Value of a planned compression ultrasonography after an isolated superficial vein thrombosis: results from a prospective multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficiency of a systematically planned compression ultrasonography (SP-CUS) to detect venous thrombotic complications (VTCs) in patients with symptomatic isolated superficial vein thrombosis (SVT). DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicentre, cohort study (POST). PATIENTS: As many as 537 patients with CUS-confirmed isolated SVT undergoing an SP-CUS 8-15 days after the initial CUS. OUTCOMES: Asymptomatic VTC (extension or recurrence of SVT, deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs) diagnosed by the SP-CUS and symptomatic thromboembolic complications (VTC and pulmonary embolism (PE)) up to 3 months. RESULTS: VTC was suspected before or on the day of the SP-CUS in 18 patients (3.0%). Among the 519 asymptomatic patients (97%) undergoing SP-CUS, this revealed asymptomatic VTC in 12 patients (2.3%; 4 DVT, 4 SVT recurrences, 4 SVT extensions), none of whom subsequently experienced symptomatic thromboembolic events up to 3 months. Among the 507 patients with a normal SP-CUS, 29 (5.7%) presented symptomatic thromboembolic events during follow-up: 2 PE, 7 DVT, 9 SVT recurrences and 11 SVT extensions. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the SP-CUS detected a few asymptomatic VTC, but failed to identify patients at risk of thromboembolic events during follow-up. Use of an SP-CUS was therefore neither efficient nor cost effective.

Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: The standard initial treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism is intravenous unfractionated heparin, requiring laboratory monitoring and hospitalization. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, open-label trial involving 2213 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism to compare the efficacy and safety of the synthetic antithrombotic agent fondaparinux with those of unfractionated heparin and to document noninferiority in terms of efficacy. Patients received either fondaparinux (5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 mg in patients weighing less than 50, 50 to 100, or more than 100 kg, respectively) subcutaneously once daily or a continuous intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin (ratio of the activated partial-thromboplastin time to a control value, 1.5 to 2.5), both given for at least five days and until the use of vitamin K antagonists resulted in an international normalized ratio above 2.0. The primary efficacy outcome was the three-month incidence of the composite end point of symptomatic, recurrent pulmonary embolism (nonfatal or fatal) and new or recurrent deep-vein thrombosis. RESULTS: Forty-two of the 1103 patients randomly assigned to receive fondaparinux (3.8 percent) had recurrent thromboembolic events, as compared with 56 of the 1110 patients randomly assigned to receive unfractionated heparin (5.0 percent), for an absolute difference of -1.2 percent in favor of fondaparinux (95 percent confidence interval, -3.0 to 0.5). Major bleeding occurred in 1.3 percent of the patients treated with fondaparinux and 1.1 percent of those treated with unfractionated heparin. Mortality rates at three months were similar in the two groups. Of the patients in the fondaparinux group, 14.5 percent received the drug in part on an outpatient basis. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily, subcutaneous administration of fondaparinux without monitoring is at least as effective and is as safe as adjusted-dose, intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism.

Effect of obesity on outcomes after fondaparinux, enoxaparin, or heparin treatment for acute venous thromboembolism in the Matisse trials.

BACKGROUND: Selecting initial anticoagulant dose by patient weight for acute pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis has clinical credibility; however, uncertainty remains regarding how to dose obese patients with newer anticoagulants because outcome data are sparse. OBJECTIVES: To use the Matisse trials' comparison of sc fondaparinux once daily with control heparin therapies (intravenous unfractionated heparin for pulmonary embolism, sc enoxaparin 1 mg/kg b.i.d. for deep vein thrombosis) for initial treatment in order to compare primary outcomes (venous thromboembolism recurrence and major bleeding) in obese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary outcomes were compared in subsets composed of patients weighing < or = and > 100 kg and with body mass index (BMI) < 30 and > or = 30 kg/m(2). Medians and ranges for weight and BMI were compared for patients suffering either recurrence or major bleeding. RESULTS: Twenty-two thousand and one patients received fondaparinux and 2217 received enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. Four hundred and ninety-six patients (11%) weighed > 100 kg and 1216 (28%) had a BMI > or = 30. Treatment groups had similar characteristics. The upper limit in subject weight for recurrence was 166 kg (BMI 58), and for major bleeding 120 kg (BMI 39). The incidences of recurrence and major bleeding were similar for each patient subset of weight and BMI for both fondaparinux and heparin treatment groups. Among patients with a primary outcome, median weights and BMIs were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: The current recommended doses of fondaparinux and heparins for the treatment of venous thromboembolism appear to provide similar protection against recurrence and major bleeding to one another and to obese and non-obese patients.

Assessment of clinically relevant bleeding as a surrogate outcome for major bleeding: validation by meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Essentials Surrogacy of clinically relevant bleeding (CRB) for major bleeding has never been validated. Our meta-analysis evaluated CRB surrogacy in trials of new versus traditional anticoagulants. Surrogacy was not validated in orthopedic surgery, venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation The difficulty in demonstrating the surrogacy may reflect a lack of homogeneity in its definition SUMMARY: Background Clinically relevant bleeding (CRB), comprising major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding, has been used as a surrogate for major bleeding in most anticoagulant trials. The validity of this surrogate to estimate trade-off between thrombotic and bleeding events in clinical trials was never assessed. Methods We systematically reviewed randomized phase III trials comparing new anticoagulants with the standard of care for venous thromboembolism prevention following major orthopedic surgery, venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment, or stroke and systemic embolism prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), and reporting both major bleeding and CRB rates. The validity of CRB as a surrogate for major bleeding was assessed according to the strength of the association between the relative risks of major bleeding and CRB, measured by the use of R2trial and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Results In the postoperative prophylactic setting (13 studies), major bleeding and CRB rates were 1.12% and 3.56%, respectively, and R2trial was 0.69 (95% CI 0.34-0.93). For acute VTE studies (n = 12), major bleeding and CRB rates were 1.87% and 9.07%; the corresponding R2trial values were 0.28 (95% CI 0.01-0.80) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.09-1.00) when only double-blind studies were considered (n = 7). For AF studies (n = 7; 22 strata), major bleeding and CRB rates were 4.82% and 15.3%, and R2trial was 0.59 (95% CI 0.15-0.82). Conclusion Despite an apparent correlation between CRB and major bleeding in major orthopedic surgery, AF, and double-blind acute VTE studies, the wide CIs suggest that CRB might not be an acceptable surrogate outcome in any of these settings.

[General medicine management of superficial venous thrombosis of the lower limbs: A survey in Saône-et-Loire]. / Prise en charge en médecine générale des thromboses veineuses superficielles des membres inférieurs. Enquête en Saône-et-Loire.

CONTEXT: For a long time, superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) of the lower limbs was considered as benign. Due to lack of clear scientific evidence, its treatment was heterogeneous and even potentially deleterious. Since 2010, several major studies have highlighted the seriousness of SVT, and prophylactic doses of fondaparinux have proven their efficacy for this indication. While the French recommendations have not yet taken on board all this data, has practice already changed? AIM: To describe in general practice the usual management of suspected SVT. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study of general practitioners in Saône-et-Loire. Each doctor taking part was asked to note on a paper questionnaire the details of the last patient in whom they suspected SVT. Data collected included: clinical presentation, diagnostic and therapeutic management and follow-up of the patients. RESULTS: Between 01/01/2014 and 31/03/2014, 88 doctors out of 443 contacted (20%) completed the questionnaire. According to the information they provided, 36 physicians (40.9% [95% CI: 30.6-50.2]) searched for an associated pulmonary embolism. Eighty-two physicians (93.2% [95% CI: 87.9-98.4]) prescribed a venous compression ultrasound (CUS) exploration. Twelve etiological assessments were carried out (13.6% [95% CI: 6.5-20.8]) of which 6 (6.8%) appeared to be justified. 64 (72.7%) of the patients were given an anticoagulant therapy (heparin or fondaparinux), including 15 (17%) at a prophylactic dose and 49 (55.7%) at a curative dose. Forty-nine doctors (55.7% [95% CI: 45.3-66.1]) prescribed a CUS follow-up. CONCLUSION: General practitioners seem to have adapted their diagnostic practices to the data highlighting the potential seriousness of SVT. The treatment they give, however, remains very variable and potentially deleterious, in particular due to a high rate of treatments given at curative doses.

Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin compared with continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: A low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin sodium, has been shown to be effective and safe in preventing deep vein thrombosis both in general surgery and in high-risk orthopedic surgery. We conducted a controlled, randomized trial with enoxaparin in the treatment of established deep vein thrombosis. METHODS: In a multicenter trial, we compared fixed-dose subcutaneous enoxaparin, given twice daily, with adjusted-dose intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) given by continuous intravenous infusion for the initial 10 days of treatment of patients with proximal vein thrombosis. The primary efficacy outcome was the change of the size of the thrombus assessed by repeated venograms between day 0 and day 10. The primary analysis of safety was based on the incidence of major bleeding during 10 days of treatment. RESULTS: There were 67 patients in each group. Venographic assessment of clot size evolution between day 0 and day 10 showed a statistically significant superiority (P < .002) of enoxaparin over the reference treatment with UFH. Moreover, the incidence of overall recurrent thromboembolic events during 10 days of treatment was significantly higher (P < .002) in the UFH group (seven of 67) than in the enoxaparin group (one of 67). There were no serious bleeding complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin is at least as effective and safe as UFH under the conditions of this study. Moreover, it is more comfortable for patients and less time-consuming for nurses and laboratories. Thus, our study confirmed, with the use of enoxaparin, other observations that low-molecular-weight heparin provides a real therapeutic advance in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Spontaneous acute superficial vein thrombosis of the legs: do we really need to treat?

Spontaneous acute superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) of the leg is now generally recognized as an integral component of venous thromboembolic disease with potentially severe consequences. However, the relatively low grades of some current international recommendations and uncertainty regarding the cost-effectiveness of available therapies may prompt questioning of the real need to treat patients with SVT and explain the persisting heterogeneity of their management in practise. Yet several studies have consistently shown high rates of thromboembolic complications associated with SVT, whether at first presentation or during follow-up. The CALISTO trial established for the first time the clinical benefit of a well-defined anticoagulant regimen for the prevention of serious thromboembolic complications in SVT patients, and we believe that patients such as those included in this trial should receive this regimen as tested. However, several areas of uncertainty remain for categories of SVT patients not evaluated in CALISTO.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopedic surgery with vitamin K antagonists: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The benefit-to-risk ratio of vitamin K antagonists (VKA), relative to active comparators, especially low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), for preventing venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery is debated. OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized trials in orthopedic surgery comparing adjusted doses of VKA to control treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An exhaustive literature search, both manual and computer-assisted, was performed. Studies were selected on the basis of randomization procedure (VKA vs. a control group). At least one of the following outcome measures was to be evaluated: deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), death, major hemorrhage or wound hematoma. Four reviewers assessed each article to determine eligibility for inclusion and outcome measures. RESULTS: VKAs were more effective than placebo or no treatment in reducing DVT [567 patients, relative risk (RR) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37, 0.84, P < 0.01] and clinical PE (651 patients, RR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.09, 0.59, P < 0.01). These results were obtained at the cost of a higher rate of wound hematoma (162 patients, RR = 2.91, 95% CI 1.09, 7.75, P = 0.03). VKAs were also more effective than intermittent pneumatic compression (534 patients, RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.25, 0.82, P = 0.009) in preventing proximal DVT. In contrast, VKAs were less effective than LMWH in preventing total DVT and proximal DVT (9822 patients, RR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.27, 1.79, P < 0.001; and 6131 patients, RR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.04, 2.17, P = 0.028, respectively). The differences between VKA and LMWH in major hemorrhage and wound hematoma were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, VKAs are less effective than LMWH, without any significant difference in the bleeding risk.

Poor anticoagulant response to tissue factor pathway inhibitor in patients with venous thrombosis.

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is of major importance in regulating the coagulation triggering effects of tissue factor. An association between TFPI deficiency and thrombosis has still not been clearly demonstrated. We evaluated the anticoagulant activity of exogenous TFPI added either to the plasma of patients with venous thrombosis (n = 118) or to the plasma of healthy controls similar in terms of mean age and sex ratio (n = 107). A poor anticoagulant response to TFPI, defined as TFPI resistance, was observed in 4.7% of controls and in 11.0% of patients. TFPI resistance was associated with an almost threefold increase in the risk of thrombosis and could therefore represent a novel hemostatic risk factor for venous thrombosis.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in internal medicine with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparins: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The prevention of venous thromboembolic disease is less studied in medical patients than in surgery. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomised trials studying prophylactic unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in internal medicine, excluding acute myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke. Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) systematically detected at the end of the treatment period, clinical pulmonary embolism (PE), death and major bleeding were recorded. RESULTS: Seven trials comparing a prophylactic heparin treatment to a control (15,095 patients) were selected. A significant decrease in DVT and in clinical PE were observed with heparins as compared to control (risk reductions = 56% and 58% respectively, p <0.001 in both cases), without significant difference in the incidence of major bleedings or deaths. Nine trials comparing LMWH to UFH (4,669 patients) were also included. No significant effect was observed on either DVT, clinical PE or mortality. However LMWH reduced by 52% the risk of major haemorrhage (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis, based on the pooling of data available for several heparins, shows that heparins are beneficial in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in internal medicine.

Aging and venous thromboembolism influence the pharmacodynamics of the anti-factor Xa and anti-thrombin activities of a low molecular weight heparin (nadroparin).

Venous thromboembolism may be efficiently treated by one single daily administration of a high dose of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The present study investigates if the physiological deterioration of renal function associated with normal aging or the presence of an acute venous thromboembolism influences the pharmacodynamic pattern of the anti-factor Xa and anti-thrombin activities. Three groups of 12 subjects were investigated. The first 2 groups were composed of healthy volunteers differing by age (25 +/- 4 and 65 +/- 3 yrs) and creatinine clearance (114 +/- 15 and 62 +/- 6 ml x min(-1)). The third group was composed of patients hospitalized for deep vein thrombosis, having a mean age of 65 +/- 11 yrs and creatinine clearance of 76 +/- 8 ml x min(-1). Nadroparin was administered subcutaneously once daily at the dose of 180 anti-factor Xa IU.kg(-1) for 6 to 10 days. Serial sampling on day 1 and on the last day of administration (day n) allowed the pharmacodynamic parameters of the anti-factor Xa and anti-thrombin activities to be compared at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. The main findings were the following: (1) After repeated administration, a significant accumulation of the anti-factor Xa activity was observed in the healthy elderly and in the patients but not in the healthy young subjects (accumulation factor: 1.3). There was no evidence of accumulation of anti-thrombin activity; (2) There were significant correlations between the clearance of creatinine and the clearance of the anti-factor Xa activity but not with that of the anti-thrombin activity; (3) In the patients, the clearance of the anti-factor Xa and of the anti-thrombin activities were 1.4 and 2 times higher respectively than those calculated in the healthy elderly; (4) The mean ratio of the of anti-factor Xa and anti-thrombin clearances was close to 2 in the healthy subjects but equal to 5.4 in the patients. These results suggest that the mechanisms involved in the clearance of polysaccharide chains which support the anti-thrombin activity are different from those of the anti-factor Xa activity and that the enhanced binding properties of plasma proteins to unfractionated heparin reported in patients presenting an acute venous thromboembolism also exists for LMWH, predominantly for the anti-thrombin activity.

Chrono-pharmacological study of once daily curative dose of a low molecular weight heparin (200 IU antiXa/kg of Dalteparin) in ten healthy volunteers.

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is currently prescribed for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis at the dose of 100 IU antiXa/kg twice daily or at a dose of 175 IU antiXa/kg once daily with a similar efficacy. We decided to study the chrono-pharmacology of curative dose of LMWH once daily administrated according to the one previously described with unfractionated heparin (UFH). Ten healthy volunteers participated in an open three-period crossover study according to three 24 h cycles, separated by a wash-out interval lasting 7 days: one control cycle without injection, two cycles with subcutaneous injection of 200 IU antiXa/kg of Dalteparin (Fragmin) at 8 a.m. or at 8 p.m. Parameters of heparin activity were analysed as maximal values and area under the curve. Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), prothrombin time (PT) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) were higher after 8 p.m. injection than after 8 a.m. injection (p < 0.05) while no chrono-pharmacological variation of anti factor Xa (AXa) activity was observed. Thus the biological anticoagulant effect of 200 IU antiXa/kg of Dalteparin seems to be higher after an evening injection than after a morning injection. A chrono-therapeutic approach with LMWH, as prescribed once daily, deserves further investigation since our results suggest that a preferential injection time may optimise the clinical efficacy of these LMWH.

Circadian changes in the pharmacokinetics of oral ketoprofen.

Several investigations which have taken treatment time into account have shown that the pharmacokinetic parameters, the therapeutic efficacy and even the toxicity of a large number of products may vary according to the administration schedule. The present study was carried out in order to evaluate any circadian changes in pharmacokinetic parameters of ketoprofen, a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). This randomised crossover study consisted of a single oral dose of ketoprofen 100mg administered to 8 healthy male volunteers, mean age 27.2 years, at 07.00 hours, 13.00 hours, 19.00 hours or 01.00 hours in 4 study periods during the first 3 months of the year. The order of administration was randomised, with each subject acting as his own control. A total of 14 blood and 4 urine samples were taken over a 12-hour period. The peak plasma concentration was twice as high after drug administration at 07.00 hours (13.4 +/- 1 mg/L) than after other administration times (13.00 hours: 6.9 +/- 1; 19.00 hours: 7.2 +/- 0.7; 01.00 hours: 6.3 +/- 0.5 mg/L) [p less than 0.001]. The time to reach peak concentration was much longer after drug administration at 01.00 hours (135 +/- 16.7 min) than at 07.00 (73.1 +/- 14.1 min), 13.00 (75 +/- 16.5 min) or 19.00 hours (82.5 +/- 12.7 min) [p less than 0.05]. The lag time was significantly longer at 01.00 hours than at 13.00 hours (p less than 0.01). The absorption rate constant after treatment at 01.00 hours was less than at the other times of administration (p less than 0.05). The bodyweight-corrected area under the curve (AUC0-12) was greater after 07.00 hours than after 13.00 (p less than 0.01) or 19.00 hours (p less than 0.05) and greater after 01.00 hours than after 13.00 hours (p less than 0.05). The elimination half-life was significantly longer after administration at 01.00 hours than after 19.00 hours (p less than 0.05), while the total clearance was lowest at 07.00 hours. Cosinor analysis demonstrated statistically significant circadian rhythms for all pharmacokinetic parameters described above. The amount of ketoprofen eliminated in the urine was delayed, and was significantly greater after the administration at 01.00 hours than 07.00 hours or 19.00 hours (p less than 0.01). The relationship between absorption, diffusion and/or elimination mechanisms of the drug are discussed.

Acute thrombosis of a vena cava filter with a clot above the filter. Successful treatment with low-dose urokinase.

Inferior vena cava thrombosis is a major complication after filter placement. The thrombus can propagate through the filter leading to a high risk of pulmonary embolism. We report such a case in a patient with a Günther filter, successfully treated with urokinase, and we discuss the efficacy and the safety of thrombolytic therapy in such situations.

Circadian dynamics of coagulation and chronopathology of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Future therapeutic implications for the treatment of these disorders?

Arterial thromboembolic disorders are the leading cause of death in most of the advanced nations. The study of epidemiologic relationship of these disorders to biological rhythms may lead to a better understanding and perhaps a better treatment. Chronoepidemiologic studies demonstrated a morning peak for arterial thromboembolic disorders (cerebral and myocardial infarctions) and sudden cardiac deaths. These variations might be explained partially by circadian variations in hemostasis. Indeed chronophysiologic studies have shown that hemostatic variables follow circadian rhythms. The level of platelet aggregation and that of blood coagulation have been found to be increased in the morning whereas fibrinolytic activity is lower at this time of the day. The facts suggest a chronotherapeutic approach in thromboembolic disorders.

Acceptability and efficacy of two associations of paracetamol with a central analgesic (dextropropoxyphene or codeine): comparison in osteoarthritis.

A double-blind randomized parallel group trial was undertaken to compare the acceptability and efficacy of 2 forms of analgesic treatment, DI-Antalvic (Houde Laboratories, Puteaux, France) (30 mg dextropropoxyphene and 400 mg paracetamol per capsule) and Efferalgan-Codeine (UPSA Laboratories, Rueil Malmaison, France) (30 mg codeine and 500 mg paracetamol per tablet) prescribed for 1 week at doses of 6 capsules/day and 6 tablets/day, respectively, in 141 outpatients with active osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. The principal aim of the trial was concerned with acceptability, with efficacy as its secondary aim. The principal trial criterion was defined as overall assessment of acceptability by the patient at the end of the trial (success or failure) or by treatment dropouts because of an adverse effect (failure). Comparability of the groups was confirmed before any treatment regarding the physical characteristics of the patients, characteristics of osteoarthritis, and the initial level of pain and functional consequences of pain. Results show that the analgesic efficacy of the treatment was similar, but that the acceptability of Efferalgan-Codeine was significantly worse than that of DI-Antalvic: 53% failure with Efferalgan-Codeine versus 29% failure with DI-Antalvic (P = .005). Other trials of the same type would seem necessary (comparison of lower doses, other types of pain) before being able to generally extrapolate such findings.

Prevalence of factor V Leiden (APCR) and other inherited thrombophilias in young patients with myocardial infarction and normal coronary arteries.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of activated protein C resistance (APCR, factor V Leiden) in coronary artery thrombosis. METHODS: The prevalence of APCR and of congenital deficiencies of antithrombin III, protein C, protein S, plasminogen, and factor XII was investigated in adult patients under 45 years of age with acute myocardial infarction. The results were compared with those of a group of 53 age and sex matched control subjects. RESULTS: Among 75 patients under the age of 45 years who were admitted from November 1994 to April 1996 for acute myocardial infarction, 22 (29.3%) had normal coronary arteriography (group I) and 53 (70.7%) had significant coronary artery disease (group II). Inherited thrombophilia was more often found in group I (4/22, 18.2%) than in group II (4/53, 7.5%) but the difference was not significant (F test: p = 0.22). The prevalence of APCR was 9.1% (2/22) in group I, 3.8% (2/53) in group 2 (p = 0.57), and 3.8% (2/53) in the normal control group (p = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of congenital thrombophilias, including APCR, does not seem to be increased in young patients with myocardial infarction and normal coronary angiograms, compared with young patients with coronary atherosclerosis and with normal control subjects. However, the statistical power of the study is too low to detect a significant difference and these results are published to allow a meta-analysis of this problem in the future.

Measurement of heparin in plasma: influence of inter-subject and circadian variability in heparin sensitivity according to method.

Heparin was measured, with respect to standard curves prepared with normal pooled plasma, by five methods (APTT, thrombin time, one and two stage coagulation, anti-factor Xa and chromogenic anti-factor Xa) after addition at three concentrations to plasmaprepared from normal young volunteers, hospitalized patients with malignancy and geriatric patients. By the APTT and TT, differences in sensitivity were observed at 0.4iu heparin/ml corresponding to an apparent difference in heparin level of 10 and 14 fold between high and low responding individuals. Such large differences were not apparent by anti-factor Xa assay. A circadian difference in sensitivity was also observed in the patient group such that in samples taken at night, heparin levels were 30-50% higher on average when measured in the APTT and TT. Again, such large differences were not apparent by anti-factor Xa methods. In light of recent findings about the usefulness of anti-factor Xa methods for efficient monitoring of heparin, it is suggested that this conclusion may arise from the tendency for anti-factor Xa methods to determine actual concentrations of heparin.

Good clinical practices in phase I studies.

In France, official guidelines for good clinical practices in clinical trials were issued in 1987. In December 1988, a law was passed that fixed the requirements for carrying out experiments in healthy subjects. It will be completed by official guidelines for the structures in which experiments on healthy subjects (and patients as well, when the investigation would not benefit the health of the patients) may be conducted. Hence a battery of recent legal instructions precisely state what good clinical practices are in the setting of phase I studies. Of particular importance are: subject recruitment and selection methods and procedures; specific competence of the investigator, in particular to interpret the pre-trial data; necessary and sufficient facilities to guarantee the subjects' safety; careful quality control to check all laboratory procedures; necessity of written standard operating procedures.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations of acenocoumarol orally administrated either once or twice daily in patients with deep venous thrombosis.

The literature suggests that variations in anticoagulant effect occur when acenocoumarol is administrated in a daily dose. We assessed the anticoagulant effects of acenocoumarol with INR, factors VII and X and protein C in 12 randomly selected hospitalised patients with deep-vein thrombosis, six of them receiving a daily dose of acenocoumarol, the other six receiving twice daily doses. When the drug effect had been at a steady-state for at least 72 h, five blood samples were drawn per patient over a period of 24 h. No nycthemeral significant variations were noted for INR, factor X and protein C in the two groups (P > 0.10). Nycthemeral significant variation in factor VII when acenocoumarol was administered once daily was noted (P = 0.02), but the clinical relevance of factor VII variation at steady-state is uncertain. In spite of the short pharmacokinetic half-life of acenocoumarol, a stable nycthemeral pharmacodynamic activity was observed after once daily administration; twice-daily administration of acenocoumarol does not appear to be justified.