Cost-utility analysis of prenatal diagnosis of congenital cardiac diseases using deep learning.

BACKGROUND: Deep learning (DL) is a new technology that can assist prenatal ultrasound (US) in the detection of congenital heart disease (CHD) at the prenatal stage. Hence, an economic-epidemiologic evaluation (aka Cost-Utility Analysis) is required to assist policymakers in deciding whether to adopt the new technology. METHODS: The incremental cost-utility ratios (CUR), of adding DL assisted ultrasound (DL-US) to the current provision of US plus pulse oximetry (POX), was calculated by building a spreadsheet model that integrated demographic, economic epidemiological, health service utilization, screening performance, survival and lifetime quality of life data based on the standard formula: CUR = Increase in Intervention Costs - Decrease in Treatment costs Averted QALY losses of adding DL to US & POX US screening data were based on real-world operational routine reports (as opposed to research studies). The DL screening cost of 145 USD was based on Israeli US costs plus 20.54 USD for reading and recording screens. RESULTS: The addition of DL assisted US, which is associated with increased sensitivity (95% vs 58.1%), resulted in far fewer undiagnosed infants (16 vs 102 [or 2.9% vs 15.4%] of the 560 and 659 births, respectively). Adoption of DL-US will add 1,204 QALYs. with increased screening costs 22.5 million USD largely offset by decreased treatment costs (20.4 million USD). Therefore, the new DL-US technology is considered "very cost-effective", costing only 1,720 USD per QALY. For most performance combinations (sensitivity > 80%, specificity > 90%), the adoption of DL-US is either cost effective or very cost effective. For specificities greater than 98% (with sensitivities above 94%), DL-US (& POX) is said to "dominate" US (& POX) by providing more QALYs at a lower cost. CONCLUSION: Our exploratory CUA calculations indicate the feasibility of DL-US as being at least cost-effective.

The impact of a routine late third trimester growth scan on the incidence, diagnosis, and management of breech presentation in Oxfordshire, UK: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Breech presentation at term contributes significantly to cesarean section (CS) rates worldwide. External cephalic version (ECV) is a safe procedure that reduces term breech presentation and associated CS. A principal barrier to ECV is failure to diagnose breech presentation. Failure to diagnose breech presentation also leads to emergency CS or unplanned vaginal breech birth. Recent evidence suggests that undiagnosed breech might be eliminated using a third trimester scan. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of introducing a routine 36-week scan on the incidence of breech presentation and of undiagnosed breech presentation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We carried out a population-based cohort study of pregnant women in a single unit covering Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. All women delivering between 37+0 and 42+6 weeks gestational age, with a singleton, nonanomalous fetus over a 4-year period (01 October 2014 to 30 September 2018) were included. The mean maternal age was 31 years, mean BMI 26, 44% were nulliparous, and 21% were of non-white ethnicity. Comparisons between the 2 years before and after introduction of routine 36-week scan were made for 2 primary outcomes of (1) the incidence of breech presentation and (2) undiagnosed breech presentation. Secondary outcomes related to ECV, mode of birth, and perinatal outcomes. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. A total of 27,825 pregnancies were analysed (14,444 before and 13,381 after). A scan after 35+0 weeks was performed in 5,578 (38.6%) before, and 13,251 (99.0%) after (p < 0.001). The incidence of breech presentation at birth did not change significantly (2.6% and 2.7%) (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.89, 1.18; p = 0.76). The rate of undiagnosed breech before labour reduced, from 22.3% to 4.7% (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.12, 0.36; p < 0.001). Vaginal breech birth rates fell from 10.3% to 5.3% (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.30, 0.87; p = 0.01); nonsignificant increases in elective CS rates and decreases in emergency CS rates for breech babies were seen. Neonatal outcomes were not significantly altered. Study limitations include insufficient numbers to detect serious adverse outcomes, that we cannot exclude secular changes over time which may have influenced our results, and that these findings are most applicable where a comprehensive ECV service exists. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a universal 36-week scan policy was associated with a reduction in the incidence but not elimination of undiagnosed term breech presentation. There was no reduction in the incidence of breech presentation at birth, despite a comprehensive ECV service.

Correction: The impact of a routine late third trimester growth scan on the incidence, diagnosis, and management of breech presentation in Oxfordshire, UK: A cohort study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003503.].

How often do we incidentally find a fetal abnormality at the routine third-trimester growth scan? A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Third-trimester scans are increasingly used to try to prevent adverse outcomes associated with abnormalities of fetal growth. Unexpected fetal malformations detected at third-trimester growth scans are rarely reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and type of fetal malformations detected in women attending a routine third-trimester growth scan. STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based study of all women with singleton pregnancy attending antenatal care over a 2-year period in Oxfordshire, UK. Women who had a viable singleton pregnancy at dating scan were included. Women had standard obstetrical care including the offer of a routine dating scan and combined screening for trisomies; a routine anomaly scan at 18 to 22 weeks; and a routine third-trimester growth scan at 36 weeks. The third-trimester scan comprises assessment of fetal presentation, amniotic fluid, biometry, umbilical and middle cerebral artery Dopplers, but no formal anatomic assessment is undertaken. Scans are performed by certified sonographers or clinical fellows (n=54), and any suspected abnormalities are evaluated by a team of fetal medicine specialists. We assessed the frequency and type of incidental congenital malformations identified for the first time at this third-trimester scan. All babies were followed-up after birth for a minimum of 6 months. RESULTS: There were 15,244 women attending routine antenatal care. Anomalies were detected in 474 (3.1%) fetuses as follows: 103 (21.7%) were detected before the anomaly scan, 174 (36.7%) at the anomaly scan, 11 (2.3%) after the anomaly scan and before the third-trimester scan, 43 (9.1%) at the third-trimester scan and 143 (30.2%) after birth. The 43 abnormalities were found in a total of 13,023 women who had a 36 weeks scan, suggesting that in 1 out of 303 (95% confidence interval, 233-432) women attending such a scan, a new malformation was detected. Anomalies detected at the routine third-trimester scan were of the urinary tract (n=30), central nervous system (5), simple ovarian cysts (4), chromosomal (1), splenic cyst (1), skeletal dysplasia (1), and cutaneous lymphangioma (1). Most urinary tract anomalies were renal pelvic dilatation, which showed spontaneous resolution in 57% of the cases. CONCLUSION: When undertaking a program of routine third-trimester growth scans in women who have had previous screening scans, an unexpected congenital malformation is detected in approximately 1 in 300 women.

International gestational age-specific centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices: a longitudinal prospective cohort study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.

BACKGROUND: Reference values for umbilical artery Doppler indices are used clinically to assess fetal well-being. However, many studies that have produced reference charts have important methodologic limitations, and these result in significant heterogeneity of reported reference ranges. OBJECTIVES: To produce international gestational age-specific centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices based on longitudinal data and the same rigorous methodology used in the original Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. STUDY DESIGN: In Phase II of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project (the INTERBIO-21st Study), we prospectively continued enrolling pregnant women according to the same protocol from 3 of the original populations in Pelotas (Brazil), Nairobi (Kenya), and Oxford (United Kingdom) that had participated in the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study. Women with a singleton pregnancy were recruited at <14 weeks' gestation, confirmed by ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length, and then underwent standardized ultrasound every 5±1 weeks until delivery. From 22 weeks of gestation umbilical artery indices (pulsatility index, resistance index, and systolic/diastolic ratio) were measured in a blinded fashion, using identical equipment and a rigorously standardized protocol. Newborn size at birth was assessed using the international INTERGROWTH-21st Standards, and infants had detailed assessment of growth, nutrition, morbidity, and motor development at 1 and 2 years of age. The appropriateness of pooling data from the 3 study sites was assessed using variance component analysis and standardized site differences. Umbilical artery indices were modeled as functions of the gestational age using an exponential, normal distribution with second-degree fractional polynomial smoothing; goodness of fit for the overall models was assessed. RESULTS: Of the women enrolled at the 3 sites, 1629 were eligible for this study; 431 (27%) met the entry criteria for the construction of normative centiles, similar to the proportion seen in the original fetal growth longitudinal study. They contributed a total of 1243 Doppler measures to the analysis; 74% had 3 measures or more. The healthy low-risk status of the population was confirmed by the low rates of preterm birth (4.9%) and preeclampsia (0.7%). There were no neonatal deaths and satisfactory growth, health, and motor development of the infants at 1 and 2 years of age were documented. Only a very small proportion (2.8%-6.5%) of the variance of Doppler indices was due to between-site differences; in addition, standardized site difference estimates were marginally outside this threshold in only 1 of 27 comparisons, and this supported the decision to pool data from the 3 study sites. All 3 Doppler indices decreased with advancing gestational age. The 3rd, 5th 10th, 50th, 90th, 95th, and 97th centiles according to gestational age for each of the 3 indices are provided, as well as equations to allow calculation of any value as a centile and z scores. The mean pulsatility index according to gestational age = 1.02944 + 77.7456*(gestational age)-2 - 0.000004455*gestational age3. CONCLUSION: We present here international gestational age-specific normative centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices produced by studying healthy, low-risk pregnant women living in environments with minimal constraints on fetal growth. The centiles complement the existing INTERGROWTH-21st Standards for assessment of fetal well-being.

Safety Indices of Ultrasound: Adherence to Recommendations and Awareness During Routine Obstetric Ultrasound Scanning.

PURPOSE: To analyze bioeffect safety indices and assess how often operators look at these indices during routine obstetric ultrasound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Automated analysis of prospectively collected data including video recordings of full-length ultrasound scans coupled with operator eye tracking was performed. Using optical recognition, we extracted the Mechanical Index (MI), Thermal Index in soft tissue (TIs), and Thermal Index in bone (TIb) values and ultrasound mode. This allowed us to report the bioeffect safety indices during routine obstetric scans and assess adherence to professional organization recommendations. Eye-tracking analysis allowed us to assess how often operators look at the displayed bioeffect safety indices. RESULTS: A total of 637 ultrasound scans performed by 17 operators were included, of which 178, 216, and 243 scans were first, second, and third-trimester scans, respectively. During live scanning, the mean and range were 0.14 (0.1 to 3.0) for TIb, 0.2 (0.1 to 1.2) for TIs, and 0.9 (0.1 to 1.3) for MI. The mean and standard deviation of TIb were 0.15 ±â€Š0.03, 0.23 ±â€Š0.09, 0.32 ±â€Š0.24 in the first, second, and third trimester, respectively. For B-mode, the highest TIb was 0.8 in all trimesters. The highest TIb was recorded for pulsed-wave Doppler mode in all trimesters. The recommended exposure times were maintained in all scans. Analysis of eye tracking suggested that operators looked at bioeffect safety indices in only 27 (4.2 %) of the scans. CONCLUSION: In this study, recommended bioeffect indices were adhered to in all routine scans. However, eye tracking showed that operators rarely assessed safety indices during scanning.

Epidural analgesia at trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC): a significant adjunct to successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).

INTRODUCTION: Epidural analgesia has been considered a risk factor for labor dystocia at trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) and uterine rupture. We evaluated the association between exposure to epidural during TOLAC and mode of delivery and maternal-neonatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single center retrospective study of women that consented to TOLAC within a strict protocol between 2006 and 2013. Epidural "users" were compared to "non-users". Primary outcome was the mode of delivery: repeat in-labor cesarean or vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Secondary outcomes were maternal/neonatal morbidities. Univariate/multivariate analyses for associations between epidural and mode of delivery were adjusted for significant covariates/mediators. RESULTS: Of a total of 105,471 births registered, 9464 (9.0%) were eligible for TOLAC; 7149 (75.5%) women consented to TOLAC, among which 4081 (57.1%) had epidural analgesia. The in labor cesarean rate was significantly lower for the epidural "users" 8.7% vs. "non-users" 11.8%, P<0.0001, with a parallel increased rate of instrumental delivery. Uterine rupture rates were comparable: 0.4% and 0.29%, respectively (P=0.31). The adjusted multivariate model showed that epidural "users" were more likely to experience a VBAC, odds ratio (OR) 4.58 [3.67; 5.70]; P<0.0001 with a similar rate of adverse maternal-neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia at TOLAC may emerge as a safe and significant adjunct for VBAC.

Fetal Urine Production Rate in Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes Is Associated with Adverse Neonatal Outcome: A Pilot Study.

AIM: In this study, we evaluate the associations between fetal urinary production rate (FUPR), measured by ultrasound, and adverse neonatal outcome in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). METHODS: We conducted a prospective pilot cohort of singleton pregnancies complicated by PPROM occurring at gestational week 24 or later managed until spontaneous labor (after 48 h of admission), chorioamnionitis, or induction by protocol at 35 + 0 weeks. FUPR was evaluated by 2D sonography at admission (corrected for gestational age). The main neonatal outcome measures were chorioamnionitis, placental inflammatory grading, first neonatal creatinine value, first neonatal dextrose value, length of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (grades I-IV), blood transfusions, reduced neonatal urine production rate (<4 mL/kg/h), and early neonatal sepsis. Samples of maternal (at admission) and umbilical cord blood were analyzed for interleukin-6 (IL-6) level. RESULTS: The study included 38 women. Low FUPR was associated with clinical chorioamnionitis, longer NICU hospitalization (p = 0.01), higher rates of NEC or IVH (p = 0.008), and blood transfusion (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: A finding of FUPR on in utero ultrasound examination in pregnancies complicated by PPROM may be indicative of adverse neonatal outcome.

Amniotic Fluid Embolism: A Rare Complication of Second-Trimester Amniocentesis.

Amniotic fluid embolism occurring following diagnostic amniocentesis is extremely rare. Only 2 cases have been reported in the English literature over the past 55 years, the most recent one approximately 3 decades ago. We present a case of amniocentesis at 24 weeks' gestation that was performed as part of an evaluation of abnormal fetal ultrasound findings. Immediately following amniotic fluid aspiration, maternal hemodynamic collapse occurred, initially diagnosed and treated as anaphylactic shock. Shortly after initial therapy, coagulopathy was noted and amniotic fluid syndrome suspected. Rapid response restored maternal hemodynamic stability; however, the fetus had suffered fatal damage.

New Israeli Sonographic Estimated Fetal Weight Growth Curves as Compared to Current Birth Weight Growth Curves: On What Should Diagnosis of Intrauterine Growth Disorders Be Based?

BACKGROUND: Two types of growth curves are commonly used to diagnose fetal growth disorders: neonatal birth weight (BW) and sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW). The debate as to which growth curve to use is universal. OBJECTIVES: To establish sonographic EFW growth curves for the Israeli population and to assess whether the use of the BW growth curves currently adapted in Israel leads to under-diagnosis of intrauterine growth disorders. METHODS: Biometric data collected during a 6 year period was analyzed to establish sonographic EFW growth curves between 15-42 weeks of gestation for the Israeli population. Growth curves were compared to previously published sonographic EFW growth curves. A comparison with the Israeli BW growth curves was performed to assess the possibility of under-diagnosis of intrauterine growth disorders. RESULTS: Out of 42,778 sonographic EFW studies, 31,559 met the inclusion criteria. The sonographic EFW growth curves from the current study resembled the EFW curves previously published. The comparison of the current sonographic EFW and BW growth curves revealed under-diagnosis of intrauterine growth disorders during the preterm period. Four percent of the fetuses assessed between 26-34 weeks would have been suspected of being growth restricted; 2.8 percent of the fetuses assessed between 30-36 weeks would have been suspected of having macrosomia, based on the BW growth curves. CONCLUSIONS: New Israeli sonographic EFW growth curves resemble previously published sonographic EFW curves. Using BW growth curves may lead to the under-diagnosis of growth disorders. We recommend adopting sonographic EFW growth to diagnose intrauterine growth disorders.

Impact of surgeon annual volume on short-term maternal outcome in cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: The annual procedure volume is an accepted marker for quality of care and has been documented in various medical fields. Surgeon volume has been shown to correlate with morbidity and mortality rates in surgical and high-risk medical procedures. Although cesarean delivery is 1 of the most common surgical procedures in the United States, the link between a surgeon's annual cesarean delivery volume and maternal outcome has never been tested. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a surgeon's annual volume on short-term maternal outcome in cesarean deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study in a single tertiary center between 2006 and 2013. Cesarean deliveries were categorized into 2 groups based on the annual volume of cesarean delivery of the attending obstetrician. The "low" group included obstetricians with a low annual volume, whose annual volume of cesarean delivery was lower than median. The "high" group comprised obstetricians with a high annual volume whose annual volume was at median and above. Further analyses were done for quartiles and for 4 clinical relevant groups according to the annual number of cesarean deliveries that were performed/supervised by the attending obstetrician (≤20, 21-60, 61-120, and >120). The primary outcome was a composite adverse maternal outcome that included ≥1 of the following outcomes: urinary or gastrointestinal tract injuries, hemoglobin drop >3 g/dL, blood transfusion, relaparotomy, puerperal fever, prolonged maternal hospitalization, and readmission. Secondary outcomes were operative times (skin incision to delivery and overall). RESULTS: A total of 11,954 cesarean deliveries were included; the median annual number of cesarean deliveries that were performed/supervised by 1 obstetrician was 48. Unadjusted analysis suggested that the patients in the high group had fewer urinary and gastrointestinal injuries (18/9278 [0.2%] vs 16/2676 [0.6%] injuries; P < .001), less blood loss as measured by hemoglobin drop >3 g/dL (1053/9278 [11.5%] vs 366/2676 [13.8%]; P < .001), and fewer cases of prolonged maternal hospitalization (80/9278 [0.9%] vs 39/2676 [1.5%]; P = .006). The rate of blood transfusion, relaparotomy, puerperal febrile morbidity, and readmission to hospital did not differ between groups. Multivariable regression analysis showed that cesarean delivery performed/supervised by the high group resulted in a significantly lower composite adverse maternal outcome (15.8% vs 18.9%; odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.95; P = .004). This was related primarily to a decreased frequency of urinary and gastrointestinal injuries, lower likelihood of hemoglobin drop >3 g/dL, and lower incidence of prolonged maternal hospitalization. Operative times were significantly shorter for the high group. Composite adverse maternal outcome ranged from 21.8% in the lowest quartile to 17.9% in quartile 2, to 17.4% in quartile 3, and 15.6% in quartile 4. quartile 4 served as the reference; quartile 3 had an odds ratio of 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.29; P = .029); quartile 2 had an odds ratio of 1.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.36; P = .021, and quartile 1 had an odds ratio of 1.51 (95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.99; P = .004) for composite adverse maternal outcome. Composite adverse maternal outcome ranged from 21.5% in clinical group 1 to 17.5% in clinical group 2, to 17.9% in clinical group 3, and 15.2% in clinical group 4 (P = .001). Cesarean delivery performed/supervised by clinical groups 2, 3, and 4 in comparison with clinical group 1 were associated with a statistically significant risk reduction, (23%, 25%, and 34% respectively). CONCLUSION: Maternal composite morbidity is decreased as the volume of cesarean deliveries that are performed or supervised by obstetricians increases.

The association between ABO blood group and obstetric hemorrhage.

UNLABELLED: Whether intra- and early post-partum hemorrhage is influenced by ABO blood groups remains unknown. Therefore, we compared women with O to non-O blood groups with regard to maternal post-partum hemorrhage and transfusion need. This retrospective study was conducted in a single tertiary center between 2005 and 2014. For the purpose of the study, parturients were categorized as O and non-O blood groups. Data included all deliveries but excluded patients with missing blood grouping or hemoglobin values, and/or stillbirth. Drop in hemoglobin was defined as hemoglobin concentration at admission for delivery minus lowest hemoglobin concentration post-delivery. Study outcomes were postpartum hemorrhage, hemoglobin drop >2-7 g/dL inclusive, and packed red blood cells transfusion. STATISTICS: descriptive, χ(2) (p < 0.05 significant) and multivariable regression models [odds ratio (OR), 95 % confidence interval (CI), p value]. 125,768 deliveries were included. After multivariable analysis, women with O blood type relative to women with non-O blood type had significantly higher odds of postpartum hemorrhage (OR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.05-1.23, p < 0.001), higher odds of statistically significant hemoglobin decreases of >2, 3, or 4 g/dL (OR 1.07; 95 % CI 1.04-1.11, p < 0.001, OR 1.08; 95 % CI 1.03-1.14, p = 0.002, OR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.05-1.23, p = 0.001; respectively), and higher odds, albeit not statistically significant of 5, 6, or 7 g/dL decreases in hemoglobin (OR 1.13; 95 % CI 1.00-1.29, p = 0.055, OR 1.05; 95 % CI 0.84-1.32, p = 0.66, OR 1.15; 95 % CI 0.79-1.68, p = 0.46; respectively), but no difference in blood products transfusion (OR 1.03; 95 % CI 0.92-1.16, p = 0.58). In conclusion, women with blood type O may be at greater risk of obstetrical hemorrhage.

Delivery of a very low birth weight infant and increased maternal risk of cancer and death: a population study with 16 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy complications represent sentinel events for women's future health. We investigated whether delivery of a very low birth weight (VLBW) infant is associated with increased maternal risk for future incidence of maternal cancer and death. METHODS: This is a population-based cohort study of linked Israeli Ministry of Health datasets between 1995 and 2011. Women delivering a live singleton <1,500 g infant (VLBW group) were compared with women delivering a live singleton, 3,000-3,500 g (control). The first pregnancy eligible for entry into the study, the "index pregnancy," reflected exposure status for each participant. Primary outcomes were maternal cancer and death. Cancer diagnoses were further classified by primary site. Cox regression models adjusted for follow-up period and maternal characteristics at index pregnancy: Age at delivery, ethnicity, years of education, marital status, and previous cancer afforded calculation of hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). FINDINGS: During the study period, 982,091 mothers with 2,243,736 live births were identified; of these, 13,773 births were VLBW eligible for inclusion in the study and 448,743 births were controls. Groups differed significantly by average follow-up and all maternal characteristics evaluated. Overall rate of cancers and death was significantly increased for VLBW women compared to controls: 18.4 versus 15.7% and 7.3 versus 3.2%, both p < 0.0001. The Cox model adjusted for maternal characteristics showed significantly increased risk of cancer (all sites) in the VLBW women: HR 1.18 (95% CI 1.02-1.37) and for death: HR 2.13 (95% CI 1.68-2.71), and an increased combined risk of both outcomes: HR 1.4 (95% CI 1.23-1.59). INTERPRETATION: The delivery of a VLBW newborn is an independent lifetime risk factor for subsequent maternal cancers and death. These women may benefit from targeted cancer screening and counseling.

Iron deficiency anemia at admission for labor and delivery is associated with an increased risk for Cesarean section and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Maternal iron deficiency anemia (IDA) impacts placenta and fetus. We evaluated effects of IDA at admission for delivery on cesarean rates, and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Medical records from Jerusalem (2005-2012) identified women with a live-birth singleton fetus in cephalic presentation of any gestational age and excluded planned cesarean, chronic/gestational diseases identified with anemia. Study population was divided into anemic and non-anemic women using WHO criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: cesarean rate, and adverse outcomes (maternal: packed cells transfusion, early post-partum hemorrhage, preterm delivery; and neonatal: 5' Apgar < 7, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit [NICU] admission, extreme birthweights). Continuous variable analysis and multivariate backward step-wise logistic regression models were prepared with Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: In all, 96,066 deliveries were registered, of which 75,660 (78.8%) were included. IDA was present in 7,977 women (10.5%). Anemia at birth was significantly associated with cesarean section (OR 1.30; 95%CI, 1.13-1.49, p < 0.001), packed cells transfusion (OR 5.48; 95%CI, 4.57-6.58, p < 0.001), preterm delivery (OR 1.54; 95%CI, 1.36-1.76, p < 0.001), macrosomia (OR 1.23; 95%CI, 1.12-1.35, p < 0.001), Large for Gestational Age (OR 1.29; 95%CI, 1.20-1.39, p < 0.001), Apgar 5' < 7 (OR 2.21; 95%CI, 1.84-2.64, p < 0.001), and NICU admission (OR 1.28; 95%CI, 1.04-1.57, p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Iron deficiency anemia at delivery is associated with an increased risk for cesarean section and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in otherwise healthy women. Monitoring/correction of hemoglobin concentrations even in late pregnancy may prevent these adverse events.

Induction of labor at term following external cephalic version in nulliparous women is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.

PURPOSE: To determine whether induction of labor (IOL) after successful external cephalic version (ECV) is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery (CD) compared with IOL with spontaneous cephalic presentation. METHODS: Retrospective case-control study. All women having IOL after successful ECV were eligible. Each woman in the study group was matched for parity, age and indication for induction with two consecutive controls having IOL and spontaneous cephalic presentation. The primary outcome measure was CD. Secondary outcomes measures were operative vaginal delivery, perineal tear/episiotomy and post-partum hemorrhage. RESULTS: 79 women enrolled in the study group were matched with 158 controls. The overall incidence of CD was significantly higher in the study group compared with the control group (20.3 vs. 10.1 %; OR 2.25, 95 % CI 1.06-4.79, P = 0.03). After dividing the groups according to parity, the difference in the CD rate remained statistically significant for nulliparous women (36.7 vs. 15 %; OR 3.28, 95 % CI 1.17-9.16, P = 0.02), but not for multiparous women (10.2 vs. 7.1 %; OR 1.48, 95 % CI 0.44-4.92, P = 0.53). There was no significant difference in adjusted odds ratios for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Induction of labor after successful ECV in nulliparous women increased the risk of CD compared with IOL with spontaneous cephalic presentation.

Revisit of risk factors for major obstetric hemorrhage: insights from a large medical center.

PURPOSE: To revisit risk factors of major obstetric hemorrhage in a large obstetric center. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case control study was conducted based on institutional electronic database and blood bank registry of a single center, 2005-2014. The major obstetric hemorrhage event was defined as transfusion of ≥5 red blood cells units within 48 h of birth and compared to matched group (ratio 1:4) based on the time of birth. Multivariable stepwise backward logistic regression models were fitted to determine risk factors for major obstetric hemorrhage. Odds ratio (OR), further evaluated by standard measures of the predictive accuracy of the logistic regression models, C statistics, and associated neonatal adverse outcome are reported. RESULTS: 113,342 women delivered during the study; 122 (0.1 %) women experienced major obstetric hemorrhage. There was one major obstetric hemorrhage fatality (0.8 %). Compared to the controls, we identified historical as well as significant current modifiable risk factors for major obstetric hemorrhage: multifetal pregnancy (OR 3.92; 95 % CI 1.34-11.52; p = 0.013), induction of labor (OR 2.81; 95 % CI 1.22-7.05; p = 0.027), cesarean section (OR 25.56; 95 % CI 12.88-50.75; p < 0.001), and instrumental delivery (OR 6.58; 95 % CI 2.36-18.3; p < 0.001). C statistics of the model for major obstetric hemorrhage prediction was 0.919 (95 % CI 0.890-0.948, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Major obstetric hemorrhage is a rare event with potentially modifiable risk factors which represent a platform of interventions for lessening obstetric morbidity.

Perimortem cesarean section for maternal and fetal salvage: concise review and protocol.

Cardiopulmonary arrest is a rare event during pregnancy and labor. Perimortem cesarean section has been resorted to as a rare event since ancient times; however, greater awareness regarding this procedure within the medical community has only emerged in the past few decades. Current recommendations for maternal resuscitation include performance of the procedure after five minutes of unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. If accomplished in a timely manner, perimortem cesarean section can result in fetal salvage and is also critical for maternal resuscitation. Nevertheless, deficits in knowledge about this procedure are common. We have reviewed publications on perimortem cesarean section and present the most recent evidence on this topic, as well as recommending our "easy-to-access protocol" adapted for resuscitation following maternal collapse.