Pathologic nonresponders after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer demonstrate no survival benefit compared with patients treated with primary esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) has become the preferred treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Survival often is correlated to degree of pathologic response; however, outcomes in patients who are found to be pathologic nonresponders (pNR) remain uninvestigated. This study was designed to evaluate survival in pNR to NCRT compared with patients treated with primary esophagectomy (PE). METHODS: Using our comprehensive esophageal cancer database, we identified patients treated with NCRT and deemed pNR along with patients who proceeded to PE. Clinical and pathologic data were compared using Fisher's exact and χ(2), whereas Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: We identified 63 patients treated with NCRT and were found to have a pNR, and 81 patients who underwent PE. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly decreased in the pNR group compared with those treated with PE (10 vs. 50 months (0-152), P < 0.001 and 13 vs. 50 months (0-152), P < 0.001, respectively). For patients with stage II disease, DFS and OS were similarly decreased in pathologic nonresponders (13 vs. 62 months (0-120), P < 0.001 and 31 vs. 62 months (0-120), P = 0.024, respectively). There were no differences in DFS or OS for patients with stage III disease (10 vs. 14 months (0-152), P = 0.29 and 10 vs. 19 months (0-152), P = 0.16, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic nonresponders to NCRT for esophageal cancer receive no benefit in DFS or OS compared with patients treated with PE. For patients with stage II disease, DFS and OS are, in fact, significantly decreased in the pNR.

Gallbladder pathology in morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: Obese patients are at increased risk for biliary disease. The prevalence and type of gallbladder pathology in morbidly obese patients was evaluated, and compared with a non-obese control group. METHODS: A consecutive series of obese patients (n=478) who had undergone bariatric surgery with concurrent routine cholecystectomy and a consecutive group of organ donors (n=481) were compared. Gallbladder pathology was defined as: cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, cholesterolosis, or normal pathology. RESULTS: Mean age of obese patients and of donors was 42 +/- 9 and 43 +/- 17 years respectively and mean BMI was 52 +/- 10 and 27 +/- 7 kg/m2 respectively, P<0.05. There were more females in the obesity group (88% vs 47%, P<0.0001). 31% of obese patients and 7% of controls had a previous cholecystectomy (P<0.0001). 21% of the obese and 72% of the controls had normal gallbladder pathology (P<0.0001). Overall, obese patients had a higher incidence of cholelithiasis (25% vs 5%, P<0.0001), cholecystitis (50% vs 17%, P<0.0001), and cholesterolosis (38% vs 6%, P<0.0001) compared with controls. Obese patients with BMI <50 were more likely than those with BMI > or =50 to have normal gallbladder pathology (27% vs 14%, P<0.001). Female patients were more likely to have undergone previous cholecystectomy than males in both the obese group (34% vs 11%, P<0.001) and the control group (12% vs 2%, P<0.0001). Normal pathology was more common in male patients (80% vs 63%, P<0.0001) and patients <50 years (76% vs 66%, P<0.05) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients have an increased incidence of benign gallbladder disease than a group of controls, and the relative risk appears to be positively correlated with the level of increase in the BMI. Obesity appears to change the effect of age and gender on gallbladder pathology.

Routine ilioinguinal nerve excision in inguinal hernia repairs.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inguinal neuralgia is one of the most significant complications following inguinal hernia repair. Routine ilioinguinal nerve excision has been proposed as a means to avoid this complication. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of neuralgia and paresthesia following routine ilioinguinal nerve excision compared to nerve preservation. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified 90 patients who underwent Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs with either routine nerve excision (n = 66) or nerve preservation (n = 24). All patients were contacted and data was collected on incidence and duration of postoperative neuralgia and paresthesia. Comparison was made by chi(2) analysis. RESULTS: The patients with routine neurectomy were similar to the group without neurectomy based on gender (male/female 51/15 vs. 19/5) and mean age (68 +/- 14 vs. 58 +/- 18 years). In the early postoperative period (6 months), the incidence of neuralgia was significantly lower in the neurectomy group versus the nerve preservation group (3% vs. 26%, P <0.001). The incidence of paresthesia in the distribution of the ilioinguinal nerve was not significantly higher in the neurectomy group (18% vs. 4%, P = 0.10). At 1 year postoperatively, the neurectomy patients continued to have a significantly lower incidence of neuralgia (3% vs. 25%, P = 0.003). The incidence of paresthesia was again not significantly higher in the neurectomy group (13% vs. 5%, P = 0.32). In patients with postoperative neuralgia, mean severity scores on a visual analog scale (0-10) were similar in neurectomy and nerve preservation patients at all end points in time (2.0 +/- 0.0 to 2.5 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.0 to 2.2 +/- 1.5). In patients with postoperative paresthesia, mean severity scores on a visual analog scale (0-10) were similar in the neurectomy and nerve preservation patients at 1 year (2.5 +/- 2.2 vs. 4.0 +/- 0.0) and 3 years (3.5 +/- 2.9 vs. 4.0 +/- 0.0). CONCLUSIONS: Routine ilioinguinal neurectomy is associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative neuralgia compared to routine nerve preservation with similar severity scores in each group. There is a trend towards increased incidence of subjective paresthesia in patients undergoing routine neurectomy at 1 month, but there is no significant increase at any other end point in time. When performing Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair, routine ilioinguinal neurectomy is a reasonable option.

Management of ampullary lesions.

Adenomatous lesions of the ampulla of Vater are relatively rare neoplasms that raise many questions regarding standard management. Adenocarcinoma often will be found in ampullary lesions and should be treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Benign-appearing adenomas may be treated by PD, transduodenal ampullectomy (AMP), or endoscopic ampullectomy (EA). AMP and EA have decreased morbidity and mortality compared with PD but are limited by concerns for appropriate resection margins, high recurrence rates, and the need for surveillance endoscopy or additional procedures. Preoperative endoscopic biopsies should be obtained to identify carcinoma, but they have high false-negative rates and cannot be relied upon to rule out malignancy. Intraoperative frozen section evaluation should be requested routinely during AMP, with conversion to PD if carcinoma is demonstrated. The gold standard management of benign adenomas has not been clarified, but the goal for all treatment modalities is complete resection. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis may be exceptions to this, and routine surveillance endoscopy and biopsy with selective resection have been advocated by some as an alternative to complete resection. Adjuvant chemoradiation has a very limited role in the treatment of ampullary carcinoma and ideally should be offered in the setting of a clinical trial. Metastatic and locally advanced, unresectable lesions may be palliated by surgical or endoscopic bypass, as well as by celiac plexus blockade.