Trends and Determinants of Location of Death Due to Colorectal Cancer in the United States : A Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States (US); however, there are limited data on location of death in patients who die from CRC. We examined the trends in location of death and determinants in patients dying from CRC in the US. METHODS: We utilized the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database to extract nationwide data on underlying cause of death as CRC. A multinomial logistic regression was performed to assess associations between clinico-sociodemographic characteristics and location of death. RESULTS: There were 850,750 deaths due to CRC from 2003 to 2019. There was a gradual decrease in deaths in hospital, nursing home, or outpatient facility/emergency department over time and an increase in deaths at home and in hospice. Relative to White decedents, Black, Asian, and American Indian/Alaska Native decedents were less likely to die at home and in hospice compared with hospitals. Individuals with lower educational status also had a lower risk of dying at home or in hospice compared with in hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The gradual shift in location of death of patients who die of CRC from institutionalized settings to home and hospice is a promising trend and reflects the prioritization of patient goals for end-of-life care by healthcare providers. However, there are existing sociodemographic disparities in access to deaths at home and in hospice, which emphasizes the need for policy interventions to reduce health inequity in end-of-life care for CRC.

Incidence of Secondary Cancers After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Whether neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) induces secondary cancers is controversial. This retrospective cohort study describes the incidence of secondary cancers in LARC patients. METHODS: We compared 364 LARC patients who received conventional (50.4 Gy) or short course neoadjuvant radiation (25 Gy x 5 fractions) followed by resection to 142 patients with surgically resected rectal cancer who did not receive radiation at a single institution from 2004 to 2018. Secondary cancer was defined as any nonmetastatic noncolorectal malignancy diagnosed via biopsy or definitive imaging criteria at least 6 mo after completion of neoadjuvant therapy or after resection in the comparison group. RESULTS: Among the neoadjuvant radiation group (364 patients, 40% female, age 61 ± 13 y), 32 patients developed 34 (9.3%) secondary cancers. Three cases involved a pelvic organ. Among the comparison group (142 patients, 39% female, age 64 ± 15 y), 15 patients (10.6%) developed a secondary cancer. Five cases involved pelvic organs. Secondary cancer incidence did not differ between groups. Latency period to secondary cancer diagnosis was 6.7 ± 4.3 y. Patients who received radiation underwent longer median follow-up (6.8 versus 4.5 y, P < 0.01) and were significantly less likely to develop a pelvic organ cancer (odds ratio 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.83; P = 0.02). No genetic mutations or cancer syndromes were identified among patients with secondary cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is not associated with increased secondary cancer risk in LARC patients and may have a local protective effect on pelvic organs, especially prostate. Ongoing follow-up is critical to continue risk assessment.

The SAGES MASTERS program presents: the top 10 seminal articles for laparoscopic left and sigmoid colectomy pathway for uncomplicated disease.

BACKGROUND: As one of the 8 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Masters Program clinical pathways, the Colorectal Pathway aims to deliver educational content for the general surgeon organized along 3 levels of performance (competency, proficiency and mastery) each represented by an anchoring procedure. In this article, the SAGES Colorectal Task Force presents focused summaries of the top 10 seminal articles selected for laparoscopic left/sigmoid colectomy for uncomplicated disease. METHODS: Using a systematic literature search of Web of Science, the most cited articles on laparoscopic left and sigmoid colectomy were identified, reviewed, and ranked by members of the SAGES Colorectal Task Force. Additional articles not identified in the literature search were included if deemed impactful by expert consensus. The top 10 ranked articles were then summarized, including their findings, strengths and limitations with emphasis on relevance and impact in the field. RESULTS: The top 10 articles selected focus on variations in minimally invasive surgical techniques, video demonstrations, stratified approaches for benign and malignant disease as well as assessments of the learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: The selected top 10 seminal articles for laparoscopic left and sigmoid colectomy in uncomplicated disease are considered by the SAGES colorectal task force to be fundamental to the knowledge base of minimally invasive surgeons as they progress to mastery in these procedures.

Impact of Bundled Payment Care Improvement Initiative on Health Care Expenditure in Major Bowel Procedures.

BACKGROUND: The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative links payments for Medicare beneficiaries during an episode of care (90 days from index surgery). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether major bowel participating Bundled Payments for Care Improvement organizations experience greater cost savings for colectomy while maintaining satisfactory quality outcomes compared to nonparticipating organizations. DESIGN: This is an Analysis of all Bundled Payments for Care Improvement participating hospitals for major bowel procedures (major bowel group) and propensity score-matched against Bundled Payments for Care Improvement organizations that do not include major bowel procedures (nonmajor bowel group) and those that do not participate in any Bundled Payments for Care Improvement program (non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement group). SETTING: Programs accepting Medicare and Medicaid in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients included were major bowel cases in the Medicare Standard Analytic file within Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups 329-331 at participating facilities between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures included average total care expenditure and quality of care (length of stay, morbidity, and mortality) from 3 days preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: We abstracted 7609 major bowel episodes from 23 major bowel group facilities, 21,872 episodes from nonmajor bowel-matched hospitals, and 19,383 episodes from non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-matched hospitals. From the baseline (January 2011 to June 2012) to final period (July 2015 to June 2016), we noted a $2955 average reduction in care expenditures. The largest decrease in average total episode expenditure occurred within the major bowel group (14% reduction) compared to the other groups (6% reduction for nonmajor bowel and 5% reduction for non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement). Utilizing a generalized estimating equation to adjust for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics, the average total episode expenditure for the major bowel group decreased by $4885 (95% CI $4838-$4932; p < 0.001) compared to $2050 (95% CI $2038-$2061) for the non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement group. All groups had similar reductions in length of stay, 30-day and 90-day complication rates, and readmission rates. LIMITATIONS: Analyses were limited by the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Bundled Payments for Care Improvement participation for major bowel procedures resulted in a greater decrease in average total cost per episode of care than in nonparticipating hospitals without compromise in quality of care. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B837.IMPACTO DE LA INICIATIVA BUNDLED PAYMENT AGRUPADOS PARA LA MEJORA DE LA ATENCIÓN DEL GASTO SANITARIO EN LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS INTESTINALES MAYORESANTECEDENTES:La iniciativa de Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención vincula los pagos para los beneficiarios de Medicare durante un episodio de atención (90 días desde la cirugía índice).OBJETIVO:Determinar si las principales organizaciones de Bundled Payment para el mejoramiento de la atención relacionados a los procedimientos intestinales experimentan mayores ahorros en los costos para una colectomía manteniendo resultados satisfactorios de calidad en comparación con las organizaciones no participantes.DISEÑO:Análisis de todos los hospitales participantes del programa Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención para procedimientos intestinales mayores (grupo que incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores) y puntaje de propensión comparado con las organizaciones que no incluyen dichos procedimientos (grupo que no incluye procedimientos intestinales mayores) y aquellos que no participan en ningún programa de Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención (grupo no BPCI).MARCO:Programas que aceptan Medicare y Medicaid en los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Casos intestinales mayores en el archivo analítico estándar de Medicare dentro de los grupos relacionados con el diagnóstico 329-331 en los centros participantes entre el 1/1/2011-30/6/2016.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Gasto total promedio y calidad de la atención (duración de la estadía, morbilidad, mortalidad) desde los 3 días preoperatorio hasta los 90 días postoperatorio.RESULTADOS:Hemos extraído 7609 episodios intestinales mayores de 23 instalaciones del grupo que incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores, 21.872 episodios de hospitales del grupo que no incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores y 19.383 episodios de hospitales del grupo no BPCI. Desde la línea de base (1/2011 - 6/2012) hasta el período final (7/2015 - 6/2016), notamos una reducción promedio de $2955 en los gastos de atención. La mayor disminución en el gasto promedio total por episodios ocurrió dentro del grupo que incluyen intestinales mayores (14% de reducción) en comparación con los otros grupos (6% de reducción para el grupo que no incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores, 5% de reducción para el no BPCI). Utilizando una ecuación de estimación generalizada para ajustar los datos demográficos del paciente, las comorbilidades y las características del hospital, el gasto total promedio por episodio para el grupo que incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores disminuyó en $ 4885 (IC del 95%: $4838-4932; p <0,001) en comparación con $2050 (IC del 95%: $2038-2061) para el grupo que no pertenece al programa BPCI. Todos los grupos tuvieron reducciones similares en la duración de la estancia, tasas de complicaciones de 30/90 días y de readmisión.LIMITACIONES:Análisis limitados por la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio.CONCLUSIONES:La participación de Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención en aquellos procedimientos intestinales mayores resultó en una disminución mayor en el costo total promedio por episodio de atención que en los hospitales no participantes, sin comprometer la calidad de la atención. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B837. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto).

Diverticular Disease Epidemiology: Rising Rates of Diverticular Disease Mortality Across Developing Nations.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of diverticular disease is growing in the Western world. However, the global burden of disease is unknown in the developing world. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the global burden of diverticular disease as measured by disease-specific mortality while identifying indicators of rising disease rates. DESIGN: We undertook an ecological analysis based on data from the World Health Organization Mortality Database. Then, we analyzed global age-adjusted mortality rates from diverticular disease and compared them to national rates of overweight adults, health expenditures, and dietary composition. SETTINGS: National vital statistics data were collected. PATIENTS: Diverticular disease deaths from January 1, 1994 through December 31, 2016 were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the national age-adjusted mortality rate. RESULTS: The average age-adjusted mortality rate for diverticular disease was 0.51 ± 0.31/100,000 with a range of 0.11 to 1.75/100,000. During the study period, we noted that 57% of nations had increasing diverticular disease mortality rates, whereas only 7% had decreasing rates. More developed nations (40%) than developing nations (24%) were categorized as having high diverticular disease mortality burden over the time period of the study, and developed nations had higher percentages of overweight adults (58.9 ± 3.1%) than developing nations (50.6 ± 6.7%; p < 0.0001). However, developing nations revealed more rapid increases in diverticular disease mortality (0.027 ± 0.024/100,000 per year) than developed nations (0.005 ± 0.025/100,000 per year; p = 0.001), as well as faster expanding proportions of overweight adults (0.76 ± 0.12% per year) than in already developed nations (0.53 ± 0.10% per year; p<0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Ecological studies cannot define cause and effect. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variability in diverticular disease mortality across the globe. Developing nations were characterized by rapid increases in diverticular disease mortality and expanding percentages of overweight adults. Public health interventions in developing nations are needed to alter mortality rates from diverticular disease. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B397. EPIDEMIOLOGÍA DE LA ENFERMEDAD DIVERTICULAR: TASAS CRECIENTES DE MORTALIDAD POR ENFERMEDAD DIVERTICULAR EN LOS PAÍSES EN DESARROLLO: La incidencia de la enfermedad diverticular está creciendo en el mundo occidental. Sin embargo, la carga mundial de la enfermedad es desconocida en el mundo en desarrollo.Determinar la carga global de la enfermedad diverticular medida por la mortalidad específica de la enfermedad mientras se identifican los indicadores de aumento de las tasas de enfermedad.Realizamos un análisis ecológico basado en datos de la Base de datos de mortalidad de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Luego, analizamos las tasas globales de mortalidad ajustadas por edad por enfermedad diverticular y las comparamos con las tasas nacionales de adultos con sobrepeso, gastos de salud y composición dietética.Datos nacionales de estadísticas vitales.Muertes por enfermedades diverticulares desde el 1 de enero de 1994 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2016.Tasa nacional de mortalidad ajustada por edad.La tasa promedio de mortalidad ajustada por edad para la enfermedad diverticular fue de 0,51 ± 0,31 / 100,000 con un rango de 0,11 a 1,75 / 100,000. Durante el período de estudio, notamos que el 57% de las naciones tenían tasas crecientes de mortalidad por enfermedades diverticulares, mientras que solo el 7% tenían tasas decrecientes. Las naciones más desarrolladas (40%) que las naciones en desarrollo (24%) se clasificaron como que tienen una alta carga de mortalidad por enfermedad diverticular durante el período de tiempo del estudio, y las naciones desarrolladas tuvieron porcentajes más altos de adultos con sobrepeso (58.9 ± 3.1%) que las naciones en desarrollo (50,6 ± 6,7%) (p <0,0001). Sin embargo, las naciones en desarrollo revelaron aumentos más rápidos en la mortalidad por enfermedades diverticulares (0.027 ± 0.024 / 100,000 por año) que las naciones desarrolladas (0.005 ± 0.025 / 100,000 por año) (p = 0.001), así como proporciones de adultos con sobrepeso en expansión más rápida (0.76 ± 0.12% por año) que en las naciones ya desarrolladas (0.53 ± 0.10% por año) (p <0.0001).Los estudios ecológicos no pueden definir causa y efecto.Existe una considerable variabilidad en la mortalidad por enfermedad diverticular en todo el mundo. Los países en desarrollo se caracterizaron por un rápido aumento en la mortalidad por enfermedades diverticulares y porcentajes crecientes de adultos con sobrepeso. Se necesitan intervenciones de salud pública en los países en desarrollo para alterar las tasas de mortalidad por enfermedad diverticular. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B397.

Anastomotic Troubleshooting.

Anastomotic leak remains a critical and feared complication in colorectal surgery. The development of a leak can be catastrophic for a patient, resulting in overall increased morbidity and mortality. To help mitigate this risk, there are several ways to assess and potentially validate the integrity of a new anastomosis to give the patient the best chance of avoiding this postoperative complication. A majority of anastomoses will appear intact with no obvious sign of anastomotic dehiscence on gross examination. However, each anastomosis should be interrogated before the conclusion of an operation. The most common method to assess for an anastomotic leak is the air leak test (ALT). The ALT is a safe intraoperative method utilized to test the integrity of left-sided colon and rectal anastomoses and most importantly allows the ability to repair a failed test before concluding the operation. Additional troubleshooting is sometimes needed due to technical difficulties with the circular stapler. Problems, such as incomplete doughnuts and stapler misfiring, do occur and each surgeon should be prepared to address them.

Proving the Effectiveness of the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) Skills Curriculum: A Single-blinded, Multispecialty, Multi-institutional Randomized Control Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the noninferiority of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum over current training paradigms and identify an ideal training platform. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is currently no validated, uniformly accepted curriculum for training in robotic surgery skills. METHODS: Single-blinded parallel-group randomized trial at 12 international American College of Surgeons (ACS) Accredited Education Institutes (AEI). Thirty-three robotic surgery experts and 123 inexperienced surgical trainees were enrolled between April 2015 and November 2016. Benchmarks (proficiency levels) on the 7 FRS Dome tasks were established based on expert performance. Participants were then randomly assigned to 4 training groups: Dome (n = 29), dV-Trainer (n = 30), and DVSS (n = 32) that trained to benchmarks and control (n = 32) that trained using locally available robotic skills curricula. The primary outcome was participant performance after training based on task errors and duration on 5 basic robotic tasks (knot tying, continuous suturing, cutting, dissection, and vessel coagulation) using an avian tissue model (transfer-test). Secondary outcomes included cognitive test scores, GEARS ratings, and robot familiarity checklist scores. RESULTS: All groups demonstrated significant performance improvement after skills training (P < 0.01). Participating residents and fellows performed tasks faster (DOME and DVSS groups) and with fewer errors than controls (DOME group; P < 0.01). Inter-rater reliability was high for the checklist scores (0.82-0.97) but moderate for GEARS ratings (0.40-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence of effectiveness for the FRS curriculum by demonstrating better performance of those trained following FRS compared with controls on a transfer test. We therefore argue for its implementation across training programs before surgeons apply these skills clinically.

Are There Variations in Mortality From Diverticular Disease By Sex?

BACKGROUND: Previous data reveal that females account for a disproportionate majority of all patients diagnosed with diverticulitis. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the variation in mortality from diverticular disease by sex. DESIGN: This was a nationwide retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research national registry. PATIENTS: All citizens of the United States who died from an underlying cause of death of diverticulitis between January 1999 and December 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome addressed was overall mortality rate of diverticulitis by sex. Secondary outcomes included pattern variances in demographics and secondary causes of death. RESULTS: During the study period, 55,096 patients (0.12%) died with an underlying cause of death of diverticulitis from a total of 44,915,066 deaths. Compared with other causes, females were disproportionally more likely to die from diverticulitis than males (0.17% females vs 0.08% males; p < 0.001). Age-adjusted incidence of death was higher for females compared with males. Female patients were less likely to die within the hospital compared with males (OR = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.75); p < 0.001). Conversely, female patients were more likely to die either at nursing homes or hospice facilities (OR = 1.64 (95% CI, 1.55-1.73); p < 0.001). In addition, females with an underlying cause of death of diverticulitis were less likely to have a surgical complication as their secondary cause of death (OR = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.78); p < 0.001) but more likely to have nonsurgical complications related to diverticulitis such as sepsis (OR = 1.04 (95% CI, 1.01-1.05); p < 0.03), nonsurgical GI disorders such as obstruction (OR = 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09-1.24); p < 0.001), or chronic pelvic fistulizing disease (OR = 1.43 (95% CI, 1.23-1.66); p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by a lack of more specific clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: Females have a higher incidence of diverticular disease mortality. Their deaths are more commonly secondary to nonsurgical infections, obstruction, or pelvic fistulae. Female patients represent a particularly vulnerable population that may benefit from more intensive diverticulitis evaluation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B257. ¿EXISTEN VARIACIONES EN LA MORTALIDAD POR ENFERMEDAD DIVERTICULAR POR GÉNERO?: Los datos anteriores revelan que las mujeres representan una mayoría desproporcionada de todos los pacientes diagnosticados con diverticulitis.Este estudio analizó la variación en la mortalidad por enfermedad diverticular por género.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo a nivel nacional.Los datos se obtuvieron del registro nacional WONDER del Centro de Control de Enfermedades.Se incluyeron todos los ciudadanos de los Estados Unidos que murieron por una causa subyacente de muerte (UCOD por sus siglas en inglés) de diverticulitis del 1 / 1999-12 / 2016.El resultado primario abordado fue la tasa de mortalidad general de la diverticulitis por género. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron variaciones de patrones en la demografía y causas secundarias de muerte.Falta de datos clínicos más específicos.Durante el período de estudio, 55.096 pacientes (0,12%) murieron con un UCOD de diverticulitis de un total de 44.915.066 muertes. En comparación con otras causas, las mujeres tenían una probabilidad desproporcionadamente mayor de morir de diverticulitis que los hombres (0.17% F vs. 0.08% M, p <0.001). La incidencia de muerte ajustada por edad fue mayor para las mujeres que para los hombres. Las pacientes femeninas tenían menos probabilidades de morir en el hospital en comparación con los hombres (OR 0.72, IC 0.69-0.75, p <0.001). Por el contrario, las pacientes femeninas tenían más probabilidades de morir en asilos de ancianos o en centros de cuidados paliativos (OR 1.64, IC 1.55-1.73, p <0.001). Además, las mujeres con una UCOD de diverticulitis tenían menos probabilidades de tener una complicación quirúrgica como causa secundaria de muerte (OR 0.72, CI 0.66-0.78, p <0.001) pero más probabilidades de tener complicaciones no quirúrgicas relacionadas con la diverticulitis, como sepsis (OR 1.04, CI 1.01-1.05, p <0.03), trastornos gastrointestinales no quirúrgicos como obstrucción (OR 1.16, CI 1.09-1.24, p <0.001), o enfermedad fistulizante pélvica crónica (OR 1.43, CI 1.23-1.66, p <0,001).Las mujeres tienen una mayor incidencia de mortalidad por enfermedad diverticular. Sus muertes son más comúnmente secundarias a infecciones no quirúrgicas, obstrucción o fístulas pélvicas. Las pacientes femeninas representan una población particularmente vulnerable que puede beneficiarse de una evaluación más intensiva de diverticulitis. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B257.

Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.

BACKGROUND: While the ACOSOG and ALaCaRT trials found that laparoscopic resections for rectal cancer failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of pathologic outcomes when compared with open resections, the COLOR II and COREAN studies demonstrated non-inferiority of clinical outcomes, leading to uncertainty regarding the value of minimally invasive (MIS) techniques in rectal cancer surgery. We analyzed differences in pathologic and clinical outcomes between open versus MIS resections for rectal cancer. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent resection for stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma from the National Cancer Database (2010-2015). Surgical approach was categorized as open or MIS (laparoscopic or robotic). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to assess differences in outcomes and survival. Analysis was performed in an intention-to-treat fashion. RESULTS: A total of 31,190 patients who underwent rectal adenocarcinoma resection were identified, of whom 52.8% underwent open resection and 47.2% underwent MIS resection (31.0% laparoscopic, 16.2% robotic). After adjustment for patient, tumor, and institutional characteristics, MIS approaches were associated with significantly decreased risk of positive circumferential resection margins (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94), increased likelihood of harvesting ≥ 12 lymph nodes (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21), shorter length of stay (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.53-0.62), and improved overall survival (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: MIS approaches to rectal cancer resection were associated with improved pathologic and clinical outcomes when compared to the open approach. In this nationwide, facility-based sample of cancer cases in the United States, our data suggest superiority of MIS techniques for rectal cancer treatment.

High Risk of Proximal and Local Neoplasms in 2206 Patients With Anogenital Extramammary Paget's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Extramammary Paget's disease is an uncommon intraepidermal adenocarcinoma with poorly defined clinical implications. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to estimate the risk of second primary neoplasms in patients with extramammary Paget's disease. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry (1973-2014). SETTINGS: The study included population-based cancer registries from the United States. PATIENTS: Patients who were diagnosed with anogenital Paget's disease were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk of second primary development was measured. RESULTS: We identified 108 patients with anal Paget's disease, 421 patients with male genital (scrotum or penis) Paget's, and 1677 patients with female genital (vagina or vulva) Paget's. Median follow-up time was 5.9 years. The risk of developing colorectal adenocarcinoma was 18.5% for patients with anal Paget's disease. Eighty percent of colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnoses were synchronous (within 2 mo) to anal Paget's diagnoses, whereas metachronous tumors occurred at a median time of 2.4 years. Of patients with anal Paget's disease, 8.3% developed an anal adenocarcinoma or nonsmall cell cancer. In male patients with genital Paget's, the risk of proximal genitourinary malignancy was 9.7%, scrotal or testicular adenocarcinoma was 0.4%, and penile or scrotal squamous carcinoma was 1.7%. In female patients with genital Paget's, the risk of proximal genitourinary malignancy was 3.0%, vaginal or vulvar adenocarcinoma was 1.4%, and vaginal or vulvar squamous neoplasm was 1.0%. Five-year overall survival was 59.7%, 73.5%, and 80.7% in patients with anal, male genital, and female genital Paget's (p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The registry did not record surveillance schedule, provider specialty, or nonprocedural therapies for extramammary Paget's disease. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest published cohort of patients with extramammary Paget's disease, patients with anal Paget's had a much higher risk of both proximal and local neoplasms as compared with patients with genital Paget's. Patients with anal Paget's also experienced worse survival as compared with those with purely genital Paget's. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B20. ALTO RIESGO DE NEOPLASIAS PROXIMALES Y LOCALES EN 2206 PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD DE PAGET EXTRAMAMARIA ANOGENITAL:: La enfermedad de Paget extramamaria es un adenocarcinoma intraepidérmico poco frecuente con implicaciones clínicas poco definidas.Estimar el riesgo de segundas neoplasias primarias en pacientes con enfermedad de Paget extramamaria.Análisis retrospectivo del Registro de Vigilancia, Epidemiología y Resultados Finales (1973-2014).Registros de base poblacional en cáncer de los Estados Unidos.Pacientes que fueron diagnosticados con enfermedad de Paget anogenital.Riesgo de desarrollo un cáncer primario adicional.Se identificaron 108 pacientes con Paget anal, 421 pacientes con Paget genital masculino (escroto o pene) y 1677 pacientes con Paget genital femenino (vagina o vulva). Tiempo mediano de seguimiento fue de 5,9 años. El riesgo de desarrollar adenocarcinoma colorrectal fue del 18,5% para los pacientes con Paget anal. El ochenta por ciento de los diagnósticos de adenocarcinoma colorrectal fueron sincrónicos (dentro de los 2 meses) a los diagnósticos de Paget anal, mientras que los tumores metacrónicos ocurrieron en un tiempo promedio de 2,4 años. De los pacientes con Paget anal, el 8.3% desarrolló un adenocarcinoma anal o cáncer de células no pequeñas. En los pacientes masculinos con Paget genital, el riesgo de malignidad genitourinaria proximal fue del 9,7%, el adenocarcinoma escrotal o testicular fue del 0,4% y el carcinoma escamoso del pene o escroto fue del 1,7%. En pacientes femeninas con Paget genital, el riesgo de malignidad genitourinaria proximal fue de 3.0%, el adenocarcinoma vaginal o vulvar fue de 1.4% y la neoplasia escamosa vaginal o vulvar fue de 1.0%. La supervivencia general a cinco años fue del 59.7%, 73.5% y 80.7% en pacientes con anal, genital masculino y genital femenino, respectivamente (p <0.001).El registro no señalo el cronograma de vigilancia, la especialidad del proveedor o las terapias sin procedimiento para la enfermedad de Paget extramamaria.En la cohorte más grande publicada de pacientes con enfermedad de Paget extramamaria, los pacientes con Paget anal demostraron un riesgo mucho mayor de neoplasias proximales y locales en comparación con los pacientes con Paget genital. Los pacientes con Paget anal además demostraron una peor supervivencia en comparación con aquellos con Paget aislada genital. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B20.

What Is the Risk of Anal Carcinoma in Patients With Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia III?

BACKGROUND: The risk of anal carcinoma after previous diagnosis of anal intraepithelial neoplasia III is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the risk of anal carcinoma in patients with anal intraepithelial neoplasia III and to identify predictors for subsequent malignancy. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (1973-2014). SETTING: The study was composed of population-based cancer registries from the United States. PATIENTS: Patients who were diagnosed with anal intraepithelial neoplasia III were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was rate of subsequent anal squamous cell carcinoma. Predictors for anal cancer were identified using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 2074 patients with anal intraepithelial neoplasia III were identified and followed for a median time of 4.0 years (interquartile range, 1.8-6.7 y). Of the cohort, 171 patients (8.2%) subsequently developed anal cancer. Median time from anal intraepithelial neoplasia III diagnosis to anal cancer diagnosis was 2.7 years (interquartile range, 1.1-4.5 y). Fifty-two patients (30.4%) who developed anal carcinoma were staged T2 or higher. Ablative therapies for initial anal intraepithelial neoplasia III were associated with a reduction in the risk of anal cancer (OR = 0.3 (95% CI, 0.1-0.7); p = 0.004). Time-to-event analysis revealed that the 5-year incidence of anal carcinoma after anal intraepithelial neoplasia III was 9.5% or ≈1.9% per year. LIMITATIONS: The registry did not record HIV status, surveillance schedule, use of high-resolution anoscopy, or provider specialty. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest published cohort of patients with anal intraepithelial neoplasia III, ≈10% of patients were projected to develop anal cancer within 5 years. Nearly one third of anal cancers were diagnosed at stage T2 or higher despite a previous diagnosis of anal intraepithelial neoplasia III. Ablative procedures were associated with a decreased risk of cancer. This study highlights the considerable rate of malignancy in patients with anal intraepithelial neoplasia III and the need for effective therapies and surveillance. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A764.

What Is the Risk of Anastomotic Leak After Repeat Intestinal Resection in Patients With Crohn's Disease?

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of Crohn's patients require intestinal resection, and many need repeat resections. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the increased risk of clinical anastomotic leak in patients with a history of previous intestinal resection undergoing repeat resection with anastomosis for Crohn's disease. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected departmental data with 100% capture. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at the department of colorectal surgery in a tertiary care teaching hospital between July 2007 and March 2016. PATIENTS: A cohort of consecutive patients with Crohn's disease who were treated with intestinal resection and anastomosis, excluding patients with proximal fecal diversion, were included. The cohort was divided into 2 groups, those with no previous resection compared with those with previous resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical anastomotic leak within 30 days of surgery was measured. RESULTS: Of the 206 patients who met criteria, 83 patients had previous intestinal resection (40%). The 2 groups were similar in terms of patient factors, immune-suppressing medication use, and procedural factors. Overall, 20 clinical anastomotic leaks were identified (10% leak rate). There were 6 leaks (5%) detected in patients with no previous intestinal resection and 14 leaks (17%) detected in patients with a history of previous intestinal resection (p < 0.005). The OR of anastomotic leak in patients with Crohn's disease with previous resection compared with no previous resection was 3.5 (95% CI, 1.3-9.4). Patients with 1 previous resection (n = 53) had a leak rate of 13%, whereas patients with ≥2 previous resections (n = 30) had a leak rate of 23%. The number of previous resections correlated with increasing risk for clinical anastomotic leak (correlation coefficient = 0.998). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study with limited data to perform a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat intestinal resection in patients with Crohn's disease is associated with an increased rate of anastomotic leakage when compared with initial resection despite similar patient, medication, and procedural factors. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A459.

Do Appendicitis and Diverticulitis Share a Common Pathological Link?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between appendicitis and diverticulitis. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: This study was conducted in a subspecialty practice at a tertiary care facility. PATIENTS: We examined the rate of appendectomy among 4 cohorts of patients: 1) patients with incidentally identified diverticulosis on screening colonoscopy, 2) inpatients with medically treated diverticulitis, 3) patients who underwent left-sided colectomy for diverticulitis, and 4) patients who underwent colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer. INTERVENTIONS: There were no interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the appendectomy rate. RESULTS: We studied a total of 928 patients in this study. There were no differences in the patient characteristics of smoking status, nonsteroidal use, or history of irritable bowel syndrome across the 4 study groups. Patients with surgically treated diverticulitis had significantly more episodes of diverticulitis (2.8 ± 1.9) than the medically treated group (1.4 ± 0.8) (p < 0.0001). The rate of appendectomy was 8.2% for the diverticulosis control group, 13.5% in the cancer group, 23.5% in the medically treated diverticulitis group, and 24.5% in the surgically treated diverticulitis group (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for demographics and other clinical risk factors, patients with diverticulitis had 2.8 times higher odds of previous appendectomy (p < 0.001) than the control groups. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective study design is associated with selection, documentation, and recall bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal significantly higher appendectomy rates in patients with a diagnosis of diverticulitis, medically or surgically managed, in comparison with patients with incidentally identified diverticulosis. Therefore, we propose that appendicitis and diverticulitis share similar risk factors and potentially a common pathological link.

Do patient safety indicators explain increased weekend mortality?

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the differential role of patient safety indicator (PSI) events on mortality after weekend as compared with weekday admission. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality PSI events within a cohort of patients with nonelective admissions. First, we identified all patients with a PSI based on day of admission (weekend versus weekday). Then, we evaluated the outcome of mortality after each PSI event. Finally, we entered age, sex, race, median household income, payer information, and Charlson comorbidity scores in regression models to develop risk ratios of weekend to weekday PSI events and mortality. RESULTS: There were 28,236,749 patients evaluated with 428,685 (1.5%) experiencing one or more PSI events. The rate of PSI was the same for patients admitted on weekends as compared to weekdays (1.5%). However, the risk of mortality was 7% higher if a PSI event occurred to a patient admitted on a weekend as compared with a weekday. In addition, compared to patients admitted on weekdays, patients admitted on weekends had a 36% higher risk of postoperative wound dehiscence, 19% greater risk of death in a low-mortality diagnostic-related group, 19% increased risk of postoperative hip fracture, and 8% elevated risk of surgical inpatient death. CONCLUSIONS: Risk adjusted data reveal that PSI events are substantially higher among patients admitted on weekends. The considerable differences in death after PSI events in patients admitted on weekends as compared with weekdays indicate that responses to adverse events may be less effective on weekends.