DNA-PKcs-SIN1 complexation mediates low-dose X-ray irradiation (LDI)-induced Akt activation and osteoblast differentiation.

Low-dose irradiation (LDI) induces osteoblast differentiation, however the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. In this study, we explored the potential role of DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs)-Akt signaling in LDI-induced osteoblast differentiation. We confirmed that LDI promoted mouse calvarial osteoblast differentiation, which was detected by increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity as well as mRNA expression of type I collagen (Col I) and runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2). In mouse osteoblasts, LDI (1Gy) induced phosphorylation of DNA-PKcs and Akt (mainly at Ser-473). The kinase inhibitors against DNA-PKcs (NU-7026 and NU-7441) or Akt (LY294002, perifosine and MK-2206), as well as partial depletion of DNA-PKcs or Akt1 by targeted-shRNA, dramatically inhibited LDI-induced Akt activation and mouse osteoblast differentiation. Further, siRNA-knockdown of SIN1, a key component of mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2), also inhibited LDI-induced Akt Ser-473 phosphorylation as well as ALP activity increase and Col I/Runx2 expression in mouse osteoblasts. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay results demonstrated that LDI-induced DNA-PKcs-SIN1 complexation, which was inhibited by NU-7441 or SIN1 siRNA-knockdown in mouse osteoblasts. In summary, our data suggest that DNA-PKcs-SIN1 complexation-mediated Akt activation (Ser-473 phosphorylation) is required for mouse osteoblast differentiation.

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in skin wound healing: roles, opportunities and challenges.

Skin wounds are characterized by injury to the skin due to trauma, tearing, cuts, or contusions. As such injuries are common to all human groups, they may at times represent a serious socioeconomic burden. Currently, increasing numbers of studies have focused on the role of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) in skin wound repair. As a cell-free therapy, MSC-derived EVs have shown significant application potential in the field of wound repair as a more stable and safer option than conventional cell therapy. Treatment based on MSC-derived EVs can significantly promote the repair of damaged substructures, including the regeneration of vessels, nerves, and hair follicles. In addition, MSC-derived EVs can inhibit scar formation by affecting angiogenesis-related and antifibrotic pathways in promoting macrophage polarization, wound angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and cell migration, and by inhibiting excessive extracellular matrix production. Additionally, these structures can serve as a scaffold for components used in wound repair, and they can be developed into bioengineered EVs to support trauma repair. Through the formulation of standardized culture, isolation, purification, and drug delivery strategies, exploration of the detailed mechanism of EVs will allow them to be used as clinical treatments for wound repair. In conclusion, MSC-derived EVs-based therapies have important application prospects in wound repair. Here we provide a comprehensive overview of their current status, application potential, and associated drawbacks.

Percutaneous biliary stent combined with brachytherapy using 125I seeds for treatment of unresectable malignant obstructive jaundice: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ) is a common pathologic manifestation of malignant biliary obstruction. Recently, several clinical trials have explored the clinical effectiveness of intraluminal 125I seed-based brachytherapy for MOJ patients, and various outcomes have been reported. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous biliary stents with 125I seeds compared to conventional metal stents in patients with unresectable MOJ. METHODS: A systematic search of English-language databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) was performed to identify studies published prior to June 2020 that compared stents with or without 125I seeds in the treatment of unresectable MOJ. The outcomes analyzed included primary outcomes (stent patency and overall survival) and secondary outcomes (complications and liver function parameters). RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials and four retrospective studies involving 875 patients were eligible for the analysis. Of the 875 included patients, 404 were treated with 125I seed stents, while 471 were treated with conventional stents. Unadjusted pooled analysis demonstrated that compared to conventional stents, 125I seed stents extended the stent patency time [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.28-0.45, P < 0.0001] and overall survival period (HR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.42-0.64, P < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses based on the type of 125I seed stent and type of study design showed consistent results. However, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of total complications [odds ratio (OR) = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.75-1.67, P = 0.57], hemobilia (OR = 1.02, 95%CI = 0.45-2.3, P = 0.96), pancreatitis (OR = 1.79, 95%CI = 0.42-7.53, P = 0.43), cholangitis (OR = 1.13, 95%CI = 0.60-2.13, P = 0.71), or pain (OR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.22-2, P = 0.47). In addition, there were no reductions in the levels of serum indices, including total bilirubin [mean difference (MD) = 10.96, 95%CI = -3.56-25.49, P = 0.14], direct bilirubin (MD = 7.37, 95%CI = -9.76-24.5, P = 0.4), alanine aminotransferase (MD = 7.52, 95%CI = -0.71-15.74, P = 0.07), and aspartate aminotransferase (MD = -4.77, 95%CI = -19.98-10.44, P = 0.54), after treatment. Publication bias was detected regarding the outcome overall survival; however, the conclusions were not changed after the adjustment. CONCLUSION: Placement of stents combined with brachytherapy using 125I seeds contributes to a longer stent patency and higher overall survival than placement of conventional stents without extra complications or severe liver damage. Thus, it can be considered an effective and safe treatment for unresectable MOJ.

The identification of a common different gene expression signature in patients with colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies, giving rise to serious financial burden globally. This study was designed to explore the potential mechanisms implicated with CRC and identify some key biomarkers. CRC-associated gene expression dataset (GSE32323) was downloaded from GEO database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected out based on the GEO2R tool. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses were employed to search the enriched pathways of these DEGs. Additionally, a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was also constructed to visualize interactions between these DEGs. Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR) was further performed to valid the top5 up-regulated and top5 down-regulated genes in patients with CRC. Finally, the survival analysis of the top5 up-regulated and top5 down-regulated genes was conducted using GEPIA, aiming to clarify their potential effects on CRC. In this study, a total of 451 DEGs were captured (306 down-regulated genes and 145 up-regulated genes). Among these DEGs, the top5 up-regulated genes were DPEP1, KRT23, CLDN1, LGR5 and FOXQ1 while the top5 down-regulated genes were CLCA4, ZG16, SLC4A4, ADH1B and GCG. GO analysis revealed that these DEGs were mainly enriched in cell adhesion, cell proliferation, RNA polymerase II promoter and chemokine activity. KEGG analysis disclosed that the enriched pathway included mineral absorption, chemokine signaling pathway, transcriptional misregulation in cancer, pathways in cancer and PPAR signaling pathway. Survival analysis showed that the expression level of ZG16 may correlate with the prognosis of CRC patients. Furthermore, according to the connectivity degree of these DEGs, we selected out the top15 hub genes, namely MYC, CXCR1, TOP2A, CXCL12, SST, TIMP1, SPP1, PPBP, CDK1, THBS1, CXCL1, PYY, LPAR1, BMP2 and MMP3, which were expected to be promising therapeutic target in CRC. Collectively, our analysis unveiled potential biomarkers and candidate targets in CRC, which could be helpful to the diagnosis and treatment of CRC.

The efficacy and safety of erlotinib compared with chemotherapy in previously treated NSCLC: A meta-analysis.

Background: An increasing number of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor prognosis and develop progressive disease after receiving conventional treatments. In recent years, several novel therapies have been approved for later lines of therapy of previously treated NSCLC. Erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was recommended as the second-line therapy for pre-treated patients. However, the use of erlotinib has been reported to represent different clinical effects and adverse effects. Objectives: The current study was aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib versus chemotherapy in pre-treated patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible literatures updated on June 2018. Randomized-controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of erlotinib in pre-treated NSCLC were included, of which the main outcomes were ORR (objective response rate), PFS (progression-free survival), OS (overall survival) and AEs (adverse events). All the data were pooled with the corresponding 95% confidence interval using RevMan software. Sensitivity analyses and heterogeneity were quantitatively evaluated. Results: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included in this analysis. The group of erlotinib did not achieved benefit in progression-free survival (OR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.33-1.12, P = 0.11), overall survival (OR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.84-1.15, P = 0.81) as well with the objective response rate (OR = 0.77, 95%CI = 0.36-1.63, P = 0.49), respectively. In the results of subgroup analysis among the patients with EGFR wild-type, there is also no significant differences in overall survival with erlotinib (OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.78-1.04, P = 0.15) and progression-free survival (OR = 0.33, 95%CI = 0.09-1.18, P = 0.09). The most common treatment-related adverse events in the erlotinib group is rash (OR = 5.79, 95%CI = 2.12-15.77, P = 0.0006), and neutropenia (OR = 0.02, 95%CI = 0.01-0.10, P ≤ 0.00001) is more found in the control group. In addition, fatigue (P = 0.09) and diarrhea (P = 0.52), the difference between the two groups had no statistical significance. Conclusions: There was no significant difference noted with regard to efficacy and safety between erlotinib vs. chemotherapy as the later-line therapy for previously treated patients with NSCLC, even with subgroup patients who have wild-type EGFR tumors. While, erlotinib might increase the risk of rash, and decrease the risk of neutropenia, compared with the chemotherapy. Further research is needed to develop a database of all EGFR mutations and their individual impact on the differing treatments.