Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Densitom ; 23(4): 549-560, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31735596

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Five-year changes in multisite quantitative ultrasound-assessed speed of sound (SOS in m/s) were studied in a cohort of women and men. The impacts of antiresorptive therapies and menopausal status on SOS were also assessed. METHODOLOGY: Two SOS assessments, clinical assessments, and comprehensive questionnaires were completed 5 years apart on 509 women and 211 men. Age at first assessment was grouped into: <40 yr, 40-49 yr, 50-59 yr, 60-69 yr, 70-79 yr and 80+ yr. Mean rate of change in SOS at the distal radius and tibia were calculated for each age grouping by sex. SOS changes were stratified by antiresorptive use (yes, no) or menopausal status (premenopausal, postmenopausal, or bilateral oophorectomy). RESULTS: Mean losses in SOS occurred over the 5 years in almost all age groupings. In women, mean losses in SOS for the <40 yr, 40-49 yr, 50-59 yr, 60-69 yr, 70-79 yr, and 80+ yr age groupings were -59, -83, -107, -92, -80 and -66 (p = 0.30; differences among age groupings) at the radius and -18, -16, -54, -1, -9 and 31 at the tibia (p < 0.05), respectively. In men, mean SOS losses were -101, -56, -69, -67, -83 and -127 at the radius (p = 0.61) and -46, -61, 0, -35, -29, and -26 at the tibia (p = 0.23). At the tibia, women prescribed antiresorptives had a mean increase in SOS (8.6 m/s) whereas untreated participants had a mean loss (-23.0; p < 0.001); there was no significant impact at the distal radius. There were no significant differences in change in SOS among menopausal groups (p > 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: Mean SOS generally declined over 5 years in all age groupings of both sexes. The consistent mean losses in SOS over the age spans investigated are coincident with increasing fracture risk. Women on antiresorptive therapy had increased mean SOS over the 5-year assessment period at the tibia, whereas untreated women had mean losses in SOS.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Ultrassonografia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Rádio (Anatomia)/diagnóstico por imagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia/métodos
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 28(1): 1-19, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27613721

RESUMO

The purpose of this review is to assess the most recent evidence in the management of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and provide updated recommendations for its evaluation, diagnosis and treatment. A Medline search of "Hyperparathyroidism. Primary" was conducted and the literature with the highest levels of evidence were reviewed and used to formulate recommendations. PHPT is a common endocrine disorder usually discovered by routine biochemical screening. PHPT is defined as hypercalcemia with increased or inappropriately normal plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH). It is most commonly seen after the age of 50 years, with women predominating by three to fourfold. In countries with routine multichannel screening, PHPT is identified earlier and may be asymptomatic. Where biochemical testing is not routine, PHPT is more likely to present with skeletal complications, or nephrolithiasis. Parathyroidectomy (PTx) is indicated for those with symptomatic disease. For asymptomatic patients, recent guidelines have recommended criteria for surgery, however PTx can also be considered in those who do not meet criteria, and prefer surgery. Non-surgical therapies are available when surgery is not appropriate. This review presents the current state of the art in the diagnosis and management of PHPT and updates the Canadian Position paper on PHPT. An overview of the impact of PHPT on the skeleton and other target organs is presented with international consensus. Differences in the international presentation of this condition are also summarized.


Assuntos
Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Hipercalcemia/etiologia , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/complicações , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/epidemiologia , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/terapia , Incidência , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Nefrolitíase/etiologia , Paratireoidectomia , Prevalência , Cintilografia/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
3.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 15(1): 102, 2017 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28506313

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Comparisons of population health status using self-report measures such as the SF-36 rest on the assumption that the measured items have a common interpretation across sub-groups. However, self-report measures may be sensitive to differential item functioning (DIF), which occurs when sub-groups with the same underlying health status have a different probability of item response. This study tested for DIF on the SF-36 physical functioning (PF) and mental health (MH) sub-scales in population-based data using latent variable mixture models (LVMMs). METHODS: Data were from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos), a prospective national cohort study. LVMMs were applied to the ten PF and five MH SF-36 items. A standard two-parameter graded response model with one latent class was compared to multi-class LVMMs. Multivariable logistic regression models with pseudo-class random draws characterized the latent classes on demographic and health variables. RESULTS: The CaMos cohort consisted of 9423 respondents. A three-class LVMM fit the PF sub-scale, with class proportions of 0.59, 0.24, and 0.17. For the MH sub-scale, a two-class model fit the data, with class proportions of 0.69 and 0.31. For PF items, the probabilities of reporting greater limitations were consistently higher in classes 2 and 3 than class 1. For MH items, respondents in class 2 reported more health problems than in class 1. Differences in item thresholds and factor loadings between one-class and multi-class models were observed for both sub-scales. Demographic and health variables were associated with class membership. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed DIF in population-based SF-36 data; the results suggest that PF and MH sub-scale scores may not be comparable across sub-groups defined by demographic and health status variables, although effects were frequently small to moderate in size. Evaluation of DIF should be a routine step when analysing population-based self-report data to ensure valid comparisons amongst sub-groups.


Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Osteoporose/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Autorrelato , Adulto , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Estudos Prospectivos
4.
J Clin Densitom ; 20(2): 233-238, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28034592

RESUMO

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a gray-level texture measure derived from lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images that predicts fractures independent of bone mineral density (BMD). Increased abdominal soft tissue in individuals with elevated body mass index (BMI) absorbs more X-rays during image acquisition for BMD measurement and must be accommodated by the TBS algorithm. We aimed to determine if the relationship between BMI and TBS varied between 2 major manufacturers' densitometers, because different densitometers accommodate soft tissues differently. We identified 1919 women and 811 men, participants of the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, aged ≥40 yr with lumbar spine DXA scans acquired on GE Lunar (4 centers) or Hologic (3 centers) densitometers at year 10 of follow-up. TBS was calculated for L1-L4 (TBS iNsight® software, version 2.1). A significant negative correlation between TBS and BMI was observed when TBS measurements were performed on Hologic densitometers in men (Pearson r = -0.36, p <0.0001) and in women (Pearson r = -0.33, p <0.0001); significant correlations were not seen when TBS was measured on GE Lunar densitometers (Pearson r = 0.00 in men, Pearson r = -0.02 in women). Age-adjusted linear regression models confirmed significant interactions between BMI and densitometer manufacturer for both men and women (p < 0.0001). In contrast, comparable positive correlations were observed between BMD and BMI on both Hologic and GE Lunar densitometers in men and women. In conclusion, BMI significantly affects TBS values in men and women when measured on Hologic but not GE Lunar densitometers. This finding has implications for clinical and research applications of TBS, especially when TBS is measured sequentially on DXA densitometers from different manufacturers or when results from different machines are pooled for analysis.


Assuntos
Absorciometria de Fóton/instrumentação , Índice de Massa Corporal , Densidade Óssea , Osso Esponjoso/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Algoritmos , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
5.
J Clin Densitom ; 20(1): 8-24, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27956123

RESUMO

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been associated with antiresorptive therapy in both oncology and osteoporosis patients. This debilitating condition is very rare and advances in diagnosis and management may now effectively reduce the risk of its development and offer valuable treatment options for affected patients. This paper provides a case-based review of ONJ and application of the International Task Force on ONJ (referred to as the "Task Force") recommendations for the diagnosis and management of ONJ. The Task Force was supported by 14 international societies and achieved consensus from representatives of these multidisciplinary societies on key issues pertaining to the diagnosis and management of ONJ. The frequency of ONJ in oncology patients receiving oncology doses of bisphosphonate (BP) or denosumab is estimated at 1%-15%, and the frequency in the osteoporosis patient population receiving much lower doses of BP or denosumab is estimated at 0.001%-0.01%. Although the diagnosis of ONJ is primarily clinical, imaging may be helpful in confirming the diagnosis and staging. In those with multiple risk factors for ONJ for whom major invasive oral surgery is being planned, interruption of BP or denosumab therapy (in cancer patients) is advised, if possible, before surgery, until the surgical site heals. Major oral surgery in this context could include multiple extractions if surgical extractions are required, not simple forceps extractions. ONJ development may be reduced by optimizing oral hygiene and postoperatively using topical and systemic antibiotics as appropriate. Periodontal disease should be managed before starting oncology doses of BP or denosumab. Local debridement may be successful in disease unresponsive to conservative therapy. Successful surgical intervention has been reported in those with stage 3 disease; less severe disease is best managed conservatively. Teriparatide may be helpful in healing ONJ lesions and may be considered in osteoporosis patients at a high fracture risk in the absence of contraindications. Resumption of BP or denosumab therapy following healing of ONJ lesions is recommended, and there have not been reports of subsequent local recurrence.


Assuntos
Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/epidemiologia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Denosumab/efeitos adversos , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Doenças Periodontais/epidemiologia , Comitês Consultivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/etiologia , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/terapia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/administração & dosagem , Desbridamento , Denosumab/administração & dosagem , Difosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Fraturas Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Higiene Bucal/métodos , Doenças Periodontais/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Teriparatida/uso terapêutico
6.
J Clin Densitom ; 17(4): 534-40, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24169082

RESUMO

Multisite quantitative ultrasound (mQUS) machines are attractive tools for assessing fragility fracture risk as they are often portable, comparatively inexpensive, require little training for their use, and emit no ionizing radiation. The primary objective of this investigation was to generate an mQUS normative database of speed of sound (SOS, in m/s) measures from a large sample of randomly selected community-based individuals. mQUS (BeamMed Omnisense MultiSite Quantitative Ultrasound 7000 S) measurements were obtained and assessed at the distal radius, tibia, and phalanx. All analyses were made separately for men and women and for each anatomical site. Scatterplots (SOS vs age) identified 30-39 yr of age as periods of both maximal SOS and of relative stability for all 3 sites over the age span investigated (30-96 yr of age; 2948 women and 1176 men) and, thus, was used as the "reference" population. For cross-sectional comparison of trends over aging, a number of age groupings were created: 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80+ yr. In general, there were decreases in SOS over increasing age groupings. The normative data generated can be used to compare a given patient's mQUS measurement with reference to a young, healthy population, assigning them a gender-appropriate T-score.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Valores de Referência , Ultrassonografia
7.
J Clin Densitom ; 17(4): 490-5, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24206867

RESUMO

The number needed to treat is a valuable metric to determine the benefit of therapy, but it must be viewed against the respective number needed to harm. Denosumab and teriparatide (TPTD) have proven antifracture efficacy at vertebral and nonvertebral sites, whereas raloxifene has proven antifracture efficacy at the spine only. Denosumab use has been associated with a small, yet statistically significant, increased incidence of eczema and serious cellulitis. Raloxifene use has been associated with statistically significant increases in the risk of venous thromboembolism and possibly deadly stroke, although not an increase in total strokes. No significant, nontransient adverse events have been reported with TPTD use. When used for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, denosumab, raloxifene, and TPTD all generally have favorable risk-to-benefit profiles, but therapy-specific contraindications necessitate thoughtful consideration of all available clinical information and individualization of treatment decisions.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Relações Médico-Paciente , Cloridrato de Raloxifeno/uso terapêutico , Teriparatida/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Denosumab , Feminino , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Cloridrato de Raloxifeno/efeitos adversos , Medição de Risco , Teriparatida/efeitos adversos
8.
J Clin Densitom ; 17(2): 295-300, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24613388

RESUMO

The diagnosis of osteoporosis in men is controversial, although most studies demonstrate similar fracture rates for men and women with the same level of hip bone mineral density (BMD). Whether this applies to the lumbar spine is currently uncertain and has important implications with respect to choice of reference population for T-score calculation and osteoporosis diagnosis. This question was specifically addressed in the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study cohort of 4745 women and 1887 men ages 50+ yr at the time of baseline lumbar spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. In up to 10 yr of observation, incident clinical major osteoporotic fractures occurred in 110 men (5.8%) vs 543 women (11.4%) (p < 0.001). Mean lumbar spine BMD in men was greater than in women, both among those with and those without incident major osteoporotic fracture (p < 0.001). Men were at slightly lower risk for incident major osteoporotic fracture than women for an equivalent lumbar spine BMD (age- and BMD-adjusted rate ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.93, p = 0.008) with similar findings after adjustment for the World Health Organization fracture risk assessment clinical risk factors or competing mortality. No significant sex difference in the BMD relationship was seen for vertebral fractures (clinical or radiographic) or for all fractures. In summary, this large population-based longitudinal cohort study found similar or lower fracture risk for men vs women after adjustment for absolute lumbar spine BMD and additional covariates. The least complicated model for describing fracture risk is therefore to use the same reference lumbar spine data for generating T-scores in men and women.


Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/lesões , Fraturas por Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/fisiopatologia , Absorciometria de Fóton , Idoso , Densidade Óssea , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia
9.
MAbs ; 16(1): 2394229, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39189686

RESUMO

Bispecific antibodies (bsAb) and multispecific antibodies (msAb) encompass a diverse variety of formats that can concurrently bind multiple epitopes, unlocking mechanisms to address previously difficult-to-treat or incurable diseases. Early assessment of candidate developability enables demotion of antibodies with low potential and promotion of the most promising candidates for further development. Protein-based therapies have a stringent set of developability requirements in order to be competitive (e.g. high-concentration formulation, and long half-life) and their assessment requires a robust toolkit of methods, few of which are validated for interrogating bsAbs/msAbs. Important considerations when assessing the developability of bsAbs/msAbs include their molecular format, likelihood for immunogenicity, specificity, stability, and potential for high-volume production. Here, we summarize the critical aspects of developability assessment, and provide guidance on how to develop a comprehensive plan tailored to a given bsAb/msAb.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/imunologia , Humanos , Animais
10.
Curr Osteoporos Rep ; 11(2): 136-46, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23525967

RESUMO

Bone structure is an integral determinant of bone strength. The availability of high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) has made it possible to measure three-dimensional bone microarchitecture and volumetric bone mineral density in vivo, with accuracy previously unachievable and with relatively low-dose radiation. Recent studies using this novel imaging tool have increased our understanding of age-related changes and sex differences in bone microarchitecture, as well as the effect of different pharmacological therapies. One advantage of this novel tool is the use of finite element analysis modelling to non-invasively estimate bone strength and predict fractures using reconstructed three-dimensional images. In this paper, we describe the strengths and limitations of HR-pQCT and review the clinical studies using this tool.


Assuntos
Osso e Ossos/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento Tridimensional , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Absorciometria de Fóton , Densidade Óssea , Canadá , Análise de Elementos Finitos , Humanos
11.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 107(9): 1361-9, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22777336

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has been identified as a risk factor for hip and vertebral fractures. Evidence supporting a relationship between PPI use and osteoporosis remains scant. Demonstrating that PPIs are associated with accelerated bone mineral density (BMD) loss would provide supportive evidence for a mechanism through which PPIs could increase fracture risk. METHODS: We used the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study data set, which enrolled a population-based sample of Canadians who underwent BMD testing of the femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine (L1-L4) at baseline, and then again at 5 and 10 years. Participants also reported drug use and exposure to risk factors for osteoporosis and fracture. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine the independent association of PPI exposure and baseline BMD, and on change in BMD at 5 and 10 years. RESULTS: In all, 8,340 subjects were included in the baseline analysis, with 4,512 (55%) undergoing year 10 BMD testing. After adjusting for potential confounders, PPI use was associated with significantly lower baseline BMD at the femoral neck and total hip. PPI use was not associated with a significant acceleration in covariate-adjusted BMD loss at any measurement site after 5 and 10 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: PPI users had lower BMD at baseline than PPI non-users, but PPI use over 10 years did not appear to be associated with accelerated BMD loss. The reasons for discordant findings between PPI use at baseline and during follow-up require further study.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Colo do Fêmur/efeitos dos fármacos , Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Coluna Vertebral/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fraturas do Quadril/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia
12.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 10: 29, 2012 Mar 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22414200

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies that compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and other patient-reported outcomes in different populations rest on the assumption that the measure has equivalent psychometric properties across groups. This study examined the measurement equivalence (ME) of the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Survey (SF-36), a widely-used measure of HRQOL, by sex and race in a population-based Canadian sample. FINDINGS: SF-36 data were from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, a prospective cohort study that randomly sampled adult men and women from nine sites across Canada. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques were used to test hypotheses about four forms of ME, which are based on equality of the factor loadings, variances, covariances, and intercepts. Analyses were conducted for Caucasian and non-Caucasian females (n = 6,539) and males (n = 2,884). CFA results revealed that a measurement model with physical and mental health factors provided a good fit to the data. All forms of ME were satisfied for the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that sex and race do not influence the conceptualization of a general measure of HRQOL in the Canadian population.


Assuntos
Fraturas Espontâneas/psicologia , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Osteoporose/psicologia , Osteoporose/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Canadá , Estudos de Coortes , Avaliação da Deficiência , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Fraturas Espontâneas/diagnóstico , Fraturas Espontâneas/cirurgia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Psicometria/instrumentação , Padrões de Referência , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
J Bone Miner Res ; 35(6): 1058-1064, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31995642

RESUMO

It is recognized that the trabecular bone score (TBS) provides skeletal information, and frailty measurement is significantly associated with increased risks of adverse health outcomes. Given the suboptimal predictive power in fracture risk assessment tools, we aimed to evaluate the combination of frailty and TBS regarding predictive accuracy for risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). Data from the prospective longitudinal study of CaMos (Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study) were used for this study. TBS values were estimated using lumbar spine (L1 to L4 ) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images; frailty was evaluated by a frailty index (FI) of deficit accumulation. Outcome was time to first incident MOF during the follow-up. We used the Harrell's C-index to compare the model predictive accuracy. The Akaike information criterion, likelihood ratio test, and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used to compare model performances between the model combining frailty and TBS (subsequently called "FI + TBS"), FI-alone, and TBS-alone models. We included 2730 participants (mean age 69 years; 70% women) for analyses (mean follow-up 7.5 years). There were 243 (8.90%) MOFs observed during follow-up. Participants with MOF had significantly higher FI (0.24 versus 0.20) and lower TBS (1.231 versus 1.285) than those without MOF. FI and TBS were significantly related with MOF risk in the model adjusted for FRAX with bone mineral density (BMD) and other covariates: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.43) for per-SD increase in FI; HR = 1.38 (95% CI 1.21-1.59) for per-SD decrease in TBS; and these associations showed negligible attenuation (HR = 1.24 for per-SD increase in FI, and 1.35 for per-SD decrease in TBS) when combined in the same model. Although the model FI + TBS was a better fit to the data than FI-alone and TBS-alone, only minimal and nonsignificant enhancement of discrimination and NRI were observed in FI + TBS. To conclude, frailty and TBS are significantly and independently related to MOF risk. Larger studies are warranted to determine whether combining frailty and TBS can yield improved predictive accuracy for MOF risk. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.


Assuntos
Fragilidade , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Absorciometria de Fóton , Idoso , Densidade Óssea , Canadá , Osso Esponjoso/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Fragilidade/complicações , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Fraturas por Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco
14.
Arch Osteoporos ; 14(1): 49, 2019 04 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31037359

RESUMO

Parity and lactation showed no associations with incident clinical fragility fractures or radiographic vertebral compression fractures in the 16-year CaMos prospective study. Parity was associated with slightly greater decline in femoral neck but not hip or spine areal bone mineral density (aBMD), while lactation showed no associations with aBMD change. PURPOSE: Pregnancy and especially lactation cause loss of bone mass and microarchitectural changes, which temporarily increase fracture risk. After weaning, aBMD increases but skeletal microarchitecture may be incompletely restored. Most retrospective clinical studies found neutral or even protective associations of parity and lactation with fragility fractures, but prospective data are sparse. CaMos is a randomly selected observational cohort that includes ~ 6500 women followed prospectively for over 16 years. METHODS: We determined whether parity or lactation were related to incident clinical fragility fractures over 16 years, radiographic (morphometric and morphologic) vertebral fractures over 10 years, and aBMD change (spine, total hip, and femoral neck) over 10 years. Parity and lactation duration were analyzed as continuous variables in predicting these outcomes using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Three thousand four hundred thirty-seven women completed 16 years of follow-up for incident clinical fractures, 3839 completed 10 years of morphometric vertebral fracture assessment, 3788 completed 10 years of morphologic vertebral fracture assessment, and 4464 completed 10 years of follow-up for change in aBMD. In the multivariate analyses, parity and lactation duration showed no associations with clinical fragility fractures, radiographic vertebral fractures, or change in aBMD, except that parity associated with a probable chance finding of a slightly greater decline in femoral neck aBMD. CONCLUSIONS: Parity and lactation have no adverse associations with clinical fragility or radiographic vertebral fractures, or the rate of BMD decline over 10 years, in this prospective, multicenter study of a randomly selected, population-based cohort of women.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Lactação/fisiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Paridade/fisiologia , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Colo do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia
15.
Am J Med ; 132(11): e771-e777, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31152714

RESUMO

Patients often start treatment to reduce fracture risk because of a bone mineral density T-score consistent with osteoporosis (≤ -2.5). Others with a T-score above -2.5 may be treated when there is a history of fragility fracture or when a fracture risk algorithm categorizes them as having a high risk for fracture. It is common to initiate therapy with a generic oral bisphosphonate, unless contraindicated, and continue therapy if the patient is responding as assessed by stability or an increase in bone mineral density. However, some patients may respond well to an oral bisphosphonate, yet remain with an unacceptably high risk for fracture. Recognition of this occurrence has led to the development of an alternative strategy: treat-to-target. This involves identifying a biological marker (treatment target) that represents an acceptable fracture risk and then initiating treatment with an agent likely to reach this target. If the patient is on a path to reaching the target with initial therapy, treatment is continued. If it appears the target will not be reached with initial therapy, treatment is changed to an agent more likely to achieve the goal.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores/análise , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Algoritmos , Densidade Óssea , Humanos , Seleção de Pacientes
16.
Diabetes Care ; 42(4): 507-513, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30692240

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore whether frailty was associated with fracture risk and whether frailty could modify the propensity of type 2 diabetes toward increased risk of fractures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were from a prospective cohort study. Our primary outcome was time to the first incident clinical fragility fracture; secondary outcomes included time to hip fracture and to clinical spine fracture. Frailty status was measured by a Frailty Index (FI) of deficit accumulation. The Cox model incorporating an interaction term (frailty × diabetes) was used for analyses. RESULTS: The analysis included 3,149 (70% women) participants; 138 (60% women) had diabetes. Higher bone mineral density and FI were observed in participants with diabetes compared with control subjects. A significant relationship between the FI and the risk of incident fragility fractures was found, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.02 (95% CI 1.01-1.03) and 1.19 (95% CI 1.10-1.33) for per-0.01 and per-0.10 FI increase, respectively. The interaction was also statistically significant (P = 0.018). The HR for per-0.1 increase in the FI was 1.33 for participants with diabetes and 1.19 for those without diabetes if combining the estimate for the FI itself with the estimate from the interaction term. No evidence of interaction between frailty and diabetes was found for risk of hip and clinical spine fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with type 2 diabetes were significantly frailer than individuals without diabetes. Frailty increases the risk of fragility fracture and enhances the effect of diabetes on fragility fractures. Particular attention should be paid to diabetes as a risk factor for fragility fractures in those who are frail.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Complicações do Diabetes/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Fragilidade/complicações , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
17.
Arch Osteoporos ; 14(1): 53, 2019 05 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31098708

RESUMO

Using data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, several risk factors predictive of imminent (2-year) risk of low-trauma non-vertebral fracture among high-risk women were identified, including history of falls, history of low-trauma fracture, poorer physical function, and lower T score. Careful consideration should be given to targeting this population for therapy. PURPOSE: Fracture risk assessment has focused on a long-term horizon and populations with a broad risk range. For elderly women with osteoporosis or low bone mass, or a history of fragility fractures ("high-risk women"), risk prediction over a shorter horizon may have greater clinical relevance. METHODS: A repeated-observations design and data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study were employed. Study population comprised women aged ≥ 65 years with T score (total hip, femoral neck, spine) ≤ - 1.0 or prior fracture. Hazard ratios (HR) for predictors of low-trauma non-vertebral fracture during 2-year follow-up were estimated using multivariable shared frailty model. RESULTS: The study population included 3228 women who contributed 5004 observations; 4.8% experienced low-trauma non-vertebral fracture during the 2-year follow-up. In bivariate analyses, important risk factors included age, back pain, history of falls, history of low-trauma fracture, physical function, health status, and total hip T score. In multivariable analyses, only four independent predictors were identified: falls in past 12 months (≥ 2 falls: HR = 1.9; 1 fall: HR = 1.5), low-trauma fracture in past 12 months (≥ 1 fracture: HR = 1.7), SF-36 physical component summary score (≤ 42.0: HR = 1.6), and total hip T score (≤ - 3.5: HR = 3.7; > - 3.5 to ≤ - 2.5: HR = 2.5; > - 2.5 to ≤ - 1: HR = 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Imminent risk of low-trauma non-vertebral fracture is elevated among high-risk women with a history of falls or low-trauma fracture, poorer physical function, and lower T score. Careful consideration should be given to identifying and targeting this population for therapy.


Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose/complicações , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá/epidemiologia , Regras de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Colo do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco
18.
Bone ; 43(4): 672-8, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18640295

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Striking geographic variation in the incidence of osteoporotic fracture has been shown in national and international studies. The contributing risk factors for this variation are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: To determine the geographic variation of bone mineral density (BMD) values, prevalent low-trauma fracture, prior falls, and vertebral deformity and to determine how this variation is related to the geographic variation of incident low-trauma fracture. METHODS: We studied incident fracture among 2484 men and 6093 women ages 50 and older from CaMos, a randomly-selected population-based longitudinal cohort recruited from within 50 kilometers of nine cities across Canada. Analyses included up to an eight-year follow-up. RESULTS: Estimates of fracture incidence are all age-standardized and given per 1000 person-years and CI denotes confidence interval. Among men, the lowest incidence of low-trauma fracture was 3.2 (95% CI: 1.1-7.5) in Quebec and the highest was 11.9 (95% CI: 7.1-18.6) in Calgary, compared with an overall incidence of 7.2 (95% CI: 5.8-8.7). Among women, the lowest incidence of low-trauma fracture was 11.5 (95% CI: 8.5-15.1) in Halifax and the highest was 18.5 (95% CI: 14.6-23.3) in Calgary, compared with an overall incidence of 15.3 (95% CI: 14.1-16.7). The regional variation in low-trauma fractures was similar to variation in hip fracture incidence among women (Pearson correlation, r=0.46 to 0.76) but not men (r=-0.06 to 0.05). We noted significant geographic variation in the prevalence of low BMD, as defined by BMD T-score< or =-2.5, however this variation was not directly related to low-trauma fractures or other risk factors. Furthermore, a model including age, BMD, falls, vertebral deformity, and prior clinical fracture was a good predictor of geographic variation of low-trauma fracture incidence in both men (r=0.66) and women (r=0.84). CONCLUSIONS: For both men and women, the burden of low-trauma fracture is not related to the prevalence of osteoporosis as defined by BMD, but is related to a more comprehensive assessment of fracture risk including the following: age, BMD, falls, prior fracture, and vertebral deformity.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais
19.
CMAJ ; 178(13): 1660-8, 2008 Jun 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18559803

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Measurement of bone mineral density is the most common method of diagnosing and assessing osteoporosis. We sought to estimate the average rate of change in bone mineral density as a function of age among Canadians aged 25-85, stratified by sex and use of antiresorptive agents. METHODS: We examined a longitudinal cohort of 9423 participants. We measured the bone mineral density in the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck at baseline in 1995-1997, and at 3-year (participants aged 40-60 years only) and 5-year follow-up visits. We used the measurements to compute individual rates of change. RESULTS: Bone loss in all 3 skeletal sites began among women at age 40-44. Bone loss was particularly rapid in the total hip and was greatest among women aged 50-54 who were transitioning from premenopause to postmenopause, with a change from baseline of -6.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] -7.5% to -4.9%) over 5 years. The rate of decline, particularly in the total hip, increased again among women older than 70 years. Bone loss in all 3 skeletal sites began at an earlier age (25-39) among men than among women. The rate of decline of bone density in the total hip was nearly constant among men 35 and older and then increased among men older than 65. Use of antiresorptive agents was associated with attenuated bone loss in both sexes among participants aged 50-79. INTERPRETATION: The period of accelerated loss of bone mineral density in the hip bones occurring among women and men older than 65 may be an important contributor to the increased incidence of hip fracture among patients in that age group. The extent of bone loss that we observed in both sexes indicates that, in the absence of additional risk factors or therapy, repeat testing of bone mineral density to diagnose osteoporosis could be delayed to every 5 years.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Osteoporose/metabolismo , Absorciometria de Fóton , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , População Rural , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
20.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 29(2): 194-210, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17766187

RESUMO

Recognizing Osteoporosis and its Consequences in Quebec (ROCQ) is an ongoing patient health-management programme aimed at evaluating the diagnostic and treatment care gaps for osteoporosis following a fragility fracture, and subsequently initiating and measuring interventions to decrease these gaps in women 50 years of age and over. Hospitals servicing approximately half of the population of the Province of Quebec (Canada) are participating in the ROCQ programme. Women with fragility and traumatic fractures are approached during their visit to a cast or outpatient clinic and are subsequently contacted by telephone 0 to 16 weeks after their fracture (phase 1). During the first phone contact, they are invited to answer a questionnaire aimed at identifying the specific circumstances of their fracture and asked to participate in an observational study that could last up to 18 months. Based on this initial questionnaire, patients are classified as having either experienced a fragility or traumatic fracture. During the first phone contact, there is no reference about the possible association between the fracture and osteoporosis and no investigation or intervention is proposed. Six to eight months after the fracture event (phase 2), women are again contacted by phone to complete a questionnaire that evaluates the diagnostic and treatment rates for osteoporosis. At this phase of the programme, women with fragility fractures are randomized to one of the three following intervention groups: 1) Educational Video Group, 2) Documentation Group and 3) Control Group. Participants are contacted 12 to 14 months after the intervention (phase 3) to evaluate the efficacy of the interventions on the diagnosis and treatment rates of osteoporosis. All participants with fragility or traumatic fractures who consent will be followed for 20 years using data from the Québec Ministry of Health database to measure the association between the index fracture and future fracture risk.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Osteoporose/terapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Quebeque , Inquéritos e Questionários , Telefone
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA