RESUMO
Household studies provide an efficient means to study transmission of infectious diseases, enabling estimation of susceptibility and infectivity by person-type. A main inclusion criterion in such studies is usually the presence of an infected person. This precludes estimation of the hazards of pathogen introduction into the household. Here we estimate age- and time-dependent household introduction hazards together with within household transmission rates using data from a prospective household-based study in the Netherlands. A total of 307 households containing 1,209 persons were included from August 2020 until March 2021. Follow-up of households took place between August 2020 and August 2021 with maximal follow-up per household mostly limited to 161 days. Almost 1 out of 5 households (59/307) had evidence of an introduction of SARS-CoV-2. We estimate introduction hazards and within-household transmission rates in our study population with penalized splines and stochastic epidemic models, respectively. The estimated hazard of introduction of SARS-CoV-2 in the households was lower for children (0-12 years) than for adults (relative hazard: 0.62; 95%CrI: 0.34-1.0). Estimated introduction hazards peaked in mid October 2020, mid December 2020, and mid April 2021, preceding peaks in hospital admissions by 1-2 weeks. Best fitting transmission models included increased infectivity of children relative to adults and adolescents, such that the estimated child-to-child transmission probability (0.62; 95%CrI: 0.40-0.81) was considerably higher than the adult-to-adult transmission probability (0.12; 95%CrI: 0.057-0.19). Scenario analyses indicate that vaccination of adults can strongly reduce household infection attack rates and that adding adolescent vaccination offers limited added benefit.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Epidemias , Adulto , Adolescente , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Prospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Características da FamíliaRESUMO
Legionnaires' disease (LD) is a severe and potentially fatal form of bacterial pneumonia caused by Legionella spp. We evaluated the use of UV-light for detecting Legionella non-pneumophila in water samples according to the NEN-EN-ISO 11731:2017 methodology (reference method) in a collaborative effort involving 10 laboratories. First, a test panel was constructed of 298 strains: 157 Legionella strains and 141 non-Legionella strains were cultured on buffered charcoal yeast extract (BCYE)-medium and confirmed according to ISO 11731: 2017 (cultured on BCYE agar plates with and without l-cysteine), and by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time of flight or next generation sequencing. All strains were additionally exposed to an UV-light to assess if they showed a bright blue fluorescence effect (UV-positive) or not (UV-negative). Second, in an interlaboratory study, 10 laboratories analyzed a blinded set of 16 Legionella strains and 8 non-Legionella strains using both methods. The test panel analyses showed 100% accordance between the UV-light and reference method. In addition, the interlaboratory study results showed full agreement between both methods. Our results support the implementation of UV-light detection to confirm Legionella presumptive colonies during analyses of water samples according to the NEN-EN-ISO 11731:2017 methodology. Implementation of UV-light confirmation could reduce workload, time-to-result and costs for the analyses of water samples for the presence of Legionella.
Assuntos
Legionella , Raios Ultravioleta , Microbiologia da Água , Legionella/isolamento & purificação , Legionella/classificação , Legionella/genética , FluorescênciaRESUMO
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are increasingly identified as Legionnaires' disease (LD) sources. An outbreak investigation was initiated following five LD cases reported in September 2022 in Houten, the Netherlands. Case identification was based on the European LD case definition, with symptom onset from 1 September 2022, residence in or within 5â¯km of Houten, or visit to Houten within the incubation period, without other likely sources. We sampled potential sources and genotyped environmental and clinical isolates. We identified 15 LD cases with onset between 13 September and 23 October 2022. A spatial source identification and wind direction model suggested an industrial (iWWTP) and a municipal WWTP (mWWTP) as potential sources, with the first discharging water into the latter. Both tested positive for Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1 and 6 with multiple sequence types (ST). We detected L. pneumophila sg1 ST42 in the mWWTP, matching with one of three available clinical isolates. Following control measures at the WWTPs, no further cases were observed. This outbreak underlines that municipal and industrial WWTPs can play an important role in community LD cases and outbreaks, especially those with favourable conditions for Legionella growth and dissemination, or even non-favourable conditions for growth but with the influx of contaminated water.
Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Legionella pneumophila , Doença dos Legionários , Águas Residuárias , Microbiologia da Água , Doença dos Legionários/epidemiologia , Doença dos Legionários/microbiologia , Humanos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Águas Residuárias/microbiologia , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Legionella pneumophila/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Purificação da Água , Adulto , GenótipoRESUMO
Mycoplasma pneumoniae is an important cause of pneumonia and extra-pulmonary manifestations. We observed a rise in admissions due to M. pneumoniae infections starting October 2023 in a regional hospital in the Netherlands and an increased incidence in national surveillance data. The incidence in the Netherlands has not been that high since 2011. The patients had a lower median age compared with 2019 and 2020 (28 vs 40 years). M. pneumoniae should be considered in patients with respiratory symptoms, especially children.
Assuntos
Pneumonia por Mycoplasma , Criança , Humanos , Adulto , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma/epidemiologia , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Incidência , Mycoplasma pneumoniae , HospitaisRESUMO
Upper respiratory tract infections are a significant cause of social- and disease burden worldwide. Currently, invasive and uncomfortable molecular detection methods are used for respiratory pathogen detection. We aimed to assess the ability and bearability of a rhinorrhea swab (RS) to detect respiratory pathogens in comparison to the combined nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab (NP/OP). This study was performed at a Public Health Service severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing facility between November and December 2022 in the Netherlands. Adults aged 16 years and older, being subjected to a standard of care NP/OP swab with nasal discharge, were included and received an additional RS. Respiratory pathogen detection was evaluated using SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) PCR. Bearability was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) scores and a questionnaire. A total of 100 adults with a mean age ± SD of 46 ± 16 years were included. The NP/OP swab detected 104 pathogens, the RS 83 pathogens (p < 0.001), and in total 108 respiratory pathogens were identified in 89 adults (89%). The ability to detect respiratory pathogens compared between the RS and the combined NP/OP swab revealed a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI 73%-89%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 72%-100%). RS were significantly more bearable than the combined NP/OP swab (p value < 0.001). Therefore, nasal discharge found in adults can be used as an adequate reliable medium for respiratory pathogen detection using SARS-CoV-2 PCR and MLPA PCR.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Rinorreia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex , Países BaixosRESUMO
Respiratory tract infections (RTI) in children remain a cause of disease burden worldwide. Nasopharyngeal (NP) & oropharyngeal (OP) swabs are used for respiratory pathogen detection, but hold disadvantages particularly for children, highlighting the importance and preference for a child friendly detection method. We aimed to evaluate the performance and tolerability of a rhinorrhea swab (RS) in detecting viral pathogens when compared to a combined OP(/NP) or mid-turbinate (MT) nasal swab. This study was conducted between September 2021 and July 2022 in the Netherlands. Children aged 0-5 years, with an upper RTI and nasal discharge, were included and received a combined swab and a RS. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 PCR were used for viral pathogen detection. Tolerability was evaluated with a questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. During 11 months 88 children were included, with a median age of 1.00 year [interquartile range 0.00-3.00]. In total 122 viral pathogens were detected in 81 children (92%). Sensitivity and specificity of the RS compared to a combined swab were respectively 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91%-100%) and 78% (95% CI 45%-94%). Rhinorrhea samples detected more pathogens than the (combined) nasal samples, 112 versus 108 respectively. Median VAS scores were significantly lower for the RS in both children (2 vs. 6) and their parents (0 vs. 5). A RS can therefore just as effectively/reliably detect viral pathogens as the combined swab in young children and is better tolerated by both children and their parents/caregivers.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Respiratórias , Humanos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Nasofaringe , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Rinorreia , Conchas NasaisRESUMO
Accurate surveillance of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) incidence includes large-scale antibody testing of the population. Current testing methods require collection of venous blood samples by a healthcare worker, or dried blood spot (DBS) collection using finger prick, however this might have some logistic and processing limitations. We investigated the performance of the Ser-Col device for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies using a finger prick: DBS-like collection system that includes a lateral flow paper for serum separation and allows for automated large scale analysis. For this prospective study, adult patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 were included 6 weeks post-symptom onset. Healthy, adult volunteers were included as a negative control group. Venous blood and capillary blood using the Ser-Col device were collected and the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 total antibody ELISA was performed on all samples. We included 50 subjects in the study population and 49 in the control group. Results obtained with venous blood versus Ser-Col capillary blood showed 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.93-1.00) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 0.93-1.00). Our study shows the feasibility of SARS-CoV-2 total antibody screening using a standardized DBS technique with semiautomated processing for large scale analysis.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Prospectivos , Anticorpos Antivirais , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Teste em Amostras de Sangue SecoRESUMO
Legionnaires' disease (LD) is a severe pneumonia mainly caused by the bacterium Legionella pneumophila. Although many environmental sources of LD have been described, the sources of the majority of non-outbreak LD cases have not been identified. In several outbreaks in the Netherlands, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were identified as the most likely source of infection. In this study, four criteria for Legionella growth and emission to air and surface waters were selected based on the literature and a risk matrix was drafted. An inventory was made of all WWTPs and their characteristics in the Netherlands. The risk matrix was applied to identify WWTPs at risk for Legionella growth and emission. Wastewater was collected at WWTPs with moderate to high risk for Legionella growth and emission. In 18% of the sampled WWTPs, Legionella spp. was detected using culture methods. The presented risk matrix can be used to assess the risks of Legionella growth and emission for WWTPs and support surveillance by prioritizing WWTPs. When Legionella is detected in the wastewater, it is recommended to take action to prevent emission to air or discharge on surface waters and, if possible, reduce the Legionella concentration.
Assuntos
Legionella pneumophila , Legionella , Doença dos Legionários , Humanos , Águas Residuárias , Doença dos Legionários/epidemiologia , Surtos de DoençasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Understanding the dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) household transmission is important for adequate infection control measures in this ongoing pandemic. METHODS: Households were enrolled upon a polymerase chain reaction-confirmed index case between October and December 2020, prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination program. Saliva samples were obtained by self-sampling at days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 from study inclusion. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and oropharyngeal swabs (OPS) were collected by the research team at day 7 and capillary blood samples at day 42. Household secondary attack rate (SAR) and per-person SAR were calculated based on at least 1 positive saliva, NPS, OPS, or serum sample. Whole genome sequencing was performed to investigate the possibility of multiple independent SARS-CoV-2 introductions within a household. RESULTS: Eighty-five households were included consisting of 326 (unvaccinated) individuals. Comparable numbers of secondary cases were identified by saliva (133/241 [55.2%]) and serum (127/213 [59.6%]). The household SAR was 88.2%. The per-person SAR was 64.3%. The majority of the secondary cases tested positive in saliva at day 1 (103/150 [68.7%]). Transmission from index case to household member was not affected by age or the nature of their relationship. Phylogenetic analyses suggested a single introduction for the investigated households. CONCLUSIONS: Households have a pivotal role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission. By repeated saliva self-sampling combined with NPS, OPS, and serology, we found the highest SARS-CoV-2 household transmission rates reported to date. Salivary (self-) sampling of adults and children is suitable and attractive for near real-time monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in this setting.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Humanos , Pandemias , Filogenia , SalivaRESUMO
PURPOSE: At the end of life, patients and their families tend to favor adequate pain and symptom management and attention to comfort measures over prolongation of life. However, it has been suggested that many cancer patients without curative options still receive aggressive treatment. We therefore aimed to describe the number of diagnostic procedures, hospitalization, and medication use among these patients as well as factors associated with receiving such care. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study on all patients with metastasized cancer from a primary colon or bronchus and lung (BL) neoplasm from the moment of first admittance (January-December 2017) to end of follow-up (November 2018) or death. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients with colon (36%) or BL (64%) cancer were included in this study, with a median survival time of 7.4 months. 93% of the patients were subjected to at least one diagnostic procedure, 49% received chemotherapy, and 56% received expensive medication including immunotherapy. Patients had a median of 4.6 hospital admissions and 2.3 emergency room (ER) visits. A quarter of all patients (n = 105) received specialized palliative care with a mean of 1.96 consultations and the first consultation after a median time of 4.1 months. Patients with BL neoplasms received significantly more diagnostic procedures, chemotherapy episodes, ER/ICU admissions, and more often received an end-of-life statement per person-year than patients with a primary colon neoplasm. Females received significantly less diagnostic procedures and visited the ER/ICU less frequently than males, and patients aged > 70 years received significantly less chemotherapy (episodes) and expensive medication than younger patients. No differences in care were found between different socioeconomic status groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with metastasized colon or BL cancer receive a large amount of in-hospital medical care. Specialized palliative care was initiated relatively late despite the incurable disease status of all patients. Factors associated with more procedures were BL neoplasms, age between 50 and 70, and male gender.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Assistência Terminal , Idoso , Brônquios , Estudos de Coortes , Colo , Feminino , Hospitalização , Hospitais , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados PaliativosRESUMO
We compared the clinical performance of the ImmuView L. pneumophila and L. longbeachae urinary antigen test (SSI Diagnostica A/S, Hillerød, Denmark) to that of the BinaxNOW Legionella urinary antigen card (Binax; Abbott, Lake Buff, IL) using urine specimens from patients suspected of having pneumonia. In total, 100 frozen urine samples (derived from 50 Legionella cases and 50 noncases) were analyzed with both tests, as were 200 nonfrozen prospectively collected samples. For urine samples from five Legionella cases and two non-Legionella cases, analytical sensitivity (limit of detection) and repeatability were examined. The urine samples from the five Legionella cases were diluted with urine samples that tested Legionella urinary antigen negative with both tests. The analyses of the 100 frozen samples resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of both ImmuView and the BinaxNOW of 96.0% (48/50) and 100% (50/50), respectively. Of the 200 nonfrozen samples, there were three samples that showed a positive result for L. pneumophila by both tests. The analyses of reproducibility showed that for the 34 (diluted) samples that were tested at two consecutive times, 33 samples showed a consistent result for both the ImmuView and the BinaxNOW tests (Cohen's kappa values of 0.916 and 0.928). In addition, the ImmuView test may have detected two L. longbeachae-positive urine samples, although other diagnostic tests could not confirm this. Both ImmuView and BinaxNOW showed high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in urine samples from clinical patients with a suspected lower respiratory tract infection.
Assuntos
Legionella pneumophila , Legionella , Doença dos Legionários , Antígenos de Bactérias , Humanos , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Doença dos Legionários/diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , SorogrupoRESUMO
A biologic wastewater treatment plant was identified as a common source for 2 consecutive Legionnaires' disease clusters in the Netherlands in 2016 and 2017. Sequence typing and transmission modeling indicated direct and long-distance transmission of Legionella, indicating this source type should also be investigated in sporadic Legionnaires' disease cases.
Assuntos
Doença dos Legionários/epidemiologia , Gerenciamento de Resíduos , Águas Residuárias/microbiologia , Microbiologia da Água , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Geografia Médica , Hospitalização , Humanos , Doença dos Legionários/transmissão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Estações do AnoRESUMO
In this study, we compared the bioNexia test (bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France), a new immunochromatographic assay for the detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 in urine, with the BinaxNOW urinary antigen test (Alere, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). After 15 min of incubation (in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions), the sensitivities and specificities were, respectively, 76.5% and 97.2% for the bioNexia test and 87.1% and 100% for the BinaxNOW test. After a prolonged incubation time of 60 min, the sensitivities and specificities increased to, respectively, 89.4% and 97.2% for the bioNexia test and 91.8% and 100% for the BinaxNOW test. When the tests were read after 15 min, the concentration of discrepant urine samples increased the sensitivities to 94.1% for both tests. In conclusion, we found that although the bioNexia test showed lower sensitivity for the detection of L. pneumophila antigen in nonconcentrated urine compared to the BinaxNOW test, a prolonged incubation time as well as the use of concentrated samples showed comparable sensitivities for both tests.
Assuntos
Antígenos de Bactérias/análise , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Cromatografia de Afinidade/métodos , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Doença dos Legionários/diagnóstico , Urina/química , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sorogrupo , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Check-Direct ESBL Screen for BD MAX (ESBL qPCR) and an ESBL culture method to identify ESBLs directly from rectal swabs. Methods: Rectal swabs were obtained from clinical patients by performing cross-sectional (point)prevalence measurements in three regional hospitals. Rectal swabs were analysed by direct culture (ChromID ESBL agar) and with the ESBL qPCR. Suspected ESBL-producing isolates were confirmed with the combination disc method and analysed by WGS. Results: Out of 354 rectal swabs and 351 patients, 21 rectal swabs and 20 patients were positive for ESBL-producing isolates, resulting in a regional ESBL colonization prevalence of 5.7%. One rectal swab was false negative with the ESBL qPCR (blaTEM-12) and not covered by the ESBL qPCR. Eight ESBL qPCR-positive rectal swabs could not be confirmed by culture and were classified as false ESBL qPCR positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the ESBL qPCR were 95.2% (n = 20) and 97.6% (n = 323), respectively. When an optimal cycle threshold cut-off value of 37 was used, the ESBL qPCR displayed a sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% (n = 20) and 98.8% (n = 327), respectively (AUC = 0.975, 95% CI = 0.922-1). Conclusions: This ESBL qPCR offers rapid direct detection of the most prevalent ESBL types (blaCTX-M group and blaSHV group) from rectal swabs. The relatively high false-positive rate renders this test the most suitable as a screening test in high-prevalence regions or in an outbreak setting where a fast result is essential.
Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Reto/microbiologia , beta-Lactamases/análise , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Estudos Transversais , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Enterobacteriaceae/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , beta-Lactamases/biossínteseRESUMO
In 2002, the National Legionella Outbreak Detection Program was implemented in the Netherlands to detect and eliminate potential sources of organisms that cause Legionnaires' disease (LD). During 2002-2012, a total of 1,991 patients with LD were reported, and 1,484 source investigations were performed. Of those sources investigated, 24.7% were positive for Legionella spp. For 266 patients with LD, 105 cluster locations were identified. A genotype match was made between a strain detected in 41 patients and a strain from a source location. Despite the systematic approach used by the program, most sources of LD infections during 2002-2012 remained undiscovered. Explorative studies are needed to identify yet undiscovered reservoirs and transmission routes for Legionella bacteria, and improved laboratory techniques are needed to detect Legionella spp. in clinical samples with a high background of microbial flora (such as soil).
Assuntos
Legionella , Doença dos Legionários/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Surtos de Doenças , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Feminino , Humanos , Doença dos Legionários/microbiologia , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Legionella is the causative agent for Legionnaires' disease (LD) and is responsible for several large outbreaks in the world. More than 90% of LD cases are caused by Legionella pneumophila, and studies on the origin and transmission routes of this pathogen rely on adequate molecular characterization of isolates. Current typing of L. pneumophila mainly depends on sequence-based typing (SBT). However, studies have shown that in some outbreak situations, SBT does not have sufficient discriminatory power to distinguish between related and nonrelated L. pneumophila isolates. In this study, we used a novel high-resolution typing technique, called whole-genome mapping (WGM), to differentiate between epidemiologically related and nonrelated L. pneumophila isolates. Assessment of the method by various validation experiments showed highly reproducible results, and WGM was able to confirm two well-documented Dutch L. pneumophila outbreaks. Comparison of whole-genome maps of the two outbreaks together with WGMs of epidemiologically nonrelated L. pneumophila isolates showed major differences between the maps, and WGM yielded a higher discriminatory power than SBT. In conclusion, WGM can be a valuable alternative to perform outbreak investigations of L. pneumophila in real time since the turnaround time from culture to comparison of the L. pneumophila maps is less than 24 h.
Assuntos
Mapeamento Cromossômico/métodos , Legionella pneumophila/classificação , Legionella pneumophila/genética , Doença dos Legionários/microbiologia , Tipagem Molecular/métodos , Surtos de Doenças , Genótipo , Humanos , Doença dos Legionários/epidemiologia , Epidemiologia Molecular/métodos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Legionella bacteria are ubiquitous in natural matrices and man-made systems. However, it is not always clear if these reservoirs can act as source of infection resulting in cases of Legionnaires' disease. This review provides an overview of reservoirs of Legionella reported in the literature, other than drinking water distribution systems. Levels of evidence were developed to discriminate between potential and confirmed sources of Legionella. A total of 17 systems and matrices could be classified as confirmed sources of Legionella. Many other man-made systems or natural matrices were not classified as a confirmed source, since either no patients were linked to these reservoirs or the supporting evidence was weak. However, these systems or matrices could play an important role in the transmission of infectious Legionella bacteria; they might not yet be considered in source investigations, resulting in an underestimation of their importance. To optimize source investigations it is important to have knowledge about all the (potential) sources of Legionella. Further research is needed to unravel what the contribution is of each confirmed source, and possibly also potential sources, to the LD disease burden.
Assuntos
Reservatórios de Doenças , Legionella/isolamento & purificação , Legionelose/epidemiologia , Microbiologia da Água , Humanos , Legionelose/microbiologia , Doença dos Legionários/epidemiologia , Doença dos Legionários/microbiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Children are generally considered main drivers of transmission for respiratory viruses, but the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 challenged this paradigm. Human rhinovirus (RV) continued to co-circulate throughout the pandemic, allowing for direct comparison of age-specific infectivity and susceptibility within households between these viruses during a time of low SARS-CoV-2 population immunity. METHODS: Households with children were prospectively monitored for ≥23 weeks between August 2020 and July 2021. Upon onset of respiratory symptoms in a household, an outbreak study was initiated, including questionnaires and repeated nasal self-sampling in all household members. Swabs were tested by PCR. Age-stratified within-household secondary attack rates (SARs) were compared between SARS-CoV-2 and RV. RESULTS: A total of 307 households participated, including 582 children and 627 adults. Overall, SAR was lower for SARS-CoV-2 than for RV (aOR 0.55) and age distributions differed between both viruses (p < 0.001). Following household exposure, children were significantly less likely to become infected with SARS-CoV-2 compared to RV (aOR 0.16), whereas this was opposite in adults (aOR 1.71). CONCLUSION: In households, age-specific susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 and RV differs and drives differences in household transmission between these pathogens. This highlights the importance of characterizing age-specific transmission risks, particularly for emerging infections, to guide appropriate infection control interventions.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Características da Família , Rhinovirus , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/transmissão , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Rhinovirus/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Lactente , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções por Picornaviridae/transmissão , Infecções por Picornaviridae/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , PandemiasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Legionella is a water and soil bacterium that can infect humans, causing a pneumonia known as Legionnaires' disease. The pneumonia is almost exclusively caused by the species L. pneumophila, of which serogroup 1 is responsible for 90% of patients. Within serogroup 1, large differences in prevalence in clinical isolates have been described. A recent study, using a Dutch Legionella strain collection, identified five virulence associated markers. In our study, we verify whether these five Dutch markers can predict the patient or environmental origin of a French Legionella strain collection. In addition, we identify new potential virulence markers and verify whether these can predict better. A total of 219 French patient isolates and environmental strains were compared using a mixed-genome micro-array. The micro-array data were analysed to identify predictive markers, using a Random Forest algorithm combined with a logistic regression model. The sequences of the identified markers were compared with eleven known Legionella genomes, using BlastN and BlastX; the functionality for each of the predictive markers was checked in the literature. RESULTS: The five Dutch markers insufficiently predicted the patient or environmental origin of the French Legionella strains. Subsequent analyses identified four predictive markers for the French collection that were used for the logistic regression model. This model showed a negative predictive value of 91%. Three of the French markers differed from the Dutch markers, one showed considerable overlap and was found in one of the Legionella genomes (Lorraine strain). This marker encodes for a structural toxin protein RtxA, described for L. pneumophila as a factor involved in virulence and entry in both human cells and amoebae. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a mixed-genome micro-array and statistical analysis using a Random Forest algorithm has identified virulence markers in a consistent way. The Lorraine strain and related Dutch and French Legionella strains contain a marker that encodes a RtxA protein which probably is involved in the increased prevalence in clinical isolates. The current set of predictive markers is insufficient to justify its use as a reliable test in the public health field in France. Our results suggest that genetic differences in Legionella strains exist between geographically distinct entities. It may be necessary to develop region-specific mixed-genome microarrays that are constantly adapted and updated.
Assuntos
Genômica , Legionella pneumophila/genética , Legionella pneumophila/isolamento & purificação , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Meio Ambiente , França , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Genoma Bacteriano/genética , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal (OP) and nasopharyngeal (NP) sampling has historically been considered the reference specimen type used for respiratory virus detection. Saliva could be a less invasive alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection, but limited evidence is available. METHODS: The technical and clinical performance of saliva was compared to OP/NP on the Hologic Panther platform with two Aptima assays, the End-Point Transcription-Mediated Amplification assay (EP-TMA) and Real-Time Transcription-Mediated Amplification assay (RT-TMA). The samples were collected at the Public Health Service Testing Site XL location in Schiphol Amsterdam Airport. At the site, the Regional Public Health Laboratory Kennemerland (RPHLK) has a fully equipped laboratory facility. RESULTS: A total of 374 samples (187 OP/NP swabs and 187 saliva samples) were collected from 187 unique patients. The Real-Time Transcription-Mediated Amplification assay (RT-TMA) resulted in comparable sensitivities for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in both the OP/NP swabs (88.3%; 113/128) and saliva samples (87.5%; 112/128). The End-Point Transcription-Mediated Amplification assay (EP-TMA) analyses showed a similar sensitivity (86.7%; 111/128) in the OP/NP swabs but a lower sensitivity in the saliva samples (80.5%; 103/128). Within the discordant analyses, we found no associations in the symptoms, earlier SARS-CoV-2 infections and eating, smoking, drinking and tooth brushing habits within one hour before testing. CONCLUSIONS: The Hologic Panther platform Real-Time Transcription-Mediated Amplification assay (RT-TMA) yields a sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva that is comparable to the OP/NP swabs derived from participants presenting themselves at a public health testing facility with minimal or mild symptoms.