Audit of local recurrence rates following 'ultra'-conservative surgery for invasive breast cancer--a boost to the breast?

BACKGROUND: Conservative breast surgery with postoperative radiotherapy and appropriate systemic therapy is associated with similar outcomes when compared with mastectomy. The reported 5 year local recurrence rate varies between 3% and 15%. We prefer a more conservative 'complete' local excision rather than 'wide' local excision combined with post-operative radical radiotherapy and tumour bed boost with the aim of achieving optimal cosmesis. AIMS: Our review was undertaken to assess whether or not this 'ultra' conservative approach was compromising long-term local control. METHODS: Case notes and pathology reports of patients who underwent conservative surgery for breast cancer from January 1983 to February 2001 were accessed for this audit. Patient demographic data and tumour characteristics were noted. The primary outcome data were the number of local recurrences following invasive breast cancer at 5 and 10 years and the distance from the tumour to the closest margin of excision. RESULTS: At 5 and 10 years there were 16/451 and 5/124 local recurrences, with a local recurrence rate of 3.5% (95% CI, 1.7-4.7%) and 4.1% (95% CI, 0.47-6.5%), respectively. Complete data with regards to the closest histological margin of excision were available in 423 patients. One hundred and sixty-five patients (39%) had their tumours excised with a distance of less than 1 mm to the closest margin. Nearly, all tumours (97.8%) were excised with the distance to the closest margin less than 1 cm and 81% with 5 mm or less. CONCLUSION: It is possible to achieve low local recurrence rates after very conservative surgery for breast cancer when this is combined with radical radiotherapy and an additional tumour bed boost.

Elective versus ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a 1-year cost-effectiveness analysis.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening condition with an overall mortality of 80%. It predominantly affects men 65-74 years of age and is caused by focal distension of the main blood vessel in the abdomen. Most patients go undetected until their aneurysm ruptures. Controversy surrounds the most appropriate form of screening for AAA. Currently, screening is only carried out selectively in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Some patients have their AAA detected incidentally, whilst ultrasound examination of the abdomen is carried out for other indications. These patients have the opportunity to undergo surveillance or elective surgery. The mortality rate of emergency surgical intervention following rupture (50%) is far worse in comparison to that of patients undergoing planned intervention under specialist vascular surgeons (5%). Despite improvements in outcomes from elective intervention for AAA as a result of specialisation, the overall mortality from this condition remains very high (80%) as the commonest presentation of an AAA is rupture. Screening all men aged 65-74 years is considered too costly in the current economic climate. However the cost difference between elective repair and emergency repair of AAA must be considered given that the outcome from elective AAA repair is far superior to that following ruptured AAA repair. Our objective was to retrospectively collect costs and outcomes of elective and emergency AAA repair in order to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis. Four multiprofessional teams in accident and emergency, operation theatres, intensive care, and surgical wards at the Kent and Canterbury Hospital were selected from health-care professionals including doctors, managers, nurses, and clerical staff with the purpose of obtaining costs. Detailed cost data collection sheets were prepared to calculate costs, which included staff costs, consumables including drugs, intravenous fluids, equipment, investigations, laundry, catering, and stationery. An inventory of costs per item was obtained, and the total cost was calculated from the number of items used. Outcomes were measured in terms of survival. The total costs of emergency AAA repair were pounds sterling 96,700.69, with a cost per life saved of pounds sterling 24,175.17. The total cost of elective AAA repair was pounds sterling 76,583.22, with a cost per life saved of pounds sterling 5,470.23. Emergency intervention for AAA was found to cost five times more than a planned intervention per life saved per year.