Effective Interventions for Diabetes Patients by Community Pharmacists: A Meta-analysis of Pharmaceutical Care Components.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included interventions provided by community pharmacists for patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes, the analysis of each component of the intervention(s), and the description of the training that the pharmacists received. DATA SOURCES: The literature research was conducted in PubMed and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 2000 to April 2016) for RCTs with interventions provided by community pharmacists for patients with diabetes. Corresponding authors were contacted about missing data and intervention and training design. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: RCTs published in English or German were included if pharmaceutical care or medication therapy management was conducted by community pharmacists with diabetes patients. Basic information, intervention and training design data were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: The literature research resulted in 11 eligible studies for further analysis. The corresponding authors of 6 studies responded to our request and sent their raw data. The calculated meta-analytical effect of 640 analyzed patients was a hemoglobin A1C (A1C) difference of -0.66%, with a 95% CI of -0.86% to -0.45%. The analysis revealed that most intervention elements had a significant positive meta-analytical effect on the A1C values. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that community pharmacist-led interventions can improve glycemic control in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes. The most effective intervention components were patient centered and interdisciplinary. Pharmaceutical care interventions should, therefore, include the following components: sending feedback to the physician, setting individual goals, reviewing medication, and assessing patients' health beliefs and medication knowledge.

Pharmaceutical care of an adolescent with type 1 diabetes. / Wie betreuen wir als Apotheker einen Jugendlichen mit Diabetes mellitus Typ 1? Ein Beispiel aus der klinischen Praxis.

This article describes the pharmaceutical care of an adolescent with type 1 diabetes mellitus, who took part in the DIADEMA study. Diabetes was diagnosed for three years and his baseline HbA1c-value was 9.3 %. In the DIADEMA study adolescents received pharmaceutical care provided by community pharmacists in addition to usual care provided by diabetologists and diabetes educators. Patients in the intervention group received monthly scheduled visits with the community pharmacists and on-demand telephone calls. Fundamental contents of the pharmacistá¾½s interventions were in particular self-monitoring of blood glucose, prevention of acute and long-term diabetes complications and conscientious consumption of alcohol. Furthermore difficulties in individual insulin therapy and current life conditions were addressed.

Diabetes Stewardship ­ Pharmaceutical care of adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus provided by community pharmacists. / Pharmazeutische Betreuung von Jugendlichen mit Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 Zeit für "Diabetes Stewardship"?

Diabetes mellitus Type 1 is one of the most common diseases in childhood. Severe, secondary diseases like hypertension or blindness are results of micro- and macrovascular complications caused by insufficient glycaemic control. Especially adolescent patients with type 1 diabetes have a lower adherence rate. The DIADEMA trial proved that community pharmacist in collaboration with diabetologists and diabetes advisors can have a positive impact on the therapy of adolescents with type 1 diabetes. This article highlights and explains which components of the pharmacist intervention caused the preferable adjustments and improved the insulin therapy of the patients.

EMDIA Case Series-Effective Medication Therapy Management (MTM) for Diabetes Type 2 Patients-A Proof of Concept Study.

Background: A 2016 meta-analysis of pharmaceutical care for patients with diabetes mellitus showed that the following four components were most effective: (a) individual goal setting, (b) sending feedback to the physician, (c) reviewing the medication, and (d) reviewing blood glucose measurements. Methods: To formulate a hypothesis regarding the effect of these four pharmaceutical care components on glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus and the feasibility of these components in practice. Ten patients with type 2 diabetes were included in the case series and received medication therapy management over four months. Results: The four care components were feasible in everyday practice and could be implemented within one patient visit. The average visits were 49 and 28 min at the beginning and end of the study, respectively. The glycated hemoglobin values did not change over the study period, though the fasting blood glucose decreased from 142 to 120 mg/dl, and the number of unsolved drug-related problems decreased from 6.9 to 1.9 per patient by the study end. Conclusions: This case series supports the hypothesis that community pharmacists can implement structured pharmaceutical care in everyday pharmacy practice for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Training Pharmacy Students in Self-Medication Counseling Using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination-Based Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacists play an important role in ensuring the safe, effective, and rational use of drugs in self-medication. Given the potential risks of self-medication, adequate training on self-medication counseling should be provided to pharmacy students during their academic education. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) could be used to train pharmacy students in these skills. This study evaluated the efficacy of an OSCE-based approach for training pharmacy students in self-medication counseling and communication skills. METHODS: This randomized controlled study was conducted among pharmacy students using a pre-post design. The intervention group completed OSCE-based self-medication training, while the control group collected counseling-relevant information from summaries of product characteristics of over-the-counter drugs. The counseling and communication skills of both groups before and after training were assessed by completing OSCEs. The participants completed a self-assessment questionnaire on self-confidence and self-perceived proficiency before each OSCE encounter and a satisfaction survey at the end of the seminar. RESULTS: Students were generally satisfied with the seminar. While the OSCE-trained group demonstrated significantly greater increases in counseling skills and self-confidence and self-perceived proficiency than the control group, both groups had similar increases in communication skills. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that applying OSCEs as a learning tool for self-medication counseling is beneficial for improving students' counseling skills as well as self-confidence and self-perceived proficiency. These results support the inclusion of OSCEs in pharmacy education and highlight its potential to bridge gaps between knowledge and practice.

Blended Learning on Blood Pressure Measurement: Investigating Two In-Class Strategies in a Flipped Classroom-Like Setting to Teach Pharmacy Students Blood Pressure Measurement Skills.

For reliable blood pressure measurement, various potential sources of inaccuracies need to be considered to avoid incorrect decision-making. Pharmacy students should be sensitized and taught the skill accordingly. One strategy to teach students' blood pressure measurement skills might be through a blended learning approach in a flipped classroom-like setting. With a randomized two-arm study among pharmacy students in their eighth semester, the required extent of in-class session in the scope of a blended learning approach in a flipped classroom-like setting was evaluated. Participants' self-confidence and self-perceived proficiency were evaluated through a survey, and participants' blood pressure measurement performance was assessed by objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Participants' satisfaction with, and perception of, the flipped classroom were also surveyed. The extended in-class activities did not result in a significantly higher increase of participants' OSCE score and self-assessment score when compared to the brief in-class session. Both in-class sessions yielded a significant increase in the OSCE scores as well as in the self-assessment scores. Moreover, the teaching approaches were predominantly well-received by the students. The use of both flipped classroom-like approaches improved pharmacy students' blood pressure measurement performance, though the brief in-class session was sufficient. Students' self-confidence/self-perceived proficiency in blood pressure measurement skills increased similarly in both settings.

PharmAdhere: training German community pharmacists with Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.

Background Pharmacists who engage in Pharmaceutical Care need skills to optimise responsible medication use and increase medication adherence. Objectives We developed and evaluated a blended-learning programme for German community pharmacists that focused on conducting consultations in chronic diseases. Setting Community pharmacists in Germany. Method Interventional study with pre-post design. We combined e-learning with Objective Standardised Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) for emergency situations, initiation/implementation of medication therapy and detection of symptoms of four chronic diseases. Specific procedures were defined in the Pharmaceutical Action Plan. Skills were measured with a global analytical marking sheet derived from the Medication Related Consultation Framework and scored with the Canadian criticality/relevancy matrix. Time limits matched real practice scenarios. Main outcome measures Changes in knowledge (difference of test results before and after e-learning) and changes in skills (difference in scores of the OSCEs before and after training). Results 22 out of the 26 pharmacists enrolled, completed the study. The number of correctly answered questions increased significantly after the e-learning for all four indications with a mean number of additional correct answers between 3.86 and 4.9 points out of 15 (p < 0.001). The sums of the analytical checklist points in percentages increased significantly in all topics from the baseline summative OSCE to the final summative OSCE between 6.14 and 31.85% (p < 0.001). The maximum duration of consultation per patient was less than 10 min in all OSCEs. Conclusion The use of e-learning and OSCEs was well received by participants and is a successful method to deliver practical Pharmaceutical Care training.