RESUMO
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is associated with a severe respiratory disease in China, that rapidly spread across continents. Since the beginning of the pandemic, available data suggested the asymptomatic transmission and patients were treated with specific drugs with efficacy and safety data not always satisfactory. The aim of this review is to describe the vaccines developed by three companies, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and University of Oxford/AstraZeneca, in terms of both technological and pharmaceutical formulation, safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity. A critical analysis of Phases 1, 2, and 3 clinical trial results available was conducted, comparing the three vaccine candidates, underlining their similarities and differences. All candidates showed consistent efficacy and tolerability; although some differences can be noted, such as their technological formulation, temperature storage, which will be related to logistics and costs. Further studies will be necessary to evaluate long-term effects and to assess the vaccine safety and efficacy in the general population.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Tecnologia , Desenvolvimento de VacinasRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Breast surgery is considered a clean surgical procedure; nevertheless, infection rates are often higher than those reported after other similarly considered clean surgeries (e.g., thyroid, hernia). Acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections, mostly surgical site infections and implant-associated infections are commonest events that could complicate postoperative care. RECENT FINDINGS: Risk of infection is closely related to surgery procedure itself and patients host factors. Gram-positive bacteria with pattern of antimicrobial resistance are increasingly isolated and before today less frequent causes such as gram negative and mycobacteria infections. Impact of postoperative complications is underestimated and lacking an appropriate care and education for local and systemic management. SUMMARY: We report the current evidence on the management of infections after breast surgery. New drugs options for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other gram positive should have a place in this setting. Stewardship activities aiming at reducing infections risks with the correct considerations of host, microbiological and surgical risk factors.
Assuntos
Mama/cirurgia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/classificação , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/classificação , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Mycobacterium/classificação , Mycobacterium/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: describing the current role of carbapenems and carbapenem-sparing strategies in the setting of antimicrobial stewardship programs. RECENT FINDINGS: sparing carbapenems with other drugs appears to be an interesting perspective for a variety of reasons in the current context of the multidrug-resistant (MDR) pandemic. Specific algorithms should also be precisely investigated to define better how to spare carbapenems within empiric and targeted regimens, with combination treatment or monotherapies, aiming at the best use of the new drugs and improving de-escalation as soon as possible for most of the patients. SUMMARY: stewardship programs may be useful in reducing probable misuse and overuse of antibiotics, which has probably contributed to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant bacteria worldwide. The proposal of carbapenem-sparing strategies has then generated substantial scientific debate and, overall, the concept of sparing these drugs is well advocated together with judicious use of novel drugs, appropriate measures of infection control and prevention as well as in stewardship programs to curb the spread of MDR and XDR-strains in healthcare facilities.
Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Resistência beta-Lactâmica , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bactérias/enzimologia , Bactérias/genética , Proteínas de Bactérias/biossíntese , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , beta-Lactamases/biossíntese , beta-Lactamases/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The reliability of diagnostic criteria for invasive fungal diseases (IFD) developed for severely immunocompromised patients is questionable in critically ill adult patients in intensive care units (ICU). OBJECTIVES: To develop a standard set of definitions for IFD in critically ill adult patients in ICU. METHODS: Based on a systematic literature review, a list of potential definitions to be applied to ICU patients will be developed by the ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Critically Ill Patients (ESGCIP) and the ESCMID Fungal Infection Study Group (EFISG) chairpersons. The proposed definitions will be evaluated by a panel of 30 experts using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness methods. The panel will rank each of the proposed definitions on a 1-9 scale trough a dedicated questionnaire, in two rounds: one remote and one face-to-face. Based on their median rank and the level of agreement across panel members, selected definitions will be organised in a main consensus document and in an executive summary. The executive summary will be made available online for public comments. CONCLUSIONS: The present consensus project will seek to provide standard definitions for IFD in critically ill adult patients in ICU, with the ultimate aims of improving their clinical outcome and facilitating the comparison and generalizability of research findings.
Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/diagnóstico , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/patologia , Terminologia como Assunto , Consenso , HumanosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Elizabethkingia meningoseptica can frequently colonizes the respiratory tract, but its pathogenetic role and its clinical significance are frequently questioned. However, recent data reported E. meningoseptica outbreaks in particular settings, as hospitalized patients. CASE REPORT: We report here the first case of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica infection in Italy in a patient with necrotic-hemorrhagic pancreatitis. E. meningoseptica was isolated from respiratory tract and treated with combination antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: We discuss here the role of isolation of E. meningoseptica in hospitalized patients as a sign of patient's frailty.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Chryseobacterium/isolamento & purificação , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecções por Flavobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/complicações , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Idoso , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecções por Flavobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Flavobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Hemorragia/complicações , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Necrose/complicações , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical pattern of viral central nervous system (CNS) infections and compare meningitis and encephalitis. METHODS: This is a retrospective study reporting the clinical characteristics and outcome of 138 cases of viral meningitis and meningoencephalitis in a real life experience at a referral centre in Turin, Northern Italy. RESULTS: Enteroviruses were predominant in younger patients who were mainly presenting with signs of meningitis, had shorter hospital admission and absence of complications, whereas herpesviruses had more often signs of encephalitis, were more frequent in elderly patients, had longer hospital admission and frequent complications and sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Two main clinical entities with different epidemiology, clinical aspects and prognosis may be identified within the group of viral CNS inefctions.
Assuntos
Encefalite Viral/patologia , Encefalite Viral/virologia , Enterovirus/isolamento & purificação , Herpesviridae/isolamento & purificação , Meningite Viral/patologia , Meningite Viral/virologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
COVID-19/patologia , Linfócitos/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Autopsia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Clostridium difficile is responsible for more than 90 % of cases of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis. The most important virulence factors are two toxins called enterotoxin A and cytotoxin B; some C. difficile strains contain the C. difficile binary toxin (CDT). The aim of our study was to prospectively analyze C. difficile clinical isolates in a single center to determine the molecular features of collected strains. Among the 252 isolates, 217 were A + B + (86.1 %), 33 were A + B + cdt + (13.1 %) and 2 were A - B + (0.8 %). There were 15 different ribotypes with a predominance of 018.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile/genética , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Enterotoxinas/genética , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Clostridioides difficile/classificação , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos , Itália , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , RibotipagemRESUMO
Tigecycline, the first member of the glycylcyclines, has been approved for complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). It has a wide range of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including anaerobes. Since its approval, the worldwide clinical use of tigecycline has been heterogeneous, either as a monotherapy or as a part of combination therapy, almost exclusively at the standard dosage, in patients with community-acquired (CA) infections as well as health-care associated (HCA) or nosocomial infections (HA), including infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. In recent years, issues and warnings of an increased mortality in these heterogeneous patients treated with tigecycline have been raised by meta-analyses and by regulatory agencies. Re-defining tigecycline therapy is a proposal, based on epidemiological, clinical, microbiological and pharmacological considerations, to distinguish patients who may be treated with monotherapy, according to the official indications and dosages, from those treated with combination treatment, mostly with high dosages in the setting of nosocomial IAIs, possibly caused by MDR bacteria or as a carbapenem-sparing strategy. Whilst available clinical data and guidelines suggest caution with monotherapy in severe infections, experience worldwide indicates that combination treatment with high-dosage tigecycline is increasingly used.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Minociclina/análogos & derivados , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Humanos , Minociclina/efeitos adversos , Minociclina/farmacocinética , Minociclina/uso terapêutico , TigeciclinaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this document was to develop standardized research definitions of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) in non-neutropenic, adult patients without classical host factors for IFD, admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: After a systematic assessment of the diagnostic performance for IFD in the target population of already existing definitions and laboratory tests, consensus definitions were developed by a panel of experts using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. RESULTS: Standardized research definitions were developed for proven invasive candidiasis, probable deep-seated candidiasis, proven invasive aspergillosis, probable invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and probable tracheobronchial aspergillosis. The limited evidence on the performance of existing definitions and laboratory tests for the diagnosis of IFD other than candidiasis and aspergillosis precluded the development of dedicated definitions, at least pending further data. The standardized definitions provided in the present document are aimed to speed-up the design, and increase the feasibility, of future comparative research studies.
Assuntos
Aspergilose , Candidíase Invasiva , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas , Adulto , Humanos , Consenso , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/diagnóstico , Aspergilose/diagnóstico , Candidíase Invasiva/diagnóstico , Unidades de Terapia IntensivaRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients affected by chronic hepatitis because of HBV infection, long-term suppressive therapy with nucleos(t)ides analogues in the HBeAg- patients has shown low effects on HBsAg titre (qHBsAg) decrease, and HBsAg loss is difficult to achieve. Thus, in this type of patients the main goals of antiviral therapy is the suppression of HBV-DNA and ALT normalization. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated different qHBsAg kinetics in 134 treatment-naïve patients having the same characteristics: HBeAg-, infection sustained by HBV genotype D and persistently undetectable HBV-DNA. Patients were treated with NAs therapy (lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, entecavir and tenofovir) for at least 2 years. qHBsAg was performed every 6 months. RESULTS: Our results showed a significantly greater qHBsAg decline after 2 years in patients treated with tenofovir (0.45 logIU/ml) than in patients treated with telbivudine (0.12 logIU/ml; P < 0.001). The calculated expected time to HBsAg loss was shorter in the tenofovir group than in the telbivudine group (nearly 17 vs 63 years, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HBeAg negative patients infected by HBV genotype D should be treated with more potent NAs such as entecavir or tenofovir to obtain a significant qHBsAg decrease, but the achievement of HBsAg loss seems to require almost two decades of therapy.
Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B/sangue , Antígenos E da Hepatite B/sangue , Vírus da Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , DNA Viral/sangue , Feminino , Genótipo , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Guanina/uso terapêutico , Vírus da Hepatite B/genética , Hepatite B Crônica/sangue , Hepatite B Crônica/diagnóstico , Humanos , Cinética , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Organofosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telbivudina , Tenofovir , Timidina/análogos & derivados , Timidina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: An uncommon manifestation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is systemic vasculitis associated with type II cryoglobulinemia (cryoglobulinemic vasculitis), a proliferative B cell disorder that transforms into B cell malignancy in 5-10% of patients. The monoclonal rheumatoid factors (mRF) that bear the WA cross-idiotype (Xid) are responsible for most cases of cryoglobulinemic vasculitis in patients with HCV infection. The purpose of this study was to determine whether WA B cells can be detected in asymptomatic patients with HCV infection, using sequence analysis of B cell clonal expansions (BCEs) to identify the WA Xid. METHODS: Asymptomatic patients with HCV infection and those without HCV infection as well as respective control patients with cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, whose serum was either negative or positive for WA mRF, were studied. BCEs were isolated in the patients' blood, and WA BCEs were identified by sequencing analysis. RESULTS: BCEs were detected in all control patients with cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, but only control patients with HCV infection had WA BCEs. None of the 33 asymptomatic patients without HCV infection had a BCE. WA BCEs were detected in 4 (7.4%) of 55 asymptomatic patients with HCV infection, in none of 14 patients with HCV infection and type III cryoglobulinemia, and in 5 (13.5%) of 37 patients with HCV infection and serum RF positivity. One patient with a WA BCE had splenic lymphoma markers and villous lymphocytes, and the villous lymphocytes were found to be WA B cells. CONCLUSION: By identification of the WA Xid, WA B cells can be detected in asymptomatic HCV-infected patients. WA B cells in asymptomatic patients with HCV infection may be a marker for the development of cryoglobulinemic vasculitis and associated B cell malignancies. The results of this study provide a basis for the development of the first practical clinical application of cross-idiotype analysis.
Assuntos
Linfócitos B/imunologia , Crioglobulinemia/imunologia , Hepatite C Crônica/imunologia , Idiótipos de Imunoglobulinas/imunologia , Vasculite/imunologia , Adulto , Linfócitos B/patologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/imunologia , Crioglobulinemia/complicações , Crioglobulinemia/patologia , Feminino , Genes de Imunoglobulinas , Hepatite C Crônica/complicações , Hepatite C Crônica/patologia , Humanos , Leucemia de Células B , Linfoma de Células B , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Vasculite/complicações , Vasculite/patologiaRESUMO
A 50-year old female was treated with anidulafungin after fluconazole treatment, for a complex clinical picture and immunosuppression. Anidulafungin was chosen when liver function test was abnormal in a setting of multiple causes of liver toxicity.
Assuntos
Antifúngicos/administração & dosagem , Antifúngicos/efeitos adversos , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas , Equinocandinas/administração & dosagem , Fluconazol/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Anidulafungina , Feminino , Fluconazol/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , TransplanteRESUMO
COVID-19 quickly became a pandemic causing millions of infections and mortalities. It required real-time adjustments to healthcare systems and infection prevention and control (IPC) measures to limit the spread and protect healthcare providers and hospitalized patients. IPC guidelines were adopted and developed based on experience gained during the MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV outbreaks. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize current evidence on IPC in healthcare settings and patients with COVID-19 to prevent nosocomial infections during the actual pandemic. A search was run on PubMed using the terms ('COVID-19' [Mesh]) AND ('Infection Control' [Mesh]) between 2019 and 2021. We identified 86 studies that were in accordance with our aim and summarized them under certain themes as they related to COVID-19 infection control measures. All the guidelines recommend early diagnosis and rapid isolation of COVID-19 patients. The necessary precautions should be taken comprising the whole process, starting with an infectious disease plan, administrative and engineering controls, triage, and PPE training. Guidelines should target modes of transmission, droplet, aerosol, and oral-fecal, while recommending control precautions. Healthcare facilities must promptly implement a multidisciplinary defense system to combat the outbreak.
RESUMO
The host inflammatory response is critical in the progression of lung injuries in patients with SARS-CoV-2. Corticosteroids (CS) have been widely used as immunomodulating agents, but the right timing, dosage and type of molecule are unknown. In fact, the early use of CS could facilitate the viral replication but late administration may not prevent the alveolar damage. Nevertheless, a short administration of high doses of CS in the early stage of the inflammatory phase resulted in favorable outcomes. Noteworthy, some inhaled CS inhibited in vitro the viral replication of SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to define the place in therapy for CS in COVID-19 infection describing the features of patients who may benefit from their administration.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Inflamação/virologia , Metanálise como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has been shown to shorten time to recovery and improve clinical outcomes in randomized trials. METHODS: This was the final day 28 comparative analysis of data from a phase 3, randomized, open-label study comparing 2 remdesivir regimens (5 vs 10 days, combined for this analysis [remdesivir cohort]) and a real-world retrospective longitudinal cohort study of patients receiving standard-of-care treatment (nonremdesivir cohort). Eligible patients, aged ≥18 years, had confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), oxygen saturation ≤94% on room air or required supplemental oxygen, with pulmonary infiltrates. Propensity score matching (up to 1:10 ratio) was used to ensure comparable populations. We assessed day 14 clinical recovery (determined using a 7-point ordinal scale) and day 28 all-cause mortality (coprimary endpoints). RESULTS: A total of 368 (remdesivir) and 1399 (nonremdesivir) patients were included in the matched analysis. The day 14 clinical recovery rate was significantly higher among the remdesivir versus the nonremdesivir cohort (65.2% vs 57.1%; odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.90; Pâ =â 0.002). The day 28 mortality rate was significantly lower in the remdesivir cohort versus the nonremdesivir cohort (12.0% vs 16.2%; OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-.95; Pâ =â .03). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir was associated with significantly higher rates of day 14 clinical recovery, and lower day 28 mortality, compared with standard-of-care treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. These data, taken together, support the use of remdesivir to improve clinical recovery and decrease mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection.