Impact of an HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis dashboard on veteran PrEP enrollment.

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective at reducing the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition in at-risk individuals; however, it is largely underutilized. The Veterans Health Administration has created an HIV PrEP dashboard to identify at-risk veterans in attempt to increase PrEP enrollment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether the use of an HIV PrEP dashboard would prove effective at increasing PrEP enrollment at a single facility. METHODS: This was a single-center quality improvement project. Three pharmacists used the HIV PrEP dashboard and retrospective chart review to identify eligible patients for PrEP. A multimodal process of contacting patients was conducted. The primary objective was to evaluate the number of patients who enrolled in PrEP during the study period. Secondary objectives included evaluating the ability of the HIV PrEP dashboard to identify eligible patients, identify effective strategies to target PrEP enrollment, and compare those patients who accepted with those who declined PrEP to evaluate barriers to enrollment. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients reviewed, 26 patients (27.7%) were found eligible for PrEP. Of the eligible patients, 3 patients (11.5%) were enrolled, and 7 patients (26.9%) declined PrEP. The others were lost to follow-up (9 of 26, 34.6%), had no action taken on a chart note to provider (6 of 26, 23.1%), or did not have a primary care provider assigned at the local facility (1 of 26, 3.9%). The 3 patients who were successfully enrolled in PrEP were all contacted and prescribed PrEP through the infectious diseases (ID) clinic. There were no statistically significant differences between the cohorts of patients who accepted and declined PrEP. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an HIV PrEP dashboard aided in identifying eligible patients for PrEP. Enrollment through the ID clinic was the most successful modality. Further research is needed to characterize barriers to PrEP uptake and to develop strategies to increase prescribing from non-ID providers.

Reprint of: Impact of an HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis dashboard on veteran PrEP enrollment.

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective at reducing the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition in at-risk individuals; however, it is largely underutilized. The Veterans Health Administration has created an HIV PrEP dashboard to identify at-risk veterans in attempt to increase PrEP enrollment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether the use of an HIV PrEP dashboard would prove effective at increasing PrEP enrollment at a single facility. METHODS: This was a single-center quality improvement project. Three pharmacists used the HIV PrEP dashboard and retrospective chart review to identify eligible patients for PrEP. A multimodal process of contacting patients was conducted. The primary objective was to evaluate the number of patients who enrolled in PrEP during the study period. Secondary objectives included evaluating the ability of the HIV PrEP dashboard to identify eligible patients, identify effective strategies to target PrEP enrollment, and compare those patients who accepted with those who declined PrEP to evaluate barriers to enrollment. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients reviewed, 26 patients (27.7%) were found eligible for PrEP. Of the eligible patients, 3 patients (11.5%) were enrolled, and 7 patients (26.9%) declined PrEP. The others were lost to follow-up (9 of 26, 34.6%), had no action taken on a chart note to provider (6 of 26, 23.1%), or did not have a primary care provider assigned at the local facility (1 of 26, 3.9%). The 3 patients who were successfully enrolled in PrEP were all contacted and prescribed PrEP through the infectious diseases (ID) clinic. There were no statistically significant differences between the cohorts of patients who accepted and declined PrEP. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an HIV PrEP dashboard aided in identifying eligible patients for PrEP. Enrollment through the ID clinic was the most successful modality. Further research is needed to characterize barriers to PrEP uptake and to develop strategies to increase prescribing from non-ID providers.

Case Report: Cefepime Induced Neurotoxicity Following a Change in Infusion Time.

Purpose: Cefepime is an antibiotic associated with cefepime induced neurotoxicity (CIN), particularly in those with reduced renal function, or in cases of inappropriate medication dosing. This report describes a case of CIN associated with a change in infusion duration from 180 to30 minutes, which to the best of our knowledge has not been previously reported in the literature. Summary: A 73-year old male was treated with extended infusion cefepime over 180 minutes while hospitalized with recurrent pneumonia. On discharge, cefepime was continued as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) administered over 30 minutes. The patient began to experience symptoms of neurotoxicity after 1 day of receiving OPAT, which subsequently led to a readmission as neurological symptoms worsened. Cefepime was discontinued and symptoms resolved within 48 hours. Renal function was stable throughout treatment and no other causes for neurotoxicity were noted. Conclusion: This is a unique case of CIN secondary to shortened infusion time, which is clinically relevant, particularly during transitions of care. Further investigation, including more widespread use of therapeutic drug monitoring will be beneficial to further elucidate the relationship between infusion time and CIN development.

Comparing Anti-Factor Xa and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Levels for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin.

Background: Lab tests such as activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels are typically used to monitor intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV heparin), with recent evidence suggesting that anti-Xa levels may provide a more accurate measure of anticoagulation. Objective: The Lexington Veterans Affairs Health Care System transitioned from using aPTT to anti-Xa levels in January 2017. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this change. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing all patients receiving IV heparin per protocol for at least 24 hours from August 1, 2016, to January 31, 2017 (aPTT group), and February 1, 2017, to July 31, 2017 (anti-Xa group). The primary objective was a comparison of IV heparin doses required to achieve goal range between the 2 cohorts. Secondary objectives included a comparison of time to therapeutic goal, percentage of time within goal range, number of rate changes until therapeutic goal, and adverse outcomes, such as number of bleeds. Results: A total of 155 patients were included in this study. Significantly higher IV heparin doses were required to achieve therapeutic goal in the anti-Xa group, despite significantly fewer IV heparin rate changes required. Anti-Xa monitoring was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Conclusion and Relevance: Significantly higher IV heparin doses were required to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa levels after transitioning from an aPTT-based protocol in the largely unstudied veteran population. However, the transition from aPTT to anti-Xa monitoring appears safe and efficacious in these patients.

Outcomes From a Pharmacist - led Proton Pump Inhibitor Stewardship Program at a Single Institution.

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective medications for acid-related disorders; however, they are also overused and may be associated with several adverse effects. A PPI stewardship program was implemented at one institution to combat the overuse of PPIs. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an inpatient PPI stewardship program in reducing PPI use, both during hospitalization and upon discharge. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to an internal medicine service at a single institution from March 14, 2016, to August 14, 2016, with an intervention by the PPI stewardship team. The primary objective was to determine the percentage of patients who tolerated inpatient and outpatient PPI discontinuation, or dose de-escalations upon discharge. Secondary objectives included the identification of risk factors for intolerance of PPI discontinuation, the occurrence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications after PPI discontinuation, and the percentage of patients who required "as needed" acid suppressive therapy (AST) with an antacid or histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) to control their symptoms while hospitalized. Results: During the study time period, 537 patients with an active outpatient prescription for a PPI were admitted to an internal medicine team with 41.0% (n = 220) not meeting criteria for inpatient continuation. Of these patients, 95.9% (n = 211) tolerated inpatient PPI discontinuation, with 83.4% (n = 176) not requiring any "as needed" AST during hospitalization. Upon discharge, 57.1% patients (n = 24 of 42) tolerated PPI discontinuation at 3 months, while 81.8% patients (n = 18 of 22) tolerated PPI dose de-escalations at 3 months. Risk factors for intolerance of inpatient PPI discontinuation were a higher body mass index (BMI) (33.7 vs 30.3 kg/m2, P = .046) and longer length of stay (7.0 vs 4.0 days, P = .03), while longer duration of PPI use (9.0 vs 5.5 years, P = 0.03) was identified as a risk factor for intolerance of outpatient PPI discontinuation. One patient experienced reflux esophagitis 2 months after PPI discontinuation. Conclusion: A PPI stewardship program at a single institution resulted in the reduction of inappropriate PPI use in both the inpatient and outpatient settings.

Comparison of Outcomes: Nurse-Driven vs. Physician-Driven Weight-Based Intravenous Heparin Protocol.

The transition from a physician-driven heparin protocol to a nurse- driven heparin protocol at one institution resulted in shorter times to therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), increased time within goal aPTT range, and an increased percent- age of patients who ultimately achieved a therapeutic aPTT.

Outcomes After Implementation of an Alcohol Withdrawal Protocol at a Single Institution.

Background: There are varying dosing strategies for the administration of benzodiazepines in the setting of alcohol withdrawal. In October 2014, a symptom-based alcohol withdrawal protocol (AWP) using the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol, Revised (CIWA-Ar) scale was implemented at one institution. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the AWP. Methods: Retrospective chart review was completed, including patients receiving at least one dose of diazepam for alcohol withdrawal pre- and post-protocol. The primary outcome of this study was the average daily and cumulative dose of diazepam during hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and occurrence of seizures or delirium tremens. Results: The average daily dose and the average cumulative dose of diazepam were significantly lower in the post-protocol group (5.4 vs 12.1 mg, p < .001; 35.0 vs 77.6 mg, p < .001, respectively). Length of stay was similar between groups (6.5 vs 6.4 days, p = .91), however, duration of benzodiazepine use was decreased in the post-protocol group (2.2 vs 4.7 days, p < .001). Despite using reduced doses of benzodiazepines, there was no increase in adverse events. Conclusions: The implementation of a symptom-based AWP using the CIWA-Ar scale was associated with a reduced average daily and cumulative dose of diazepam without any apparent safety issues.

Lack of correlation between standardized antimicrobial administration ratios (SAARs) and healthcare-facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infection rates in Veterans Affairs medical facilities.

We detected no correlation between standardized antimicrobial administration ratios (SAARs) and healthcare facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI) rates in 102 acute-care Veterans Affairs medical centers over 16 months. SAARs may be useful for investigating trends in local antimicrobial use, but no ratio threshold demarcated HO-CDI risk.

Incorporation of Clinical Staff Pharmacists in the Emergency Department Sepsis Response at a Single Institution.

Background: Sepsis is a medical emergency in which timely, appropriate antibiotic therapy improves patient outcomes. While the addition of emergency department (ED) pharmacists has been found to optimize timely antimicrobial therapy in patients with sepsis, the role of clinical staff pharmacists (CSPs) in the sepsis response has not been studied. Methods: We implemented a process of incorporating CSPs in sepsis antimicrobial management in the ED. To evaluate the accuracy of antimicrobial selection by CSPs with a sepsis antibiotic algorithm and vancomycin dosing nomogram, a retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with sepsis presenting to the ED from December 3, 2018 through March 31, 2020. Results: Of the 157 sepsis alerts included in this study, CSPs correctly used the antibiotic selection algorithm in 154 (98%) instances and the vancomycin dosing nomogram in 147 (94%) instances. Conclusions: A process incorporating CSPs into the ED sepsis response resulted in high rates of accuracy for antibiotic selection and vancomycin dosing.

Implementation of a proton pump inhibitor stewardship program.

PURPOSE: The development and implementation of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) stewardship program at a single institution are described. SUMMARY: Due to the overuse of PPIs and the increasing awareness of the adverse drug events associated with long-term PPI therapy, the pharmacy and internal medicine services of a medical center implemented a PPI stewardship program. All patients admitted to the internal medicine service were evaluated by the PPI stewardship team to determine if they had an appropriate indication for PPI continuation in the hospital as well as after discharge. If patients did not meet specified criteria for continuation of PPI use during hospitalization, PPI therapy was suspended and replaced by as-needed acid suppressive therapy, and the patients received discharge counseling regarding the implemented medication regimen changes. Challenges encountered during program development included establishing appropriate criteria for PPI continuation and determining the best method for discontinuing PPIs in order to reduce the risk of rebound hyperacidity. CONCLUSION: In an effort to reduce unnecessary PPI use, a PPI stewardship program was developed and implemented to ensure appropriate continuation of PPIs for patients admitted and discharged from an internal medicine service.