Evaluating α-galactosylceramide as an adjuvant for live attenuated influenza vaccines in pigs.

Natural killer T (NKT) cells activated with the glycolipid ligand α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) stimulate a wide variety of immune cells that enhance vaccine-mediated immune responses. Several studies have used this approach to adjuvant inactivated and subunit influenza A virus (IAV) vaccines, including to enhance cross-protective influenza immunity. However, less is known about whether α-GalCer can enhance live attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) vaccines, which usually induce superior heterologous and heterosubtypic immunity compared to non-replicating influenza vaccines. The current study used the swine influenza challenge model to assess whether α-GalCer can enhance cross-protective immune responses elicited by a recombinant H3N2 LAIV vaccine (TX98ΔNS1) encoding a truncated NS1 protein. In one study, weaning pigs were administered the H3N2 TX98ΔNS1 LAIV vaccine with 0, 10, 50, and 100 µg/kg doses of α-GalCer, and subsequently challenged with a heterologous H3N2 virus. All treatment groups were protected from infection. However, the addition of α-GalCer appeared to suppress nasal shedding of the LAIV vaccine. In another experiment, pigs vaccinated with the H3N2 LAIV, with or without 50 µg/kg of α-GalCer, were challenged with the heterosubtypic pandemic H1N1 virus. Pigs vaccinated with the LAIV alone generated cross-reactive humoral and cellular responses which blocked virus replication in the airways, and significantly decreased virus shedding. On the other hand, combining the vaccine with α-GalCer reduced cross-protective cellular and antibody responses, and resulted in higher virus titers in respiratory tissues. These findings suggest that: (i) high doses of α-GalCer impair the replication and nasal shedding of the LAIV vaccine; and (ii) α-GalCer might interfere with heterosubtypic cross-protective immune responses. This research raise concerns that should be considered before trying to use NKT cell agonists as a possible adjuvant approach for LAIV vaccines. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44149-022-00051-x.

Modulation of Immune Responses to Influenza A Virus Vaccines by Natural Killer T Cells.

Influenza A viruses (IAVs) circulate widely among different mammalian and avian hosts and sometimes give rise to zoonotic infections. Vaccination is a mainstay of IAV prevention and control. However, the efficacy of IAV vaccines is often suboptimal because of insufficient cross-protection among different IAV genotypes and subtypes as well as the inability to keep up with the rapid molecular evolution of IAV strains. Much attention is focused on improving IAV vaccine efficiency using adjuvants, which are substances that can modulate and enhance immune responses to co-administered antigens. The current review is focused on a non-traditional approach of adjuvanting IAV vaccines by therapeutically targeting the immunomodulatory functions of a rare population of innate-like T lymphocytes called invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells. These cells bridge the innate and adaptive immune systems and are capable of stimulating a wide array of immune cells that enhance vaccine-mediated immune responses. Here we discuss the factors that influence the adjuvant effects of iNKT cells for influenza vaccines as well as the obstacles that must be overcome before this novel adjuvant approach can be considered for human or veterinary use.

Comparison of therapeutic efficacy of different drugs against Trypanosoma vivax on experimentally infected cattle.

In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of diminazene diaceturate at a dose of 7 mg/kg (DA), imidocarb dipropionate at 4.8 mg/kg (IMD), isometamidium chloride at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg (ISM 0.5 and ISM 1.0) and combinations applied through different methods to treat Trypanosoma vivax in experimentally infected calves. Thirty male Girolando calves were kept indoors and infected intravenously with T. vivax trypomastigotes (approximately 1 × 106). On D-1, the calves were randomized based on the quantity of infecting parasites per animal, yielding six groups of five animals each: G1: positive control group without treatment; G2 animals treated with DA on Day 0 intramuscularly (IM); G3 animals treated with IMD on Day 0 and D + 14 subcutaneously; G4 animals treated with ISM 0.5 on Day 0 IM; G5 animals treated with ISM 1.0 on Day 0 IM; G6 animals received DA on Day 0 and ISM 1.0 on D + 14, both IM. Throughout 180 days, blood samples were collected for the evaluation of T. vivax using the Woo, Brener and PCR methods. The results indicated that the treatment protocols with DA and/or ISM 0.5 and ISM 1.0 had high efficacy (100 %) against T. vivax. Interestingly, cattle that received ISM remained free of parasites until D + 180. In contrast, animals treated with IMD had relapsed T. vivax detected on the 10th and 14th days post-treatment (DPT). Cattle that received ISM 1.0 did not exhibit relapsed T. vivax in the blood, even after reinfection performed on the 50th DPT. However, treatment with DA on Day 0 failed to prevent a new infection of T. vivax on the 50th DPT. The animals that received ISM 1.0 had a transient decrease in packed cell volume similar to that found in the control group. The reappearance of T. vivax in herds in Brazil treated with DA likely occurred due to the short half-life of the drug and not necessarily due to T. vivax resistance to DA.