RESUMO
Migraine with aura (MWA) is a common headache, characterized by short-lasting neurological signs preceding an headache attack with migraine characteristics. We have recently performed several investigations about time-delay for migraine without aura diagnosis (MWoA). Aim of this study was to compare the time necessary to obtain a correct diagnosis in MWA and MWoA patients. We enrolled 31 consecutive patients affected by MWA and 62 age- and sex-matched patients affected by MWoA. All subjects were submitted to a face-to-face interview about the time-delay from symptoms' onset and a correct migraine typology diagnosis, the number of specialists consulted and the instrumental examinations performed. Independent samples and repeated measures t test, Mann-Whitney U were performed to compare the variables of the cases with the matched controls. No significant differences were found among the collected variables. Diagnostic delay was significantly different (p < 0.05), resulting lower in patients affected by MWA than in those with MWoA. In fact, subjects affected by MWA had a mean diagnostic delay of 6.70 years (SE ± 1.5), while patients affected by MWoA had a mean interval of 10.7 years (SE ± 1.20). Patients affected by MWA present a significant lower delay for the formulation of a correct diagnosis with respect to subjects with MWoA. This could be probably due to the fact that MWA patients develop major alarm reactions related to visual symptoms and look for an earlier appointment with a specialist medical center.
Assuntos
Diagnóstico Tardio , Enxaqueca com Aura/diagnóstico , Enxaqueca sem Aura/diagnóstico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are serious health challenges. Point prevalence surveys (PPSs) are valuable tools for monitoring HAIs and AMR. AIM: To describe results of the ECDC PPS 2022 dealing with the prevalence of HAIs, antimicrobial consumption, and associated factors, in acute care hospitals. METHODS: The survey was performed in November 2022 in 14 hospitals according to the protocol proposed by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Multilevel logistic regression was performed using geographical area/hospital type as cluster variable to evaluate the factors independently associated with HAIs and antibiotics. FINDINGS: The point prevalence of HAIs was 7.43%. Patients hospitalized for longer periods were more likely to have an HAI as well as those aged 15-44 years, with a rapidly fatal disease, intubated, and with one or two devices. Antibiotics prevalence was 47.30%. Males, unknown McCabe scores, minimally invasive/non-National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surgery, patients with HAIs, hospitals with a higher alcohol hand-rub consumption, hospitals with a greater number of IPC personnel, geriatric wards, and hospitals with 300-600 beds were more likely to be under antimicrobial therapy. CONCLUSION: This PPS provided valuable information on the prevalence of HAIs and antimicrobial consumption and variables associated. The high prevalence of HAIs highlights the need for improved infection control measures.