Traumatic Parafalcine Subdural Hematoma: A Clinically Benign Finding.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for management of intracranial hemorrhage do not account for bleed location. We hypothesize that parafalcine subdural hematoma (SDH), as compared to convexity SDH, is a distinct clinical entity and these patients do not benefit from critical care monitoring or repeat imaging. METHODS: We identified patients presenting to a single level I trauma center with isolated head injuries from February 2016 to August 2017. We identified 88 patients with isolated blunt traumatic parafalcine SDH and 228 with convexity SDH. RESULTS: Demographics, comorbidities, and use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents were similar between the groups. As compared to patients with convexity SDH, patients with parafalcine SDH had a significantly lower incidence of radiographic progression, and had no cases of neurologic deterioration, neurosurgical intervention, or mortality (all P < 0.005). Compared to patients admitted to the intensive care unit, patients with parafalcine SDH admitted to the floor had a shorter length of stay (2.0 ± 1.6 versus 3.8 ± 2.9 d, P < 0.005) with no difference in outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with a parafalcine SDH are a distinct and relatively benign clinical entity as compared to convexity SDH and do not benefit from repeat imaging or intensive care unit admission.

Therapeutic Hypothermia and Targeted Temperature Management for Traumatic Arrest and Surgical Patients.

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) and targeted temperature management (TTM) have been shown to improve outcomes in survivors of cardiac arrest, but prior research has excluded trauma and postoperative patients. We sought to determine whether TH/TTM is safe in trauma and surgical patients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single level I trauma center reviewing adults presenting as a traumatic arrest or cardiac arrest in the postoperative period with a Glasgow Coma Scale <8 after return of circulation who were treated with either TH or TTM. Neurological recovery is considered favorable if a patient was discharged following commands. A total of 32 cardiac arrest patients were included in the study, 14 of whom were treated with TH and 18 with TTM protocols, with goal temperatures of 33°C and 36°C, respectively. Mean age of the cohort was 60 ± 13, with 26 (81%) men. There were 18 trauma patients and 14 postoperative patients. Complications included pneumonia (13%), sepsis (6%), bleeding requiring transfusion (22%), arrhythmias (6%), and seizures (9%), which are similar to prior published series. Overall survival to discharge was 41% (n = 13), and all survivors had favorable neurological recovery. Traumatic arrest and perioperative cardiac arrest patients previously excluded from TH/TTM studies appear to have an acceptable incidence of complications compared with standard TH/TTM patients.

Screening for thoracolumbar spinal injuries in blunt trauma: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline.

BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar spine (TLS) injuries have an incidence rate of 5% in blunt trauma patients. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma published Practice Management Guidelines for the Screening of Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture in 2007. The Practice Management Guidelines Committee was assembled to reevaluate the literature. METHODS: A search of the United States National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health database was performed using MEDLINE through PubMed (www.pubmed.gov). The search retrieved English-language articles from March 2005 to December 2011 that referenced traumatic TLS injuries and fractures. The questions posed were the following: (1) What is the appropriate imaging modality to screen patients for TLS injuries? (2) Which trauma patients require radiographic screening for TLS injuries? (3)Does a patient who is awake and alert without distracting injuries require radiologic workup to rule out TLS injuries? RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles that referenced traumatic TLS injuries in association with screening published between March 2005 and December 2011 were collected and disseminated to the committee. Twelve were found to be relevant. Nine publications from the previous 2006 guidelines were reviewed and referenced to create and validate the updated guidelines. CONCLUSION: Practice patterns have changed regarding screening blunt trauma patients for TLS injuries. Software reformatted multidetector computed tomographic scans are more sensitive and accurate than plain films. Multidetector computed tomographic scans have become the screening modality of choice and the criterion standard in screening for TLS injuries. The literature supports a Level 1 recommendation to validate this based on a preponderance of Class II data. Patients without altered mentation or significant mechanism may be excluded by clinical examination without imaging. Patients with gross neurologic deficits or concerning clinical examination findings with negative imaging should receive a magnetic resonance imaging expediently, and the spine service should be consulted.

Compared to conventional ventilation, airway pressure release ventilation may increase ventilator days in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is used both as a rescue therapy for patients with acute lung injury and as a primary mode of ventilation. Unlike assist-control volume (ACV) ventilation that uses spontaneous breathing trials, APRV weaning consists of gradual decreases in supporting pressure. We hypothesized that the APRV weaning process increases total ventilator days compared with those of spontaneous breathing trials-based weaning. METHODS: A retrospective review of a Level I trauma center's database identified trauma admissions from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2010, which required mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours and survived. Demographics, injuries, in-hospital complications, ventilation mode(s), and total ventilator days were abstracted. RESULTS: A total of 362 patients fulfilled study entry criteria; 53 patients with more than one ventilator mode change were excluded. Seventy-five patients were successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation on APRV and 234 on ACV. The APRV and ACV groups, respectively, were similar in age (46.1 vs. 44.6 years) and sex (72% vs. 73% male) but differed in Injury Severity Score (20.8 vs. 17.5; p = 0.03). Patients on APRV had higher rates of abdominal compartment syndrome (6.7% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.003) and were more likely to have a higher chest Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score ≥3 (57.3% vs. 30.8%, p < 0.001). Ventilator days were significantly greater in the APRV group (19.6 vs. 10.7 days, p < 0.001). Multiple regression was performed to adjust for the clinical differences between the two groups, identifying APRV as an independent predictor for increased number of ventilator days (B = 6.2 ± 1.5, p < 0.001) in addition to male sex, abdomen AIS score of 3 or higher, spine AIS score of 3 or higher, acute renal failure, and sepsis. CONCLUSION: APRV is frequently used for patients who are more severely injured or who develop in-hospital complications such as pneumonia. However, after controlling for potential confounding factors in a multiple regression model, the APRV mode itself seems to increase ventilator days.

Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis?

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether delayed surgical intervention in adult patients with acute appendicitis is safe by correlating the interval from onset of symptoms to operation (total interval) with the degree of pathology and incidence of postoperative complications. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Prompt appendectomy has long been the standard of care for acute appendicitis because of the risk of progression to advanced pathology. This time-honored practice has been recently challenged by studies in pediatric patients, which suggested that acute appendicitis can be managed in an elective manner once antibiotic therapy is initiated. No such data are available in adult patients with acute appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1081 patients who underwent an appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 1998 and 2004 was conducted. The following parameters were monitored and correlated: demographics, time from onset of symptoms to arrival at the emergency room (patient interval) and from arrival to the emergency room to the operating room (hospital interval), physical, computed tomography (CT scan) and pathologic findings, complications, length of stay, and length of antibiotic treatment. Pathologic state was graded 1 (G1) for acute appendicitis, 2 (G2) for gangrenous acute appendicitis, 3 (G3) for perforation or phlegmon, and 4 (G4) for a periappendicular abscess. RESULTS: The risk of advanced pathology, defined as a higher pathology grade, increased with the total interval. When this interval was <12 hours, the risk of developing G1, G2, G3, and G4, was 94%, 0%, 3%, and 3%, respectively. These values changed to 60%, 7%, 27%, and 6%, respectively, when the total interval was 48 to 71 hours and to 54%, 7%, 26%, and 13% for longer than 71 hours. The odds for progressive pathology was 13 times higher for the total interval >71 hours group compared with total interval<12 hours (95% confidence interval = 4.7-37.1). Although both prolonged patient and hospital intervals were associated with advanced pathology, prehospital delays were more profoundly related to worsening pathology compared with in-hospital delays (P < 0.001). Advanced pathology was associated with tenderness to palpation beyond the right lower quadrant (P < 0.001), guarding (P < 0.001), rebound (P < 0.001), and CT scan findings of peritoneal fluid (P = 0.01), fecalith (P = 0.01), dilation of the appendix (P < 0.001), and perforation (P < 0.001). Increased length of hospital stay (P < 0.001) and antibiotic treatment (P < 0.001) as well as postoperative complications (P < 0.001) also correlated with progressive pathology. CONCLUSION: In adult patients with acute appendicitis, the risk of developing advanced pathology and postoperative complications increases with time; therefore, delayed appendectomy is unsafe. As delays in seeking medical help are difficult to control, prompt appendectomy is mandatory. Because these conclusions are derived from retrospective data, a prospective study is required to confirm their validity.