Overall Survival with Brentuximab Vedotin in Stage III or IV Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Five-year follow-up in a trial involving patients with previously untreated stage III or IV classic Hodgkin's lymphoma showed long-term progression-free survival benefits with first-line therapy with brentuximab vedotin, a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate, plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD), as compared with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). A planned interim analysis indicated a potential benefit with regard to overall survival; data from a median of 6 years of follow-up are now available. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive up to six cycles of A+AVD or ABVD. The primary end point, modified progression-free survival, has been reported previously. The key secondary end point was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 664 patients were assigned to receive A+AVD and 670 to receive ABVD. At a median follow-up of 73.0 months, 39 patients in the A+AVD group and 64 in the ABVD group had died (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 0.88; P = 0.009). The 6-year overall survival estimates were 93.9% (95% CI, 91.6 to 95.5) in the A+AVD group and 89.4% (95% CI, 86.6 to 91.7) in the ABVD group. Progression-free survival was longer with A+AVD than with ABVD (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.86). Fewer patients in the A+AVD group than in the ABVD group received subsequent therapy, including transplantation, and fewer second cancers were reported with A+AVD (in 23 vs. 32 patients). Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was recommended after an increased incidence of febrile neutropenia was observed with A+AVD. More patients had peripheral neuropathy with A+AVD than with ABVD, but most patients in the two groups had resolution or amelioration of the event by the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received A+AVD for the treatment of stage III or IV Hodgkin's lymphoma had a survival advantage over those who received ABVD. (Funded by Takeda Development Center Americas and Seagen; ECHELON-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01712490; EudraCT number, 2011-005450-60.).

Higher Mortality in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Pre-Existing Arterial Hypertension-Real World Data of the Polish Lymphoma Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Arterial hypertension is mentioned as a risk factor in cardio-oncology. This study aimed to assess the long-term prognostic value of arterial hypertension (AH) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: We analysed data collected by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group for the evaluation of the outcomes associated with the use of first-line rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone therapy in patients with DLBCL with coexisting AH. Patients with other cardiovascular comorbidities or premature chemotherapy discontinuation due to cardiovascular toxicity were excluded. RESULTS: Pre-existing AH was diagnosed in 65 of 232 patients with DLBCL (28%) included in the study, and was associated with significantly shorter overall survival values (p<0.00001). The rates of DLBCL recurrence, administration of second-, third-, or fourth-line chemotherapy, and lymphoma-related deaths were similar in patients with and those without AH. Cardiovascular deaths were significantly more frequently observed in patients with pre-existing AH (38.5% vs 3.6%, p<0.0001). In the univariate analysis, AH (p=0.000001), older age (p<0.000001), and diabetes (p=0.0065) were identified as significant predictors of all-cause mortality; however, cardiovascular mortality was associated with AH (p<0.000001), older age (p=0.000008), and dyslipidaemia (p=0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed AH as an age-independent significant predictor of all-cause (p=0.00045) and cardiovascular mortality (p<0.000001). CONCLUSION: In the long-term follow-up of patients with DLBCL, the role of AH, as an important age-independent predictor of premature cardiovascular mortality, was so strong that it may have value for use in close surveillance in cardio-oncology clinics.

Molnupiravir is effective in patients with haematological malignancies.

Patients with hematologic malignancies are particularly vulnerable to severe infectious complications. SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a high risk of severe course and death in this patient population. In addition, immune deficits associated with both the blood cancer and the treatment used make vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 less effective than in immunocompetent individuals. Molnupiravir is one of the first oral antiviral drugs to demonstrate a significant benefit in reducing hospitalisation and death in COVID-19 in the general population. In this context, 175 haematology patients with diagnosed COVID-19, and treated with MOL between January and April 2022, came under our scrutiny with a view to defining their clinical characteristics and outcomes. The most common underlying conditions were lymphomas (45%), multiple myelomas (21%) and acute leukaemias or myelodysplastic syndrome (35%). Of all, 77% of the patients were vaccinated, and half of them received a booster. At 28 days after the breakthrough COVID-19 diagnosis, 35 (20%) subjects required hospital admission. Out of those patients, seven (4%) died during the follow-up due to the progression of COVID. Our results corroborate what has been established to date with regard to the positive clinical and safety outcomes of MOL in haematology patients with mild or moderate COVID-19.

Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma: 3-year update of the ECHELON-1 study.

The phase 3 ECHELON-1 study demonstrated that brentuximab vedotin (A) with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD; A+AVD) exhibited superior modified progression-free survival (PFS) vs doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) for frontline treatment of patients with stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Maturing positron emission tomography (PET)-adapted trial data highlight potential limitations of PET-adapted approaches, including toxicities with dose intensification and higher-than-expected relapse rates in PET scan after cycle 2 (PET2)-negative (PET2-) patients. We present an update of the ECHELON-1 study, including an exploratory analysis of 3-year PFS per investigator. A total of 1334 patients with stage III or IV cHL were randomized 1:1 to receive 6 cycles of A+AVD (n = 664) or ABVD (n = 670). Interim PET2 was required. At median follow-up of 37 months, 3-year PFS rates were 83.1% with A+AVD and 76.0% with ABVD; 3-year PFS rates in PET2- patients aged <60 years were 87.2% vs 81.0%, respectively. A beneficial trend in PET2+ patients aged <60 years on A+AVD was also observed, with a 3-year PFS rate of 69.2% vs 54.7% with ABVD. The benefit of A+AVD in the intent-to-treat population appeared independent of disease stage and prognostic risk factors. Upon continued follow-up, 78% of patients with peripheral neuropathy on A+AVD had either complete resolution or improvement compared with 83% on ABVD. These data highlight that A+AVD provides a durable efficacy benefit compared with ABVD for frontline stage III/IV cHL, consistent across key subgroups regardless of patient status at PET2, without need for treatment intensification or bleomycin exposure. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01712490 (EudraCT no. 2011-005450-60).

Older patients (aged ≥60 years) with previously untreated advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a detailed analysis from the phase III ECHELON-1 study.

Effective and tolerable treatments are needed for older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. We report results for older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated in the large phase III ECHELON-1 study of frontline brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). Modified progression-free survival per independent review facility for older versus younger patients (aged ≥60 vs. <60 years) was a pre-specified subgroup analysis; as the ECHELON- 1 study was not powered for these analyses, reported P-values are descriptive. Of 1,334 enrolled patients, 186 (14%) were aged ≥60 years (A+AVD: n=84, ABVD: n=102); results below refer to this age group. Modified progression-free survival per independent review facility was similar in the two arms at 24 months (A+AVD: 70.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 58.4-79.4], ABVD: 71.4% [95% CI: 60.5-79.8], hazard ratio (HR)=1.00 [95% CI: 0.58-1.72], P=0.993). After a median follow-up of 60.9 months, 5-year progression-free survival per investigator was 67.1% with A+AVD versus 61.6% with ABVD (HR=0.820 [95% CI: 0.494-1.362], P=0.443). Comparing A+AVD versus ABVD, grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 18% versus 3%; any-grade febrile neutropenia in 37% versus 17%; and any-grade pulmonary toxicity in 2% versus 13%, respectively, with three (3%) pulmonary toxicity-related deaths in patients receiving ABVD (none in those receiving A+AVD). Altogether, A+AVD showed overall similar efficacy to ABVD with survival rates in both arms comparing favorably to those of prior series in older patients with advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Compared to ABVD, A+AVD was associated with higher rates of neuropathy and neutropenia, but lower rates of pulmonary-related toxicity. Trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01712490; EudraCT number: 2011-005450-60.

Pixantrone plus rituximab versus gemcitabine plus rituximab in patients with relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma not eligible for stem cell transplantation: a phase 3, randomized, multicentre trial (PIX306).

PIX306 was a phase 3, randomised, single-blind, multicentre trial conducted in adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 3 who relapsed after ≥1 rituximab-containing regimen and were not eligible for a stem cell transplant. Patients were randomised 1:1 to pixantrone 50 mg/m2 or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, combined with rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, for up to six cycles. Patients were followed for up to 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), complete response (CR) rate, overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Overall, 312 patients were randomised (median age 73·0 years). The study did not meet its primary endpoint. Median PFS [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 7·3 months (5·2-8·4) with pixantrone + rituximab (PIX + R) and 6·3 months (4·4-8·1) with gemcitabine + rituximab [GEM + R; hazard ratio (HR): 0·85; 95% CI 0·64-1·14; P = 0·28]. Median OS was 13·3 (10·1-19·8) months with PIX + R and 19·6 (12·4-31·9) months with GEM + R (HR: 1·13; 95% CI 0·83-1·53). ORR was 61·9% and 43·9% respectively and CR rate 35·5% and 21·7%. The incidence of adverse events, including cardiac events, was not statistically significant different between PIX + R and GEM + R.

Outcomes of treatment with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R or R-CHOP in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The standard first-line treatment for primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients is rituximab-based immunochemotherapy; however, this is not due to the result of randomized clinical trials. AIMS: We retrospectively investigated 53 PMBCL patient outcomes treated either with R-CHOP-21 or DA-EPOCH-R-28. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were complete remission (CR), overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related complications. RESULTS: Treatment with R-CHOP-21 resulted in a 92.0% ORR (60% CR), while DA-EPOCH-R yielded a 92.6% ORR (70.4% CR). There were no differences in the occurrence of grade 3-4 hematological adverse events, but grade 1-2 cardiologic complications (P = .003) were observed more frequently in the DA-EPOCH-R arm. Median PFS and OS were not achieved. The differences in estimated 12-month PFS in R-CHOP and DA-EPOCH-R group (87% vs 73.9%) and OS (100% vs 92%) were insignificant. Patients treated with R-CHOP-21 and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) had an improved OS (P = .03) but not PFS (P = .43) compared to those treated solely with R-CHOP-21. No differences in PFS or OS were observed between patients treated with R-CHOP-21/auto-HSCT and DA-EPOCH-R. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that R-CHOP-21 may be an alternative to DA-EPOCH-R treatment for PMBCL patients.

A multicenter retrospective study of 223 patients with t(14;16) in multiple myeloma.

The t(14;16) translocation, found in 3%-5% of newly diagnosed (ND) multiple myeloma (MM), has been associated with adverse outcomes. However, the studies establishing the characteristics of t(14;16) included solely small cohorts. The goal of the current international, multicenter (n = 25 centers), retrospective study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of t(14;16) patients in a large, real-world cohort (n = 223). A substantial fraction of patients had renal impairment (24%) and hemoglobin <10 g/dL (56%) on initial presentation. Combined therapy of both immunomodulatory drug and proteasome inhibitor (PI) in the first line was used in 35% of patients. Autologous stem cell transplantation was performed in 42% of patients. With a median follow up of 4.1 years (95% CI 3.7-18.7), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from first line therapy were 2.1 years (95% CI 1.5-2.4) and 4.1 years (95% CI 3.3-5.5), respectively. Worse OS was predicted by age > 60 years (HR = 1.65, 95% CI [1.05-2.58]), as well as revised International Scoring System (R-ISS) 3 (vs R-ISS 2; HR = 2.59, 95% CI [1.59-4.24]). In conclusion, based on the largest reported cohort of t(14;16) patients, quarter of this subset of MM patients initially presents with renal failure, while older age and the R-ISS 3 predict poor survival.

The rationale for combination therapy in patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: ten questions.

Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone immunochemotherapy remains standard of care for first-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). High-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation is offered to most relapsing/refractory patients who respond to salvage therapy. This Q&A review evaluates recommended management strategies for second and subsequent lines of therapy in patients with DLBCL, outlining the relative efficacies of currently available options including novel agents such as ibrutinib and CAR-T cells. The combination of pixantrone and rituximab is currently under investigation as a second-line treatment for patients ineligible for stem cell transplantation, while pixantrone monotherapy is the only therapeutic option approved for multiply relapsed and refractory DLBCL beyond the second line at this time.

Safety and Efficacy of Bendamustine Monotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Polish Lymphoma Research Group Real-Life Analysis.

Bendamustine is a cytostatic drug with a unique structure, combining the features of purine nucleoside analogs and alkylating agents. In patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) it is commonly used in combination with rituximab (BR protocol) both in the first-line as well as subsequent lines of therapy, and in clinical trials it is often combined with new targeted therapies. Therefore, the data on its real-life safety and efficacy are of clinical significance. As the Polish Lymphoma Research Group (PLRG), we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and tolerability of bendamustine monotherapy in 96 patients with CLL. The median number of bendamustine cycles was 5, and 44 patients did not complete the planned 6 cycles (46%). Among the adverse events associated with the earlier termination of bendamustine treatment, infections were the most common (20.5%), followed by neutropenia (15.9%) and thrombocytopenia (15.9%). Dose reductions and/or delays occurred in 31% of treatment cycles (132 of 425) with neutropenia (17.9%) as the most frequent cause. Efficacy analysis showed an overall response rate of 88.2% with complete remission and partial remission achieved in 43.8 and 41.7% of patients, respectively. At the 24th month of follow-up, progression-free survival was 52% and overall survival was 69.7%. Bendamustine in monotherapy was found to be safe and efficacious, at least in terms of early response. Special attention should be paid to infectious complications, and especially that immune disorders are characteristic in the clinical course of CLL. Our observations suggest efforts must be made to ensure the proper timing and proper dose in the administration of the drug, and to avoid the premature termination of the treatment.

Primary Cardioprotection Reduces Mortality in Lymphoma Patients with Increased Risk of Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity, Treated by R-CHOP Regimen.

BACKGROUND: Advances in anti-lymphoma therapy prolong overall survival, making late adverse effects, like doxorubicin-related cardiotoxicity, an even more important clinical issue. The effectiveness of cardioprotective strategies with close monitoring, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or ß-blockers as well as liposomal doxorubicin are still unconfirmed in clinical practice. METHODS: This study evaluated the role of a primary cardioprotection strategy in preventing cardiovascular mortality and heart failure occurrence in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients with a high risk of anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Thirty-five NHL patients were subjected prospectively to ramipril and/or bisoprolol at NHL diagnosis, before implementing doxorubicin-containing regimens. Additionally, patients with a diagnosis of asymptomatic/mild heart failure received the liposomal form of doxorubicin. The clinical outcome and frequency of all serious cardiac events were compared with the results in a historical cohort of 62 high-risk cases treated without primary cardioprotection. RESULTS: NHL patients with a primary cardioprotection strategy did not experience cardiovascular deaths in contrast to the retrospective control group where cardiovascular mortality was 14.5% at 3 years (p < 0.05). Primary cardioprotection also decreased the frequency of new cardiotoxicity-related clinical symptoms (2.8 vs. 24.1%; p < 0.05) and prevented the occurrence of cardiac systolic dysfunction (0 vs. 8.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). Although the study was not planned to detect any survival benefit, it demonstrated a trend towards increased response rates (complete response 82 vs. 67%; p not significant) and prolonged survival (projected 5-year overall survival 74 vs. 60%; p < 0.05) for patients treated with primary cardioprotection. CONCLUSIONS: A primary personalized cardioprotection strategy decreases the number of cardiac deaths and may potentially prolong overall survival in NHL patients with increased risk of anthracycline cardiotoxicity.

Safety of AFM11 in the treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies: findings from two phase 1 studies.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) remains poor, with existing treatments having significant side effects. Developed for the treatment of these cancers, AFM11 is a tetravalent, bispecific humanised recombinant antibody construct (TandAb®) designed to bind to human CD19 and CD3 and lead to the activation of T cells inducing apoptosis and killing of malignant B cells. METHODS: Two open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation phase 1 studies evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and activity of AFM11 in patients with R/R CD19-positive B cell NHL (AFM11-101) and in patients with CD19 + B-precursor Philadelphia-chromosome negative ALL (AFM11-102). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed and recorded; imaging (NHL) or bone marrow assessment (ALL) were used to evaluate response. Additional pharmacodynamic assays undertaken included cytokine release analysis and B-cell and T-cell depletion. RESULTS: In AFM11-101, 16 patients with R/R NHL received AFM11 in five different dose cohorts. Of which, 14 experienced drug-related treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) [including five serious AEs (SAEs)], five patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and ten patients discontinued the study. The high number of neurological events led to a decrease in infusion frequency during the study. No objective response to treatment was observed. In AFM11-102, 17 patients with R/R ALL received AFM11 in six different dose cohorts. Thirteen patients experienced drug-related TEAEs (including four SAEs), DLTs occurred in two patients and five patients discontinued the study. An objective response was recorded in three patients. The maximum tolerated dose could not be determined in either study due to early termination. CONCLUSIONS: AFM11 treatment was associated with frequent neurological adverse reactions that were severe in some patients. In ALL, some signs of activity, albeit short-lived, were observed whereas no activity was observed in patients with NHL; therefore, further clinical development was terminated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02106091 . Safety Study to Assess AFM11 in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory CD19 Positive B-cell NHL. Registered April 2014. NCT02848911 . Safety Study to Assess AFM11 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Adult B-precursor ALL. Registered July 2016.

Early efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma: A real-world retrospective report of the Polish Lymphoma Research Group.

BACKGROUND: The first-line obinutuzumab-based immunochemotherapy improves the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) compared with rituximab-based regimens. However, infusion-related reactions occur in almost half of patients during the 1st obinutuzumab administration. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the early effectiveness and safety of obinutuzumab-based induction regimens in a real-world setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Outcomes of patients diagnosed with FL and treated with obinutuzumab between January 2020 and September 2021 were analyzed. RESULTS: The study group included 143 treatment-naïve patients with FL. The median age was 52 years (range: 28-89 years); 45.1% of patients had a high-risk disease as assessed using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI). Induction chemotherapy included: O-CVP (obinutuzumab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone) in 49.0% of patients, O-CHOP (O-CVP plus doxorubicin) in 28.7% and O-BENDA (obinutuzumab, bendamustine) in 22.4%. Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were 69.9% and 26.5%, respectively. There was no difference in response rates between different regimens (p = 0.309). Maintenance was started in 115 patients (85.2%). In the 1st cycle, obinutuzumab was administered as a single 1000-milligram infusion in 47.9% of patients, whereas in 52.1%, initial infusions were split over 2 days (100 mg/900 mg). Infusion-related reactions were reported only during the 1st administration of obinutuzumab in 9.1% of patients, with a similar incidence in those receiving the total dose on a single day or split over 2 days (p = 0.458). The most common adverse events were hematological. Five patients died from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). CONCLUSION: The early responses to induction regimens and adverse events profile were similar for every type of induction treatment. The infusion-related reactions were rare and limited to the 1st dose of obinutuzumab.

The PD-1- and LAG-3-targeting bispecific molecule tebotelimab in solid tumors and hematologic cancers: a phase 1 trial.

Tebotelimab, a bispecific PD-1×LAG-3 DART molecule that blocks both PD-1 and LAG-3, was investigated for clinical safety and activity in a phase 1 dose-escalation and cohort-expansion clinical trial in patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies and disease progression on previous treatment. Primary endpoints were safety and maximum tolerated dose of tebotelimab when administered as a single agent (n = 269) or in combination with the anti-HER2 antibody margetuximab (n = 84). Secondary endpoints included anti-tumor activity. In patients with advanced cancer treated with tebotelimab monotherapy, 68% (184/269) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; 22% were grade ≥3). No maximum tolerated dose was defined; the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 600 mg once every 2 weeks. There were tumor decreases in 34% (59/172) of response-evaluable patients in the dose-escalation cohorts, with objective responses in multiple solid tumor types, including PD-1-refractory disease, and in LAG-3+ non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including CAR-T refractory disease. To enhance potential anti-tumor responses, we tested margetuximab plus tebotelimab. In patients with HER2+ tumors treated with tebotelimab plus margetuximab, 74% (62/84) had TRAEs (17% were grade ≥3). The RP2D was 600 mg once every 3 weeks. The confirmed objective response rate in these patients was 19% (14/72), including responses in patients typically not responsive to anti-HER2/anti-PD-1 combination therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03219268 .

Bing-Neel Syndrome, a Rare Presentation of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia-A Multicenter Report by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group.

Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS) is a rare presentation of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). BNS is a consequence of the central nervous system (CNS) involvement by lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) and, rarely, the peripheral nervous system. The data on BNS are extremely scarce. Therefore, we performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of BNS patients diagnosed and treated in centers aligned with the Polish Lymphoma Research Group. The analysis covers the years 2014-2021. Eleven patients were included, 55% females and the median age at BNS diagnosis was 61 years. The median time from WM to BNS was 3.5 years; 27% of patients did have a diagnosis of WM and BNS made simultaneously or within 30 days from each other. Isolated parenchymal involvement was the least frequent (20%). Patients were treated with different regimens, mostly able to cross the blood-brain barrier, including 18% treated with ibrutinib first line. The cumulative objective response to treatment was 73%. With the median follow-up of 20 months (95% CI, 2-32), the 36-month estimates were: overall survival (OS) 47%, progression-free survival (PFS) 33%, and cumulative incidence of BNS-associated death 41%. The performance status according to ECOG was significant for PFS (HR = 7.79) and the hemoglobin concentration below 11 g/dL was correlated with PFS. To conclude, BNS is a very rare manifestation of WM. It is associated with a poor outcome with most patients succumbing to BNS.

Outcome of SARS-CoV-2-Infected Polish Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has become the cause of a worldwide pandemic, and its clinical infection course in patients with hematological malignancies may be severe. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on 188 chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients (CLL) with COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: At the time of infection 51 patients (27.1%) were treated with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), 46 (24.5%) with anti-CD20 antibodies while 37 patients (19.7%) received venetoclax. In total, 111 patients (59.0%) required hospitalization and 50 patients (26.5%) died due to COVID-19. Patients with poor performance status (ECOG >1; p = 0.02), advanced age (>65 years; p = 0.04), low hemoglobin concentration (≤10 g/dl; p = 0.0001), low platelets (<100 × 109/L; p = 0.003), and elevated lactate dehydrogenase level (LDH; p = 0.014) had an increased risk of death due to COVID-19. Neither CLL treatment status (treatment naïve vs. treated) nor the type of CLL-directed treatment had impact on the SARS-CoV-2 related risk of death. The multivariate survival analysis showed that advanced age (p = 0.009) and low platelet count (p = 0.0001) were associated with significantly shorter patients' overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection in CLL patients is associated with poor outcome regardless of administered CLL-directed treatment.

Tafasitamab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) require further treatment options, especially in cases that cannot tolerate stem cell transplant or cytotoxic chemotherapy. CD19 has emerged as an attractive target in B-cell malignancy and is the subject of several therapeutic strategies. The anti-CD19, humanized, monoclonal antibody tafasitamab (MOR208) has an engineered, modified Fc region with increased affinity for Fcγ receptors, leading to increased cytotoxicity via natural killer cells and macrophages (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis) in a promising approach. AREAS COVERED: The development of tafasitamab is reviewed, together with the pharmacokinetics and clinical experience of tafasitamab in R/R DLBCL; clinical data have led to FDA approval and inclusion in NCCN treatment guidelines for tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide in this indication. EXPERT OPINION: Patients with R/R DLBCL who have failed rituximab-containing regimens may be resistant to CD20-directed therapies; therefore, therapies with an alternative mode of action are of great interest in this setting. Tafasitamab, an anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, in combination with lenalidomide has demonstrated promising efficacy for patients with R/R DLBCL who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. This could provide an alternative approach to classical chemotherapy-based regimens in the relapsed setting.

Acalabrutinib: a highly selective, potent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Inhibiting the activity of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) prevents the activation of the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway, which in turn prevents both B-cell activation and BTK-mediated activation of downstream survival pathways. Acalabrutinib is an orally available, highly selective, next-generation inhibitor of BTK. Based on the results of two key phase 3 trials (ELEVATE-TN in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL] and ASCEND in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL), which demonstrated superior progression-free survival while maintaining favorable tolerability, acalabrutinib was granted US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2019 for the treatment of patients with CLL. Acalabrutinib appears to offer similar efficacy but a significantly improved tolerability profile to first-generation agents. Acalabrutinib is a good candidate to combine with other anti-cancer therapies, including B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, a factor that may help to further improve clinical outcomes in CLL.

Phase I, first-in-human trial of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor M7583 in patients with B-cell malignancies.

M7583 is a potent, highly selective, covalent BTK inhibitor in development. In this phase I, first-in-human, open label, multicenter dose-escalation trial, M7583 was given at 80 mg (three days)/160 mg (full 28-day cycle), then 300 mg/day, 600 mg/day, 900 mg/day, and 300 mg twice daily to 18 patients (median age 63 years) with refractory/resistant, stage III/IV B-cell malignancies who failed prior therapy (NCT02825836). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 89% of patients, treatment-related AEs in 78%, and treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs in 17%. Common AEs were diarrhea (33%), fatigue (22%), and vomiting (17%). M7583 was rapidly absorbed and exposure was dose-proportional. BTK occupancy was >95% in the 300 mg twice daily and 900 mg/day cohorts. Objective response rate was 50% and disease control rate 78%, supporting a favorable benefit:risk profile. Fasted doses up to 900 mg once daily and 300 mg twice daily were well tolerated and may be tested in future clinical studies.