RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) may mimic other more common odontogenic processes such as infection, trauma, and benign pathology. Delays in diagnosis and treatment are known to result in poorer survival outcomes. PURPOSE: The study purpose was to measure the association between referral type and OSCC stage at time of presentation. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This was a retrospective cohort study composed of newly diagnosed OSCC patients treated with surgical resection from 2014 to 2023 at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center. Patients who presented with self-referrals or had surgical treatment outside of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center were excluded. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The primary predictor was referral source (dental vs medical specialty). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome was pathological T stage (pT stage). The secondary outcome was overall survival (OS). COVARIATES: Covariates included demographic data and cancer-related variables (symptomatology, subsite, and risk factors). ANALYSES: A multivariate logistical regression model for pT stage was constructed using all significant covariates as well as preoperative patient and tumor characteristics. For OS, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed and compared with the log-rank test. A P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 215 subjects were included in the study sample. The majority were referred by a dental provider (n = 132, 62.3%). Dental referrals presented with significantly earlier T stage disease (RRpT3/T4 0.65, P < .01) and had lower rates of cervical nodal positivity (RRpN1-N3 0.62, P = .01). Dental referral independently increased the odds of early pT stage presentation (odds ratio 5.10, P < .01) after controlling for age, sex, oral pain symptoms, social history (smoking and drinking), head neck cancer history, and tumor subsite. Dental referrals had significantly improved OS (P = .03) and were also associated with lower rates of oral pain symptoms (RRoral pain 0.80, P = .02), lymphovascular invasion (RRLVI 0.50; P = .04), and perineural invasion (RRPNI 0.63, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among subjects with similar risk factors, those referred from dental providers were found to have earlier stage disease. Unfortunately, over half of dental referrals still presented with pain symptoms and more than a third presented with locally advanced disease. Dental providers appear to be positioned to detect earlier OSCC; however, there is room for improvement.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the Modified Frailty Index and Modified Surgical Apgar scores in predicting postoperative outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent major head and neck surgery between 2012 and 2015. Modified Surgical Apgar, and Frailty Index, scores were calculated on 723 patients. The primary outcome was 30-day complication and/or mortality. RESULTS: The mean Modified Frailty Index was 0.11 ± 0.12, and mean Modified Surgical Apgar score was 6.15 ± 1.67. Both scores were significantly associated with 30-day complication (P<0.05). The Modified Surgical Apgar score was superior to the Modified Frailty Index in predicting complications (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.76; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI), 0.722-0.793; and AUC=0.59; 95 % CI, 0.548-0.633, respectively). Concurrent use of both scoring systems (AUC=0.77) was not superior to individual use. An increase in the mFI from 0.27 to 0.36 was associated with an increase in the risk of complication postoperatively (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.67; 95 % CI, 1.30-10.34, P=.014). A reduction in the mSAS from 7 to 6 increased the risk of complication following surgery (OR=2.64; 95 % CI, 1.45-4.80; P=.002). CONCLUSION: Both scores are useful in risk stratifying head and neck cancer patients. The Modified Surgical Apgar score was superior at predicting complications; concurrent use of both scores added minimal benefit.