The predictive value of inflammatory biomarkers for major pathological response in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and its association with the immune-related tumor microenvironment: a multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory biomarkers in the peripheral blood have been established as predictors for immunotherapeutic efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether they can also predict major pathological response (MPR) in neoadjuvant setting remains unclear. METHODS: In this multi-center retrospective study, 122 and 92 stage I-IIIB NSCLC patients from six hospitals who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery were included in the discovery and external validation cohort, respectively. Baseline and on-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were calculated and associated with MPR. Furthermore, resected tumor samples from 37 patients were collected for RNA-sequencing to investigate the immune-related tumor microenvironment. RESULTS: In both the discovery and validation cohorts, the on-treatment NLR, dNLR, PLR, and SII levels were significantly lower in the patients with MPR versus non-MPR. On-treatment SII remained an independent predictor of MPR in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of on-treatment SII for predicting MPR was 0.75 (95%CI, 0.67-0.84) in the discovery cohort. Moreover, the predictive value was further improved by combining the on-treatment SII and radiological tumor regression data, demonstrating an AUC of 0.82 (95%CI, 0.74-0.90). The predictive accuracy was validated in the external cohort. Compared with the SII-high group, patients with SII-Low were associated with the activated B cell receptor signaling pathway and a higher intratumoral immune cell infiltration level. CONCLUSIONS: On-treatment SII was independently associated with MPR in NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Major pathological response exhibited distinct prognostic significance for lung adenocarcinoma post different modalities of neoadjuvant therapy.

AIMS: For non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, the major pathological response (MPR) is defined as the percentage of residual viable tumour cells (%RVT) in the tumour bed of no more than 10%. It has been proposed as a predictor of survival in neoadjuvant therapy-treated cohorts. Nonetheless, the significance of %RVT in the pathological assessment of lung adenocarcinoma cohorts remains undetermined. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 152 lung adenocarcinoma patients were included in this retrospective study, among whom 67 received neoadjuvant targeted therapy and 85 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinicopathological characteristics, neoadjuvant treatment response and survival status were investigated. The routinely adopted standard for MPR (%RVT ≤ 10%) failed to differentiate prognosis in the lung adenocarcinoma population. For the neoadjuvant chemotherapy cohort, the optimal %RVT cut-off value of RFS was 60%. However, this cut-off value was clinically insignificant in the neoadjuvant targeted-therapy cohort. Hence, for these patients, we built a nomogram model including high-grade patterns and ypN stage to predict disease recurrence, demonstrating high efficacy (a bootstrap-corrected C-index of 0.731). CONCLUSIONS: %RVT served as a strong indicator of the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy but not neoadjuvant targeted therapy. Residual high-grade pathological patterns might substitute MPR in prognostic evaluation of lung adenocarcinoma post-targeted therapy.

Clinical utility of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the assessment of mediastinal lymph node disease after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The performance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the prediction of ypN2 disease in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has not been reported. This multicenter study investigated the utility of PET/CT to assess ypN2 disease in these patients. METHODS: A total of 181 consecutive patients (chemoimmunotherapy = 86, chemotherapy = 95) at four institutions were enrolled in this study. Every patient received a PET/CT scan prior to surgery and complete resection with systematic nodal dissection. The diagnostic performance was evaluated through area under the curve (AUC). Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis were performed to identify the risk factors affecting recurrences. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT for ypN2 diseases were 0.667, 0.835, and 0.779, respectively. Therefore, the AUC was 0.751. Compared with the false positive cases, the mean value of max standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (6.024 vs. 2.672, p < 0.001) of N2 nodes was significantly higher in true positive patients. Moreover, the SUVmax of true positive (7.671 vs. 5.976, p = 0.365) and false (2.433 vs. 2.339, p = 0.990) positive cases were similar between chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively. Survival analysis proved that pathologic N (ypN) 2 patients could be stratified by PET/CT-N2(+ vs. -) for both chemoimmunotherapy (p = 0.023) and chemotherapy (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT is an accurate and non-invasive test for mediastinal restaging of NSCLC patients who receive neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The ypN2 patients with PET/CT-N2( +) are identified as an independent prognostic factor compared with PET/CT-N2(-). CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) plays an integral role during disease diagnosis, staging, and therapeutic response assessments in patients with NSCLC. PET/CT could be an effective non-invasive tool for predicting ypN2 diseases after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. KEY POINTS: • PET/CT could serve as an effective non-invasive tool for predicting ypN2 diseases. • The ypN2 patients with PET/CT-N2( +) were a strong and independent prognostic factor. • The application of PET/CT for restaging should be encouraged in clinical practice.

Hybrid uniportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery staplers: technical aspects and results.

Background: The clinical efficacy of robot-assisted thoracic surgeries has been explored by numerous recent studies. Nonetheless, since current standard robotic systems (da Vinci Xi system) were intended for multiportal surgical processes and robotic staplers were still unavailable in the developing world, obstacles still remain concerning the feasibility of uniportal robotic surgeries. Methods: A hybrid uniportal robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) modality utilizing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) staplers was investigated in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative outcomes concerning patients receiving hybrid uniportal RATS between August 2022 and September 2022 were collected. Results: A total of 40 patients were included in this study. Most of the patients (23/40, 57.5%) received hybrid uniportal RATS lobectomies. One conversion from uniportal RATS to biportal process was encountered due to extensive adhesions discovered intraoperatively. The median procedural duration was 76 min [interquartile range (IQR), 61-99 min], and the median blood loss volume was 50 mL (IQR, 50-50 mL). A median stay length of three days (IQR, 2-4 days) was recorded. Eleven patients (27.5%) developed Clavien-Dindo grade I-II postoperative complications, while no grade III-IV complications were observed. Aside from this, none of the patients were readmitted or died within 30 days post-surgery. Conclusions: The feasibility of hybrid uniportal RATS procedures using VATS staplers has been preliminarily validated. For early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients, such a procedure might clinical efficacy comparable to that of uniportal RATS utilizing robotic staplers.

The additional radiotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis of stage III-N2 with highest mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The benefits of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for heterogeneous pathological N2 (pN2) diseases remain unclear in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate suitable pN2 patients for adjuvant CRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with pN2 NSCLC in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from January 2012 to December 2016. Included cases were subdivided as highest mediastinal lymph node (HM) (n = 732) metastasis and non-HM metastasis (n = 677) groups according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Furthermore, the Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to evaluate the prognostic benefits of adjuvant CRT in heterogeneous pN2 subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 1409 patients were enrolled in this study, with a median follow-up time of 63.8 months. Patients with HM involvement had worse prognoses (p < 0.001 for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS)). Furthermore, the survival improvement of adjuvant CRT was significant for these patients (p < 0.001 for RFS and p = 0.032 for OS), regardless of whether it was single (p < 0.001 for RFS and p = 0.029 for OS) or multiple pN2 (p < 0.001 for RFS and p = 0.026 for OS) diseases. According to multivariable cox analysis, the long-term RFS and OS in the cancerous HM group were independently predicted by pathological N stage (p = 0.002 for RFS and p < 0.001 for OS) and adjuvant CRT (p < 0.001 for RFS and p = 0.011 for OS). CONCLUSION: Metastatic HM was associated with a worse prognosis in pN2 disease. Our analysis supported that adjuvant CRT significantly improved both RFS and OS for these patients.

Perioperative outcomes comparison of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for thymic epithelial tumor: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The advent of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has completely revolutionized the modality of thymectomy, which could reportedly achieve equivalent efficacy compared with a minimally invasive approach. This study was conducted to further compare the perioperative outcomes between these two modalities. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study that included patients receiving either a robotic or video-assisted thoracoscopic (VAT) thymectomy between February 2021 and January 2023 was conducted. All the patients were pathologically confirmed with thymic epithelial tumors. Clinical and pathological characteristics and perioperative outcomes were collected and compared between these two cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients were included in this study, with 61 (32.1%) and 129 (67.9%) receiving robotic and video-assisted thymectomy, respectively. The clinicopathological characteristics were not significantly different between these 2 groups. The size of the resected specimens in the RATS cohort was larger than the VATS cohort [median (IQR), 13.0 (8.0-16.0) vs. 9.0 (6.7-12.0) cm, p < 0.001], while the procedural duration was longer for the RATS group than its counterpart [median (IQR), 105 (85-143) vs. 85 (69-115) min, p = 0.001]. Moreover, no other significant difference was observed between these two groups. Since more than half of the robotic thymectomy was performed using a subxiphoid approach, a subgroup analysis was further conducted. Similarly, the robotic group through a subxiphoid approach harbored a longer procedural duration, and the size of the specimens obtained was larger than the VATS group [median (IQR), 14.0 (11.0-16.5) vs. 12.5 (8.5-15.0) cm, p = 0.061]. CONCLUSIONS: The early clinical efficacy of robotic thymectomy was proven comparable to the established VATS approach, and such a modality might have strength when obtaining larger specimens, which could contribute to improving long-term efficacy. Despite the longer procedural duration recorded in the early stage of conducting robotic thymectomy, further accumulation would help decrease the time.

The IASLC grading system for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma: a potential prognosticator for patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

Background: Grading system for resected invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) was validated as a strong prognostic indicator. Nonetheless, the efficacy of utilizing such grading system in prognostic assessment of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy still needs elucidating. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted including patients with resected adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or targeted therapy from August 2012 to December 2020 in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. All the surgical specimens were re-evaluated and graded. The prognostic value of the grading system was further validated. Results: Ultimately, a total of 198 patients were enrolled in this study, and subdivided into three cohorts according to the grading system. There were 13 (6.6%), 37 (18.7%), and 148 (74.7%) patients belonging to Grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively. IASLC grading system demonstrated significant power in prognosis differentiation of the entire cohort [recurrence-free survival (RFS), p < 0.001; overall survival (OS), p < 0.001] and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and targeted therapy cohorts separately, and was further verified as a significant prognostic indicator for RFS and OS in multivariable Cox analysis. Since the majority of the patients (84.8%) did not achieve major pathologic response (MPR), representing a wide spectrum of survival, the prognostic value of grading system in non-MPR cohort was further evaluated. Similar results were also obtained that IASLC grading system was assessed significant in univariable analysis of RFS (p < 0.001) and univariable analysis of OS (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The prognostic efficacy of pathological evaluation of the residual proportion of pulmonary adenocarcinoma post-neoadjuvant therapy using IASLC grading system was preliminarily verified. Such grading system might assist prognostic evaluation of neoadjuvant cohort other than traditional pathological parameters.

Real-world clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who undergo complete resection continue to demonstrate high risk of recurrence and death. The advent of the neoadjuvant regimen has brought new hope for these patients. The present study aims to further demonstrate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A real-world observational study was conducted concerning patients who received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab or nivolumab combined with chemotherapy between January 2018 and December 2020 in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response (MPR), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were analyzed and divided into the pembrolizumab (n = 42) and nivolumab groups (n = 34) with a median follow-up time of 12.2 months. Most patients (92%) had stage III disease, with 41 (54%) and 29 (38%) patients initially diagnosed clinical stage IIIA and IIIB, respectively. Fifty (66%), 21 (28%) and 5 (6%) patients received two, three and four cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, separately, achieving an ORR of 75%. None of them needed a reduced initial dose or delay due to intolerable adverse events. Forty-nine (64%) and 28 (37%) patients achieved MPR and pCR, respectively. RNA sequencing showed that MPR associated with increased infiltration of cytotoxic immune cells with tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs). Histological evaluation highlighted the localization of B cells within TLSs. Forty-two (69%) patients with clinically N2 disease at baseline were downstaged to pathological N0 (39 patients) or N1 (3 patients). One-year-PFS rate of stage III patients was 91%. No difference in baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes was observed between 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable NSCLC was further validated, with a high MPR rate and manageable adverse events.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes among non-small cell lung cancer patients with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy, EGFR-TKI, and chemotherapy alone: a real-world evidence study.

Background: The utilization of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy has increased significantly for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is still unclear whether such a treatment paradigm affects perioperative outcomes compared with other neoadjuvant treatment. We aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy and to compare them with neoadjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for resectable NSCLC. Methods: A retrospective cohort including 194 stage IB-IIIB NSCLC underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant treatment between 2018 and 2020 were reviewed. Perioperative complications were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and were compared using one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square test. Results: There were 42, 54, and 98 patients in the neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy, EGFR-TKI, and chemotherapy alone groups, respectively. The tumor size before neoadjuvant treatment was well balanced among the three groups (P=0.122). A shorter median surgical time was observed in the EGFR-TKI group than ICI plus chemotherapy group and chemotherapy group alone (120 vs. 150 vs. 146 min, P=0.041). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was performed in 37 (88.1%), 49 (90.7%), and 57 (58.7%) patients in the three groups, respectively (P<0.001). A higher incidence of pneumonia (P=0.014) was found in the chemotherapy group. Perioperative mortality was observed in 1 patient (2.4%) in the ICI plus chemotherapy group and in 3 patients (3.1%) in the chemotherapy alone group (P=0.440). Patients in the ICI plus chemotherapy group had higher proportions of pathological complete response (40.5% vs. 11.1% vs. 6.1%, P<0.001) and downstaging of clinical N2 status (68.6% vs. 42.9% vs. 31.7%, P=0.012) than patients in EGFR-TKI group and chemotherapy alone group. Conclusions: Surgical resection for NSCLC following neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy was safe and feasible, the perioperative outcomes were similar with neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy alone without unexpected perioperative complications. Additional prospective studies are necessary to validate our findings.

Reconsidering T component of cancer staging for T3/T4 non-small-cell lung cancer with additional nodule.

Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with additional nodule(s) located in the same lobe or ipsilateral different lobe were designated as T3 and T4, respectively, which was merely defined by anatomical location of additional nodule(s), regardless of other prognostic factors. Methods: A total of 4711 patients with T1-4, N0-2, M0 NSCLC undergoing complete resection were identified between 2009 and 2014, including 145 patients with additional nodule(s) in the same lobe (T3-Add) and 174 patients with additional tumor nodule(s) in ipsilateral different lobe (T4-Add). Overall survival (OS) was compared using multivariable Cox regression models and propensity score matching analysis (PSM). Results: T3-Add patients [T3-Add versus T3, hazard ratio (HR), 0.695; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.528-0.915; p = 0.009] and comparable OS with T2b patients through multivariable Cox analysis, and further validated by PSM. T4-Add patients carried a wide spectrum of prognosis, and the largest diameter of single tumor was screened out as the most effective indicator for distinguishing prognosis. T4-Add (⩽3 cm) patients had better OS than T4 patients [T4-Add (⩽3 cm) versus T4, HR, 0.629; 95% CI, 0.455-0.869; p = 0.005] and comparable OS with T3 patients. And T4-Add (>3 cm) patients had comparable OS with T4 patients. Conclusion: NSCLC patients with additional nodule(s) in the same lobe and ipsilateral different lobe (maximum tumor diameter ⩽ 3 cm) should be further validated and considered restaging as T2b and T3 in the forthcoming 9th tumor, node, and metastasis staging system.

Three-dimensionally printed navigational template: a promising guiding approach for lung biopsy.

Background: Percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy is customarily conducted under computed tomography (CT) guidance, which primarily depends on the conductors' experience and inevitably contributes to long procedural duration and radiation exposure. Novel technique facilitating lung biopsy is currently demanded. Methods: Based on the reconstructed anatomical information of CT scans, a three-dimensionally printed navigational template was customized to guide fine-needle aspiration (FNA). The needle insertion site and angle could be indicated by the template after proper placement according to the reference landmarks. From June 2020 to August 2020, patients with peripheral indeterminate lung lesions ≥30 mm in diameter were enrolled in a pilot trial. Cases were considered successful when the virtual line indicated by the template in the first CT scan was pointing at the target, and the rate of success was recorded. The insertion deviation, procedural duration, radiation exposure, biopsy-related complications, and diagnostic yield were documented as well. Results: A total of 20 patients consented to participate, and 2 withdrew. The remaining 18 participants consisting of 11 men and 7 women with a median age of 63 [inter-quartile range (IQR), 50-68] years and a median body mass index (BMI) of 23.5 (IQR, 20.8-25.8) kg/m2 received template-guided FNA. The median nodule size of the patients was 41.2 (IQR, 36.2-51.9) mm and 17 lesions were successfully targeted (success rate, 94.4%). One lesion was not reached through the designed trajectory due to an unpredictable alteration of the lesion's location resulting from pleural effusion. The median deviation between the actual position of the needle tip and the designed route was 9.4 (IQR, 6.8-11.7) mm. The median procedural duration was 10.7 (IQR, 9.7-11.8) min, and the median radiation exposure was 220.9 (IQR, 198.6-249.5) mGy×cm. No major biopsy-related complication was encountered. Definitive diagnosis of malignancy was reached in 13 of the 17 (76.5%) participants. Conclusions: The feasibility and safety of navigational template-guided FNA were preliminarily validated in lung biopsy cohort. Nonetheless, patients with pleural effusion were not recommended to undergo FNA guided by such technique. Trial Registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03325907).

A modified T categorization for part-solid lesions in Chinese patients with clinical stage I Non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the prognostic impact of the presence of ground glass opacity (GGO) component and compared a modified clinical T categorization (cTm) with the current 8th classification (cT8) for survival prediction in Chinese patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: According to cTm and cT8 classifications, we retrospectively evaluated 1461 patients with part-solid or pure-solid lesions. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. The concordance index (C- index), reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to estimate reclassification net benefits of cTm for survival prediction. RESULTS: The cT8 classification clearly stratifies the survival outcomes in solid tumors but not in part-solid tumors. The presence of GGO components was an independent prognostic factor for both RFS and OS (p < 0.001), indicating a better outcome in each clinical T stage. The C-index was significantly improved from 0.650 to 0.730 for RFS (p < 0.001) and 0.647 to 0.730 for OS (p < 0.001) after reclassifying by cTm categorization. The DCA, NRI (RFS: 0.342, OS: 0.302), and IDI (RFS: 0.070, OS: 0.054) demonstrated that the cTm classification provided more net benefit in the survival prediction compared with the current cT8 classification. CONCLUSIONS: The current cT8 classification may not be appropriate for part-solid lesions because the presence of GGO components is associated with excellent prognosis despite clinical stage. Also, the cTm classification for part-solid lesions showed an improvement in survival prediction.