Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg ; 275(6): e759-e765, 2022 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740246

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery establishes a considerable pathologic complete response (pCR) in EC. The aim was to determine site of residual tumor and its prognostic impact. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: High rates of residual tumor in the adventitial region even inside the radiation fields will influence current decision-making. METHODS: We evaluated resection specimens with marked target fields from 151 consecutive EC patients treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel and 41.4Gy between 2009 and 2018. RESULTS: In radically resected (R0) specimens 19.8% (27/136) had a pCR (ypT0N0) and 14% nearly no response (tumor regression grade: tumor regression grade 4-5). Residual tumor commonly extended in or restricted to the adventitia (43.1%; 47/109), whereas 7.3% was in the mucosa (ypT1a), 16.5% in the submucosa (ypT1b) and 6.4% only in lymph nodes (ypT0N+). Macroscopic residues in R0-specimens of partial responders (tumor regression grade 2-3: N = 90) were found in- and outside the gross tumor volume (GTV) in 33.3% and 8.9%, and only microscopic in- and outside the clinical target volume in 58.9% and 1.1%, respectively. Residual nodal disease was observed proximally and distally to the clinical target volume in 2 and 5 patients, respectively. Disease Free Survival decreased significantly if macroscopic tumor was outside the GTV and in ypT2-4aN+. CONCLUSIONS: After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, pCR and ypT1aN0 were seen in a limited number of R0 resected specimens (19.8% and 7.3%, respectively), whereas 6.4% had only nodal disease (yT0N+). Disease Free Survival decreased significantly if macroscopic residue was outside the GTV and in responders with only nodal disease. Therefore, we should be cautious in applying wait and see strategies.


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Quimiorradioterapia , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual/patologia
2.
Acta Oncol ; 60(3): 277-284, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33151766

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: When treating patients for esophageal cancer (EC) with photon or proton radiotherapy (RT), breathing motion of the target and neighboring organs may result in deviations from the planned dose distribution. The aim of this study was to evaluate the magnitude and dosimetric impact of breathing motion. Results were based on comparing weekly 4D computed tomography (4D CT) scans with the planning CT, using the diaphragm as an anatomical landmark for EC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 20 EC patients were included in this study. Diaphragm breathing amplitudes and off-sets (changes in position with respect to the planning CT) were determined from delineated left diaphragm structures in weekly 4D CT-scans. The potential dosimetric impact of respiratory motion was shown in several example patients for photon and proton radiotherapy. RESULTS: Variation in diaphragm amplitudes were relatively small and ranged from 0 to 0.8 cm. However, the measured off-sets were larger, ranging from -2.1 to 1.9 cm. Of the 70 repeat CT-scans, the off-set exceeded the ITV-PTV margin of 0.8 cm during expiration in 4 CT-scans (5.7%) and during inspiration in 13 CT-scans (18.6%). The dosimetric validation revealed under- and overdosages in the VMAT and IMPT plans. CONCLUSIONS: Despite relatively constant breathing amplitudes, the variation in the diaphragm position (off-set), and consequently tumor position, was clinically relevant. These motion effects may result in either treatments that miss the target volume, or dose deviations in the form of highly localized over- or underdosed regions.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Tomografia Computadorizada Quadridimensional , Humanos , Movimento (Física) , Radiometria , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Respiração
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(6): 1588-1597, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29611027

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) is a known adverse prognostic factor in patients with colorectal carcinoma. The prevalence and significance of EMVI in esophageal cancer (EC) patients is still unclear. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively reviewed the resection specimens of patients with pathologic locally advanced (pT3/T4/N0-3) EC who were treated with curative intent between 2000 and 2015. Patients with previous malignancies and gastroesophageal junction (type II/III) tumors were excluded. Included were 81 patients who underwent surgery alone and 37 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). EMVI was assessed on hematoxylin and eosin slides and confirmed or excluded by additional Elastica van Gieson staining. Survival was analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: EMVI was present in 23.5% (n = 19) of patients in the surgery-alone group and 21.6% (n = 8) of patients in the nCRT group. The prevalence of EMVI after surgery alone was significantly high in squamous cell carcinomas and among tumors located in the mid-esophagus, as well as those with lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.05). After nCRT, the presence of EMVI was significantly high in tumors with lymphovascular and perineural tumor growth (p = 0.034). EMVI status was an independent adverse prognostic factor for disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 7.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-21.8; p =0.001] and overall survival (HR 6.5, 95% CI 2.2-19.1; p = 0.001) in the surgery-alone group for node-positive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of locally advanced > pT3/N0-3 EC patients, EMVI was present in 23.5% of patients in the surgery-alone group and in 21.6% of patients after nCRT. EMVI was an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients after surgery alone.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomia , Veias/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundário , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esôfago/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Vasos Linfáticos/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nervos Periféricos/patologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
5.
World J Surg ; 36(12): 2872-8, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22965535

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of esophageal cancer has grown over the recent decades and 30% of esophageal cancer patients are now 75 years or older at the time of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate trends in management and survival of patients aged 75 years or older with esophageal cancer. METHODS: In the Netherlands cancer registry, we identified all patients aged 75 years or older who were diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 1989 and 2008. Trends in management and survival were analyzed by time period (1989-2001 vs. 2002-2008), TNM stage, and age (75-79, 80-84, and 85+ years). χ2 testing was used to analyze time trends in treatment, Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing to estimate survival, and Cox regression model to calculate hazard ratios for death. RESULTS: Some 7,253 patients were included in the study. The surgical resection rate increased over the 1989-2008 period from 8.9 to 12.6% (p=0.028), especially among patients aged 75-79 years (44.6 vs. 55.4%, p<0.001) and patients with TNM stage I disease (12.7 vs. 22.0%, p<0.001). The use of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) also increased (0.19 vs. 2.20%, p<0.001). Whereas the use of chemotherapy as a single-modality treatment more than doubled (0.64 vs. 1.54%, p=0.004), that of radiotherapy alone decreased (38.1 vs. 31.6%, p<0.001). Although median survival time was marginally higher in the 2002-2008 period than in 1989-2001, overall 5 year survival rates remained low at 6 and 5%, respectively (p<0.001). Five-year survival rate after surgery increased from 16 to 30% (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients of 75 years or older, surgical treatment and use of definitive CRT have increased between 1989 and 2008. Also, an increase in the use of chemotherapy as a single modality was noted. Overall 5 year survival for all cancer patients was stable but remained poor, while survival of patients who underwent esophagectomy improved significantly in the Netherlands since 1989.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/tendências , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Terapia Combinada/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Combinada/tendências , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomia/mortalidade , Esofagectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida
6.
Radiother Oncol ; 117(1): 152-8, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26364884

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) improves survival in esophageal cancer (EC) patients, but the response to treatment is heterogeneous and little is known regarding prognostic and predictive markers in these patients. CD44, SOX2 and SHH have been implicated in resistance to CRT, possibly through an association with a cancer stem cell phenotype. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 101 EC patients treated with nCRT and surgery were included. Sufficient pre-treatment biopsy material was present in 71 patients, of which 53 patients were non-complete responders on nCRT (nCR). Protein expression was examined using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analysis for disease free survival (DFS) and cause specific survival (CSS) in the complete cohort, the pre-treatment biopsies group and post-treatment nCR group. RESULTS: Low CD44 expression in the nCR group was an independent prognostic factor for both DFS and CSS (DFS HR 2.81, p=0.002 and CSS HR 3.48, p=0.002). Absent SOX2 expression in pretreatment biopsies was related to systemic recurrence (p=0.029) while low SHH in pretreatment biopsies was an independent prognostic factor for a poor DFS (HR 2.27, p=0.036). No relation between marker expression and response to nCRT was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Low expression of CD44 and SHH are associated with a poor survival outcome in EC patients treated with nCRT.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Feminino , Proteínas Hedgehog/metabolismo , Humanos , Receptores de Hialuronatos/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Transcrição SOXB1/metabolismo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA