Symptoms of psychosis in schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder: A comparison of African Americans and Caucasians in the Genomic Psychiatry Cohort.

Several studies have reported differences between African Americans and Caucasians in relative proportion of psychotic symptoms and disorders, but whether this reflects racial bias in the assessment of psychosis is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the distribution of psychotic symptoms and potential bias in symptoms assessed via semi-structured interview using a cohort of 3,389 African American and 5,692 Caucasian participants who were diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder. In this cohort, the diagnosis of schizophrenia was relatively more common, and the diagnosis of bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type was less relatively common, among African Americans than Caucasians. With regard to symptoms, relatively more African Americans than Caucasians endorsed hallucinations and delusions symptoms, and this pattern was striking among cases diagnosed with bipolar disorder and schizoaffective-bipolar disorder. In contrast, the relative endorsement of psychotic symptoms was more similar among cases diagnosed with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder-depressed type. Differential item function analysis revealed that African Americans with mild psychosis over-endorsed "hallucinations in any modality" and under-endorsed "widespread delusions" relative to Caucasians. Other symptoms did not show evidence of racial bias. Thus, racial bias in assessment of psychotic symptoms does not appear to explain differences in the proportion of symptoms between Caucasians and African Americans. Rather, this may reflect ascertainment bias, perhaps indicative of a disparity in access to services, or differential exposure to risk factors for psychosis by race. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Combining maxRatio analysis with real-time PCR and its potential application for the prediction of Meloidogyne incognita in field samples.

Diagnosing and quantifying plant-parasitic nematodes is critical for efficient nematode management. Several studies have been performed intending to demonstrate nematode quantification via real-time quantitative PCR. However, most of the studies used dilution of DNA templates to make standard curves, while few studies used samples with different nematode numbers to make the standard curve, resulting in a high standard error. The objective of the present study was to develop a high quality standard curve using samples containing different numbers of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and evaluate the results of real time qPCR with maxRatio analysis. The results showed that a high quality standard curve was obtained with different nematode numbers using specific primers and cycle threshold (Ct)-PCR (R²=0.9962, P<0.001, n=9). With the maxRatio analysis, the fractional cycle number (FCN)-PCR cycle curve and adjusted FCN (FCNadj)-PCR cycle curve had similar patterns as those of the Ct-PCR cycle curve. For quantification of nematodes in field soil samples, qPCR estimations with a FCNadj-PCR cycle standard curve was very close to microscope counting of second-stage juveniles (R²=0.9064, P<0.001, n=10), qPCR estimations with a FCN-PCR cycle standard curve was comparably good (R²=0.8509, P<0.001, n=10), and the biases with a Ct-PCR cycle standard curve were large (R²=0.7154, P<0.001, n=10). Moreover, we found that the concentration of Triton X-100 had less of an effect on FCN as compared to Ct, with delta FCN 0.52, and delta Ct 3.94 at 0.8% Triton. The present study suggests, that combined with maxRatio methods, real time qPCR could be a practical approach for quantifying M. incognita in field samples.