Local intratumoral tumor necrosis factor-alpha and systemic IFN-alpha 2b in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

To examine tolerability and activity of local, intratumoral tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and systemic interferon-alpha2b (IFN-alpha2b) in locally advanced, hormone-resistant prostate cancer (LA-HRPC), 10 patients with LA-HRPC (T4N x M0, n = 3, T4N x M1, n = 5; T4N1M1, n = 2) were treated with recombinant TNF-alpha injected locally into prostate tumor tissue at 4-week intervals (maximum of four cycles) combined with intermittent subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of 5 x 10(6) IU IFN-alpha2b. Twenty-nine TNF-alpha cycles were administered. Despite significant TNF-alpha leakage into the systemic circulation 2 h after intraprostatic application (from a mean of 9 to a mean of 416 pg/ml; p = 0.0034), TNF-alpha (and IFN-alpha2b) was well tolerated (WHO grade 1-2 toxicity), possibly because of its rapid neutralization by increasing soluble 55-kDa and 75-kDa TNF receptor levels in the serum (mean increase 268% and 91%, respectively) at the same time. TNF-alpha induced prostate tumor cell necrosis in all patients, leading to a significant reduction of prostate volume in 9 of 10 cases (mean 38%; p = 0.0025). The significant short-term increase of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (mean 65%; p < 0.001), tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) (mean 85%; p = 0.001), and possibly interleukin-8 (IL-8) (mean 2687%; p < 0.009) serum levels within 4 h after TNF-alpha confirmed the cytotoxic effect in vivo. In the long term, serum PSA levels dropped by 18%-87%, reaching the nadir value 7 weeks after baseline. Objective responses of metastases were not seen. Intraprostatic administration of TNF-alpha is feasible at a tolerable toxicity in patients with LA-HRPC and, thus, may be a new treatment option for these patients.

Contraceptive knowledge and attitudes of Austrian adolescents after mass media reports linking third-generation oral contraceptives with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism.

We performed a representative survey to determine the level of knowledge of 1,010 Austrian adolescents aged 14 to 24 years about selected facts relating to the recent massive news coverage of the increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism in users of third-generation oral contraceptives and to assess the contraceptive behavior of this population. The overall use rate of oral contraceptives and condoms had increased significantly between 1991 and 1996. Sixty-six percent of the adolescents surveyed stated not having heard or read any media reports on oral contraceptives. Only 8% of those who had knew that most reports focused on the pill as a possible cause of venous thromboembolism, whereas the majority of respondents indicated that the media conveyed doubts regarding the health safety of oral contraceptives in general. Nearly half of adolescents were unable to define what a thrombosis was. Thus, although the mass media play an important role in transmitting medical information, the dissemination of practical, accurate advice on the risks of a drug and competent patient counseling is reserved for the health care professionals.

Contraceptive knowledge and behavior of conventionalists, careerists, idealists, bouncers, desperadoes, and outsiders.

The aim of the survey was to determine the contraceptive behavior and knowledge on contraceptive methods of adolescents. We defined six clusters according to personality, leisure activities, and sociodemographic characteristics: conventionalists, careerists, idealists, bouncers, desperadoes, and outsiders. 1010 Austrian adolescents aged 14-24 years participated in the survey. 96%-100% indicated that they were familiar with the condom and the contraceptive pill. The two most popular contraceptive methods cited were the condom (39%) and OC (34%). Whereas 40% of conventionalists reported that OC were their preferred method of contraception, 53% of idealists indicated that they preferred the condom. 66% of the desperadoes indicated that they considered the pill expensive. 85% of conventionalists and careerists believe that OC offer the best protection against pregnancy. Clusters with higher self-esteem and those with a higher educational level were more likely to believe that this method is unreliable. The results obtained indicate that outsiders, desperatoes, and bouncers show deficits in sex education; only careerists and idealists appeared to be better informed. Research on adolescent contraceptive behavior should drop the traditional stratifying criteria and appreciate the diversity of adolescent populations in order to be better able to classify adolescents according to their contraceptive attitudes.