No advantage with navigated versus conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty-10 year results of a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial area of surgical practice. The aim of this study is to report the ten-year revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) of a single-blinded, prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing electromagnetically (EM) navigated and conventional TKA. METHODS: 199 patients were randomised to receive either EM navigated or conventional TKA where the aim of implantation was neutral mechanical alignment in all cases. Ten-year revision rates were collated and compared between the two intervention groups. Longitudinal PROMS data was collected prospectively at various time points up to 10 years post-operatively. RESULTS: Over the ten-year period, there were 23 deaths (22.8%) in the EM navigation cohort and 30 deaths (30.6%) in the conventional cohort. At 10 years post-operatively, there was no statistically significant difference in all cause revision between the EM navigation and conventional cohort (4.0 vs 6.1%, p = 0.429). When analysing causes of revision that might be influenced by utilising EM navigation, there was no statistically significant difference in revisions (3.0% EM navigated vs 4.1% conventional group, p = 0.591). Patients that received navigated TKAs had improved Oxford Knee Society, American Knee Society Score and range of motion at 3 months following surgery compared to conventional TKA (p = 0.002, p = 0.032, and p = 0.05, respectively). However, from 1 to 10 years post-operatively, both interventions had equivalent outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in revision rates or clinical outcomes comparing EM navigated versus conventional TKA at ten-year follow-up. The expected mortality rate makes it unlikely that a difference in revision rates will reach statistical significance in the future. In the setting of an experienced knee arthroplasty surgeon, it is difficult to justify the additional costs of CAS in TKA surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Inflammatory prognostic scoring systems are risk factors for surgical site infection following wide local excision of soft tissue sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Limb-sparing surgery with negative margins is possible in most soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resections and focuses on maximising function and minimising morbidity. Various risk factors for surgical site infections (SSIs) have been reported in the literature specific to sarcoma surgery. The aim of this study is to determine whether systemic inflammatory response prognostic scoring systems can predict post-operative SSI in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of STS. METHODS: Patients who had a planned curative resection of a primary STS at a single centre between January 2010 and December 2019 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. Data were extracted on patient and tumour characteristics, and pre-operative blood results were used to calculate inflammatory prognostic scores based on published thresholds and correlated with risk of developing SSI or debridement procedures. RESULTS: A total of 187 cases were included. There were 60 SSIs. On univariate analysis, there was a statistically significant increased risk of SSI in patients who are diabetic, increasing specimen diameter, American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) grade 3, use of endoprosthetic replacement, blood loss greater than 1 L, and junctional tumour location. Modified Glasgow prognostic score, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and neutrophil-platelet score (NPS) were statistically associated with the risk of SSI. On multivariate analysis, ASA grade 3, junctional tumour location and NPS were independently associated with the risk of developing a SSI. CONCLUSION: This study supports the routine use of simple inflammation-based prognostic scores in identifying patients at increased risk of developing infectious complications in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of STS.

Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic hybrid total hip arthroplasty. A median of 15 years follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The optimum choice of bearing surfaces in total hip replacement (THR) in the younger and active patient remains controversial. The aim of this study was to report the 10 year clinical outcomes, and a median of 15 year implant survival and incidence of complications in a series of Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic THRs utilising an uncemented shell and cemented stem. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2007, 175 consecutive patients (195 hips) underwent primary THR. The acetabular components was Trident Peripheral Self Locking (Stryker Orthopaedics) with a third-generation ceramic head and liner (Alumina ceramic, Stryker Orthopaedics). The stem utilised was an Exeter V-40 (Stryker Orthopaedics). Data were collated on demographics, surgical factors, clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes and revision. RESULTS: 23 patients (27 THRs) died during the follow-up period at a median of 7.8 (3.8 to 9.0) years post-operatively due to causes unrelated to the THR. Median age at time of surgery was 55 (interquartile range 48-60) years. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 15.2 years. Survivorship for all-cause revision was 97.2%. Increasing patient age at time of surgery was associated with a higher OHS at 10 years (p = 0.022). 32 mm head diameter had an improved OHS at 3 months (p = 0.014) and 10 years (p = 0.030). Posterior surgical approach had a statistically significant better OHS at 3 months (p = 0.015) and 1 year (p < 0.001), but the effect was not significant at 10 years (p = 0.440). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study support excellent long-term outcomes and survivorship of Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in a hybrid THR in a younger population. Surgical factors leading to a more favourable outcome were the use of a 32 mm femoral head and a posterior approach. Increasing age at surgery demonstrated the most sustained improvement in 10 year clinical outcomes.

Right on target?

Targets have become an integral part of health care, whether we agree with them or not. Many accept the progress made with the use of targets, but our duty as health professionals is to ensure that their use and interpretation is undertaken with the same care and understanding of their limitations that we apply to our clinical practice, and that they are not mis-interpreted or used to justify the latest political idioms. Currently the healthcare profession is failing to understand the consequences of setting targets, or the wider implications of hitting them. This article aims to summarise how we can learn from past experiences to become more aware of the benefits and draw-backs of targets in healthcare, and how we can utilise them more efficiently in health care.

Survival of the GAP II cage in the management of metastatic disease of the acetabulum.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of an antiprotrusio acetabular cage (APC) when used in the surgical treatment of periacetabular bone metastases. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study using a prospectively collected database involved 56 patients who underwent acetabular reconstruction for periacetabular bone metastases or haematological malignancy using a single APC between January 2009 and 2020. The mean follow-up was 20 months (1 to 143). The primary outcome measure was implant survival. Postoperative radiographs were analyzed for loosening and failure. Patient and implant survival were assessed using a competing risk analysis. Secondary parameters included primary malignancy, oncological treatment, surgical factors, length of stay in hospital, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients (59%) died during the study period at a mean of 15 months postoperatively (1 to 63). No patient had radiological evidence of loosening or failure. Acetabular component survival was 100%. Three patients (5.4%) had further surgery; one (1.8%) underwent revision of the femoral component for dislocation, one required debridement with implant retention for periprosthetic joint infection, and one required closed reduction for dislocation. Using death as a competing risk, at 100 months, the probability of revision was 0.036 and the risk of death was 0.84. CONCLUSION: With appropriate patient selection, the antiprotrusio cage offers good implant survival, with a reasonable perioperative complication rate in this high-risk group of patients when managing metastatic disease or haematological malignancy around the acetabulum. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):504-509.

Does the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score aid in the management of patients undergoing surgery for a soft-tissue sarcoma? : an international multicentre study.

AIMS: The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) uses preoperative CRP and albumin to calculate a score from 0 to 2 (2 being associated with poor outcomes). mGPS is validated in multiple carcinomas. To date, its use in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is limited, with only small cohorts reporting that increased mGPS scores correlates with decreased survival in STS patients. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre cohort study identified 493 STS patients using clinical databases from six collaborating hospitals in three countries. Centres performed a retrospective data collection for patient demographics, preoperative blood results (CRP and albumin levels and neutrophil, leucocyte, and platelets counts), and oncological outcomes (disease-free survival, local, or metastatic recurrence) with a minimum of two years' follow-up. RESULTS: We found that increased mGPS, tumour size, grade, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and disease recurrence were associated with reduced survival. Importantly, mGPS was the best at stratifying prognosis and could be used in conjunction with tumour grade to sub-stratify patient survival. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that prognosis of localized STS strongly correlates with mGPS, as an increasing score is associated with a poorer outcome. We note that 203 patients (41%) with an STS have evidence of systemic inflammation. We recommend the mGPS and other biochemical blood indicators be introduced into the routine diagnostic assessment in STS patients to stratify patient prognosis. Its use will support clinical decision-making, especially when morbid treatment options such as amputation are being considered. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):168-176.

Anatomical pelvic loading of a monoblock polyethylene acetabular component.

AIMS: Uncemented metal acetabular components show good osseointegration, but material stiffness causes stress shielding and retroacetabular bone loss. Cemented monoblock polyethylene components load more physiologically; however, the cement bone interface can suffer fibrous encapsulation and loosening. It was hypothesized that an uncemented titanium-sintered monoblock polyethylene component may offer the optimum combination of osseointegration and anatomical loading. METHODS: A total of 38 patients were prospectively enrolled and received an uncemented monoblock polyethylene acetabular (pressfit) component. This single cohort was then retrospectively compared with previously reported randomized cohorts of cemented monoblock (cemented) and trabecular metal (trabecular) acetabular implants. The primary outcome measure was periprosthetic bone density using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry over two years. Secondary outcomes included radiological and clinical analysis. RESULTS: Although there were differences in the number of males and females in each group, no significant sex bias was noted (p = 0.080). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in age (p = 0.910) or baseline lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) (p = 0.998) found between any of the groups (pressfit, cemented, or trabecular). The pressfit implant initially behaved like the trabecular component with an immediate fall in BMD in the inferior and medial regions, with preserved BMD laterally, suggesting lateral rim loading. However, the pressfit component subsequently showed a reversal in BMD medially with recovery back towards baseline, and a continued rise in lateral BMD. This would suggest that the pressfit component begins to reload the medial bone over time, more akin to the cemented component. Analysis of postoperative radiographs revealed no pressfit component subsidence or movement up to two years postoperatively (100% interobserver reliability). Medial defects seen immediately postoperatively in five cases had completely resolved by two years in four patients. CONCLUSION: Initially, the uncemented monoblock component behaved similarly to the rigid trabecular metal component with lateral rim loading; however, over two years this changed to more closely resemble the loading pattern of a cemented polyethylene component with increasing medial pelvic loading. This indicates that the uncemented monoblock acetabular component may result in optimized fixation and preservation of retroacetabular bone stock. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):872-880.