Arthritis is associated with high nutritional risk among older Canadian adults from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

This study assessed the association between arthritis, functional impairment, and nutritional risk (NR). Cross-sectional data were from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a nationally representative sample of 45-85-year-old community-dwelling Canadians (n = 41,153). The abbreviated Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluating for Eating and Nutrition II (SCREEN II-AB) Questionnaire determined NR scores (continuous), and high NR (score < 38); the Older American Resources and Services scale measured functional impairment. NR scores and status (low/high) were modelled using multiple linear and logistic regressions, respectively. Analyses adjusted for demographic characteristics, functional impairment, and health (body mass index, self-rated general and mental health). Additional analyses stratified the models by functional impairment. People with arthritis had poorer NR scores (B: - 0.35, CI - 0.48, - 0.22; p < 0.05) and increased risks of high NR (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06, 1.17). Among those with functional impairment, the likelihood of high NR was 31% higher in people with arthritis compared to those without arthritis (95% CI 1.12, 1.53). Among those with no functional impairment, the likelihood of high NR was 10% higher in people with arthritis compared to those without (95% CI 1.04, 1.16). These relationships differed based on the type of arthritis. Arthritis is associated with high NR in community-dwelling older adults, both with and without functional impairment. Findings highlight the need for further research on these relationships to inform interventions and improve clinical practices.

Identifying Barriers of Arthritis-Related Disability on Food Behaviors to Guide Nutrition Interventions.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of arthritis-related disability on aspects of food insecurity and to gain insight into the incentives and barriers to participating in a nutrition intervention. DESIGN: Four focus groups were held in April to May, 2018. Participants completed questionnaires about socioeconomic status, diet, and health. SETTING: The Perform Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 27 adults diagnosed with arthritis. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: Perceived impact of arthritis-related disability on food behaviors as well as incentives and deterrents to participating in a nutrition intervention. ANALYSIS: Transcriptions of the focus group discussions were coded using the constant comparative method. Basic descriptive statistics were used to analyze the questionnaire data. RESULTS: The themes of pain, fatigue, knowledge, and social support emerged in discussions on food choices, procurement, preparation, consumption, and other lifestyle behaviors. Participants reported common barriers, although the extent to which they were affected varied. Questionnaire results revealed low disability. Timing, cost, and information quality were important incentives to participate in a nutrition intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Results highlight the need for further research among people with greater limitations related to arthritis and adapted nutrition interventions that provide both knowledge and experience to help individuals overcome the challenges of arthritis.

Validation of a screening tool to identify the nutritionally at-risk pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a screening tool to be used by nurses to determine which economically disadvantaged pregnant women are most likely to benefit from a dietitian's intensive intervention. METHODS: The 26-variable screening tool was used by 53 nurses in 17 Montreal primary care facilities at first contact with 300 subjects who were eligible for prenatal programs for low-income women. Among these, 259 subjects were subsequently interviewed by a Montreal Diet Dispensary (MDD) dietitian using the Higgins Method, established as the gold standard for the detection of a nutritionally at-risk pregnancy. Comparisons of the results obtained by dietitians using the Higgins Method with scores obtained by nurses using the screening tool to determine risk levels and individual variables were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and predictive indices such as sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. RESULTS: Because of low agreement between the findings of MDD dietitians and nurses using the screening tool, 10 variables were excluded. The resulting 16-variable tool showed a correlation coefficient of 0.70. The ROC cut-off for this simplified tool was 8, meaning that a woman would be considered at nutritional risk if her score was 8 or more. This score optimized sensitivity (85%) with rather low specificity (50%), but retained a positive predictive value of 87% and a negative predictive value of 55%. CONCLUSION: Revisions of the screening tool to identify nutritionally at-risk pregnant women led to the development of a simplified screening tool with an acceptable measure of nutritional risk in pregnancy. Hence, the use of this tool by any health professional will identify the majority of the nutritionally at-risk pregnant women most likely to benefit from a dietitian's intensive intervention.

Effects of early cholesterol intake on cholesterol biosynthesis and plasma lipids among infants until 18 months of age.

BACKGROUND: The endogenous cholesterol fractional synthesis rate (FSR) is related inversely to infant dietary cholesterol at 4 months of age; however, it remains to be established whether this effect is permanent, possibly contributing to later hypercholesterolemia. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether levels of dietary cholesterol in infancy induced changes in FSR and plasma lipid levels that persisted at 18 months. METHODS: A prospective clinical trial was conducted with 47 infants, from their first week of life until 18 months of age, who received human milk (HM) until weaned (n = 15) or were randomized to receive modified cow's milk formula (MCF) with added cholesterol (n = 15) or cow's milk formula (CF) (n = 17) for 12 months. Cholesterol contents of HM, MCF, and CF were 120, 80, and 40 mg/L, respectively. FSR and plasma lipid levels were measured at 4 and 18 months. RESULTS: At 4 months, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were higher for infants fed HM and MCF, compared with CF. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were higher in the MCF group than in the HM and CF groups. FSR in the HM group (0.034 +/- 0.005 pools per day) was lower than that in the CF group (0.052 +/- 0.005 pools per day). There was no difference between the HM and MCF (0.047 +/- 0.005 pools per day) groups or between the MCF and CF groups. At 18 months, there were no differences in FSRs or plasma lipid profiles between the groups. CONCLUSION: Although cholesterol intake before weaning affects FSRs and plasma lipid profiles at 4 months, these differences do not persist after weaning to an unrestricted diet at 18 months. This provides additional evidence that there is no imprinting of FSR in infancy with differing dietary levels of cholesterol.