Understanding the associations among education, employment characteristics, and smoking.

The current study examined the association between education level and smoking status in a community-based sample of working adults. Participants were enrolled at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center site of a cancer risk behavior reduction intervention delivered at the worksite. There was a strong educational gradient in smoking status. The prevalence of current smoking was almost threefold higher among individuals with

What accounts for the association of education and smoking cessation?

BACKGROUND: Education has been identified as a potent sociodemographic predictor of smoking cessation and the Healthy People 2010 goals include the elimination of health disparities attributable to education. METHOD: The current study prospectively examined the association of education with smoking cessation as well variables that might account for that association among employed adults residing in the southeastern United States. RESULTS: A strong educational gradient in cessation was evident. Only 6% of smokers with less than a high school (HS) degree quit smoking during the 4-year study period, whereas 17% of smokers with a HS degree but no college degree and 28% of smokers with at least a college degree quit smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Education appeared to uniquely contribute to the prediction of smoking abstinence over and above the effects of demographic, environmental, tobacco dependence, transtheoretical model, and job-related variables. Obtaining a better understanding of how or why education influences smoking cessation could contribute to reducing the educational gradient in abstinence and warrants further research attention.

Late relapse/sustained abstinence among former smokers: a longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Relapse remains the most refractory aspect of nicotine dependence, but little is known about relapse that occurs after a period of prolonged abstinence (i.e., "late relapse"). METHOD: The current study examined the prevalence and predictors of late relapse/sustained abstinence in a community-based, longitudinal cohort of former smokers surveyed at baseline and again 4 years later (n = 1143). RESULTS: Late relapse rates declined precipitously and sustained abstinence increased as the duration of abstinence at baseline increased. Although the risk for late relapse appeared to be small when using a point prevalence definition of smoking, that risk increased substantially if fluctuations in smoking behavior over time were considered (i.e., many former smokers relapsed and then regained abstinence during the 4-year study period). Although there were a number of significant prospective predictors of late relapse/sustained abstinence, they did not retain their predictive ability after controlling for baseline duration of abstinence. CONCLUSION: Although late relapse rates in the general population of former smokers appear low, and particularly so for individuals who have been abstinent for long periods of time, fluctuations between abstinence and smoking over time are not uncommon. How these fluctuations influence health or sustained abstinence over time is unclear. Because late relapse rates are generally low, interventions are likely to require careful targeting of at-risk individuals if they are to be efficacious and cost-effective.

Concomitant use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco: prevalence, correlates, and predictors of tobacco cessation.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the characteristics, tobacco use patterns over time, and predictors of tobacco cessation among concomitant users of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. METHODS: Participants were employed adults residing in the southeastern United States who participated in the Working Well cancer prevention trial. Participants were assessed at baseline and followed-up 4 years later. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The study yielded several key findings: (a) the prevalence of concomitant smoking and smokeless tobacco use was high among males and nonexistent among females, (b) the characteristics of concomitant users were relatively distinct from those of both smokers and smokeless tobacco users, (c) concomitant users exhibited substantial variability in their tobacco use patterns and were less likely to stop using tobacco than were smokers or smokeless tobacco users, (d) indicators of nicotine dependence predicted tobacco cessation for both smokers and smokeless tobacco users, but were largely unrelated to tobacco cessation among concomitant users, and (e) demographics, environmental variables, and measures derived from the transtheoretical model were not consistent predictors of tobacco cessation after controlling for nicotine dependence.