Psoriasis Is a Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection After Primary TKA.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between psoriasis and complications after primary TKA is not well defined. Current studies are limited to small, single-center studies evaluating fewer than 150 patients with psoriasis, with some studies reporting an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and another reporting no associated risk. There is a need to reevaluate the risk of psoriasis and postoperative complications, including SSI, to better risk-stratify and guide practice in this patient population. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Compared with patients without psoriasis, after accounting for potential confounders such as age, insurance, and comorbidities, do patients with psoriasis have a higher odds of superficial SSI after primary TKA? (2) Do patients with psoriasis have a higher odds of deep SSI after primary TKA? METHODS: Patients 18 years or older who underwent unilateral, primary TKA between 2015 and 2019 were identified in the PearlDiver database (n = 490,722). Patients with rheumatoid, septic, or posttraumatic arthritis were excluded, as well as patients with bone neoplasias (n = 188,557). Additionally, patients with less than 2 years of follow-up (n = 53,673) were excluded. In all, 248,492 patients were included in this study; 0.4% (1078) were in the psoriasis group and 99% (247,414) were in the control group. Overall 2-year superficial and deep SSI rates were stratified and compared between patients with psoriasis and a control group of patients who did not have psoriasis as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the odds of undergoing an aseptic revision or manipulation under anesthesia. RESULTS: In the multivariable analysis, which controlled for potential confounders such as age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and liver disease, the odds of SSI-either superficial or deep-remained higher for patients with psoriasis (OR 1.74 [95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.96]; p = 0.04). When focusing on superficial infections in the multivariable analysis, patients with psoriasis had a higher odds of superficial SSI than those in the control group (OR 2.83 [95% CI 1.26 to 6.34]; p = 0.01). The odds of deep SSI were not different between the two cohorts in our multivariable analysis (OR 1.32 [95% CI 0.66 to 2.66]; p = 0.43). Patients with psoriasis did not have an increased odds of undergoing an aseptic revision (OR 0.79 [95% CI 0.48 to 1.32]; p = 0.38) or manipulation under anesthesia (OR 0.74 [95% CI 0.52 to 1.06]; p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Patients with psoriasis had higher overall rates of SSI at 2 years of follow-up than patients without psoriasis. Our findings suggest that psoriasis is a risk factor for superficial SSI after primary TKA and is an important comorbidity for surgeons to consider before surgery. Further research is needed to assess the role of adjunctive interventions in patients with psoriasis to mitigate the elevated odds of superficial SSI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Isolated Liner Exchange Versus All-Component Revision for Instability After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Instability is a common cause for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risks and benefits of polyethylene liner exchange (LE) as compared to full metal component revision continue to be debated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the success rate and complication profiles of revision TKA for instability based on surgical procedure. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing revision TKA for instability from 2015 to 2019. Patients with prior revisions were excluded. 42 patients undergoing isolated polyethylene LE without an increase in constraint were compared with 48 patients undergoing full component revision revision (FCR) of both tibial and femoral components. The primary outcome was differences in rerevision for instability. Noninstability reoperations, 90-day readmissions, and lengths-of-stay were also compared. RESULTS: LEs had a 10.1% higher rerevision for instability rate that approached statistical significance (LE 14.3% versus FCR 4.2%, P = .092). Additionally, FCR had a 4.2% rate of aseptic loosening and a 4.2% rate of periprosthetic-joint-infection, whereas LE had none (P = .181). FCR also had a longer length-of-stay (FCR 3.0 ± 1.3 versus LE: 1.8 ± 0.9 days, P < .001). No differences were found in 90-day readmissions (LE 7.1% versus FCR 4.2%, P = .661). CONCLUSION: All component revision may have a higher success rate than isolated LE in addressing instability but is associated with higher rates of surgical complications. With appropriate patient selection and risk-benefit discussion, isolated LE may be a reasonable surgical option for TKA instability with a lower complication profile and length-of-stay.

Revision total knee arthroplasty for arthrofibrosis improves range of motion.

PURPOSE: Arthrofibrosis after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a significant contributor to patient dissatisfaction. While treatment algorithms involve early physical therapy and manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), some patients ultimately require revision TKA. It is unclear whether revision TKA can consistently improve these patient's range of motion (ROM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate ROM when revision TKA was performed for arthrofibrosis. METHODS: A retrospective study of 42 TKA's diagnosed with arthrofibrosis from 2013 to 2019 at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. The primary outcome was ROM (flexion, extension, and total arc of motion) before and after revision TKA, and secondary outcomes included patient reported outcomes information system (PROMIS) scores. Categorical data were compared using chi-squared analysis, and paired samples t tests were performed to compare ROM at three different times: pre-primary TKA, pre-revision TKA, and post-revision TKA. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess for effect modification on total ROM. RESULTS: The patient's pre-revision mean flexion was 85.6 degrees, and mean extension was 10.1 degrees. At the time of the revision, the mean age of the cohort was 64.7 years, the average body mass index (BMI) was 29.8, and 62% were female. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, revision TKA significantly improved terminal flexion by 18.4 degrees (p < 0.001), terminal extension by 6.8 degrees (p = 0.007), and total arc of motion by 25.2 degrees (p < 0.001). The final ROM after revision TKA was not significantly different from the patient's pre-primary TKA ROM (p = 0.759). PROMIS physical function, depression, and pain interference scores were 39 (SD = 7.72), 49 (SD = 8.39), and 62 (SD = 7.25), respectively. CONCLUSION: Revision TKA for arthrofibrosis significantly improved ROM at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years with over 25 degrees of improvement in the total arc of motion, resulting in final ROM similar to pre-primary TKA ROM. PROMIS physical function and pain scores showed moderate dysfunction, while depression scores were within normal limits. While physical therapy and MUA remain the gold standard for the early treatment of stiffness after TKA, revision TKA can improve ROM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Initiation of Bisphosphonates Prior to Total Joint Arthroplasty Does Not Lower Periprosthetic Fracture Risk.

BACKGROUND: Many patients are diagnosed with osteoporosis shortly prior to scheduling total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to determine if initiation of bisphosphonates prior to TJA decreased the risks of periprosthetic fractures (PPFx). METHODS: A national database was used to identify all patients diagnosed with osteoporosis prior to primary TJA. Patients who had osteoporosis without preoperative bisphosphonate use were designated as our control group. Patients on preoperative bisphosphonates were stratified based on duration and timing of bisphosphonate use: long-term preoperative users (initiation 3 to 5 years preoperatively), intermediate-term preoperative users (initiation 1 to 3 years preoperatively), and short-term preoperative users (initiation 0 to 1 year preoperatively). Rates of PPFx at 90-day and 2-year follow-up were compared between groups. RESULTS: In patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, there was no difference in PPFx rate between our control group and preoperative bisphosphonate users of all durations at 90-day (P = .12) and 2-year follow-up (P = .22). In patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty, there was no difference in PPFx rate between our control group and preoperative bisphosphonate users of all durations at 90-day (P = .76) and 2-year follow-up (P = .39). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing primary TJA, preoperative bisphosphonate users did not have a decreased PPFx rate compared to our control group at 90-day and 2-year follow-up. Our findings suggest that preoperative bisphosphonate use, regardless of the duration of treatment, does not confer protective benefits against PPFx in patients undergoing TJA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.

Higher Complication Rate in COVID-19 Recovered Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data reviewing complication risks associated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA) after recovering from COVID-19. This study evaluated complications within 90 days of TJA in patients who had a COVID-19 diagnosis at varying intervals prior to surgery versus a non-COVID-19 cohort. METHODS: A large national database was used to identify patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in the six months prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty. The incidence of complications within 90 days of surgery was recorded and compared to a COVID-19 negative control group matched 1:3 for age range in 5-year intervals, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and sex. There were 7,780 patients included in the study; 5,840 (75.1%) never diagnosed with COVID-19, 1,390 (17.9%) who had a COVID-19 diagnosis 0 to 3 months prior to surgery, and 550 (7.1%) who had a COVID-19 diagnosis 3 to 6 months prior to surgery. RESULTS: When compared to their COVID negative controls, patients who had a COVID-19 diagnosis 0 to 3 months prior to surgery had significantly higher rates of readmission (14.0 versus 11.1%, P = .001), pneumonia (2.2 versus 0.7%, P < .001), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (3.3 versus 1.9%, P = .001), kidney failure (2.4 versus 1.4%, P = .006), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (1.4 versus 0.7%, P = .01). Patients who had a COVID-19 diagnosis 3 to 6 months prior to surgery had significantly higher rates of pneumonia (2.0 versus 0.7%, P = .002) and DVT (3.6 versus 1.9%, P = .005) when compared to their COVID negative controls. CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 within three months prior to TJA have an increased risk of 90-day postoperative complications. Risk for pneumonia and DVT remains elevated even when surgery was performed as far as 3 to 6 months after COVID-19 diagnosis.

Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Reduces Radiographic Outliers for Low-volume Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgeons.

Background: Most studies evaluating robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA TKA) analyzed the advantages offered to high-volume surgeons. This study aims to determine if RA TKA improves radiographic or clinical outcomes for low-volume, non-arthroplasty-trained surgeons. Methods: Radiographic and early clinical outcomes of 19 RA TKAs and 41 conventional TKAs, all performed by a single, non-arthroplasty-trained orthopaedic surgeon, were compared. Radiographic outliers were based on surgeon targets and defined as tibial posterior slope outside of 0°-5°, tibial tray varus outside of 0°-3°, and the presence of notching. Clinical outcomes included inpatient narcotic usage, length of stay, range of motion, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System scores. Results: There was a significant decrease in tibial slope outliers (RA TKA 0% vs non-RA TKA 22%, P = .024) and notching incidence (RA TKA 0% vs non-RA TKA 19.5%, P = .044) in the RA group. Tibial tray varus/valgus outliers trended lower in the RA TKA group (10.0% vs 26.8%, P = .189). Length of stay was significantly shorter in RA patients (48.0 hours [standard deviation: 25.5] vs 67.7 hours [34.3], P = .038). RA patients trended toward lower in postoperative inpatient total mean morphine equivalents usage (79.9 [89.2] vs 140.1 [169.3], P = .142) and inpatient mean morphine equivalents usage per day (30.36 [26.9] vs 45.6 [36.7], P = .105). There was no significant difference in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System scores or range of motion at first and second postoperative follow-up within 3 months. Conclusions: RA TKA reduced the incidence of radiographic outliers when compared to conventional TKA for a low-volume arthroplasty surgeon.

Preoperative Depression Is Associated With Increased Short-term Complications But Equivalent Long-term Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Concomitant depression negatively impacts outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys are validated measures that quantify depression, pain, and physical function. We hypothesized that higher preoperative PROMIS-depression scores would be associated with inferior outcomes following TKA. A total of 258 patients underwent primary TKA at a tertiary academic center between June 2018 and August 2020. PROMIS scores were collected preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Patients with preoperative PROMIS depression scores of 55 or greater were considered PROMIS depressed (PD) and patients with scores less than 55 were considered not PROMIS depressed (ND). The primary outcomes were changes in PROMIS scores. Secondary outcomes included total and daily mean morphine milligram equivalents (MME) received during admission as well as 90-day hospital readmission and 2-year all-cause revision rates. There were 66 (25.58%) patients in the PD group and 192 (74.42%) in the ND group. Patients in the PD group had improved depression scores at all follow-up intervals (P<.001) and decreased pain scores at 1 year (P=.016). Both groups experienced similar changes in function scores at each follow-up interval. Patients in the PD group had higher total (P=.176) and daily (P=.433) mean MME use while admitted. Ninety-day hospital readmissions were higher in the PD group (P=.002). There were no differences in 2-year revision rates (P=.648). Preoperative PROMIS-depression scores of 55 or greater do not negatively impact postoperative function, depression, or pain, and patients with these scores have greater improvement in depression and pain at certain intervals. Patients in the PD group had higher readmission rates. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):40-45.].

Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections Into a Preexisting Total Knee Arthroplasty are Associated With Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Revision.

Background: This study aims to determine the risks of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and revision associated with injecting a preexisting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with intra-articular corticosteroids (IACSs). Methods: The PearlDiver database was used to identify patients who underwent elective, primary TKA between 2015 and 2019. Patients who received IACS injections into the ipsilateral knee within 1 year after their primary TKA were matched 2:1 on age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index and compared to a no-injection control group. The incidence of PJI at 1 year postoperatively and revision at 2 years postoperatively were compared between groups. Results: A total of 27,059 patients were in the injection cohort and 54,116 patients in the control cohort. The overall PJI rate was 1.3% in the injection cohort and 0.8% in the control cohort (P < .001). The rate of PJI increased with the number of post-TKA IACS injections received: 1 injection (1.3%), 2 injections (1.4%), and >3 injections (1.8%) (P < .001 for all, compared to controls). The revision rate was 3.1% in the injection cohort and 1.3% in the control cohort (P < .001). Revision rates increased with the number of post-TKA IACS injections received: 1 injection (2.5%), 2 injections (4.2%), and >3 injections (7.3%) (P < .001 for all, compared to controls). Conclusions: IACS injections into a preexisting TKA are associated with an incremental increased risk of prosthetic joint infection and revision. Considering the potential deleterious impact of PJI and complexity of revision procedures, IACS injections into a preexisting TKA should be strongly discouraged.