93.2%]. CONCLUSION: Our results show that neural networks can detect bleedings in capsule endoscopy videos under realistic, clinical conditions with an accuracy of 90.6%, potentially reducing reading time per capsule and helping to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.

INTRODUCTION: Transthoracic esophagectomy is a highly complex and sophisticated procedure with high morbidity rates and a significant mortality. Surgical access has consistently become less invasive, transitioning from open esophagectomy to hybrid esophagectomy (HE) then to totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), and most recently to robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE), with each step demonstrating improved patient outcomes. Aim of this study with more than 600 patients is to complete a propensity-score matched comparison of postoperative short-term outcomes after highly standardized RAMIE vs. HE in a European high volume center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred and eleven patients that underwent transthoracic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between May 2016 and May 2021 were included in the study. In January 2019, we implemented an updated robotic standardized anastomotic technique using a circular stapler and ICG (indocyanine green) for RAMIE cases. Data were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained IRB-approved database. Outcomes of patients undergoing standardized RAMIE from January 2019 to May 2021 were compared to our overall cohort from May 2016-April 2021 (HE) after a propensity-score matching analysis was performed. RESULTS: Six hundred and eleven patients were analyzed. 107 patients underwent RAMIE. Of these, a total of 76 patients underwent a robotic thoracic reconstruction using the updated standardized circular stapled anastomosis (RAMIE group). A total of 535 patients underwent HE (Hybrid group). Seventy patients were propensity-score matched in each group and analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics. RAMIE patients had a significantly shorter ICU stay (p = 0.0218). Significantly more patients had no postoperative complications (Clavien Dindo 0) in the RAMIE group [47.1% vs. 27.1% in the HE group (p = 0.0225)]. No difference was seen in lymph node yield and R0 resection rates. Anastomotic leakage rates when matched were 14.3% in the hybrid group vs. 4.3% in the RAMIE group (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Our analysis confirms the safety and feasibility of RAMIE and HE in a large cohort after propensity score matching. A regular postoperative course (Clavien-Dindo 0) and a shorter ICU stay were seen significantly more often after RAMIE compared to HE. Furthermore it shows that both procedures provide excellent short-term oncologic outcomes, regarding lymph node harvest and R0 resection rates. A randomized controlled trial comparing RAMIE and HE is still pending and will hopefully contribute to ongoing discussions.

There is no correlation between a delayed gastric conduit emptying and the occurrence of an anastomotic leakage after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Esophagectomy is the gold standard in the surgical therapy of esophageal cancer. It is either performed thoracoabdominal with a intrathoracic anastomosis or in proximal cancers with a three-incision esophagectomy and cervical reconstruction. Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) is the most common functional postoperative disorder after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (IL). Pneumonia is significantly more often in patients with DGCE. It remains unclear if DGCE anastomotic leakage (AL) is associated. Aim of our study is to analyze, if AL is more likely to happen in patients with a DGCE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 816 patients were included. All patients have had an IL due to esophageal/esophagogastric-junction cancer between 2013 and 2018 in our center. Intrathoracic esophagogastric end-to-side anastomosis was performed with a circular stapling device. The collective has been divided in two groups depending on the occurrence of DGCE. The diagnosis DGCE was determined by clinical and radiologic criteria in accordance with current international expert consensus. RESULTS: 27.7% of all patients suffered from DGCE postoperatively. Female patients had a significantly higher chance to suffer from DGCE than male patients (34.4% vs. 26.2% vs., p = 0.040). Pneumonia was more common in patients with DGCE (13.7% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.025), furthermore hospitalization was longer in DGCE patients (median 17 days vs. 14d, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of type II anastomotic leakage, (5.8% in both groups DGCE). All patients with ECCG type II AL (n = 47; 5.8%) were treated successfully by endoluminal/endoscopic therapy. The subgroup analysis showed that ASA ≥ III (7.6% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.05) and the histology squamous cell carcinoma (9.8% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of an AL. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that DGCE after IL is a common finding in a standardized collective of patients in a high-volume center. This functional disorder is associated with a higher rate of pneumonia and a prolonged hospital stay. Still, there is no association between DGCE and the occurrence of an AL after esophagectomy. The hypothesis, that an DGCE results in a higher pressure on the anastomosis and therefore to an AL in consequence, can be refuted. DGCE is not a pathogenetic factor for an AL.

Short- and long-term follow-up of patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation.

PURPOSE: Esophageal perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In addition to surgical treatment, endoscopic endoluminal stent placement and endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are established methods in the management of this emergency condition. Although health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is becoming a major issue in the evaluation of any therapeutic intervention, not much is known about HRQoL, particularly in the long-term follow-up of patients treated for non-neoplastic esophageal perforation with different treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' outcome after non-neoplastic esophageal perforation with focus on HRQoL in the long-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients treated for non-neoplastic esophageal perforation at the University Hospital Cologne from January 2003 to December 2014 were included. Primary outcome and management of esophageal perforation were documented. Long-term quality of life was assessed using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Health-Related Quality of Life Index (HRQL) for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires for general and esophageal specific QoL (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18). RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Based on primary treatment, patients were divided into an endoscopic (n = 27; 46.6%), surgical (n = 20; 34.5%), and a conservative group (n = 11; 19%). Short- and long-term outcome and quality of life were compared. HRQoL was measured after a median follow-up of 49 months. HRQoL was generally reduced in patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation. Endoscopically treated patients showed the highest GIQLI overall score and highest EORTC general health status, followed by the conservative and the surgical group. CONCLUSION: HRQoL in patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation is reduced even in the long-term follow-up. Temporary stent or EVT is effective and provides a good alternative to surgery, not only in the short-term but also in the long-term follow-up.

A new hybrid stent using endoscopic vacuum therapy in treating esophageal leaks: a prospective single-center experience of its safety and feasibility with mid-term follow-up.

Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) and endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are endoscopic options for treating leaks of the esophagus. VACStent® is a variant of SEMS that aims to combine the advantages of SEMS and EVT in one device. Due to this unique construction, VACStent® can build a barrier to the leak and facilitate wound healing with EVT, all while maintaining intestinal passage. We present the first prospective feasibility study of VACStent® for treating leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Between September 2019 and November 2020, we performed a prospective, investigator-initiated, single-center study and included all patients who underwent endoscopic stenting with VACStent® for various kinds of esophageal leaks, such as spontaneous, iatrogenic or anastomotic leaks. We included 20 patients, who underwent a total of 24 endoscopic VACStent® implantations. Technical success of the application of the VACStent® was achieved in all interventions (n = 24, 100%). Overall, clinical success in closing the leaks with VACStent® treatment was achieved in 60% of patients (12/20). No severe VACStent® treatment-related adverse events occurred. Oral feeding with supplement high-energy drinks failed in all patients due to clogging of the suction tube. VACStent® is a safe and feasible endoscopic treatment option for leaks of the upper gastrointestinal tract. However, our data could not show the expected advantage of orally feeding the patients during the treatment with the VACStent® in its current form. Efficacy of VACStent® compared to EVT or SEMS needs to be investigated in a further study. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03962179.

Management of intra-thoracic anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic vacuum therapy versus stenting.

Despite a significant decrease of surgery-related mortality and morbidity, anastomotic leakage still occurs in a significant number of patients after esophagectomy. The two main endoscopic treatments in case of anastomotic leakage are self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) and the endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT). It is still under debate, if one method is superior to the other. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature to compare the effectiveness and the related morbidity of SEMS and EVT in the treatment of esophageal leakage. We systematically searched for studies comparing SEMS and EVT to treat anastomotic leak after esophageal surgery. Predefined endpoints including outcome, treatment success, endoscopy, treatment duration, re-operation rate, intensive care and hospitalization time, stricture rate, morbidity and mortality were assessed and included in the meta-analysis. Seven retrospective studies including 338 patients matched the inclusion criteria. Compared to stenting, EVT was significantly associated with higher healing (OR 2.47, 95% CI [1.30 to 4.73]), higher number of endoscopic changes (pooled median difference of 3.57 (95% CI [2.24 to 4.90]), shorter duration of treatment (pooled median difference - 11.57 days; 95% CI [- 17.45 to - 5.69]), and stricture rate (OR 0.22, 95% CI [0.08 to 0.62]). Hospitalization and intensive care unit duration, in-hospital mortality rate, rate of major and treatment related complications, of surgical revisions and of esophago-tracheal fistula failed to show significant differences between the two groups. Our analysis indicates a high potential for EVT, but because of the retrospective design of the included studies with potential biases, these results must be interpreted with caution. More robust prospective randomized trials should further investigate the potential of the two procedures.

Self-expandable metal stent fixation with a temporary Overstitch Apollo® suture as a rescue therapy for a reluctant tuberculous esophageal-mediastinal fistula.

We present the case of a 79 y.o. male diagnosed with tuberculosis and mediastinal lymphadenopathy fistulizing in the esophageal lumen. Despite a number of treatments, including over-the scope (OVESCO) clip, the patient had intolerance for oral intake and repeated infections.

Outcome of prophylactic endoscopic vacuum therapy for high-risk anastomosis after esophagectomy.

Background: Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has become an established procedure for the treatment of anastomotic leaks (AL) in upper gastrointestinal surgery. A novel approach is the use of EVT for preventing leaks in high-risk anastomosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of prophylactic EVT (pEVT) in patients receiving surgical revision of the anastomosis after oncological Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) due to AL.Material and methods: Between June 2016 and February 2019, all patients who underwent anastomotic revision after ILE due to a confirmed AL were included. The primary outcome was the success rate of pEVT, which was defined as absence of an AL after revision. Secondary outcome parameters were duration of treatment, inflammatory levels, and ICU/hospital stay.Results: Twenty-one patients underwent anastomotic revision due to an AL. The cause of the AL was ischemia in nine patients (42.9%) and non-ischemia (other) in 12 patients (57.1%). PEVT was performed in 14 patients (66.6%). The overall success rate of pEVT was five out of 14 patients (35.7%).Conclusions: Prophylactic EVT cannot prevent a re-leak in patients with high-risk anastomosis due to surgical revision of an AL after oncological ILE. However, pEVT might help to control the clinical condition of these patients.

[GERD and Barett: Natural Course of One Disease - Update Diagnostics and Therapy]. / GERD und Barrett.

GERD and Barett: Natural Course of One Disease - Update Diagnostics and Therapy Abstract. The gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) represents a relatively frequent condition, which clinically includes orocervical, thoracic and abdominal complaints. GERD is defined as pathological gastroesophageal acidic reflux, which consecutively leads to mucosal damage of the esophagus such as reflux esophagitis. The most common symptom of GERD is heartburn but GERD symptoms include various complaints, which need to be considered in diagnosis and therapy. Besides endoscopy, barium swallow, pH metry and manometry are counted among the routine diagnostics for GERD patients. For therapy, dietary and lifestyle measures come along with medication such as proton pump inhibitors (PPI) as daily medication and antacids on demand. It has been demonstrated that anti-reflux surgery, minimally invasive fundoplication or magnet augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter, produces an equal and lasting effect on GERD compared to PPI. Surgery is preferred in case of large hiatal hernia of voluminous reflux. Success of therapy is given if esophageal exposure to acid is reduced, which shows in remission of esophagitis or which can be demonstrated through pH-metry control. Additionally, improvement of quality of life stands in the focus of GERD treatment, which is to be considered for every therapeutic step. Barrett esophagus represents a subtype of GERD with rising incidence in Western countries. As potential precancerous lesion, the Barrett's esophagus is to be diagnosed early and needs to undergo a risk stratified surveillance in order to prevent dysplasia or carcinoma. Patients with low grade dysplasia, high grade dysplasia or early Barrett's carcinoma should be treated endoscopically. Soon artificial intelligence might contribute to improvement of Barrett's esophagus surveillance and treatment.

Endoscopic vacuum therapy versus stenting for postoperative esophago-enteric anastomotic leakage: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal anastomotic leakage still represents a challenging complication after esophageal surgery. Endoscopically placed self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are the treatment of choice, but since the introduction of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) for esophageal leakage 10 years ago, increasing evidence has demonstrated that EVT might be a superior alternative. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and related morbidity of SEMS and EVT in the treatment of esophageal leak. METHODS: We systematically searched for studies comparing SEMS and EVT to treat anastomotic leakage after esophageal surgery. Predefined end points including outcome, treatment success, endoscopy, treatment duration, hospitalization time, morbidity, and mortality were assessed and included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Five retrospective studies including 274 patients matched the inclusion criteria. Compared with stenting, EVT was significantly associated with a higher rate of leak closure (odds ratio [OR] 3.14, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.23 to 7.98), more endoscopic device changes (pooled median difference of 3.09; 95 %CI 1.54 to 4.64]), a shorter duration of treatment (pooled median difference -11.90 days; 95 %CI -18.59 to -5.21 days), and a lower mortality rate (OR 0.39, 95 %CI 0.18 to 0.83). There were no significant differences in short-term and major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the retrospective quality of the studies with potential biases, the results of the meta-analysis must be interpreted with caution. However, the analysis indicates the potential benefit of EVT, which should be further investigated with standardized and prospectively collected data.

Efficacy and feasibility of OverStitch suturing of leaks in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

BACKGROUND: Management of upper gastrointestinal leaks is challenging. A new potential treatment option for this complication is endoscopic suturing with the OverStitch system (Apollo Endosurgery, Texas, USA), which is today mainly used for endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and feasibility of this new treatment option in patients with leaks in the upper gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center study of all patients who underwent endoscopic suturing with OverStitch of leaks in the upper gastrointestinal tract. RESULTS: Endoscopic suturing was performed on 13 patients (mean age, 59.62 ± 16.29 years; mean leak size, 22.31 ± 22.6 mm) over a period of 8 months. Postoperative leaks were detected in 10 patients (76.9%) after foregut surgery. Interventional success was achieved in all endoscopic attempts (n = 16, 100%) with a mean closure time of 28.0 ± 12.36 min per patient. Follow-up technical success rate for each suture was (n = 8, 50.0%). Clinical success, including repeated suture attempts was achieved in 8 of the 13 patients (61.5%). These 8 patients had not received prior treatment for the leak. No immediate or delayed serious complications occurred as a result of OverStitch. The mean follow-up was 95 ± 91.07 days. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic suturing with OverStitch for leaks in the upper gastrointestinal tract is feasible and effective in patients who have not received prior treatment. This minimally invasive technique seems to be a promising option especially for patients with large leaks and significant comorbidities.

Semiautomated Renal Cortex Volumetry in Spectral Computed Tomography: Effect of Monoenergetic Reconstructions on Measurement Precision and Interobserver Variability.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of virtual monoenergetic images (vMEIs) on renal cortex volumetry (RCV) and estimation of split-renal function. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (mean ± SD, 64.7 ± 9.9 years) underwent a contrast-enhanced dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography. Images were reconstructed with a reference standard (iterative model reconstruction, IMRRef), a newly spectral detector computed tomography algorithm (SPcon) and vMEI at 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 keV. Two blinded independent readers performed RCV on all data sets with a semiautomated tool. RESULTS: Total kidney volume was up to 15% higher in vMEI at 40/60 keV compared with IMRRef (P < 0.001). Total kidney volume with vMEI at 80/100 keV was similar to IMRRef (P < 0.001). Split-renal function was similar in all reconstructions at approximately 50% ± 3%. Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant differences (P > 0.05), except for 40 keV versus SPcon (P < 0.05). The time required to perform RCV was reasonable, approximately 4 minutes, and showed no significant differences among reconstructions. Interreader agreement was greatest with vMEI at 80 keV (r = 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.85; P < 0.0002) followed by IMRRef images (r = 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.84; P < 0.0003). IMRRef showed the highest mean Hounsfield unit for cortex/medulla of 223.4 ± 73.7/62.5 ± 19.7 and a ratio of 3.7. CONCLUSIONS: Semiautomated RCV performed with vMEI and IMRRef/SPcon is feasible and showed no clinically relevant differences with regard to split-renal function. Low-kiloelectron volt vMEI showed greater tissue contrast and total kidney volume but no benefit for RCV. Moderate-kiloelectron volt vMEI (80 keV) results were similar to IMRRef with a faster postprocessing time.

HER2/neu (ERBB2) expression and gene amplification correlates with better survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: HER2 (ERBB2 or HER2/neu) is a tyrosine-kinase increasing cell proliferation. Overexpression/amplification of HER2 is correlated with worse prognosis in solid malignancies. Consequently, HER2 targeting is established in breast and upper gastrointestinal tract cancer. There are conflicting data concerning the impact of HER2 overexpression on esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), as most studies do not differ between cancers of the esophagus/gastroesophageal junction and the stomach. The aim of this study was to analyze the expression/amplification of HER2 in EAC in correlation to clinicopathological data to verify its prognostic impact. METHODS: We analyzed 428 EAC patients that underwent transthoracic thoraco-abdominal esophagectomy between 1997 and 2014. We performed HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) according to the guidelines and fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization (FISH) for IHC score2+, using tissue micro arrays (TMA) with up to eight biopsies from the surface and infiltration area of a single tumor for evaluating HER2-heterogeneity and single-spot TMA. The HER2-status was correlated with clinicopathological data. RESULTS: HER2-positivity was found in up to 14.9% in our cohort (IHC score 3+ or IHC score 2+ with gene amplification) and demonstrated a significantly better overall survival (OS) in correlation to HER2-negative tumors (median OS 70.1 vs. 24.6 months, p = 0.006). HER2-overexpression was more frequently seen in lower tumor stages (pT1/pT2, p = 0.038), in the absence of lymphatic metastases (pN0/pN+, p = 0.020), and was significantly associated with better histological grading (G1/G2) (p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a positive prognostic impact of HER2 overexpression in a large cohort of EAC, contrary to other solid malignancies including gastric cancer and breast cancer, but consistent to the results of a large study on EAC from 2012.

Assessing guideline adherence in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding receiving antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy.

Background & aims: Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) occurs frequently and is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality, especially in patients receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy (APT and ACT, respectively). We aimed to evaluate adherence to guideline recommendations published by European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE).Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with NVUGIB und prior exposition to APT or ACT at a single university hospital between 01 January 2016 and 31 December 2017.Results: 270 patients were identified (70.4% male, median age 72 years). 6/17 (35.3%) patients receiving APT for primary cardiovascular prophylaxis, 39/71 (54.9%) and 35 (49.3%) patients receiving APT for secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis (using strict and liberal definition, respectively) and 13/25 (52%) patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were not managed according to current recommendations. Management of ACT for secondary thromboembolic prophylaxis did not follow guideline recommendations in 59/93 (63.4%) and 34/93 (36.6%) patients (using strict and liberal definition, respectively). 23.7% of patients with NVUGIB were exposed to combined APT and ACT for whom no guideline recommendations exist. Mortality for any reason was twice as high in patients who were not managed according to guideline recommendations (18.8% vs. 8% using strict definition, 20.5% vs. 10.2% using liberal definition), which did not remain significant after adjusting for comorbidities, whereas cardiovascular events were observed at similar rates.Conclusion: A significant number of patients with NVUGIB receiving APT or ACT is not managed according to current ESGE guideline recommendations. Strategies to implement these guidelines into daily practice need to be developed.