A Novel Technique of Placing Desfibrillator Leads in Patients with Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava.

Persistent left superior vena cava is the most common thoracic venous anomaly. It is usually asymptomatic, but it can make implanting intracardiac devices difficult.We present a novel technique to facilitate desfibrillator lead implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava and the absence of the right superior vena cava. We used a fixed-curve Selectra 3D 65-42 cm sheath (Biotronik), orienting it toward the tricuspid valve (TV) by rotating it counter-clockwise. During follow-up, the electrodes remained stable.Our technique was safe, simple, and feasible for patients with this complex venous anatomy.

Prognostic impact of the findings of the genetic test in left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.

Background: The diagnosis of left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (LDAC) is sometimes complex. The Padua group recently published a document with criteria to identify patients with LDAC, requiring a compatible genetic variant for diagnosis. Due to the gaps in the knowledge of the role of genetics in its pathogenesis, our objective is to describe the findings of the genetic test in patients with LDAC in our center and its prognostic impact. Methods: Single-center prospective cohort study, in which we recruited 77 patients diagnosed with LDAC or biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy according to the criteria of Sen-Chowdhry et al. Results: We obtained a positive result in the genetic test in 53.2 %. The desmoplakin gene was the most affected (16.9 %). The mean value of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was 45.6 ± 13.1 %, with no significant differences in the severity of the dysfunction according to genetics (p = 0.187). Among the patients with positive genetics there was a greater number of segments in the LV affected by fibrosis (p = 0.043). Regarding fatty infiltration in the LV and number of affected segments, there were no significant differences between groups (p = 0.144). MACE was recorded in 23 patients (29.9 %). The positive result in the genetic test was not significantly associated with the occurrence of MACE (p = 0.902). Conclusion: In our study, we did not find mutations responsible for the disease in practically half of the cases. Despite the existence of a high proportion of MACE during follow-up, there were no prognostic differences according to the result of the genetic test.

A case of recurring myocarditis: Magnetic resonance, key to diagnosis.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is a hereditary disease characterized by the replacement of the myocardium by fibrofatty tissue. In recent years, three patterns have been described: the classic right variant, the biventricular variant, and the variant with predominant involvement of the left ventricle. Nowadays, cardiac magnetic resonance is a fundamental tool for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy. Late gadolinium enhancement is a very sensitive indicator of early left-sided involvement, and is included as a marker in the current arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy criteria. We report a case of arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy with atypical form of presentation as recurrent myocarditis. Clinical suspicion was important for the diagnosis, as the patient did not present data that would point to an infectious origin of the disease. However, the key to diagnosis was detecting a characteristic imaging pattern on cardiac magnetic resonance. Initially, a meso-subepicardial fibrosis located in lateral wall was observed, which progressively spread to other regions until it became practically global. In addition, irregularities were observed in the epicardial contour that were suggestive of fatty infiltration, all consistent with the diagnosis of arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy. Learning objective: Arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy has recently been recognized as part of the arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy spectrum. Given the difficulties in its diagnosis, it is essential to have a high index of suspicion. We must pay attention to the clinical context and the cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings, which has become an essential imaging tool for diagnosis.