RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Food insecurity (FI) has been shown to be associated with poor health both in developing and developed countries. Little is known about the relation between FI and neurological disorder. We assessed the relation between FI and risk for neurologic symptoms in southwest Ethiopia. METHODS: Data about food security, gender, age, household assets, and self-reported neurologic symptoms were collected from a representative, community-based sample of adults (N = 900) in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. We calculated univariate statistics and used bivariate chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression models to assess the relation between FI and risk of neurologic symptoms including seizures, extremity weakness, extremity numbness, tremors/ataxia, aphasia, carpal tunnel syndrome, vision dysfunction, and spinal pain. RESULTS: In separate multivariate models by outcome and gender, adjusting for age and household socioeconomic status, severe FI was associated with higher odds of seizures, movement abnormalities, carpal tunnel, vision dysfunction, spinal pain, and comorbid disorders among women. Severe FI was associated with higher odds of seizures, extremity numbness, movement abnormalities, difficulty speaking, carpal tunnel, vision dysfunction, and comorbid disorders among men. CONCLUSION: We found that FI was associated with symptoms of neurologic disorder. Given the cross-sectional nature of our study, the directionality of these associations is unclear. Future research should assess causal mechanisms relating FI to neurologic symptoms in sub-Saharan Africa.
Assuntos
Abastecimento de Alimentos , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/epidemiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrição/complicações , Desnutrição/psicologia , Medição de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Firearms are a major cause of injury and death. We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of movie scenes that depicted firearms and verbal firearm safety messages; (2) the context and health outcomes in firearm scenes; and (3) the association between the Motion Picture Association of America ratings and firearm scene characteristics. METHODS: Ten top revenue-grossing motion pictures were selected for each year from 1995 to 2004 in descending order of gross revenues. Data on firearm scenes were collected by movie coders using dual-monitor computer workstations and real-time collection tools. RESULTS: Seventy of the 100 movies had scenes with firearms and the majority of movies with firearms were rated PG-13. Firearm scenes (N = 624) accounted for 17% of screen time in movies with firearms. Among firearm scenes, crime or illegal activity was involved in 45%, deaths occurred in 19%, and injuries occurred in 12%. A verbal reference to safety was made in 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Depictions of firearms in top revenue-grossing movies were common, but safety messages were exceedingly rare. Major motion pictures present an under-used opportunity for education about firearm safety.
Assuntos
Armas de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Filmes Cinematográficos/estatística & dados numéricos , Crime/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Educação em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Filmes Cinematográficos/classificação , Segurança , Estados Unidos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Injuries from vehicle crashes are a major cause of death among American youth. Many of these injuries are worsened because of noncompliant safety practices. Messages delivered by mass media are omnipresent in young peoples' lives and influence their behavior patterns. In this investigation, we analyzed seat belt and helmet messages from a sample of top-grossing motion pictures with emphasis on scene context and character demographics. METHODS: Content analysis of 50 top-grossing motion pictures for years 2000 to 2004, with coding for seat belt and helmet usage by trained media coders. RESULTS: In 48 of 50 movies (53% PG-13; 33% R; 10% PG; 4% G) with vehicle scenes, 518 scenes (82% car/truck; 7% taxi/limo; 7% motorcycle; 4% bicycle/skateboard) were coded. Overall, seat belt and helmet usage rates were 15.4% and 33.3%, respectively, with verbal indications for seat belt or helmet use found in 1.0% of scenes. Safety compliance rates varied by character race (18.3% white; 6.5% black; p = 0.036). No differences in compliance rates were noted for high-speed or unsafe vehicle operation. The injury rate for noncompliant characters involved in crashes was 10.7%. A regression model demonstrated black character race and escape scenes most predictive of noncompliant safety behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Safety compliance messages and images are starkly absent in top-grossing motion pictures resulting in, at worst, a deleterious effect on vulnerable populations and public health initiatives, and, at minimum, a lost opportunity to prevent injury and death. Healthcare providers should call on the motion picture industry to improve safety compliance messages and images in their products delivered for mass consumption.
Assuntos
Dispositivos de Proteção da Cabeça/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Filmes Cinematográficos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cintos de Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Filmes Cinematográficos/classificação , Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECT: In recent years, endovascular treatment of cerebral artery aneurysms (CAAs) has received greater attention. The authors evaluated patient demographics, endovascular and surgical approaches, and basic outcomes in the treatment of CAAs in a nationally representative administrative database. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2003, diagnosed CAA coded as either an unruptured or ruptured lesion and treated with surgical clip occlusion, wrapping combined with endovascular repair, or endovascular repair alone was included in the present study. RESULTS: Treatment of CAAs significantly increased for unruptured (from 4036 to 8334 cases, p = 0.002) but not ruptured (from 9330 to 11,269 cases, p = 0.231) lesions. Endovascular treatment of CAAs in particular also increased in patients with unruptured (from 11 to 43%, p < 0.001) and ruptured (from 5 to 31%, p < 0.001) lesions. In 2003, the mortality rate associated with unruptured CAAs treated using clip occlusion (1.36%) or endovascular repair (1.41%) was similar, whereas rate differences were noted between these treatments for ruptured CAAs (12.7% for clip occlusion compared with 16.6% for endovascular repair; p = 0.05). Endovascular treatment of unruptured CAAs was associated with a shorter length of stay (LOS) and higher rate of discharge to home compared with those for clip occlusion. The LOS was also shorter in patients with endovascularly treated ruptured CAAs. Aneurysm type (odds ratio [OR] 10.1, ruptured lesion), patient age (OR 1.28, each 10 years), comorbid conditions (OR 1.08, each condition), and hospital case volume (OR 0.97, each additional case) were significant predictors of death in the regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular techniques for the treatment of CAAs are being used increasingly in the US, although the majority of patients with this pathological entity still undergo surgical clip occlusion. In cases of unruptured CAAs, endovascular treatment is associated with a shorter LOS and higher discharge-to-home rate. Aneurysm status, patient age, comorbid conditions, and hospital case volume are significant predictors of death. Finally, demographic differences exist between the populations presenting with unruptured or ruptured CAAs.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Roto/terapia , Angioplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Embolização Terapêutica/estatística & dados numéricos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/terapia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma Roto/mortalidade , Angioplastia/tendências , Embolização Terapêutica/tendências , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/mortalidade , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxações Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Quadriplegia/terapia , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/terapia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Luxações Articulares/terapia , Quadriplegia/etiologia , Radiografia , Indução de Remissão , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Traumatismos da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
The epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) disease has been well described over the preceding 50 years. This disease primarily affects elderly males with smoking, hypertension, and a positive family history contributing to an increased risk of aneurysm formation. The aging population as well as increased screening in high-risk populations has led some to suggest that the incidence of AAAs is increasing. The National Inpatient Sample (1993-2003), a national representative database, was used in this study to determine trends in mortality following AAA repair in the United States. In addition, the impact of the introduction of less invasive endovascular AAA repair was assessed. Overall rates of treated unruptured and ruptured AAAs remained stable (unruptured 12 to 15/100,000; ruptured 1 to 3/100,000). In 2003, 42.7% of unruptured and 8.8% of ruptured AAAs were repaired through an endovascular approach. Inhospital mortality following unruptured AAA repair continues to decline for open repair (5.3% to 4.7%, P = 0.007). Mortality after elective endovascular AAA repair also has statistically decreased (2.1% to 1.0%, P = 0.024) and remains lower than open repair. Mortality rates for ruptured AAAs following repair remain high (open: 46.5% to 40.7%, P = 0.01; endovascular: 40.0% to 35.3%, P = 0.823). These data suggest that the numbers of patients undergoing elective AAA repair have remained relatively stable despite the introduction of less invasive technology. A shift in the treatment paradigm is occurring with a higher percentage of patients subjected to elective endovascular AAA repair compared to open repair. This shift, at least in the short term, appears justified as the mortality in patients undergoing elective endovascular AAA repair is significantly reduced compared to patients undergoing open AAA repair.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/epidemiologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Currently, headache, nausea/vomiting, visual changes, and altered mental status are accepted as indications for the evaluation of hydrocephalus in children; while dementia, gait apraxia, and urinary incontinence remain indications in the elderly. The clinical presentation of hydrocephalus in young and middle-aged adults remains poorly described. Hence, middle-aged patients with mild gait, cognitive, or urinary symptoms unaccompanied by clear exam findings often remain undiagnosed and untreated. METHODS: We report the clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes of 46 adults (ages 16-55 years) presenting with congenital, acquired, or idiopathic hydrocephalus with imaging-documented ventriculomegaly and elevated CSF pressure. RESULTS: Primary symptoms were related to gait (70%), cognition (70%), urinary urgency (48%), and headaches (56%). Eighty-four percent complained of impaired job performance. The exam findings were subtle or absent (no gait apraxia, minor gait changes in 42.9%, mildly abnormal Mini Mental State exams in only 14.3%, and incontinence in only 3.6%). Twenty-nine patients underwent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting, and 11 endoscopic third ventriculostomy, of whom six subsequently required a VP shunt. Symptomatic improvement was observed in 93% of patients 16+/- 11 months after shunting (56% complete resolution, 37% partial resolution). Patients had been followed for their symptoms an average of 6 years (range, 1-30) prior to diagnosis. DISCUSSION: We propose that there exists a clinically distinct syndrome of hydrocephalus in young and middle-aged adults (SHYMA) that comprises hydrocephalus of all etiologies. SHYMA is characterized by complaints of impaired gait, cognition, bladder control, and headaches, with a discrepancy between the prominence of symptoms and the subtlety of clinical signs. Despite the subtlety of clinical signs, CSF diversion treatment is effective at resolving symptomatology.
Assuntos
Pressão do Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/fisiologia , Hidrocefalia/fisiopatologia , Síndrome , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Ventriculografia Cerebral/métodos , Cognição/fisiologia , Feminino , Marcha/fisiologia , Cefaleia/fisiopatologia , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/classificação , Hidrocefalia/diagnóstico , Hidrocefalia/cirurgia , Hidrocefalia de Pressão Normal/fisiopatologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária , Derivação Ventriculoperitoneal/métodosRESUMO
Certain complications following open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) require additional operations or invasive procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of secondary interventions on mortality rate following open repair of intact and ruptured AAAs in the United States. Clinical data on 98,193 patients treated from 1988 to 2001 with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) primary procedure code 38.44 (resection of the abdominal aorta with replacement) were analyzed. Demographic factors, types of secondary interventions, and in-hospital mortality rates were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis (SPSS Version 11.0, Chicago, IL). The database utilized in this study was The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). The mortality rate was 4.5% in the intact AAA group and 45.5% in the ruptured AAA group. The rate of secondary operations and procedures was much higher in the ruptured AAA group, especially related to renal failure (5.52% vs 1.49%, p <0.001); respiratory failure (3.67% vs 0.71%, p <0.001); postoperative bleeding (2.41% vs 0.81%, p <0.001); or colonic ischemia (2.38% vs 0.36%, p <0.001). Increased mortality following open repair of intact AAAs accompanied: peripheral artery angioplasty/stenting (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.51; p = 0.018); coronary artery angioplasty/stenting (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.05-2.70; p = 0.031); inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 01.31-3.1; p = 0.001); vascular reconstruction or thromboembolectomy (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.9-2.22; p <0.001); lower extremity amputation (OR, 4.09; 95% CI, 2.78-6.0; p <0.001); coronary artery bypass (OR, 6.71; 95% CI, 3.74-12.03; p <0.001); operations for postoperative bleeding (OR, 6.92; 95% CI, 5.71-8.4; p <0.001); initiation of hemodialysis (OR, 10.52; 95% CI, 9.22-12.01; p <0.001); tracheostomy (OR, 11.9; 95% CI, 9.86-14.37; p <0.001); and colectomy (OR, 16.22; 95% CI, 12.55-20.95; p <0.001). Increased risk of mortality following open repair of ruptured AAAs accompanied the following: operations for postoperative bleeding (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.22-1.85; p <0.001); colectomy (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.32-2.01; p <0.001); and initiation of hemodialysis (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.30-3.08; p <0.001). The only independent variable in this group associated with decreased risk of in-hospital mortality was IVC filter placement (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27-0.64; p <0.001). This study confirms the perception that additional operations or invasive procedures following open repair of AAA entail significantly worse in-hospital mortality rates, especially when related to colonic ischemia, respiratory failure, and renal failure.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Roto/mortalidade , Aneurisma Roto/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Causas de Morte , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Probabilidade , Sistema de Registros , Reoperação/métodos , Reoperação/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to characterize variation in complication rates across hospitals with differing volumes for select high-risk operations in the United States. METHODS: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 1996 and 1997 were analyzed for 3 high-risk operations: esophagectomy (n=1,226), pancreatectomy (n=4,789), and intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n=11,863). Complications evaluated included aspiration, cardiac complications, infection, pneumonia, pulmonary failure, renal failure, septicemia, and others. The risk of complications was calculated by hospital volume deciles, as well as for high-volume hospitals (HVH) and low-volume hospitals (LVH) defined by median hospital volume. RESULTS: Rates of any postoperative complication varied nearly 2-fold across hospital volume groups. The proportion of patients across hospital deciles having at least one complication ranged from 30% to 51% for esophageal resection, 6% to 12% for pancreatic resection, and 9% to 18% for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. HVH had lower rates of one or more complications after pancreatic resection (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.83; P=.002), esophageal resection (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; P=.008), and intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.76; P<.001). Patients with one or more complications after pancreatic resection had a mortality of 18.8% versus only 5.2% for those without complications (P<.001). Esophageal resection mortality was 16.9% for patients with at least one complication and 2.5% for those without complications (P<.001) and AAA repair mortality was 10.4% for patients with at least one complication and 2.9% for those without complications (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk operations have a decreased rate of postoperative complications when performed at HVH. Variation in complication rates may contribute to the volume-outcome relationship and provide a focus for quality improvement at LVH.
Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The hypothesis of this study was that differences exist among patients with private insurance compared with patients with Medicaid or no insurance, regarding access to the timely treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and the outcomes of AAA repair. METHODS: The study comprised 5363 patients aged less than 65 years (mean age, 59 years) with a diagnostic code for intact or ruptured AAA and a procedure code for AAA repair in the National Inpatient Sample for 1995 to 2000. Dependent variables included ruptured AAA, intact AAA, and in-hospital postoperative mortality rates. Independent variables included payer status, median income, race, gender, age, and comorbid disease. Risk-adjusted analyses were performed with the use of binary logistic regression. RESULTS: AAA rupture was most likely (P <.001) to affect patients with no insurance (36%) or Medicaid (18%), compared with patients with private insurance (13%). After an adjustment for case-mix had been made, data showed that patients without insurance had an increased risk of rupture compared with patients with private insurance (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-3.5; P <.001). Operative mortality rates after elective AAA repair were greater (P =.04) for patients with no insurance (2.6%) or Medicaid (2.7%), compared with patients with private insurance (1.2%). Similarly, operative mortality rates for AAA repair after rupture were greater (P =.001) in patients without insurance (45.3%) or Medicaid (31.3%), compared with patients with private insurance (26.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Uninsured patients more often seek treatment of ruptured AAAs compared with patients with private insurance. Operative mortality rates in uninsured patients are greater for elective and emergent AAA repair. These data support the tenet that payer status is associated with mortality rates after AAA repair.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Medicaid , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Aneurisma Roto/etiologia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to characterize temporal trends in the treatment of aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) and the impact of the introduction of less invasive therapy on overall intervention rates. METHODS: Patients with diagnostic codes for AIOD, and procedure codes for aortofemoral bypass (AFB) or iliac artery angioplasty and stenting were selected from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 1996 to 2000. Utilization rates of both intervention types were determined. Outcome variables including in-hospital mortality and duration of stay were assessed. RESULTS: The rate of iliac artery angioplasty and stenting increased 850%, from 0.4 to 3.4 cases per 100,000 adults (P <.001). The rate of AFB declined 15.5%, from 5.8 to 4.9 cases per 100,000 adults (P <.005). Older age, white race, and higher-income patients were more likely to undergo angioplasty and stenting. AFB had a higher mortality rate, longer duration of stay, and higher hospital charges compared to angioplasty and stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Iliac artery angioplasty and stenting has rapidly gained a large market share in the treatment of AIOD. Acceptable clinical outcomes have likely lowered the threshold for treatment and contributed to the rapid diffusion of this technology for the treatment of AIOD.
Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão/estatística & dados numéricos , Aorta/cirurgia , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/estatística & dados numéricos , Artéria Ilíaca/cirurgia , Idoso , Tecnologia Biomédica/tendências , Feminino , Setor de Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Stents/estatística & dados numéricos , Transferência de Tecnologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
HYPOTHESIS: Variation in postoperative complications after abdominal aortic surgery contributes to differences in mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals. BACKGROUND: Hospitals with high surgical volume have been shown to have lower operative mortality rates for complex vascular surgery than those with low volumes. Differences in the rates of complications among hospitals may explain this variation in mortality. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent abdominal aortic surgery in Maryland from 1994 to 1996 (N = 2987) were included. The primary dependent variable was in-hospital mortality and the independent variables included hospital surgical volume, patient case-mix variables, and several specific postoperative complications. Two sequential analyses using multiple logistic regression were performed to determine the relative importance of independent variables in predicting mortality. RESULTS: Hospitals with high surgical volume had a lower mortality rate (5.6%) than those with medium (6.8%) and low (8.7%) volumes (P =.03). In the first multivariate analysis, after adjusting for patient case-mix, having surgery at a high-volume hospital remained associated with a 37% reduction in mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.92; P =.02). Patients at high-volume hospitals had a decreased relative risk (RR) of several complications: pulmonary failure (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.36-0.55), reintubation (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44-0.64), pneumonia (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.99), cardiac complications (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.78), and shock (RR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.75). In the second multivariate analysis, which included complications, hospital volume was no longer a significant predictor of mortality. However, several postoperative complications remained significant predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of hospital volume on mortality after abdominal aortic surgery is attributable to differences in postoperative complications and not preoperative differences in case-mix. Efforts to reduce the rates of postoperative complications may reduce mortality rates at low-volume hospitals.
Assuntos
Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidade , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/cirurgia , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Carga de Trabalho/normasRESUMO
HYPOTHESIS: High-volume centers provide superior quality care and therefore have a lower incidence of postoperative complications. DESIGN: Observational statewide administrative database. SETTING: State of Maryland, nonfederal acute-care hospital (n = 52), performing liver resection (n = 35). PATIENTS: All patients discharged after undergoing hepatic resection from 1994 to 1998 (N = 569). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two sequential analyses using multiple logistic regression of in-hospital mortality were performed to determine the relative importance of preoperative case-mix and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.8% and was significantly lower in high-volume hospitals (2.8%) than in low-volume hospitals (10.2%) (P<.001). After adjusting for case-mix in the multivariate analysis, low hospital volume was associated with a 3-fold increase in mortality (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-7.6; P =.02). Having surgery at a low-volume hospital was associated with increased rates of several postoperative complications: reintubation (relative risk [RR], 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.4), pulmonary failure (RR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.5), pneumonia (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 1.0-5.6), acute renal failure (RR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7), acute myocardial infarction (RR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.9), and aspiration (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9-2.0). When considering all other factors using statistical methods, hospital volume was no longer associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo hepatic resection at low-volume hospitals are at a higher risk of postoperative complications and death than those who have the same operation at high-volume hospitals. The empirical difference between outcomes at high- and low-volume hospitals seems to be due to a variation in postoperative complications.
Assuntos
Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Hepatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/normas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hepatectomia/mortalidade , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
HYPOTHESIS: Complex operations performed in teaching hospitals have similar outcomes as those performed in nonteaching hospitals. DESIGN: Observational cohort study with clinical patient data obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample data were linked to the American Hospital Association hospital survey data for 1997 to determine hospital characteristics. Hospitals were considered high volume if they performed more than the median (50th percentile) number of procedures per year. SETTING: Nationally representative sample of hospitals during 1996 and 1997. PATIENTS: Individuals undergoing esophageal resection (n = 1247), hepatic resection (n = 2073), or pancreatic resection (n = 3337) in Nationwide Inpatient Sample hospitals during 1996 and 1997 were included. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Unadjusted and adjusted in-hospital mortality and prolonged length of stay (>75th percentile). RESULTS: None of the procedures had higher operative mortality rates at teaching hospitals. In unadjusted analyses, pancreatic resection (4.0% vs 8.8%; P<.001), hepatic resection (5.3% vs 8.0%; P =.03), and esophageal resection (7.7% vs 10.2%; P =.10) had lower operative mortality rates at teaching compared with nonteaching hospitals. However, after adjusting for hospital volume in the multivariate analysis, hospital teaching status was no longer a predictor of operative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Teaching hospitals have lower operative mortality rates for complex surgical procedures. However, the lower mortality rates at teaching hospitals can be explained by higher procedural volume.
Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Hospitais Comunitários , Hospitais de Ensino , Auditoria Médica , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Esofagectomia/mortalidade , Esofagectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Hepatectomia/mortalidade , Hepatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatectomia/mortalidade , Pancreatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Probabilidade , Risco Ajustado , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
HYPOTHESIS: Operative mortality rates for esophageal resection vary across hospital volume groups in a nationally representative sample of hospitals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of all adult patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample who underwent esophageal resection from 1995 through 1999 (N = 3023). Operative mortality was determined for hospital volume quartiles (low, <3 per year; medium, 3-5 per year; high, 6-16 per year; very high, >16 per year). Multiple logistic regression of in-hospital mortality was used for case-mix adjusted analyses. SETTING: Hospitals performing at least 1 esophageal resection from 1995 through 1999 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. PATIENTS: Patients having esophageal resection from 1995 through 1999 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 8.2% and varied 3-fold from 11.8% to 3.7% across hospital volume groups (P<.001). In the case-mix-adjusted multivariate analysis, having surgery at a low-volume hospital (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-4.9; P<.001) or medium-volume hospital (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.3; P =.002) was associated with an increased risk of mortality compared with the reference group of very high-volume hospitals. The effect of volume on mortality was significant for both malignant and benign disease. Given the absolute risk difference of 8.1% between very high- and low-volume hospitals, only 12 patients would need to be referred to prevent 1 death after esophageal resection. CONCLUSIONS: The operative mortality rate for esophageal resection varies across hospitals in the United States. To improve the quality of care and reduce operative mortality rates for patients in need of esophageal surgery, patients should either be referred to higher-volume hospitals, or quality improvement should be directed at lower-volume hospitals.
Assuntos
Doenças do Esôfago/cirurgia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Curva ROC , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection has become common in the United States for both primary and secondary hepatic tumors. HYPOTHESIS: Variation in outcomes after hepatic resection is related to patient characteristics, the indication for operation, and hospital procedural volume. DESIGN: Observational study using a nationally representative database. PATIENTS: All patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 1996 and 1997 with a primary procedure code for hepatic resection (N = 2097). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included in-hospital mortality and length of stay. Risk-adjusted analyses were performed using hierarchical multivariate models. RESULTS: Overall mortality for the 2097 patients was 5.8%. The most common indications for hepatic resection were secondary metastases (52%), primary hepatic malignancy (16%), biliary tract malignancy (10%), and benign hepatic tumor (5%). High-volume hospitals had a mortality rate of 3.9% vs 7.6% at low-volume hospitals (P<.001). In the multivariate analysis adjusting for patient case-mix, high-volume hospitals had a 40% lower risk of in-hospital mortality compared with low-volume hospitals (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.92; P =.02). Other predictors of mortality in the multivariate analysis included age older than 65 years, hepatic lobectomy (vs wedge resection), primary hepatic malignancy (vs metastases), and the severity of underlying liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital procedural volume is an important predictor of mortality after hepatic resection. Patients who require resection of primary and secondary liver tumors should be offered referral to a high-volume center.
Assuntos
Hepatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that high-volume hospitals (HVHs) have lower mortality rates than low-volume hospitals (LVHs). However, little is known regarding the relationship of morbidity to hospital volume. The objective of the current study was to investigate the relative incidence of postoperative complications after esophageal resection at HVHs and LVHs. METHODS: All patients discharged from a nonfederal, acute-care hospital in Maryland after esophageal resection from 1994 to 1998 were included (n = 366). Rates of 10 postoperative complications were compared at HVHs and LVHs. Risk-adjusted analyses were performed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: High-volume hospitals had a mortality rate of 2.5% compared with 15.4% at LVHs (p < 0.001), with a case-mixed adjusted odds ratio (OR) of death equal to 5.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 16; p < 0.001). Low-volume hospitals had a profound increase in the risk of several complications after adjusting for case-mix: renal failure (OR, 19; 95% CI, 1.9 to 178; p = 0.01), pulmonary failure (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.6 to 14; p = 0.002), septicemia (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 15; p = 0.04), reintubation (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.1; p = 0.004), surgical complications (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.9; p = 0.001), and aspiration (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.3; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing esophageal resection at LVHs were at a markedly increased risk of postoperative complications and death. Pulmonary complications are particularly prevalent at LVHs and contribute to the death of patients having surgery at those centers.
Assuntos
Doenças do Esôfago/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Comorbidade , Doenças do Esôfago/epidemiologia , Esofagectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: High-volume hospitals have been shown to have superior outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but the contribution of surgeon volume and specialty practice to CEA outcomes in a national sample is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Using the National Inpatient Sample for 1996 and 1997, 35,821 patients who underwent CEA (ICD-9-CM code 3812) and had data for unique surgeon identification were studied. Surgeons were categorized in terms of annual CEA volume as low-volume surgeons (< 10 procedures), medium-volume surgeons (10 to 29), and high-volume surgeons (> or = 30). Data from cardiac, general, neurologic, and vascular surgical practices were analyzed. In-hospital mortality, postoperative stroke, and prolonged length of stay (> 4 days) were the primary outcomes variables. Unadjusted and case-mix adjusted analyses were performed. RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality was 0.61%. CEA was performed annually by high-volume surgeons in 52% of patients, by medium-volume surgeons in 30% of patients, and by low-volume surgeons in 18% of patients. Observed mortality by surgeon volume was 0.44% for high-volume surgeons, 0.63% for medium-volume surgeons, and 1.1% for low-volume surgeons (p < 0.001). The postoperative stroke rate was 1.14% for high-volume surgeons, 1.63% for medium-volume surgeons, and 2.03% for low-volume surgeons (p < 0.001). Surgeon specialty had no statistically significant effect on mortality or postoperative stroke. In the logistic regression model, increased risk of mortality was associated with emergent admission (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6 to 2.8, p < 0.001), patient age > 65 years (OR = 2.0; 95% CI 1.3 to 3.1, p = 0.001), low-volume surgeon (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.4 to 2.5, p < 0.001), and COPD (OR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5, p = 0.001). Low hospital CEA volume (< 100) was not a significant risk factor in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: More than 50% of the CEAs in the United States are performed by high-volume surgeons with superior outcomes. Health policy efforts should focus on reducing the number of low-volume surgeons, regardless of surgeon specialty or total hospital CEA volume.
Assuntos
Endarterectomia das Carótidas/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Competência Clínica , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Especialização , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data on the relative clinical and economic impact of postoperative complications are needed in order to direct quality improvement efforts. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing two high-risk surgical procedures, hepatectomy (n = 569) and esophagectomy (n = 366), from 1994 to 1998 were included. Data were abstracted from the Maryland hospital discharge database. Relative resource use was determined using median regression, adjusting for patient comorbidities and other case-mix variables. RESULTS: A total of 935 patients were studied. Overall in-hospital mortality was 6.1%; complication rate was 38.4%. Median cost for all patients was $14,527 (interquartile range $10,936-$21,412) and length of stay 9 days (interquartile range 7-13 days). Median hospital cost was increased for patients with complications ($16,868 versus $12,861; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, several complications remained associated with increased cost. Acute renal failure ($25,219), septicemia ($18,852), and myocardial infarction ($9,573) were associated with the greatest increase in resource use. But because the incidence of each complication varies, the attributable fraction of total resource use was highest for acute renal failure (19%), septicemia (16%), and surgical complications (16%). CONCLUSIONS: Complications are independently associated with increased resource use after high-risk surgery. Population-based studies may be valuable in determining the relative economic importance of postoperative complications. Quality improvement efforts for these complications should be prioritized based on both the incidence of the complication and its independent contribution to increased resource use.
Assuntos
Esofagectomia/economia , Hepatectomia/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Gestão da Qualidade Total , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Esofagectomia/mortalidade , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Hepatectomia/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection is increasingly performed for primary and metastatic tumors. Reports from tertiary care centers show improved outcomes over time with lower operative mortality rates. The objective of this investigation was to characterize trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection in the US during a recent 13-year period. STUDY DESIGN: Adult patients with a procedures code for hepatic resection in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1988 to 2000 were included. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample is a 20% representative sample of all discharges in the US. Outcomes variables included in-hospital mortality and length of stay. High volume hospitals performed 10 or more (>50th percentile) procedures per year. RESULTS: During the 13-year period, 16,582 patients underwent hepatic resection. The number of procedures performed increased nearly twofold, from 820 per year in 1988 to 1,420 per year in 2000. Similar changes in use were seen for each indication for operation. The overall mortality rate declined from 10.4% (1988 to 1989) to 5.3% (1999 to 2000) during the study period (p < 0.001). The mortality rate was lower at high volume centers than at lower volume centers (5.8% versus 8.9%, p < 0.001), and the decline in mortality over time was greater at high volume centers (10.1% to 3.9%, p < 0.001) compared with to low volume centers (10.6% to 7.4%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The number of hepatic resections performed in the US has increased significantly. Short-term outcomes have also improved over the same time period, with more improvement seen at higher volume centers than in lower volume centers.