Prompt and unavoidable requalification of ordinary hospital wards into a centralized department characterized by high-intensity treatment due to COVID-19 epidemic: the experience of Romano di Lombardia Hospital.

The Coronavirus epidemic quickly spread in Italy from China. In particular, it affected Bergamo province where Romano di Lombardia hospital is situated. Therefore, this hospital felt the urgency to requalify its activity in no time. It transformed itself into a unique centralized subintensive department to treat COVID-19 patients. The factors that made it possible to adequately face the stress due to patients' hospitalization were human resources and innovative elements to provide oxygen therapy. It is to underline that the logistic and methodological reality was not planned to cope with this emergency.

Lightweight partially absorbable monofilament mesh (polypropylene/poliglecaprone 25) for TAPP inguinal hernia repair: initial experience.

OBJECTIVE: An ideal mesh should produce slight foreign-body reactions and be compatible with the human organisms. Studies focusing on these aspects indicate that the use of mesh with less nonabsorbable material may reduce postoperative complications, insofar the web structure and its rigidity play an important role in compatibility. We evaluated retrospectively the patients of the past 1 year, who underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty (without the use any trocar and/or instrument of 10 mm in diameter) focusing attention on the feasibility of the technique and on the incidence of complications, especially those possibly related to the new type of mesh implanted. METHODS: Between June 2004 and September 2005, 76 patients have been operated on by using TAPP hernioplasty (bilateral or unilateral) without any 10 mm instrument/optic/trocar, and by applying a lightweight composite mesh fixed by "glues" (fibrin sealant and N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate). RESULTS: The mean overall operative time was 55.57 (+/-15.2) minutes. All the procedures have been performed on a day surgery basis. We have registered any kind of major or minor morbidity (early or late), relapse, prosthesis rejection, and/or infection. We have registered no severe pain at 10 days; whereas a mild pain is still reported in 10.5% of our cases at a 3-month follow-up. The mean follow-up is 12.4 (+/-5.1; range 4 to 19) months. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this our initial experience, TAPP hernioplasty with a lightweight composite mesh is feasible, effective, and easy to perform by experienced hands, with good results. The well-known characteristics of a mini-invasive and gentle approach, together with the type of mesh implanted and its fixation of related glues, might explain the encouraging results of our experience.

Day-case laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis and non-specific abdominal pain.

Laparoscopy is commonly used in the treatment of appendicular diseases and non-specific abdominal pain. Nevertheless, the role of day-case laparoscopic surgery in these cases is still debated. The aim of this study was to identify which cases of appendicitis or non-specific abdominal pain are most indicated for daycase laparoscopic surgery. From January 1 2000 to December 31 2005 at our institution 424 patients were treated laparoscopically for appendicitis or non-specific abdominal pain. 41 were operated on on a day-case basis. 81% of these (33 patients) were discharged from hospital within 24 hours of surgery. 2 patients could not be discharged because of persistent postoperative pain and 6 had a longer hospitalisation period for non-medical reasons. No major complications and no readmissions to hospital were observed in the 33 regularly discharged patients. Over the same period 61 patients were operated on by traditional "open" surgery for the same pathologies. Their postoperative hospitalisation was considerably longer. None of them were operated on on a day-case basis and none were discharged within 24 hours of surgery. 3 patients needed readmission to our institution within the first 30 postoperative days. Day-case laparoscopic. surgery is valid, safe and effective for the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis and nonspecific abdominal pain. For successful laparoscopic day-case surgery it is of fundamental importance to ensure adequate preoperative patient selection and to pay proper attention to the treatment of postoperative pain.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a three-trocar 5-mm instrument approach.

The natural evolution of laparoscopy seems to be the use of miniature instruments and, where possible, a reduction of the number of trocars used. We report the results of our experience with all 5-mm instrument three-trocar cholecystectomy vs. the conventional laparoscopy approach. From July 2002 to July 2005 a total of 518 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 268 of them (51.7%) were operated on with a 5-mm three-trocar approach. The primary end point was the feasibility rate of the technique. Secondary end points were safety and the impact of the technique on the duration of laparoscopy. There were two conversions to laparotomy--one in each group--while a conversion to the classical approach for the three-trocar group was registered in 9.3% of the cases. Occurrence of minor complications was 3.6% (9 cases) with the conventional approach as against 3.7% (10 cases) with the three-trocar approach. The present experience shows that 5-mm three-trocar cholecystectomy is a safe, easy, effective and reproducible approach for gallbladder disease. Such features make the technique a challenging alternative to conventional laparoscopy in the treatment of cholecystopathy, in both the acute and elective setting.

Is minilaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair feasible? A preliminary experience.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy has rapidly emerged as the preferred surgical approach to a number of different diseases because it allows for a correct diagnosis and proper treatment. It seems to be moving toward the use of mini-instruments (5 mm or less in diameter). The aim of this paper is to illustrate retrospectively the results of an initial experience of minilaparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (miniTAPP) repair of groin hernia defects performed at two institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2000 and December 2003, a total of 303 patients (mean age, 45 years) underwent a miniTAPP procedure: 213 patients (70.2%) were operated on bilaterally and 90 (28.7%) for a unilateral defect, with a total of 516 hernia defects repaired. The primary endpoint was the feasibility rate for miniTAPP. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of mini-TAPP-related complications. RESULTS: No conversions to laparoscopy or an anterior open approach were required. There were no major complications, while minor complications ranged as high as 0.3%. CONCLUSION: While limited by its retrospective design, the present study indicates that the minilaparoscopic approach to groin hernia repair is safe and effective, making miniTAPP a challenging alternative to laparoscopy in the approach to groin hernia repair.

Meckel's diverticulum: a neglected (or deliberately ignored) entity.

Meckel's diverticulum is the most common of all the possible abnormalities that incomplete obliteration of the omphalo-mesenteric duct can produce. Often it is not sought during surgery performed for other abdominal diseases, e.g. cases of appendicitis. In these situations searching for and treating Meckel's diverticulum may be regarded as simply a waste of time or unjustified because its surgical treatment is not a completely safe procedure. In our opinion the systematic search for, and treatment of, Meckel's diverticulum during surgery performed for other abdominal conditions should always be performed. Elective resection of the diverticulum is characterised by fewer postoperative complications than emergency surgery. Laparoscopy would appear to be safe and effective in the treatment of this pathology, even in cases of severe diverticulitis. We report on our last five years' experience with the surgical treatment of this rare pathology, mainly occurring in previously appendectomised patients. One aim of this study was to demonstrate the possible benefits of the laparoscopic approach, focussing attention on the advisability of searching for and resecting Meckel's diverticulum when discovered incidentally during abdominal interventions performed for other pathologies.

[Minilaparoscopic appendectomy: which indications?]. / L'appendicectomia minilaparoscopica: quale indicazione?

Laparoscopy has gained widespread acceptance in common surgical practice as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. Suspected appendicitis is still a diagnostic challenge to the general surgeon. A correct diagnosis is crucial because of the various diseases that may be responsible for the same symptoms, in order to plan the appropriate procedure or avoid an unnecessary laparotomy. Laparoscopy is the only minimally invasive technique to allow at the same time for adequate diagnosis, appropriate treatment and the best abdominal approach. Minilaparoscopy would appear to be a natural further step in the development of this technique. The aim of the present work was to illustrate retrospectively the results of an initial case-control study of minilaparoscopy vs. laparoscopy carried out at our institution. Between January and December 2002 a total of 86 patients underwent emergency and/or urgent appendectomy. Among them, 68 (79%) were operated on laparoscopically (37 [54.4%] with a minilaparoscopic approach and 31 with conventional laparoscopy), while 18 (21%) were treated by laparotomy, as performed by a well-trained surgical team. In the minilaparoscop group we registered no conversions to laparotomy and only one major postoperative complication (intra-abdominal abscess treated laparoscopically). As regards the postoperative period, generally speaking, the patients' conditions (analgesic treatment, flatus, diet, hospital discharge) were broadly the same as in the laparoscopic group. Though limited by its initial retrospective character, the present study shows that minilaparoscopic appendectomy is as safe and effective as classical laparoscopic surgery, and seems to be associated with less trauma and a more rapid postoperative recovery. Such features make minilaparoscopy a challenging alternative to conventional laparoscopy (and, of course, laparotomy) in patients referred for urgent abdominal and/or pelvic surgery.

[Our experience in the treatment of hemorrhoids and circumferential mucosal rectal prolapse using Longo muco-prolapsectomy ]. / Nostra esperienza nel trattamento della malattia emorroidaria e del prolasso mucoso circonferenziale del retto mediante mucoprolassectomia secondo Longo.

The authors report their experience with the treatment of hemorrhoid disease and circumferential mucosal rectal prolapse with the use of a mechanical suturing device, according to the Longo technique. Over the period from March 98 to December 2000, 106 patients were treated with the above-mentioned procedure (100 patients for haemorrhoids and 6 for circumferential prolapse). Twenty-one patients had grade 4, 77 grade 3 and only 2 grade 2 disease. One hundred patients were followed up over a median period of 16.5 months (for the group with haemorrhoids) and 19 months (for the prolapse group). In 81% of cases the procedure was one-day surgery. Mucohaemorrhoidectomy with a stapler was well tolerated in terms of severity of postoperative symptomatology: in 42% of the patients operated on there was no need for any analgesic treatment. The time to return to work was 9.9 days for self-employed subjects and 15.6 days for the others. Refinement of the procedure and better patient selection may improve the results achieved with this technique. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy may be regarded as a sound technique that should be part of the surgeon's armamentarium. We suggest an "eclectic" approach whereby the stapling procedure may be included among the possible therapeutic options, with a view to optimising the choice of therapy for each individual patient.

A collection of primary tissue cultures of tumors from vacuum packed and cooled surgical specimens: a feasibility study.

Primary cultures represent an invaluable tool to set up functional experimental conditions; however, creation of tissue cultures from solid tumors is troublesome and often unproductive. Several features can affect the success rate of primary cultures, including technical issues from pre-analytical procedures employed in surgical theaters and pathology laboratories. We have recently introduced a new method of collection, transfer, and preservation of surgical specimens that requires immediate vacuum sealing of excised specimens at surgical theaters, followed by time-controlled transferring at 4°C to the pathology laboratory. Here we investigate the feasibility and performance of short-term primary cell cultures derived from vacuum packed and cooled (VPAC) preserved tissues. Tissue fragments were sampled from 52 surgical specimens of tumors larger than 2 cm for which surgical and VPAC times (the latter corresponding to cold ischemia time) were recorded. Cell viability was determined by trypan blue dye-exclusion assay and hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical stainings were performed to appreciate morphological and immunophenotypical features of cultured cells. Cell viability showed a range of 84-100% in 44 out of 52 (85%) VPAC preserved tissues. Length of both surgical and VPAC times affected cell viability: the critical surgical time was set around 1 hour and 30 minutes, while cells preserved a good viability when kept for about 24 hours of vacuum at 4°C. Cells were maintained in culture for at least three passages. Immunocytochemistry confirmed the phenotype of distinct populations, that is, expression of cytokeratins in epithelioid cells and of vimentin in spindle cells. Our results suggest that VPAC preserved tissues may represent a reliable source for creation of primary cell cultures and that a careful monitoring of surgical and cold ischemia times fosters a good performance of primary tissue cultures.

Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy has became as the preferred surgical approach to a number of different diseases because it allows a correct diagnosis and treatment at the same time. In abdominal emergencies, both components of treatment - exploration to identify the causative pathology and performance of an appropriate operation - can often be accomplished via laparoscopy. There is still a debate of peritonitis as a contraindication to this kind of approach. Aim of the present work is to illustrate retrospectively the results of a case-control experience of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for abdominal peritonitis emergencies carried out at our institution. METHODS: From January 1992 and January 2002 a total of 935 patients (mean age 42.3 +/- 17.2 years) underwent emergent and/or urgent surgery. Among them, 602 (64.3%) were operated on laparoscopically (of whom 112 -18.7% - with peritonitis), according to the presence of a surgical team trained in laparoscopy. Patients with a history of malignancy, more than two previous major abdominal surgeries or massive bowel distension were not treated Laparoscopically. Peritonitis was not considered contraindication to Laparoscopy. RESULTS: The conversion rate was 23.2% in patients with peritonitis and was mainly due to the presence of dense intra-abdominal adhesions. Major complications ranged as high as 5.3% with a postoperative mortality of 1.7%. A definitive diagnosis was accomplished in 85.7% (96 pat.) of cases, and 90.6% (87) of these patients were treated successfully by Laparoscopy. CONCLUSION: Even if limited by its retrospective feature, the present experience let us to consider the Laparoscopic approach to abdominal peritonitis emergencies a safe and effective as conventional surgery, with a higher diagnostic yield and allows for lesser trauma and a more rapid postoperative recovery. Such features make Laparoscopy a challenging alternative to open surgery in the management algorithm for abdominal peritonitis emergencies.