Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Conserv Biol ; 24(1): 207-16, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19906066

RESUMO

Ecosystem-based management is logistically and politically challenging because ecosystems are inherently complex and management decisions affect a multitude of groups. Coastal ecosystems, which lie at the interface between marine and terrestrial ecosystems and provide an array of ecosystem services to different groups, aptly illustrate these challenges. Successful ecosystem-based management of coastal ecosystems requires incorporating scientific information and the knowledge and views of interested parties into the decision-making process. Estimating the provision of ecosystem services under alternative management schemes offers a systematic way to incorporate biogeophysical and socioeconomic information and the views of individuals and groups in the policy and management process. Employing ecosystem services as a common language to improve the process of ecosystem-based management presents both benefits and difficulties. Benefits include a transparent method for assessing trade-offs associated with management alternatives, a common set of facts and common currency on which to base negotiations, and improved communication among groups with competing interests or differing worldviews. Yet challenges to this approach remain, including predicting how human interventions will affect ecosystems, how such changes will affect the provision of ecosystem services, and how changes in service provision will affect the welfare of different groups in society. In a case study from Puget Sound, Washington, we illustrate the potential of applying ecosystem services as a common language for ecosystem-based management.


Assuntos
Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Ecossistema , Comunicação
2.
Science ; 319(5861): 321-3, 2008 Jan 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18202288

RESUMO

A common assumption is that ecosystem services respond linearly to changes in habitat size. This assumption leads frequently to an "all or none" choice of either preserving coastal habitats or converting them to human use. However, our survey of wave attenuation data from field studies of mangroves, salt marshes, seagrass beds, nearshore coral reefs, and sand dunes reveals that these relationships are rarely linear. By incorporating nonlinear wave attenuation in estimating coastal protection values of mangroves in Thailand, we show that the optimal land use option may instead be the integration of development and conservation consistent with ecosystem-based management goals. This result suggests that reconciling competing demands on coastal habitats should not always result in stark preservation-versus-conversion choices.


Assuntos
Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Ecologia , Ecossistema , Rhizophoraceae , Áreas Alagadas , Alismatales , Animais , Antozoários , Aquicultura/economia , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Pesqueiros/economia , Lythraceae , Penaeidae , Tailândia , Árvores , Movimentos da Água , Madeira
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA