Real-world comparative effectiveness of shockwave lithotripsy versus ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of urinary stones.

PURPOSE: To identify clinical and non-clinical predictors of treatment failure and perioperative complications following ureterorenoscopy versus shockwave lithotripsy. METHODS: The New York State Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database was used to identify 226,331 patients who underwent index ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones from 2000 to 2016. Propensity-matched generalized linear-mixed modeling was utilized to compare failure and complication rates between the two procedure groups. RESULTS: 219,383 individuals meeting inclusion criteria who underwent either ureterorenoscopy (n = 124,342) or shockwave lithotripsy (n = 95,041) in New York State between 2000 and 2016 were included in our analysis. After propensity score matching, patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy were found to have decreased odds of experiencing any type of 30-day complication (P < 0.001 for all) but increased odds of treatment failure at both 90 (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.64-1.77) and 180 (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.76-1.89) days (P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy experienced significantly higher odds of treatment failure, although this undesirable outcome appears to be partially offset by lower 30-day complication rates.

Minimally invasive vs open nephrectomy in the modern era: does approach matter?

PURPOSE: To evaluate if the widespread adoption of a minimally invasive approach to radical nephrectomy has affected short- and long-term patient outcomes in the modern era. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent radical nephrectomy from 2001 to 2012 was conducted using the US National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program and Medicare insurance program database. Patients who underwent open surgery were compared to those who underwent minimally invasive surgery using propensity score matching. RESULTS: 10,739 (85.9%) underwent open surgery and 1776 (14.1%) underwent minimally invasive surgery. Minimally invasive surgery increased from 18.4% from 2001-2004 to 43.5% from 2009 to 2012. After median follow-up of 57.1 months, minimally invasive radical nephrectomy conferred long-term oncologic efficacy in terms of overall (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.75-0.95) survival and cancer-specific (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.54-0.86) survival compared to open radical nephrectomy. Minimally invasive surgery was associated with lower risk of inpatient death [risk ratio (RR) 0.45 with 95% CI: (0.20-0.99), p = 0.04], deep vein thrombosis [RR: 0.35 (0.18-0.69), p = 0.002], respiratory complications [RR: 0.73 (0.60-0.89), p = 0.001], infectious complications [RR: 0.35 (0.14-0.90), p = 0.02], acute kidney injury [RR: 0.66 (0.52-0.84), p < 0.001], sepsis [RR: 0.55 (0.31-0.98), p = 0.04], prolonged length of stay (18.6 vs 30.0%, p < 0.001), and ICU admission (19.7 vs 26.3%, p < 0.001). Costs were similar between the two approaches (30-day costs $15,882 vs $15,564; p = 0.70). CONCLUSION: After widespread adoption of minimally invasive approaches to radical nephrectomy across the United States, oncologic standards remain preserved with improved perioperative outcomes at no additional cost burden.

Renal calculi: trends in the utilization of shockwave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy.

INTRODUCTION: To assess trends in the usage of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) in the treatment of renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analysis of the 5% Medicare Public Use Files (years 2001, 2004, 2007 and 2010) was performed to evaluate changes in the use of SWL and URS to treat renal calculi. Patients were identified using ICD-9 (cm) and CPT codes. Statistical analyses, including the Fisher, 2 tests, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and SPSS v20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS: The absolute number of patients diagnosed with (+85.1%) and treated for (+31.5%) kidney calculi increased from 2001 to 2010. The ratio of diagnosed/treated patients declined from 15.2% in 2001 to 10.8% in 2010. Whites (OR = 1.27, p < 0.0001), patients in the South (OR = 1.16, p < 0.0001) and those ≤ 84 years of age were more likely to be treated. The utilization of SWL (84.7%) was greater than URS (15.3%), but the utilization of URS increased over time from 8.4% in 2001 to 20.6% of cases by 2010 (p < 0.0001). Treatment via URS was more likely in women (OR = 1.28, p < 0.0001), in patients living outside the South (OR = 1.29-1.45, p ≤ 0.006) and in later years of the study (OR = 2.87, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns for renal calculi changed from 2001 to 2010. The usage of URS increased at the cost of SWL. Multiple sociodemographic factors correlated with the likelihood of being treated surgically as well as the choice of the surgical approach.

Trends and inequalities in the surgical management of ureteric calculi in the USA.

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in the surgical management of ureteric calculi over a 10-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analysis of the 5% Medicare Public Use Files, from 2001, 2004, 2007 and 2010, was performed to assess the use of ureteroscopy (URS), extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureterolithotomy (UL) in treating ureteric calculi. Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9th edition (Clinical Modification) and Current Procedure Terminology codes. Statistical analyses using the Fisher and chi-squared tests, and multivariate logistic regression analysis (dependent variables: URS, ESWL, UL, treatment, no treatment; independent variables: age, gender, ethnicity, geography and year of treatment) were performed. RESULTS: A total of 299 920 patients with ureteric calculi were identified. Of these, 115 200 underwent surgery. Men (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15, P < 0.001) were more likely, while patients from ethnic minorities (OR = 0.84, P = 0.004) were less likely to be treated. Patients in the West of the USA were also less likely to be treated (OR = 0.76, P < 0.001) as were patients aged <65 or >84 years old (P = 0.29). The predominant surgical approach was URS (65.2%), followed by ESWL (33.6%) and UL (1.2%). The use of URS increased over time, while the use of ESWL and UL declined. Women (OR = 1.25, P < 0.001) were more likely to undergo URS. Patients in the South of the USA (OR = 1.51, P < 0.001) and patients from ethnic minorities were more likely to undergo ESWL (OR = 1.23, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical treatment of ureteric calculi changed significantly between 2001 and 2010. The use of URS expanded at the expense of ESWL and UL. Multiple inequalities existed in overall surgical treatment rates and in the choice of treatment; age, gender, ethnicity and geography influenced both whether patients underwent surgical intervention and the type of surgical approach used.

Preoperative radiographic parameters predict long-term renal impairment following partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: We analyzed radiographic parameters describing anatomic features of renal tumors to identify preoperative characteristics that could help predict long-term decline in renal function following partial nephrectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 194 consecutive patients who underwent partial nephrectomy from January 2006 to March 2009 and analyzed a cohort of 53 patients for whom complete clinical, radiographic, and operative information was available. Computed tomography images were reviewed by a single radiologist. Radiographic criteria for describing renal tumor size and location included diameter, volume, endophytic properties, proximity to collecting system, anterior/posterior location, location relative to polar lines, and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the MDRD study group equation with serum creatinine at last follow-up. RESULTS: The median preoperative and postoperative GFR values were 75 (IQR 65-97) and 66 (IQR 55-84) mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. At a median follow-up of 38 months, the median percentage decrease in GFR was 12%. On univariate analyses, tumor diameter (P = 0.002), tumor volume (P < 0.0001), nearness of tumor to collecting system (P = 0.017), and location relative to polar lines (P = 0.017) were associated with percentage decrease in GFR. Furthermore, higher R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was also associated with poorer renal functional outcomes following partial nephrectomy (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic features of renal tumors defined by preoperative radiographic characteristics correlate with the degree of renal functional decline after partial nephrectomy. Identification of these parameters may assist in patient counseling and clinical decision making following partial nephrectomy. Validation in larger prospective studies is necessary.

Acute testicular infarction in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection and diabetic vasculopathy.

Acute testicular pain with no arterial flow on Doppler ultrasonography is highly consistent with testicular torsion. In adults, there are rare etiologies of testicular infarction other than torsion, including infection, vasculitis, and trauma. We describe a 41-year-old man with type 2 diabetes complicated by severe vasculopathy and positive SARS-CoV-2 status presenting with acute right testicular pain. Surgical exploration and pathology were concerning for arteriosclerosis and vasculitis. These observations suggest that medically complex patients presenting with acute testicular pain in the setting of COVID-19 infection could be at risk for ischemia; causes of testicular pain beyond torsion should be considered.

Living donor kidney paired donation transplantation: experience as a founding member center of the National Kidney Registry.

Kidney paired donation (KPD) is a safe and effective means of transplantation for transplant candidates with willing but incompatible donors. We report our single-center experience with KPD through participation in the National Kidney Registry. Patient demographics, transplant rates, and clinical outcomes including delayed graft function (DGF), rejection, and survival were analyzed. We also review strategies employed by our center to maximize living donor transplantation through KPD. We entered 44 incompatible donor/recipient pairs into KPD from 9/2007 to 1/2011, enabling 50 transplants. Incompatibility was attributable to blood type (54.4%) and donor-specific sensitization (43.2%). Thirty-six candidates (81.8%) were transplanted after 157 d (median), enabling pre-emptive transplantation in eight patients. Fourteen candidates on the deceased donor waiting list also received transplants. More than 50% of kidneys were received from other transplant centers. DGF occurred in 6%; one-yr rejection rate was 9.1%. One-yr patient and graft survival was 98.0% and 94.8%. KPD involving participation of multiple transplant centers can provide opportunities for transplantation, with potential to expand the donor pool, minimize waiting times, and enable pre-emptive transplantation. Our experience demonstrates promising short-term outcomes; however, longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact of KPD on the shortage of organs available for transplantation.

Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: complication comparison using the Clavien system.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy using a standardized complication-reporting system and a standardized tumor-scoring system. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 189 consecutive patients with nephrometry scores available who underwent elective partial nephrectomy for renal masses. Demographic, perioperative, and complication data were recorded. By using the modified Clavien scale, we graded 30- and 90-day complication rates. RESULTS: 107 patients underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and 82 underwent open partial nephrectomy (N=189). Open partial nephrectomy patients had higher nephrometry scores than laparoscopic patients had (7.1±2.4 vs. 5.6±1.8, P<.001). Surgical and hospitalization times were shorter, and estimated blood loss was lower in the laparoscopic group (P<.001). At 30 days, there were more overall complications in the open group, but more major complications in the laparoscopic group (P>.05). After multivariable logistic regression analysis, only higher body mass index and higher estimated blood loss were predictors of more overall complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has the advantages of decreased operative time, lower blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. The complication rate in the laparoscopic group is similar to that in the open group, despite favorable tumor characteristics in the laparoscopic group.

Comparison of complications of laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy using the modified Clavien grading system.

PURPOSE: We compared postoperative complications of laparoendoscopic single site and standard laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy using a standardized complication reporting system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of consecutive patients who underwent a total of 663 laparoscopic living donor nephrectomies and 101 laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomies. All data were recorded retrospectively. The 30-day complication rate was compiled and graded using the modified Clavien complication scale. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of complications. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were comparable between the groups. Compared to those with laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy patients who underwent laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy had a shorter hospital stay and less estimated blood loss but longer operative time (p <0.05) as well as higher oral but lower intravenous in hospital analgesic requirements (p <0.05). Mean warm ischemia time was marginally lower in the laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy group (3.9 vs 4 minutes, p = 0.03). At 30 days there was no difference in the overall complication rate between the laparoscopic living and laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy groups (7.1% vs 7.9%, p >0.05). There were 8 major complications (grade 3 to 5) in the laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy group but only 1 in the laparoendoscopic single site group. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis revealed that estimated blood loss was a predictor of fewer complications at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate patient selection and operative experience laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy may be a safe procedure associated with postoperative outcomes similar to those of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy as well as low morbidity. Using a standardized complication system can aid in counseling potential donors in the future.

Laparoendoscopic single site live donor nephrectomy: single institution report of initial 100 cases.

PURPOSE: Laparoendoscopic single site surgery is a recent advance in minimally invasive urology. We report outcomes from our initial 100 consecutive laparoendoscopic single site live donor nephrectomies done by a single surgeon and provide a matched comparison of conventional laparoscopic live donor nephrectomies done by the same surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2009 to 2010 at a tertiary referral center 100 consecutive laparoendoscopic single site live donor nephrectomies were performed by a single surgeon through a periumbilical incision using the GelPoint® system. No extraumbilical incisions or punctures were made. A retrospective review was performed using a prospectively managed database of standard perioperative and convalescent parameters. Comparison was made using a matched cohort of conventional live donor nephrectomies done by the same surgeon. RESULTS: Mean operative time was longer in the laparoendoscopic single site group (156 vs 130 minutes) but there was no difference in estimated blood loss or warm ischemia time. There was no difference in the complication rate between the 2 groups. Mean hospital stay and visual analog pain scores were similar in the groups but the laparoendoscopic group showed improved convalescence with faster return to work, normal activity and 100% recovery. Recipient graft function was equivalent in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective, matched comparison laparoendoscopic single site live donor nephrectomy was associated with longer operative time but equivalent recipient graft function and improved convalescence. The benefits of laparoendoscopic single site surgery over conventional laparoscopy may be limited. However, with respect to live donor nephrectomy the benefits of laparoendoscopic single site surgery may nevertheless prove beneficial to decrease barriers to live organ donation.

Current status of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN).

OBJECTIVE: • Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a minimally invasive option for patients undergoing nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). As the technique of RPN develops and matures, intraoperative and perioperative outcomes continue to be reported. In the current review, we discuss safety, efficacy, and recent technical advances in RPN. METHODS: • A Medline search using the keywords 'partial nephrectomy', 'robotic partial nephrectomy', 'robot partial nephrectomy', 'robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy', and 'laparoscopic partial nephrectomy' was conducted to identify original articles, review articles, and editorials on RPN. RESULTS: • There have been multiple recent retrospective studies comparing RPN with laparoscopic PN (LPN). These comparisons suggest a shorter learning curve for RPN and confirm the safety and feasibility of RPN, even for select complex renal masses. • Novel techniques have been developed in efforts to decrease warm ischaemia time. These include use of sliding-clip renorrhaphy, selective renal parenchymal clamping, and 'early unclamping' or 'no-clamp' techniques. CONCLUSIONS: • RPN appears to be a viable minimally invasive option for NSS. RPN may reduce some of the technical challenges associated with LPN, and thus, extend the potential benefits of minimally invasive NSS to a larger population. • Further studies of the long-term renal functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of RPN are needed before fully advocating this technique.

Simultaneous bilateral single-port radical nephrectomies.

The management of bilateral enhancing renal masses can be technically challenging. Simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomies in postrenal transplant patients have been previously described, but these typically require multiple port placements in addition to a hand port. Herein, we describe simultaneous bilateral single-port laparoscopic radical nephrectomies in a postrenal transplant patient.

Microwave ablation of cT1a renal cell carcinoma: oncologic and functional outcomes at a single center.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous ablation is an established alternative to surgical intervention for small renal masses. Radiofrequency and cryoablation have been studied extensively in the literature. To date, series assessing the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) are limited. We present a cohort of 110 renal tumors treated with MWA. METHODS: A review of the medical record between January 2015 and July 2019 was performed, retrospectively identifying 101 patients (110 tumors). All ablations were performed by a single board-certified urologist/interventional radiologist. Demographic information, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up surveillance data were recorded. RESULTS: Median (IQR) age was 69.7 years (60.8-77.0); 27 (24%) were female. Median (IQR) BMI was 27.0 (25.1-30.2) and Charleston Comorbidity Index was 5.0 (4.0-6.0). 82 tumors were biopsy-confirmed renal cell carcinoma/oncocytic neoplasms. Median (IQR) tumor size was 2.0 cm (1.5-2.6). Median (IQR) RENAL nephrometry score was 6.0 (5.0-8.0). Technical success was achieved in all patients and all but one patient were discharged on the same day. Median (IQR) eGFR at baseline and 1 year were 71.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (56.5-82) and 63.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 (54.0-78.2); the difference was -5.3 (p = 0.12). Two Clavien-Dindo type-I complications, one type-II complication, and one type-III complication were experienced in this cohort. Median radiographic follow-up was 376.5 days with 2 tumors (2.4% of RCC/oncocytic neoplasms) having recurred to date. CONCLUSIONS: MWA is a safe and efficacious treatment option for small renal masses with minimal adverse events and low rates of recurrence in this cohort of 101 patients. Continued follow-up is needed to assess long-term outcomes.

Simultaneous Living Donor Kidney Transplant and Laparoscopic Native Nephrectomy: An Approach to Kidney Transplant Candidates with Suspected Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

Introduction: Kidney transplant candidates are occasionally found during the pre-transplant evaluation to have a suspicious mass in a native kidney. Further work-up and management of such a mass may delay transplantation for several months, which may create logistic barriers to transplant, particularly if there are timing constraints of the donor. In this study, we report our experience with simultaneous living donor kidney transplant and laparoscopic native nephrectomy, where the indication for nephrectomy was a suspicious lesion. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent simultaneous kidney transplant and native nephrectomy using prospectively collected data. We analyzed relevant patient characteristics, surgical details, pathologic results, and long-term follow-up. Results: We identified 16 patients who underwent simultaneous living donor kidney transplantation and laparoscopic native nephrectomy at our institution between 2013 and 2018. Ten (62.5%) patients were found to have renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) on the final pathology. No patients had recurrent RCC, at a median follow-up of 4 years. Conclusion: For patients who are planning to undergo a living donor kidney transplant and are found to have a small mass that is suspicious for RCC, a simultaneous living donor kidney transplant and laparoscopic native nephrectomy is a possible approach in selected patients.

Outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy without intraoperative systemic heparinization.

PURPOSE: Intravenous heparin has traditionally been given during living donor laparoscopic nephrectomy despite the paucity of evidence supporting its use. We present the results of our experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy done without intraoperative systemic heparinization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 167 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies done without intravenous heparin from July 2005 to October 2007 at our institution. We evaluated preoperative donor characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative complications, recipient renal function and graft outcomes. RESULTS: All 138 left nephrectomies were done using a conventional laparoscopic approach while 25 of 29 right nephrectomies were done using the hand assisted technique. Warm ischemia time was approximately 3.0 minutes in each group. Mean +/- SE estimated blood loss was 183 +/- 29 ml for left and 115 +/- 16 ml for right nephrectomy. Postoperatively hematocrit decreased an average of 4.5%. There were no intraoperative complications or open conversion requirements. The postoperative complication rate was 4.8%, including 2 patients (1.2%) in whom retroperitoneal hematoma developed. Only 1 of these patients (0.6%) required blood transfusion. Two grafts (1.2%) were lost due to vascular thrombosis in the immediate postoperative period and another 2 recipients experienced delayed graft function. Average 6, 12 and 24-month serum creatinine was 1.5, 1.5 and 1.6 mg/dl, respectively. Renal allograft survival was 97% 2 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that laparoscopic donor nephrectomy can be successfully done without systemic heparinization with few donor complications, and excellent recipient graft survival and renal function up to 2 years after transplantation.

Laparoendoscopic single site live donor nephrectomy: initial experience.

PURPOSE: We present our initial experience in 40 patients undergoing laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data on 40 consecutive patients. A single access GelPOINT™ device was inserted into the abdomen through a 4 to 5 cm periumbilical incision. We used a bariatric camera with a right angle attachment for the light cord to maximize triangulation. Parameters analyzed included warm ischemia time, operative time, estimated blood loss, visual analog pain score, time to recipient creatinine less than 3 mg/dl, and recipient creatinine at discharge home, and 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 38 left and 2 right donor nephrectomies were performed. Complete laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy was successful in 38 cases. One left and 1 right case were converted to a hand assisted approach. Average ± SD body mass index was 26.1 ± 5.2 kg/m(2). Mean operative time to allograft extraction was 93.5 ± 27.5 minutes and mean total operative time was 166.7 ± 33.8 minutes. Average estimated blood loss was 106.7 ± 93.5 cc. Mean warm ischemia time was 3.96 ± 0.72 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 1.77 ± 0.43 days and median time to recipient creatinine less than 3.0 mg/dl was 54.2 ± 110.3 hours. Mean recipient creatinine at discharge home, and at 3 and 6 months was 1.48 ± 0.67, 1.29 ± 0.38 and 1.19 ± 0.34 mg/dl, respectively. Complications included hyponatremia in 1 patient, wound infection in 1, and a grade III laceration in an allograft that was sustained during extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience with laparoendoscopic single site donor nephrectomy is encouraging. This approach to kidney donation without an extra-umbilical incision could become particularly relevant to minimize morbidity in young, healthy organ donors.

The emerging role of robotics in adrenal surgery.

Robotic surgery is being performed more frequently for a variety of urologic procedures. Since the first robotic adrenalectomy less than a decade ago, this modality has gained increased acceptance in the urologic community and has been employed with increased frequency in minimally invasive centers. This review evaluates the current literature on robotic adrenalectomy, its indications, as well as its advantages and limitations compared with other forms of surgical management of adrenal pathology.

Needlescopic ablation of small adrenal masses.

Needlescopic adrenal ablative therapy is an attractive therapeutic option for the management of small adrenal masses. The spectrum of neoplasms that can be ablated includes isolated solid organ metastases (lung, kidney, liver), nonisolated but symptomatic (painful) adrenal metastasis, and small, nonmetastatic, hormonally active adrenal tumors. Moreover, needlescopic ablation offers an effective minimally morbid intervention for patients who are poor surgical candidates either due to advanced age and/or significant comorbid conditions. Ablative techniques described to date include radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation, and chemical ablation. Most procedures can be performed under percutaneous radiographic guidance on an outpatient basis. By and large, the bulk of clinical experience with adrenal ablation pertains to RFA. Successful ablation is usually dependent upon lesion size, with tumors 5 cm or smaller demonstrating the highest successful ablation rates. The most frequently described adverse sequelae of adrenal ablation are local tumor recurrences. However, many of these local recurrences can be managed by repeat ablation, with patients demonstrating durable oncologic outcomes.

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal masses 7 centimeters or larger.

OBJECTIVE: To report our operative experience and oncologic outcomes for the laparoscopic management of large renal tumors. METHODS: All laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomies performed at our institution were reviewed. Thirty patients with tumors >or=7cm and a pathologic diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma were included. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 175.7+/-24.5 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 275.5+/-165.8 mL. No case required conversion to open radical nephrectomy. The mean hospital stay was 2.4+/-1.6 days. Four patients (13%) had minor complications. Of the 30 tumors, 18 were pathologic stage T2, 9 were stage T3a, 2 were stage T3b, and one was stage T4. At a mean follow-up of 30 months (range, 10 to 70), 22 patients (73%) were alive without evidence of recurrence, and 5 patients (17%) were alive with disease. One patient (3%) died of complications related to renal cell carcinoma, and 2 patients (7%) died from other causes. Overall survival was 90%, cancer-specific survival was 97%, and recurrence-free survival was 80%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large tumors is a technically challenging operation. However, in experienced hands, it is a reasonable therapeutic option for the management of larger RCC neoplasms.