Validation of field assessment stroke triage for emergency destination for prehospital use in a rural EMS system.

BACKGROUND: Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED) is a simple and accurate prehospital stroke severity scale that has been shown to have comparable accuracy to the gold standard National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) but requires further field validation for use by emergency medical services (EMS), particularly in rural systems. FAST-ED scores ≥4 are considered high probability for large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes, while scores <4 are low to moderate probability for LVO. The objective of this study was to assess inter-rater reliability of the EMS FAST-ED (EMS) score to the emergency department FAST-ED (ED-MD) scores. METHODS: EMS calculated FAST-ED scores prior to transport to the emergency department (ED) on patients with a positive prehospital stroke screen. EDMD calculated FAST-ED scores for the same patients upon arrival to the ED. Interrater reliability and test characteristics were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were included in this study and 14 were subsequently diagnosed with an LVO. EMS assigned 34 patients (35.8%) a FAST-ED score of ≥4. EDMD assigned 25 patients (26.3%) a FAST-ED score of ≥4. Using the clinical cut-points of FAST-ED scores <4 and ≥ 4, a linearly weighted Cohen's kappa coefficient showed moderate interrater reliability when comparing EMS and EDMD scores (kw 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.63). At ≥4, EMS FAST-ED scores had a sensitivity 0.48, specificity 0.75, PPV 0.62, NPV 0.62 for predicting an LVO, while EDMD FAST-ED scores had a sensitivity 0.36, specificity 0.82, PPV 0.64, NPV 0.60. Comparable receiver operator curve area under the curve values were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: EMS and EDMD FAST-ED scores were moderately comparable in a rural EMS system. Similar NPVs compared to EDMD suggest the use of FAST-ED as an appropriate screening tool for EMS to predict the probability of LVO in the prehospital setting and make destination determinations regarding primary transport to a thrombectomy-capable stroke center.

Blacks Are Less Likely to Present With Strokes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observations From the Buckle of the Stroke Belt.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on stroke systems has not been systematically evaluated. Our study aims to investigate trends in telestroke consults during the pandemic. METHODS: We did retrospective chart review of consecutive patients seen through a telestroke network in South Carolina from March 2019 to April 2020. We dichotomized patients to preCOVID-19 pandemic (March 2019 to February 2020) and during COVID-19 pandemic (March to April 2020). RESULTS: A total of 5852 patients were evaluated during the study period, 613 (10.5%) were seen during the pandemic. The median number of weekly consults dropped from 112 to 77 during the pandemic, P=0.002. There was no difference in baseline features; however, Black patients were less likely to present with strokes during the pandemic (13.9% versus 29%, P≤0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a significant drop in telestroke volume. The impact seems to disproportionately affect Black patients.