Perioperative diagnosis and impact of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in infants with congenital heart disease.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (aVWS) has been reported in patients with congenital heart diseases associated with shear stress caused by significant blood flow gradients. Its etiology and impact on intraoperative bleeding during pediatric cardiac surgery have not been systematically studied. This single-center, prospective, observational study investigated appropriate diagnostic tools of aVWS compared with multimer analysis as diagnostic criterion standard and aimed to clarify the role of aVWS in intraoperative hemorrhage. A total of 65 newborns and infants aged 0 to 12 months scheduled for cardiac surgery at our tertiary referral center from March 2018 to July 2019 were included in the analysis. The glycoprotein Ib M assay (GPIbM)/von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) ratio provided the best predictability of aVWS (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.75-0.86]), followed by VWF collagen binding assay/VWF:Ag ratio (AUC, 0.70 [0.63-0.77]) and peak systolic echocardiographic gradients (AUC, 0.69 [0.62-0.76]). A cutoff value of 0.83 was proposed for the GPIbM/VWF:Ag ratio. Intraoperative high-molecular-weight multimer ratios were inversely correlated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (r = -0.57) and aortic cross-clamp time (r = -0.54). Patients with intraoperative aVWS received significantly more fresh frozen plasma (P = .016) and fibrinogen concentrate (P = .011) than those without. The amounts of other administered blood components and chest closure times did not differ significantly. CPB appears to trigger aVWS in pediatric cardiac surgery. The GPIbM/VWF:Ag ratio is a reliable test that can be included in routine intraoperative laboratory workup. Our data provide the basis for further studies in larger patient cohorts to achieve definitive clarification of the effects of aVWS and its potential treatment on intraoperative bleeding.

Head and Neck Cancer: A Study on the Complex Relationship between QoL and Swallowing Function.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is linked to significant morbidity, adversely affecting survival and functional capacity. Post-treatment challenges such as pain, dysphonia, and dysphagia are common, prompting increased attention in survivorship research. Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires, especially the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), are prevalent outcome measures in clinical studies but often lack parallel objective swallowing function evaluations, leading to potential outcome discrepancies. This study aimed to illuminate the relationship between subjective QoL (EQ-5D-5L and MDADI) measures and objective swallowing function (evaluated via Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing, FEES) in patients with HNSCC. The analysis revealed a notable discordance between objective measures of swallowing function, such as the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and residue ratings in the vallecula or piriform sinus, and patients' subjective QoL assessments (p = 0.21). Despite the lack of correlation, swallowing-related QoL, as measured by the MDADI, was more indicative of disease severity than generic QoL assessments. Generic QoL scores did not demonstrate substantial variation between patients. In contrast, MDADI scores significantly declined with advancing tumor stage, multimodal therapy, and reliance on feeding tubes. However, the clinical significance of this finding was tempered by the less than 10-point difference in MDADI scores. The findings of this study underline the limitations of QoL measures as standalone assessments in patients with HNSCC, given their reliance on patient-perceived impairment. While subjective QoL is a crucial aspect of evaluating therapeutic success and patient-centric outcomes, it may fail to capture critical clinical details such as silent aspirations. Consequently, QoL assessments should be augmented by objective evaluations of swallowing function in clinical research and practice to ensure a holistic understanding of patient well-being and treatment impact.