Comparison of early loosening vs delayed section of mid-urethral slings for postoperative voiding dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) is a common occurrence after midurethral sling (MUS) insertion and can result in acute or chronic urinary retention or de novo lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). However, the management of BOO after MUS is not standardised. The objective of this study was to compare two therapeutic strategies for suspected BOO after MUS. METHODS: Patients who had surgical revision for voiding dysfunction with a post-void residual (PVR) ≥100 ml after MUS in five centres between 2005 and 2020 were included in a retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: early sling loosening (EL) vs delayed section/excision of the sling (DS). RESULTS: Seventy patients were included: 38 in the EL group and 32 in the DS group. The postoperative complication rate was comparable in both groups (10.5% vs 12.5%; p = 0.99). At 3 months, the rate of withdrawal from self-catheterisation was similar in the two groups (92.1% vs 100%; p = 0.25) as was the PVR (57.5 vs 63.5 ml; p = 0.09). After a median follow-up of 9 months, there were significantly more patients with resolved voiding dysfunction in the EL group (63.2% vs 31.3%; p = 0.01). The rate of persistent/recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was higher in the DS group (21% vs 43.7%; p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, the main predictive factor of recurrent SUI was DS (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.01-8.60, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Early loosening of MUS in the case of postoperative voiding dysfunction offers better efficacy than DS of the sling, with a lower risk of recurrent/persistent SUI.

Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures.

AIMS: Achieving negative margins is essential in conservative treatment for breast cancer. The conventional method for intra-operative assessment of resection margins is gross or histological examination of frozen sections. We describe and evaluate the contribution of an original intra-operative touch preparation cytology (IOTPC) technique (400 procedures) performed on 396 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IOTPC consists of touching glass slides to the surfaces of interest after gently pressing the spatially localized specimen taken according to predetermined conditions. The result is conveyed to the surgeon immediately and compared with the conventional histological findings after embedding in paraffin. RESULTS: The average response time is 10min, which renders the technique compatible with standard operating room procedures and its cost is reasonable. The method has a sensitivity of 88.6%, specificity of 92.2%, positive predictive value of 73.6%, negative predictive value of 97%, and correlation with paraffin section histology of 91.5%. Only 5 true false negatives were found in this series and the technique prevented 11.75% of secondary re-excision procedures for positive margins. CONCLUSION: IOTPC is a reliable extemporaneous method for assessing surgical margins in conservative treatment for breast cancer and a useful tool for surgeons.