Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Child Dev ; 92(6): 2252-2267, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34716710

RESUMO

This study evaluated the impact of a parenting intervention on children's cognitive and socioemotional development in a group of caregivers and their 21-to-28-month-old children in a low-income South African township. A randomized controlled trial compared an experimental group (n = 70) receiving training in dialogic book-sharing (8 weekly group sessions) with a wait-list control group (n = 70). They were assessed before the intervention, immediately following it, and at a six month follow-up. The intervention had positive effects on child language and attention, but not behavior problems, prosocial behavior, or theory of mind. Intervention caregivers were less verbally and psychologically harsh, showed more sensitivity and reciprocity and more complex cognitive talk. This program benefitted parenting and child development and holds promise for low-income contexts.


Assuntos
Poder Familiar , Comportamento Problema , Livros , Criança , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Pais , África do Sul
2.
Child Dev ; 91(2): e383-e399, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30737957

RESUMO

Interventions that train parents to share picture books with children are seen as a strategy for supporting child language development. We conducted meta-analyses using robust variance estimation modeling on results from 19 RCTs (Ntotal  = 2,594; Mchildage  = 1-6 years). Overall, book-sharing interventions had a small sized effect on both expressive language (d = 0.41) and receptive language (d = 0.26). They had a large effect on caregiver book-sharing competence (d = 1.01). The impact of the intervention on child language was moderated by intervention dosage, with lower dosage associated with a minimal impact. Child age and caregiver education level were unrelated to child outcome. This review and meta-analysis confirms the promise of book-sharing interventions for enhancing and accelerating child language development.


Assuntos
Livros , Relações Interpessoais , Desenvolvimento da Linguagem , Leitura , Vocabulário , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
3.
BMC Psychiatry ; 17(1): 395, 2017 12 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29228912

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Depression contributes substantially to the burden of disease in South Africa. Little is known about how neighbourhoods affect the mental health of the people living in them. METHODS: Using nationally representative data (N=11,955) from the South African National Income Dynamics Study and the South African Indices of Multiple Deprivation (SAIMD) modelled at small-area level, this study tested associations between neighbourhood-level deprivation and depression, after controlling for individual-level covariates. RESULTS: Results showed a significant positive association between neighbourhood-level deprivation and depression using the composite SAIMD (ß = 0.31 (0.15); p=0.04) as well as the separate deprivation domains. Living environment deprivation (ß =0.53 (0.16); p=0.001) and employment deprivation (ß = 0.38 (0.13); p=0.004), respectively, were the two most salient domains in predicting this relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Findings supported the hypothesis that there is a positive association between living in a more deprived neighbourhood and depression, even after controlling for individual-level covariates. This study suggests that alleviating structural poverty could reduce the burden of depression in South Africa.


Assuntos
Depressão/epidemiologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Áreas de Pobreza , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , África do Sul
4.
Pediatrics ; 144(2)2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31262779

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Although adolescent mental health interventions are widely implemented, little consensus exists about elements comprising successful models. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify effective program components of interventions to promote mental health and prevent mental disorders and risk behaviors during adolescence and to match these components across these key health outcomes to inform future multicomponent intervention development. DATA SOURCES: A total of 14 600 records were identified, and 158 studies were included. STUDY SELECTION: Studies included universally delivered psychosocial interventions administered to adolescents ages 10 to 19. We included studies published between 2000 and 2018, using PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, Embase, and Applied Social Sciences Index Abstracts databases. We included randomized controlled, cluster randomized controlled, factorial, and crossover trials. Outcomes included positive mental health, depressive and anxious symptomatology, violence perpetration and bullying, and alcohol and other substance use. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by 3 researchers who identified core components and relevant outcomes. Interventions were separated by modality; data were analyzed by using a robust variance estimation meta-analysis model, and we estimated a series of single-predictor meta-regression models using random effects. RESULTS: Universally delivered interventions can improve adolescent mental health and reduce risk behavior. Of 7 components with consistent signals of effectiveness, 3 had significant effects over multiple outcomes (interpersonal skills, emotional regulation, and alcohol and drug education). LIMITATIONS: Most included studies were from high-income settings, limiting the applicability of these findings to low- and middle-income countries. Our sample included only trials. CONCLUSIONS: Three program components emerged as consistently effective across different outcomes, providing a basis for developing future multioutcome intervention programs.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente/psicologia , Saúde Mental , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Assunção de Riscos , Adolescente , Humanos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos
5.
Trials ; 18(1): 118, 2017 03 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28279200

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Children in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are at risk for problems in their cognitive, social and behavioural development. Factors such as a lack of cognitive stimulation, harsh parenting practices, and severe and persistent aggression in early childhood are central to the genesis of these problems. Interventions that target the intersection between early childhood development, parenting, and early violence prevention are required in order to meaningfully address these problems. METHODS: We are conducting a randomised controlled trial to evaluate a parenting intervention for caregivers of children aged between 23 and 27 months, designed to promote child cognitive and socioemotional development in Khayelitsha, a low-income peri-urban township in South Africa. Families are randomly allocated to a book-sharing intervention group or to a wait-list control group. In the intervention, we train caregivers in supportive book-sharing with young children. Training is carried out in small groups over a period of 8 weeks. Data are collected at baseline, post intervention and at 6 months post intervention. In addition to targeting child cognitive development, the intervention aims to improve child socioemotional functioning. DISCUSSION: The Benefits of Early Book Sharing (BEBS) trial aims to evaluate the impact of an early parenting intervention on several key risk factors for the development of violence, including aspects of parenting and child cognition, prosocial behaviour, aggression, and socioemotional functioning. The study is being carried out in a LMIC where violence constitutes a major social and health burden. Since the intervention is brief and, with modest levels of training, readily deliverable in LMIC contexts, a demonstration that it is of benefit to both child cognitive and socioemotional development would be of significance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The BEBS trial is registered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number database, registration number ISRCTN71109104 . Registered on 9 February 2016. This is version 1 of the protocol for the BEBS trial.


Assuntos
Livros , Cuidadores/psicologia , Comportamento Infantil , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Cognição , Emoções , Relações Interpessoais , Pais/psicologia , Comportamento Social , Fatores Etários , Cuidadores/educação , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Poder Familiar/psicologia , Pais/educação , Projetos de Pesquisa , África do Sul , Fatores de Tempo , Violência/prevenção & controle , Violência/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA