Left ventricular assist device implantation causes platelet dysfunction and proinflammatory platelet-neutrophil interaction.

Blood flow through left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) may induce activation and dysfunction of platelets. Dysfunctional platelets cause coagulation disturbances and form platelet-neutrophil conjugates (PNC), which contribute to inflammatory tissue damage. This prospective observational cohort study investigated patients, who underwent implantation of a LVAD (either HeartMate II (HM II) (n = 7) or HeartMate 3 (HM 3) (n = 6)) and as control patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or aortic valve replacement (AVR) (n = 10). We performed platelet and leukocyte flow cytometry, analysis of platelet activation markers, and platelet aggregometry. Platelet CD42b expression was reduced at baseline and perioperatively in HM II/3 compared to CABG/AVR patients. After surgery the platelet activation marker ß-thromboglobulin and platelet microparticles increased in all groups while platelet aggregation decreased. Platelet aggregation was more significantly impaired in LVAD compared to CABG/AVR patients. PNC were higher in HM II compared to HM 3 patients. We conclude that LVAD implantation is associated with platelet dysfunction and proinflammatory platelet-leukocyte binding. These changes are less pronounced in patients treated with the newer generation LVAD HM 3. Future research should identify device-specific LVAD features, which are associated with the least amount of platelet activation to further improve LVAD therapy.

Multi-Modal Characterization of the Coagulopathy Associated With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is used to stabilize severe cardiocirculatory and/or respiratory failure. However, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is associated with a coagulopathy characterized by thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. This study aimed to characterize the pathomechanism of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-associated coagulopathy and identify options to optimize its monitoring and therapy. DESIGN: Prospective observational clinical trial. SETTING: ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Patients treated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 10) due to acute respiratory distress syndrome and patients treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 8) due to cardiocirculatory failure. One patient per group (venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) had surgery before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. INTERVENTIONS: Blood was sampled before, and 1, 24, and 48 hours after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implantation. Point-of-care tests (thrombelastometry/platelet aggregometry), conventional coagulation tests, whole blood counts, and platelet flow cytometry were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Even before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, plasmatic coagulation and platelet aggregation were impaired due to systemic inflammation, liver failure, anticoagulants (heparins, phenprocoumon, apixaban), and antiplatelet medication. During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, hemodilution and contact of blood components with artificial surfaces and shear stress inside extracorporeal membrane oxygenation additionally contributed to coagulation and platelet defects. Fibrinogen levels, fibrin polymerization, platelet activation, and microparticle release were increased in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation compared to venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Point-of-care results were available faster than conventional analyses. Bleeding requiring blood product application occurred in three of 10 venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients and in four of eight venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. No thrombotic events were observed. In-hospital mortality was 30% for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and 37.5% for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. CONCLUSIONS: The extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-associated coagulopathy is a multifactorial and quickly developing syndrome. It is characterized by individual changes of coagulation parameters and platelets and is aggravated by anticoagulants. The underlying factors of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-associated coagulopathy differ between venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients and are best diagnosed by a combination of point-of-care and conventional coagulation and platelet analyses. Therapy protocols for treating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-associated coagulopathy should be further validated in large-scale prospective clinical investigations.

Using six-colour flow cytometry to analyse the activation and interaction of platelets and leukocytes--A new assay suitable for bench and bedside conditions.

INTRODUCTION: Platelets are main effector cells in haemostasis and also promote inflammation. Platelet-leukocyte complexes are key mediators in a variety of thromboinflammatory disorders and consecutive organ failure. Cell-specific epitopes and activation markers on platelets and leukocytes can be measured using flow cytometry. However, until recently a major restriction has been a paucity in antibody combinations and lack of detection strategies. We aimed to develop a six-colour flow cytometry method which depicts multiple aspects of platelet and leukocyte interactions in human whole blood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Platelets, including microparticles and aggregates, were detected in flow cytometry using a platelet-specific anti-CD41-FITC antibody and size-defined regions. The morphology of platelet-leukocyte complexes (including granulocyte and monocyte content) were depicted using anti-CD45-PerCP, anti-CD66b-PE-Cy7, and anti-CD14-APC antibodies in a single sample. Expression of platelet and leukocyte activation markers P-selectin and CD11b were detected using anti-CD62P-PE and anti-CD11b-BV421 antibodies, respectively. RESULTS: The sensitivity of this assay to detect the effects of various agonists (TRAP-6, ADP, collagen, epinephrine, TNF-α and LPS) is demonstrated. Furthermore, the assay is shown to detect platelet and leukocyte activation induced by extracorporeal circulation in vitro. The suitability of this assay for bedside analysis is demonstrated exemplarily in a patient treated with mechanical circulatory life support. CONCLUSIONS: Using the concurrent assessment of multiple parameters, this method gives detailed insights into the complexity and dynamics of platelet-leukocyte interactions. This assay carries the potential to increase our understanding of the mechanisms and pathophysiology of platelet-leukocyte interaction in the research laboratory and clinical setting.