Efficacy of long-term risankizumab treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Subgroup analyses by baseline characteristics and psoriatic disease manifestations through 256 weeks (LIMMitless trial).

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin disease that impacts a heterogeneous group of patients and can have multiple clinical manifestations. Risankizumab is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of risankizumab according to baseline patient characteristics, and for the treatment of high-impact disease manifestations (nail, scalp and palmoplantar psoriasis), through 256 weeks of continuous treatment in the phase 3 LIMMitless study. METHODS: This subgroup analysis evaluated pooled data from patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who were randomized to risankizumab 150 mg during two double-blind, phase 3, 52-week base studies (UltIMMa-1/2; NCT02684370/NCT02684357) and were enrolled in the phase 3 LIMMitless open-label extension study (NCT03047395). Subgroup assessments included the proportion of patients who achieved ≥90%/100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100). Among patients with nail, scalp and/or palmoplantar psoriasis in addition to skin psoriasis, assessments included changes from baseline in and resolution of these three psoriatic manifestations. RESULTS: Overall, a numerically similar proportion of patients (N = 525) achieved PASI 90/100 through Week 256, regardless of their baseline age, sex, body mass index, weight, PASI or psoriatic arthritis status. Patients with nail, scalp and/or palmoplantar psoriasis experienced substantial improvements in manifestation-specific indices (mean improvement from baseline to Week 256 of >81%, >94% and >97%, respectively); in patients with all three manifestations (N = 121), 44.6% achieved complete clearance of these manifestations at Week 256. CONCLUSIONS: Risankizumab demonstrated generally consistent efficacy through 256 weeks across patient subgroups and showed durable long-term efficacy for psoriatic disease manifestations.

Treatment Options for Onychomycosis: Efficacy, Side Effects, Adherence, Financial Considerations, and Ethics.

Background: Onychomycosis is a fungal infection of the nail unit that affects a large patient population globally. Onychomycosis, or tinea unguium, has a benign chronic clinical course; however, it can cause complications in certain patient populations suffering from diabetes and peripheral vascular disease. As nails grow slowly, onychomycosis requires a lengthy treatment plan, and choosing appropriate treatments can be challenging. There are a variety of treatment modalities available for patients including topical, oral, laser, light therapy, procedures such as avulsion and matrixectomy, supplements, over-the-counter medication, and plasma therapy that can be used as monotherapy or in combination for patient satisfaction. Objective: We sought to review treatment options for onychomycosis, taking into consideration the efficacy, side effect profiles, practicality of treatment (adherence), and costs to help healthcare providers offer ethically appropriate treatment regimens to their patients. Methods: A literature search was conducted using electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, EBSCO) and textbooks, in addition to the clinical experiences of the authors and other practitioners in treating onychomycosis, and a summary of the findings are presented here. Results: Although topical (efinaconazole, tavaborole, ciclopirox), oral (terbinafine, itraconazole), and laser (1064nm Nd:YAG lasers, both short-pulsed and Q-switched lasers, carbon dioxide lasers, and the diode 870, 930nm) are the current Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments for onychomycosis, they are just a fraction of available treatment options. New and emerging therapies including new topical and oral medications, combination therapy, photodynamic light therapy, procedural, supplements, over-the-counter medication, and plasma therapy are discussed in our review. Discussion: Onychomycosis has high reinfection and recurrence rates, and the treatment remains challenging as treatment selection involves ethical, evidence-based decision-making and consideration of each individual patient's needs, adherence, budget, the extent of quality of life discomfort, and aesthetic goals, independent of potential financial benefits to the clinicians.

Treatment Patterns and Negative Health Outcomes in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Patients in Germany and the US.

INTRODUCTION: Limited information exists on the epidemiology, treatment, and burden of palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) and defining the optimal course of treatment remains challenging without approved targeted treatments in most countries. Here, we describe the clinical and demographic characteristics, treatments received, and negative health outcomes experienced among patients with PPP in the United States (US) and Germany. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study between 2016 and 2021 using data from the US Merative™ MarketScan® Research Database and IQVIA™ German Disease Analyzer. Adult patients with PPP (ICD-10-CM L40.3) were followed from the date of their first qualifying PPP diagnosis and continued until the earlier of disenrollment or end date of database, during which treatment patterns and incidence rates of negative health outcomes were assessed. Treatment patterns included adherence, non-persistence, discontinuation, re-initiation, switching, and combination therapy. RESULTS: The prevalence of PPP was 0.005% and 0.065% in the MarketScan database and German Disease Analyzer, respectively, with 1629 and 3866 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Most patients were female (71.3%, 67.8%), with mean (SD) age of 54.1 (11.7) and 56.9 (14.3) years, respectively. One year post index, most patients received topical treatment (77.4%, 65.3%), but non-persistence and discontinuation were high. Oral and biologic treatments displayed higher levels of adherence, particularly apremilast and tofacitinib among oral treatments and TNF inhibitors and IL-23 inhibitors among biologics. Rates of negative health outcomes were higher among patients not receiving treatment post-index compared with those receiving treatment post-index across both databases, regardless of prior treatment history. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing treatment guidelines remains an unmet need for patients with PPP and could improve quality of life by reducing the occurrence of negative health outcomes. The findings from this study may provide insight into the effectiveness of current treatment options for patients with PPP and can be leveraged to support the development of treatment guidelines.