Utility and acceptability of remote 6-lead electrocardiographic monitoring in children with inherited cardiac conditions.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study sought to investigate the utility and acceptability of the KardiaMobile 6-lead ECG (KM6LECG) as a tool for remote monitoring in children with inherited cardiac conditions. DESIGN: A single-centre prospective cohort study. Children underwent standard clinical evaluation including a 12-lead ECG and a KM6LECG in the clinic. Participants recorded KM6LECGs monthly at home for 3 months. Families completed a questionnaire on their experience. SETTING: Great Ormond Street Hospital Centre for Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases. PARTICIPANTS: 64 children: 22 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM); 22 with long QT syndrome and 20 unaffected siblings (controls). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of data extracted from the clinic 12-lead ECG and supervised KM6LECG, and the supervised and unsupervised KM6LECG recording. RESULTS: Of 64 children (35% female, mean age 12 years), 58 had a baseline 12-lead ECG and appropriate baseline KM6LECG. In children with HCM, abnormalities in ventricular depolarisation/repolarisation in the limb leads of the 12-lead ECG were reliably reproduced. From the whole cohort, there was a strong positive correlation between the corrected QT interval from the 12-lead ECG and baseline KM6LECG (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.839) and baseline KM6LECG with an unsupervised KM6LECG (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.736). Suspected 'lead' misplacement impacted 18% of unsupervised recordings. Overall, the acceptability of the KM6LECG to families was good. CONCLUSIONS: The KM6LECG provides an accurate tool for assessing some ECG abnormalities associated with paediatric inherited cardiovascular disease and may provide a useful at-home adjunct to face-to-face clinical care of children requiring ECG assessment.

Novel Multiplexed Plasma Biomarker Panel Has Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential in Children With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is defined clinically by pathological left ventricular hypertrophy. We have previously developed a plasma proteomics biomarker panel that correlates with clinical markers of disease severity and sudden cardiac death risk in adult patients with HCM. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of adult biomarkers and perform new discoveries in proteomics for childhood-onset HCM. METHODS: Fifty-nine protein biomarkers were identified from an exploratory plasma proteomics screen in children with HCM and augmented into our existing multiplexed targeted liquid chromatography-tandem/mass spectrometry-based assay. The association of these biomarkers with clinical phenotypes and outcomes was prospectively tested in plasma collected from 148 children with HCM and 50 healthy controls. Machine learning techniques were used to develop novel pediatric plasma proteomic biomarker panels. RESULTS: Four previously identified adult HCM markers (aldolase fructose-bisphosphate A, complement C3a, talin-1, and thrombospondin 1) and 3 new markers (glycogen phosphorylase B, lipoprotein a and profilin 1) were elevated in pediatric HCM. Using supervised machine learning applied to training (n=137) and validation cohorts (n=61), this 7-biomarker panel differentiated HCM from healthy controls with an area under the curve of 1.0 in the training data set (sensitivity 100% [95% CI, 95-100]; specificity 100% [95% CI, 96-100]) and 0.82 in the validation data set (sensitivity 75% [95% CI, 59-86]; specificity 88% [95% CI, 75-94]). Reduced circulating levels of 4 other peptides (apolipoprotein L1, complement 5b, immunoglobulin heavy constant epsilon, and serum amyloid A4) found in children with high sudden cardiac death risk provided complete separation from the low and intermediate risk groups and predicted mortality and adverse arrhythmic outcomes (hazard ratio, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.0-4.2]; P=0.044). CONCLUSIONS: In children, a 7-biomarker proteomics panel can distinguish HCM from controls with high sensitivity and specificity, and another 4-biomarker panel identifies those at high risk of adverse arrhythmic outcomes, including sudden cardiac death.