Randomised trial of sequential versus concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (EORTC 08972-22973).

UNLABELLED: A randomised phase III study was performed comparing sequential (S) and concurrent (C) chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients were randomised to receive two courses of Gemcitabine (1250mg/m(2) days 1, 8) and Cisplatin (75mg/m(2) day 2) prior to, or daily low-dose Cisplatin (6mg/m(2)) concurrent with radiotherapy, consisting of 24 fractions of 2.75Gy in 32 days, with a total dose of 66Gy. RESULTS: Acute haematological toxicity grade 3/4 was more pronounced in the sequential (S) (30% versus 6%), oesophagitis grade 3/4 more frequent in the concurrent (C) arm (5% versus 14%). Late oesophagitis grade 3 was 4% (S and C), pneumonitis grade 3/4 14% (S) and 18% (C). Because of the poor power of the study no significant differences in median survival (MS), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) could be detected. MS was 16.2 (S) and 16.5 (C) months, 2-year OS was 34% (S) and 39% (C), 3-year OS was 22% (S) and 34% (C). CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy 66Gy given concurrently with daily low-dose Cisplatin or after two courses of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin was well tolerated. Due to early closure no conclusions can be reached on the relative merits; both arms showed good OS.

A phase II study of paclitaxel in advanced bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (EORTC trial 08956).

PURPOSE: The incidence of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) has risen steadily over the last decades along with the increasing frequency of adenocarcinomas. BAC is relatively resistant to commonly used chemotherapy regimens. A phase II study with single agent paclitaxel in patients with stages IIIB, IV or recurrent BAC was performed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with BAC with at least one target bidimensionally measurable lesion staged as unresectable stages IIIB, IV or recurrent disease, not previously irradiated; ECOG performance status 0-2; life expectancy greater than 3 months; age range between 18 and 75, received paclitaxel at a dose of 200 mg/m2 i.v. as 3h continuous infusion on day 1 every 21 days. Treatment was continued until progression or up to a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were eligible. Median number of cycles was 3 (range 0-6); 35% of patients received the planned six cycles of chemotherapy. One patient died of unrelated cause before the start of treatment. Both hematological and non-hematological toxicities were generally mild. Only one partial response (PR) was observed among the 18 eligible patients who started protocol treatment, with a response rate of 5.6% (95% CI: 0.1-27.3%). After an independent review, two PR were confirmed, for a response rate of 11.1% (95% CI: 1.4-34.7%); nine patients had stable disease (50.0%), three patients had progressive disease (11.1%) and four patients were not assessable (22.2%). Median survival was 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.8-14.5) and 1-year survival was 35.0% (95% CI: 14.1-55.8). Median progression free survival for all patients was 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.5-6.0). The study was terminated due to the low response rate. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel as single agent in stages IIIB-IV BAC was well tolerated and manageable but of limited efficacy. BAC should not be excluded from trials of new forms of chemotherapy.