Are we afraid of the woods? - An investigation of the implicit and explicit fear reactions to forests.

The beneficial effects of nature exposure have been repeatedly documented and encourage frequent and regular contact with nature and especially highlight forests. However, in human history, forests have also been associated with negative emotions such as fear and were seen as dangerous environments. While existing literature could demonstrate that natural environments can evoke fear, the focus was on the explicit perception. Given that research has shown the significance of additional implicit processes in fear-related behaviour, we aim to explore the presence of an implicit fear response to forests. Therefore, in an online study, we investigated the explicit and implicit fear reactions to forests by a Northern German sample of N = 256. Using three explicit measurements, we investigated fear and danger perception on a semantic and visual level of the stimulus category "forest" compared to the human-made urban green space "park" and the urban setting "house". Additionally, we assessed the unconscious response tendencies towards the forest within three implicit tasks: Subliminal Priming Procedure (SPP), Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) and Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT). Within the analyzed sample, the subliminally presented word forest evoked a stronger positive valence response compared to park (SPP). In contrast to houses, the forest showed a stronger approach and weaker avoidance tendency (AAT). At the same time, both the three explicit and one implicit measurement (AMP) showed a stronger fear perception of forests compared to parks or houses. Considering the increasingly utilised beneficial effects of nature in interventions, these findings should be acknowledged when implementing nature exposure in interventions and treatments.

Aberrant functional connectivity within the salience network is related to cognitive deficits and disorganization in psychosis.

In schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder cognitive deficits are a reliable characteristic predicting a poor functional outcome. It has been theorized that both the default mode network (DMN) and the salience network (SN) play a crucial role in cognitive processes and aberrant functional connectivity within these networks in psychotic patients has been reported. The goal of this study was to reveal potential links between aberrant functional connectivity within these networks and impaired cognitive performance in psychosis. We chose two approaches for cognitive assessment, first the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) combined into a global score and second the disorganization factor derived from a five-factor model of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) known to be relevant for cognitive performance. DMN and SN were identified using independent component analysis on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data. We found significantly decreased connectivity within the right supplementary motor area (SMA) and bilateral putamen in patients with psychosis (n = 70; 27F/43M) compared to healthy controls (n = 72; 28F/44M). Within patients, linear regression analysis revealed that aberrant SMA connectivity was associated with impaired global cognition, while dysfunctional bilateral putamen connectivity predicted disorganization. There were no significant changes in connectivity within the DMN. Results support the hypothesis that SN dysfunctional connectivity is important in the pathobiology of cognitive deficits in psychosis. For the first time we were able to show the involvement of dysfunctional SMA connectivity in this context. We interpret the decreased SN connectivity as evidence of reduced functionality in recruiting brain areas necessary for cognitive processing.