RESUMO
Improved first progression-free survival following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation relapse with the use of immunotherapy.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Cromossomo Filadélfia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Recidiva , Transplante Homólogo , Humanos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/mortalidade , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/genética , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aloenxertos , Resultado do Tratamento , IdosoRESUMO
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a potential cure in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); nonetheless, relapses are common and the major cause of mortality. One strategy to prevent relapse is tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) maintenance post-HCT, but published clinical experience is primarily with the first-generation TKI imatinib while data with newer generation TKIs are limited. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 185 Ph+ ALL patients who underwent HCT followed by TKI maintenance from 2003 to 2021 at City of Hope. Initially, 50 (27.0%) received imatinib, 118 (63.8%) received a second-generation TKI (2G-TKI), and 17 (9.2%) received ponatinib. A total of 77 patients (41.6%) required a dose reduction of their initial TKI due to toxicity. Sixty-six patients (35.7%) did not complete maintenance due to toxicity; 69 patients (37.3%) discontinued 1 TKI, and 11 (5.9%) discontinued 2 TKIs due to toxicity. Initial imatinib versus 2G-TKI versus ponatinib maintenance was discontinued in 19 (38.0%) versus 68 (57.6%) versus 3 (17.6%) patients due to toxicity (p = .003), respectively. Patients on ponatinib as their initial TKI had a longer duration of TKI maintenance versus 2G-TKI: 576.0 days (range, 72-921) versus 254.5 days (range, 3-2740; p = .02). The most common reasons for initial TKI discontinuation include gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance (15.1%), cytopenia (8.6%), and fluid retention (3.8%). The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival for the total population were 78% and 71%, respectively. Our findings demonstrate the challenges of delivering post-HCT TKI maintenance in a large real-world cohort as toxicities leading to TKI interruptions, discontinuation, and dose reduction were common.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases , Humanos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/mortalidade , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Quimioterapia de Manutenção , Cromossomo Filadélfia , Piridazinas/uso terapêutico , Piridazinas/efeitos adversos , Piridazinas/administração & dosagem , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapêutico , Mesilato de Imatinib/efeitos adversos , Mesilato de Imatinib/administração & dosagem , Imidazóis/efeitos adversos , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , Transplante Homólogo , AdolescenteRESUMO
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is frequently seen in the context of other aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndromes and is associated with hemolysis and increased thromboembolic events. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) is the sole curative treatment but is associated with significant morbidity. The terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab reduces hemolysis and thromboembolic events and is the sole Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for PNH. Prophylactic administration of this agent in the early post-transplantation setting to prevent hemolysis and thrombosis has not been described in the literature. We describe our institutional experience of 8 patients with PNH who underwent alloHCT and who received at least 1 dose of eculizumab within 30 days of alloHCT for prevention of thrombosis and hemolysis. One patient with underlying aplastic anemia who received bone marrow stem cells failed to engraft. Another patient experienced steroid-refractory grade IV acute graft-versus-host disease and died of a fungal infection. The other patients engrafted well; no hemolysis, thrombotic events, or infections associated with encapsulated bacteria occurred in any of the 8 patients.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Hemoglobinúria Paroxística , Hemólise/efeitos dos fármacos , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Células Clonais , Inativadores do Complemento/uso terapêutico , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemoglobinúria Paroxística/complicações , Hemoglobinúria Paroxística/terapia , Humanos , Pré-Medicação/métodos , Trombose/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Antígenos CD19 , Imunoterapia Adotiva , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/terapia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/imunologia , Antígenos CD19/imunologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
High-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can improve outcomes for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) but is associated with a high incidence of relapse. A retrospective study of 191 MCL patients who underwent ASCT at City of Hope was performed to examine prognostic factors for outcomes after ASCT. For all patients the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63% to 77%) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 53% (95% CI, 45% to 60%). The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 41% (95% CI, 34% to 48%) with a continuous pattern of relapse events occurring at a median of 2.1 years (range, .2 to 13.4) after ASCT. In multivariate analysis, post-transplant maintenance rituximab was the factor most significantly associated with both OS (relative risk [RR], .17; 95% CI, .07 to .38) and PFS (RR, .25; 95% CI, .14 to .44). For the subset of patients who had positron emission tomography (PET) data available and were in a PET-negative first complete remission at ASCT (n = 105), maintenance rituximab was significantly associated with superior OS (RR, .17; 95% CI, .05 to .59) and PFS (RR, .20; 95% CI, .09 to .43). These results support a benefit with maintenance rituximab for all MCL patients treated with ASCT.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/tratamento farmacológico , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/mortalidade , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a phase 1 study of a conditioning regimen with or without total marrow irradiation (TMI) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with high-risk or refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: Eighteen patients were enrolled on one of 2 strata. Patients with no prior radiation received TMI (900 cGy), fludarabine (FLU), and melphalan (MEL) conditioning, with bortezomib added in the second cohort (stratum I). Patients with prior radiation received FLU, MEL, and bortezomib, without TMI (stratum II). RESULTS: Eight patients were enrolled in the TMI arm (stratum I). One of 3 patients in cohort 1 experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which led to the expansion to 3 more patients with no DLT. Cohort 2 enrolled only 2 patients due to low accrual, with bortezomib, added at 0.5 mg/m 2 ; neither experienced DLT. Nine patients were enrolled in the non-TMI arm (stratum II). Three patients were enrolled in cohort 1 (bortezomib 0.5 mg/m 2 ) and none experienced DLT. Three were enrolled in cohort 2 (bortezomib 0.7 mg/m 2 ), and 1 experienced DLT; therefore, the cohort expanded to 3 more patients. One more patient experienced DLT. Median overall survival on strata I and II was 44.5 months (95% CI: 1.73-not reached) and 21.6 months (95% CI: 4.1-72.7), respectively. Median progression-free survival on strata I and II was 18.1 months (95% CI: 1.73-not reached) and 8.9 months (95% CI: 2.7-24.4), respectively. CONCLUSION: TMI 900 cGy, FLU, and MEL are considered feasible as conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation and may warrant further investigation due to favorable response rates and survival.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Melfalan , Mieloma Múltiplo , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Vidarabina , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Bortezomib/administração & dosagem , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Melfalan/uso terapêutico , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Vidarabina/administração & dosagem , Vidarabina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Transplante Homólogo , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Medula Óssea/efeitos da radiaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: After autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), consolidation with brentuximab vedotin in patients with high-risk relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma has been shown to improve progression-free survival compared with placebo. Brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab is a safe and effective treatment for relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma; therefore, we aimed to evaluate the safety and activity of this drug combination post-autologous HSCT consolidation in patients with high-risk relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS: We did a multicentre phase 2 trial at five centres in the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with high-risk relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma, had an ECOG performance status of 0-2, and had adequate organ and bone marrow function. Enrolled patients received brentuximab vedotin (1·8 mg/kg) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg) intravenously starting 30-60 days after autologous HSCT on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles. Nivolumab dose reduction was not allowed. Brentuximab vedotin dose reduction to 1·2 mg/kg was permitted. If one drug was discontinued because of a toxic effect, the other could be continued. The primary endpoint was 18-month progression-free survival in all treated patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03057795. FINDINGS: Between May 3, 2017, and July 13, 2019, 59 patients were enrolled and received the study therapy. Patients initiated brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab for a median of 54 days (IQR 46-58) after autologous HSCT and received a median of 8 cycles (8-8). 34 (58%) of 59 patients were male, 29 (49%) completed 8 cycles of brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab, and 45 (76%) completed 8 cycles of at least one drug. The median follow-up time was 29·9 months (IQR 24·6-34·8). The 18-month progression-free survival in all 59 patients was 94% (95% CI 84-98). The most common adverse events were sensory peripheral neuropathy (31 [53%] of 59) and neutropenia (25 [42%]), and immune-related adverse events requiring corticosteroids occurred in 17 (29%) of 59 patients. No treatment-related deaths were observed. INTERPRETATION: Brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab was highly active post-autologous HSCT consolidation for patients with high-risk relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma, most of whom had previous exposure to either brentuximab vedotin or PD-1 blockade. Combination immunotherapy in this setting should be further studied in patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma with further refinement of the regimen to mitigate toxic effects, particularly in high-risk patients in whom more intensive therapy to prevent relapse is warranted. FUNDING: Bristol Myers Squibb, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Lymphoma Research Foundation, and National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Doença de Hodgkin , Imunoconjugados , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Brentuximab Vedotin/uso terapêutico , Doença de Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Hodgkin/patologia , Nivolumabe/efeitos adversos , Imunoconjugados/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in therapy for multiple myeloma, patients have continued to experience relapse. We sought to better understand this. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that predict early relapse in patients with multiple myeloma who receive autologous hematopoietic peripheral stem cell transplant (HSCT). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of Kaiser Permanente Southern California patients who received HSCTs between 2008 and 2012. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were included. Factors found to be associated with inferior progression-free survival were disease status less than complete response at the time of HSCT, no use of maintenance therapy after HSCT, International Staging System stage III, and high Freiburg Comorbidity Index. Disease status less than complete response, stage III, higher Freiburg Comorbidity Index, no use of maintenance therapy, and male sex were the most predictive factors for early relapse (< 18 months). DISCUSSION: Our results identified a subgroup of high-risk individuals with multiple myeloma who will continue to do poorly after HSCT with the best available treatment using a combination of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. These results highlight the need for consideration of alternative therapy in such instances.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/estatística & dados numéricos , Mieloma Múltiplo/fisiopatologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Comorbidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores SexuaisRESUMO
PURPOSE: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including ischemic heart disease, stroke, and heart failure, are well-established late effects of therapy in survivors of childhood and young adult (< 40 years at diagnosis) cancers; less is known regarding CVD in long-term survivors of adult-onset (≥ 40 years) cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was used to describe the magnitude of CVD risk in 36,232 ≥ 2-year survivors of adult-onset cancer compared with matched (age, sex, and residential ZIP code) noncancer controls (n = 73,545) within a large integrated managed care organization. Multivariable regression was used to examine the impact of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs; hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia) on long-term CVD risk in cancer survivors. RESULTS: Survivors of multiple myeloma (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.70; P < .01), carcinoma of the lung/bronchus (IRR, 1.58; P < .01), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (IRR, 1.41; P < .01), and breast cancer (IRR, 1.13; P < .01) had significantly higher CVD risk when compared with noncancer controls. Conversely, prostate cancer survivors had a lower CVD risk (IRR, 0.89; P < .01) compared with controls. Cancer survivors with two or more CVRFs had the highest risk of CVD when compared with noncancer controls with less than two CVRFs (IRR, 1.83 to 2.59; P < .01). Eight-year overall survival was significantly worse among cancer survivors who developed CVD (60%) when compared with cancer survivors without CVD (81%; P < .01). CONCLUSION: The magnitude of subsequent CVD risk varies according to cancer subtype and by the presence of CVRFs. Overall survival in survivors who develop CVD is poor, emphasizing the need for targeted prevention strategies for individuals at highest risk of developing CVD.