Managers' Micro-Communities Matter: The Impact of Clinical Supervision Team on Therapist Perception of the Organization.

Positive organizational climate - employee perceptions of their work environment and the impact of this environment on well-being and functioning - is associated with desirable organizational and client-level outcomes in mental health organizations. Clinical supervisors are well-positioned to impact organizational climate, as they serve as intermediaries between higher-level administrators who drive the policies and procedures and the therapists impacted by such decisions. This cross-sectional study examined the role of clinical supervisors as drivers of therapist perceptions of organizational climate within supervisory teams. Specifically, the present study investigated: (1) shared perceptions of organizational climate among therapists on the same supervisory team; (2) predictors of therapist climate perceptions. Eighty-six therapists were supervised by 22 supervisors. Indices of interrater agreement and interrater reliability of therapists on the same supervisory team were examined to determine shared or distinct perceptions of organizational climate. Multi-level models were used to examine whether supervisor attitudes towards evidence-based practices and therapist perceptions of supervisor communication predicted perceived organizational climate. Results showed perceptions of organizational cohesion and autonomy were shared among therapists on the same supervisory team and distinct from therapists on different supervisory teams. Therapist perceptions of their supervisor's communication was positively associated with perceptions of organizational cohesion and autonomy. These findings align with emerging evidence that middle managers shape their employees' experience of their work environment through communication strategies. These findings also point to the potential for intervening at lower organizational levels to improve overall organizational climate.

Getting More Out of Clinical Documentation: Can Clinical Dashboards Yield Clinically Useful Information?

This study investigated coded data retrieved from clinical dashboards, which are decision-support tools that include a graphical display of clinical progress and clinical activities. Data were extracted from clinical dashboards representing 256 youth (M age = 11.9) from 128 practitioners who were trained in the Managing and Adapting Practice (MAP) system (Chorpita & Daleiden in BF Chorpita EL Daleiden 2014 Structuring the collaboration of science and service in pursuit of a shared vision. 43(2):323 338. 2014, Chorpita & Daleiden in BF Chorpita EL Daleiden 2018 Coordinated strategic action: Aspiring to wisdom in mental health service systems. 25(4):e12264. 2018) in 55 agencies across 5 regional mental health systems. Practitioners labeled up to 35 fields (i.e., descriptions of clinical activities), with the options of drawing from a controlled vocabulary or writing in a client-specific activity. Practitioners then noted when certain activities occurred during the episode of care. Fields from the extracted data were coded and reliability was assessed for Field Type, Practice Element Type, Target Area, and Audience (e.g., Caregiver Psychoeducation: Anxiety would be coded as Field Type = Practice Element; Practice Element Type = Psychoeducation; Target Area = Anxiety; Audience = Caregiver). Coders demonstrated moderate to almost perfect interrater reliability. On average, practitioners recorded two activities per session, and clients had 10 unique activities across all their sessions. Results from multilevel models showed that clinical activity characteristics and sessions accounted for the most variance in the occurrence, recurrence, and co-occurrence of clinical activities, with relatively less variance accounted for by practitioners, clients, and regional systems. Findings are consistent with patterns of practice reported in other studies and suggest that clinical dashboards may be a useful source of clinical information. More generally, the use of a controlled vocabulary for clinical activities appears to increase the retrievability and actionability of healthcare information and thus sets the stage for advancing the utility of clinical documentation.

Toward Efficient, Sustainable, and Scalable Methods of Treatment Characterization: An Investigation of Coding Clinical Practice from Chart Notes.

PURPOSE: Chart notes provide a low-cost data source that could help characterize what occurs in treatment with sufficient precision to improve management of care. This study assessed the interrater reliability of treatment content coded from chart notes and evaluated its concordance with content coded from transcribed treatment sessions. METHOD: Fifty randomly selected and digitally recorded treatment events were transcribed and coded for practice content. Independent coders then applied the same code system to chart notes for these same treatment events. ANALYSIS: We measured reliability and concordance of practice occurrence and extensiveness at two levels of specificity: practices (full procedures) and steps (subcomponents of those procedures). RESULTS: For chart notes, practices had moderate interrater reliability (M k = 0.50, M ICC = 0.56) and steps had moderate (M ICC = 0.74) to substantial interrater reliability (M k = 0.78). On average, 2.54 practices and 5.64 steps were coded per chart note and 4.53 practices and 13.10 steps per transcript. Across sources, ratings for 64% of practices and 41% of steps correlated significantly, with those with significant correlations generally demonstrating moderate concordance (practice M r = 0.48; step M r = 0.47). Forty one percent of practices and 34% of steps from transcripts were also identified in the corresponding chart notes. CONCLUSION: Chart notes provide an accessible data source for evaluating treatment content, with different levels of specificity posing tradeoffs for validity and reliability, which in turn may have implications for chart note interfaces, training, and new metrics to support accurate, reliable, and efficient measurement of clinical practice.

The Content of Usual Clinical Care for Youth with Primary Anxiety Problems.

The current study was designed to describe usual clinical care for youth with primary anxiety problems in community mental health centers. The observer-rated Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy - Revised Strategies scale (TPOCS-RS), designed to assess therapeutic techniques from five theory-based domains, was used to code sessions (N = 403) from the usual clinical care group of two randomized effectiveness trials: (a) Youth Anxiety Study (YAS) with 21 youth (M age = 10.44 years, SD = 1.91; 49.2% Latinx; 46.6%, 53.4% male) and 16 clinicians (77.5% female; 43.8% White), and (b) Child STEPS Multisite Trial with 17 youth (M age = 10.00 years, SD = 1.87; 58.8% male; 41.2% White) and 13 clinicians (M age = 40.00 years; SD = 9.18; 76.9% female; 61.5% White). The average number of TPOCS-RS items observed per treatment session was more than 10, and multiple techniques were used together in each session. All TPOCS-RS items were observed at least once throughout a clinical case, and most items reoccurred (i.e., observed in two or more sessions). The dosage of TPOCS-RS in all items was below 5 on a 7-point scale. In conclusion, clinicians in both usual care samples used a wide range of techniques from several theory-based domains at a low to medium dose. However, the type and dosage of the techniques used did vary across the two samples.

Future Directions in Youth and Family Treatment Engagement: Finishing the Bridge Between Science and Service.

The field has spent more than 50 years investing in the quality of youth mental healthcare, with intervention science yielding roughly 1,300 efficacious treatments. In the latter half of this period, concurrent efforts in implementation science have developed effective methods for supporting front-line service organizations and therapists to begin to bridge the science to service gap. However, many youths and families still do not benefit fully from these strategic investments due to low treatment engagement: nearly half of youths in need of services pursue them, and among those who do, roughly another half terminate prematurely. The negative impact of low engagement is substantial, and is disproportionally and inequitably so for many. We contend that to build a robust and "finished" bridge connecting science and service, the field must go beyond its two historical foci of designing interventions and preparing therapists to deliver them, to include an intentional focus on the youths and families who participate in these interventions and who work with those therapists. In this paper, we highlight the significance of treatment engagement in youth mental healthcare and discuss the current state of the literature related to four priorities: conceptualization, theory, measurement, and interventions. Next, we offer an example from our own program of research as one illustration for advancing these priorities. Finally, we propose recommendations to act on these priorities.

Race, racial matching, and cultural understanding as predictors of treatment engagement in youth mental health services.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the role of youth race, youth-therapist racial matching, and youth-reported therapist cultural understanding on early treatment engagement in mental health services. METHOD: The sample included 1158 youths and 126 therapists. Approximately four weeks after the first therapy session, youths responded to a survey assessing five engagement dimensions. Cultural understanding was assessed by asking youths to rate within that questionnaire the extent their therapist "understands their culture and values." Three multivariate multiple regression models were conducted to assess the associations of race, racial matching, and cultural understanding with treatment engagement. RESULTS: Youth race and racial matching were not significant predictors of treatment engagement, whereas youth-reported therapist cultural understanding was a significant predictor of engagement. Cultural understanding had the highest average effect size across all treatment engagement dimensions (ηp2 = .36) compared with youth race (ηp2 = .00) and racial matching (ηp2 = .00). Race was examined as a moderator of the effects of racial matching and cultural understanding on treatment engagement and did not yield significant effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that increasing therapists' cultural understanding of their youth clients may be a promising strategy for engaging youths early in mental health services.

Do specific modules of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression have measurable effects on youth internalizing symptoms? An idiographic analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Understanding the efficacy of each module of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may inform efforts to improve outcomes for youth depression, but effects of specific modules have been difficult to examine. Idiographic interrupted time series models offer a robust way to estimate module effects on an individual's symptoms. This study examined the association of specific CBT modules for depression on internalizing symptoms among depressed youths who received modular CBT in a randomized trial. METHODS: Individual models were created for three youths who met study criteria. Youths completed weekly symptom reports, and clinicians completed records of modules delivered. First order auto-regressive models quantified the change in average internalizing symptom severity between pre- and post-module delivery. RESULTS: All youths had 1-3 modules that were significantly associated with symptom reduction and 1-3 modules associated with deterioration. The 5 modules associated with improvement in at least one youth also lacked association (engagement, relaxation, cognitive reframing), or were associated with worsening (activity selection, parent psychoeducation) in others. Seven modules showed no measurable benefit, or detriment to any youth. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that specific modules have measurable effects, but more work is needed to build an evidence base of specific module effects to inform treatment personalization for youth depression.

Predicting Therapists' Intentions to Use Innovations: Comparing the Role of Individual, Organizational, and Innovation Characteristics.

Theories emphasize the role of individual and organizational characteristics in implementation outcomes, yet research indicates that these characteristics account for only a small amount of variance in those outcomes. Innovation characteristics might be important proximal determinants of implementation outcomes but are infrequently examined in mental health services research. This study examined the relative variance explained by individual, organizational, and innovation characteristics on behavioral intentions, a central implementation outcome in implementation theories. Data were collected from 95 therapists and 28 supervisors who participated in a cluster randomized trial that tested the effectiveness of two clinical decision-making innovations. Multilevel models compared individual, organizational, and innovation characteristics as predictors of therapists' intentions to use the innovations. Subsequent mediational path analyses tested whether innovation characteristics mediated the effect of innovation type on intentions. Individual and organizational characteristics explained 29% of the variability in therapists' intentions. Approximately 75% of the variability in therapists' intentions was accounted for by innovation characteristics. Individual and organizational characteristics were not statistically significant predictors of intentions after controlling for innovation characteristics. The indirect effect of innovation type on intentions through therapists' beliefs was statistically significant (B = 0.410, 95% Bootstrapped CI = [0.071, 0.780]), but the direct effect of innovation type was not (B = 0.174, p = .365). Innovation characteristics are related to therapist intentions and might explain why some innovations are received more favorably than others. Future studies should explore the complex interrelationships between these beliefs alongside other individual or organizational characteristics.

A Multidimensional Examination of the Measurement of Treatment Engagement: Implications for Children's Mental Health Services and Research.

OBJECTIVE: The gap between rates of children's mental health problems and their participation in services highlights the need to address concerns related to engagement in mental health services more effectively. To identify, understand, and resolve engagement concerns appropriately requires effective measurement. In this study, we employed a multidimensional conceptual framework of engagement to examine the measurement of engagement in intervention studies focused on improving children's and/or families' engagement in services. METHOD: We coded 52 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions designed to enhance treatment engagement published between 1974 and 2019 to examine what engagement constructs have been measured, how these constructs have been measured, who has provided information about engagement, and when and why engagement measures have been administered. RESULTS: Attendance was measured in 94.2% of studies, and 59.6% of studies measured only attendance. Furthermore, most studies (61.5%) measured only one engagement dimension. One hundred twelve unique indicators of treatment engagement were used (61.6% measuring attendance). Infrequent measurement of youth (19.2% of studies) or caregiver (26.9%) perspectives was apparent. About half (54.7%) of measures were completed on one occasion, with 53.7% of measures completed after treatment was concluded. CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight how the field's measurement of engagement has focused narrowly on attendance and on interventions that improve attendance. We consider promising new directions for capturing the multidimensional, dynamic, and subjective aspects of engagement, and for leveraging measurement in research and practice settings to feasibly and effectively identify, monitor, and address engagement challenges.

Whose Outcomes Come Out? Patterns of Caregiver- and Youth-reported Outcomes Based on Caregiver-youth Baseline Discrepancies.

OBJECTIVE: Discrepancies between caregiver and youth reports of emotional and behavioral symptoms are well-documented, with cross-informant correlations often falling in the low to moderate range. Studies have shown that caregiver-youth (dis)agreement in reporting of youth symptoms is related to treatment outcomes. However, commonly used methods for exploring reporter discrepancies (e.g., difference scores) are limited by their inability to assess discrepancies across multiple symptom domains simultaneously, and thus these previous findings do not explore multiple patterns of (dis)agreement. METHOD: We used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify subgroups of clinically referred youths based on patterns of caregiver- and youth-reported internalizing and externalizing symptoms for 174 caregiver-youth dyads. Longitudinal multilevel models were used to examine changes in weekly caregiver- and youth-reported internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and top problems for identified subgroups. RESULTS: The LPA identified four latent subgroups: (a) Caregiver Internalizing (9%), (b) Caregiver Internalizing-Externalizing (45%), (c) Youth Internalizing (7%), and (d) Caregiver-Youth Internalizing-Externalizing (39%). Clinical outcomes varied across informants and subgroups. Significant improvements in caregiver- and youth-reported outcome measures were documented within the Caregiver Internalizing, Caregiver Internalizing-Externalizing, and Caregiver-Youth Internalizing-Externalizing subgroups. However, only youth-reported improvements were detected in the Youth Internalizing subgroup. The results show differences in treatment outcomes across caregiver-youth informant subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest how youth and caregiver baseline data could provide guidance for clinicians in interpreting discrepant reporting and its relevance to change during treatment.

Supporting the mental health needs of underserved communities: A qualitative study of barriers to accessing community resources.

This study examined the accessibility of community resources (e.g., welfare programs and afterschool programs) for underserved youth and families with mental health needs. Mental health professionals (n = 52) from a large community mental health and welfare agency serving predominantly low-income, Latinx families completed a semistructured interview that asked about the accessibility of community resources. Participant responses were coded using an inductive thematic analysis. Results showed that 71% of participants endorsed availability barriers (e.g., limited local programs), 37% endorsed logistical barriers (e.g., waitlists), 27% endorsed attitudinal barriers (e.g., stigmatized beliefs about help-seeking), and 23% endorsed knowledge barriers (e.g., lacking awareness about local programs). Professionals' perceived availability barriers were mostly consistent with the actual availability of community resources. Findings highlight the compounding challenges that underserved communities face and point to opportunities for promoting enhanced well-being and functioning for youth and families with mental health needs.

Pilot Study of the MAP Curriculum for Psychotherapy Competencies in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the relevance, feasibility, acceptability, and instructional efficacy of the Managing and Adapting Practice (MAP) curriculum for enhancing the teaching of psychotherapy to child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) fellows. MAP is a system of resources and decision models that supports practitioners in selecting and implementing psychotherapeutic interventions for children and adolescents. The MAP curriculum includes modules to guide education about psychotherapeutic procedures (e.g., behavioral activation) common in evidence-based treatments for an array of childhood problems and to support development of competencies in assessment, treatment planning, and reflective practice. METHODS: Curriculum coding was used to examine the relevance of MAP's core components to the skills articulated in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) CAP milestones. Feasibility, acceptability, and learning outcomes were examined after delivery of the MAP curriculum to 12 CAP fellows at two sites, with instructional features tailored according to faculty preferences and training program structure. RESULTS: Coding suggested that the MAP curriculum was relevant to 95% of the 21 ACGME CAP training subcompetencies. Feasibility was indicated by the successful delivery of 100% of the planned MAP curriculum across the two sites. Acceptability was supported by positive feedback from the CAP fellows, and psychotherapy knowledge increased significantly. Finally, case review scores (mean±SD=2.21±0.15) showed positive posttraining application of MAP to two patients and exceeded scores achieved by other samples of mental health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated the potential for the MAP curriculum to support CAP education. MAP's versatility as a curriculum supports broader adoption, with continuing rigorous empirical evaluation.

How Do Treatment Protocols Affect the Use of Engagement Practices in Youth Mental Health Services?

PURPOSE: Treatment engagement poses challenges for youth mental health providers. With the expansion of evidence-based treatments (EBTs), providers face complex decisions regarding how to engage youth and families using available information sources. This study investigated how EBT protocols are associated with the selection and delivery of engagement practices. METHOD: Twenty engagement practices were coded in a sample of digital recordings of early treatment sessions (N = 193) from the Child STEPs in California study, a randomized trial testing modular treatment and community-implemented treatment for youth mental health problems. Data were collected on which protocols mental health providers reportedly used to guide their sessions and the protocols in which they had received training. We examined which information sources (i.e., the guiding protocol, other protocols in training history, unspecified source) were associated with observed engagement practices. RESULTS: In sessions guided by a protocol, most observed engagement practices were accounted for by the guiding protocol (p < .001), rather than protocols in training history or unspecified sources (p < .001). In sessions not guided by a protocol, most observed practices were accounted for by training history (p < .001). Practice frequency and extensiveness was generally greater when a protocol guided the session. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion in protocols is associated with the selection and delivery of engagement practices, but this strategy might be insufficient for supporting the use of the full range of engagement practices supported by evidence. Supports are needed that leverage the engagement evidence base to ensure that selected practices empirically fit the engagement needs of youth and families.

Knowing What To Do and When To Do It: Mental Health Professionals and the Evidence Base for Treatment Engagement.

Most mental health professionals encounter challenges to helping youth and families enroll and participate in mental health services. The empirical literature suggests that most engagement strategies are well-suited for certain types of engagement challenges. In this mixed-methods study, we examined whether mental health professionals reported using any solutions from the evidence base and, if so, the extent to which these procedures fit the engagement challenges they encountered. We surveyed all 244 mental health professionals working in a large urban school district about their experiences engaging youth and families in services. We coded professionals' written responses to open-ended questions about the challenges they encountered engaging youth and families in services, along with solutions they used to address these challenges. Most reported engagement challenges (83.3%) had a corresponding solution in the evidence base. Most reported solutions (86.5%) were practices found in the evidence base, yet most practices from the evidence base were infrequently nominated by professionals. Moreover, only 38.5% of professionals reported at least one solution that fit at least one of their challenges. In general, professionals reported using a narrow subset of engagement strategies from the literature, which often did not fit the engagement problems encountered. These results highlight opportunities for developing and disseminating a framework that explicitly coordinates evidence-based solutions matched to specific engagement challenges to support provider selection and application of engagement procedures and ultimately enhance youth and family engagement in services.

Assessing the Irritable and Defiant Dimensions of Youth Oppositional Behavior Using CBCL and YSR Items.

Research suggests that irritability and defiance are distinct dimensions of youth oppositionality that are differentially associated with internalizing and conduct problems, respectively. Because much of this evidence has emerged with limited psychometric evaluation, we conducted the first multi-informant examination of selected Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Youth Self Report (YSR) items for measuring irritability and defiance in a large clinical sample. Clinically referred youths (N = 1,030; ages 6-15; 43% female, 42% ethnic minority) were assessed prior to treatment using multi-informant rating scales and diagnostic interviews. Analyses examined factor structure, invariance, internal consistency, multi-informant patterns, and convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity with internalizing and externalizing problems/disorders. A correlated 2-factor model of irritability (stubborn/sullen/irritable, mood, temper) and defiance (argues, disobeys-home, disobeys-school) fit well for both informants. Adequate measurement invariance and scale consistency was consistently found for parent-report but not youth-report. With both informants, all hypothesized convergent and discriminant validity associations were supported: irritability and defiance with internalizing and conduct scales, respectively. However, hypothesized criterion validity associations were largely found only by parent-report: irritability with anxiety and depressive disorders, defiance with conduct disorder, and both with oppositional defiant disorder. Results consistently supported the reliability and validity of the CBCL irritability and defiance scales, with somewhat less consistent support for the YSR scales. Thus, CBCL items may provide psychometrically sound assessment of irritability and defiance, whereas further research is needed to advance youth-report and multi-informant strategies. Results also provide further support for a two subdimension model of oppositional defiant disorder symptoms that includes irritability and defiance.

Decision-Making in Mental Health Care: Measuring Provider and Supervisor Use of Evidence.

Use of evidence to inform clinical decisions has been shown to improve the quality and effectiveness of services. This study piloted an observational coding system for understanding providers and supervisors' use of evidence in their clinical decision-making. The Action Cycle and Use of Evidence Behavioral Observation Coding System (ACE-BOCS) is based on Graham et al. (Contin Educ Health Prof 26:13-24, 2006) conceptual framework for knowledge management, which articulates a sequence relevant to integrating evidence into decisions and actions, including identifying and selecting a problem and choosing, planning, and rehearsing a solution or action. Using the ACE-BOCS, two coders rated the extensiveness with which evidence was used to inform decisions made in clinical supervision sessions. In these clinical supervision sessions, supervisor-provider dyads discussed cases (N = 30; age range 8-19 years; 80% Latino/a or Hispanic ethnicity) that were identified as potentially being at risk for low treatment engagement in school mental health services. Results indicated that the ACE-BOCS can reliably and validly measure use of evidence and distinguish between strategic and indiscriminate use of evidence. The ACE-BOCS has value and utility for studying use of evidence, as it incorporates multiple actions related to service delivery and has the potential to be adapted for other aspects of mental healthcare decision-making beyond clinical supervision, as well as decision making within fields outside of mental health.

Turning Back to Treatment: The Effect of Attendance and Symptom Outcomes on Subsequent Service Use.

This study explored whether post-treatment symptom severity moderated the association between session attendance during an initial treatment episode and subsequent mental health service use. Data on attendance, symptom severity, and service use were gathered from an effectiveness trial testing a modular treatment for youth anxiety, depression, disruptive behavior, and traumatic stress. Multilevel logistic regression analyses showed a significant interaction between attendance and post-treatment symptom severity on subsequent service use, such that attendance significantly predicted subsequent service use when post-treatment symptom severity was in the normal range. Implications regarding the influence of treatment engagement on future help-seeking are discussed.

Common Elements of Childhood Universal Mental Health Programming.

Despite the availability of multiple mental health prevention and promotion programs for children, challenges related to their dissemination limit their reach and impact. This review identifies the most common practice elements of effective childhood universal mental health programming for children ages 3-11, based on a structured interpretation and coding of program manuals and descriptions in peer-reviewed articles. Across a range of program goals and targeted outcomes, psychoeducation and problem solving emerged as the most common practice elements, followed by social skills training, insight building, and communication skills. These skills were largely taught via role-plays and modeling. Synthesizing what we know from the universal mental health programming literature has potential to facilitate dissemination of information to inform the development, adaptation or adoption of programs for children.

Community Mental Health Professionals' Perceptions About Engaging Underserved Populations.

This study explored mental health professionals' perceptions about barriers and facilitators to engaging underserved populations. Responses were coded using an iterative thematic analysis based on grounded theory. Results revealed that many professionals endorsed barriers to engaging ethnic minorities and families receiving social services. Client-provider racial and linguistic matching, therapy processes and procedures (e.g., nonjudgmental stance), and implementation supports (e.g., supervision) were commonly nominated as engagement facilitators. Many professionals felt that an organizational culture focused on productivity is detrimental to client engagement. Findings shed light on professionals' perceived barriers to delivering high-quality care to underserved communities and illuminate potential engagement strategies.

Commentary: Metaknowledge is power: envisioning models to address unmet mental health needs: reflections on Kazdin (2019).

Despite having more knowledge and resources at our disposal than ever before in history, the human suffering due to mental health concerns is extensive and mostly untreated. Kazdin (Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2019) calls for a significant departure from prevailing conventions of psychotherapy delivery, noting that the traditional formats, settings, and workforce limit the potential of science to help those in need. This paper supports and extends Kazdin's argument, urging an additional shift in perspective about treatments altogether. A reconceptualization of treatment protocols as knowledge resources is offered, such that the strategy to reduce human suffering becomes one of flexibly moving knowledge of how to address mental health concerns to any and all contexts in which those problems can be addressed, whether or not a treatment is used. A dedicated pursuit of metaknowledge-knowing how to structure, coordinate, and apply knowledge-promises to lift the world's collective therapeutic intelligence and thereby move us closer to the goal of substantively addressing the global mental health burden.