Community Health Improvement Plans and Physical Activity Implementation Strategies: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Survey of US Local Health Departments.

OBJECTIVE: Community Health Improvement Plans (CHIPs) are a foundational public health practice conducted by every accredited health department in the United States. Community Health Improvement Plans may impact community-wide physical activity (PA) by implementing large-scale interventions. However, no studies have evaluated whether, or how, CHIP goals focusing on increasing PA are implemented. This study aims to understand CHIP PA goals, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes of CHIP nationally. DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional online survey of CHIP implementation. SETTING: A random sample of accredited local health departments nationally. PARTICIPANTS: Local health departments (N = 44) were invited to participate in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Constructs from Proctor's Model of Implementation Research and implementation strategies were the main outcomes assessed. RESULTS: Most CHIPs included PA goals (72.7%). Goals most commonly focused on changing built environment and infrastructure (25.9%), increasing education and awareness (22.2%), increasing PA programming (18.5%), and partnering with health care (18.5%). Common implementation strategies used were designing and evaluating their CHIPs (72.7%) and developing relationships with stakeholders (72.7%). Respondents reported that CHIPS were able to be adopted, acceptable for the community, and feasible. Community Health Improvement Plans were also reported to be safe, yet respondents reported effectiveness lower than other constructs. Participants reported that individual-level PA was unlikely to change due to their CHIP (mean = 3.39, SD = 1.12). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, it seems that communities are choosing easily adopted, appropriate, feasible, and safe interventions that may be less effective over those that may produce large-scale improvement in PA behavior. Future research needs to be conducted on the process of CHIP implementation and the potential long-term outcomes. Community Health Improvement Plans may serve as a powerful tool to improve population health if implemented effectively.

The environmental effects of non-invasive cardiac imaging.

The healthcare sector is a major contributor to the universal climate footprint, of this a significant proportion is attributable to medical imaging and further to dedicated cardiac imaging. The increasing availability and utility of cardiac imaging techniques for prognosis, diagnosis and management raises concerns for the impact of these investigations on the environment. Our objective was to review the published literature assessing the environmental impact of non-invasive imaging modalities within cardiology, subsequently helping guide physicians toward a more sustainable approach to cardiac imaging and improved awareness of the environmental impact of healthcare within this field. We conducted a systematic review of studies measuring the environmental impact of non-invasive cardiac imaging. A total of 8 studies were included in the final analysis. Cardiac imaging has a significant environmental impact, which varies by modality: lowest for echocardiography and highest for MRI. As a whole this field represents a significant contributor to climate-related threats to human health, which we should strive toward harm minimisation. This may be mitigated through the conscious utilisation of energy consumption and contrast media, as well as healthcare worker education and quality improvement to guide imaging choice based on environmental impact alongside conventional determinants such as patient characteristics, clinical guidelines and cost (visual abstract).

Community health improvement plan: Study protocol for Kansas City's intervention and implementation evaluation.

Objectives: Community health improvement plans (CHIPs) are foundational public health practice, yet no studies have been conducted to understand implementation of these plans. This evaluation study of the Kansas City CHIP aims to 1) identify implementation strategies used in the CHIP, 2) assess changes in implementation, service, and client outcomes, 3) assess contextual factors associated with implementation, and 4) understand social networks of coalitions who implement the Kansas City CHIP. Study design: This study protocol uses a unique, mixed methods approach to evaluating process and outcomes of the Kansas City CHIP. This study is supported by Proctor's Model of Implementation, RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance), and the practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM). Methods: Staff and community members involved in implementing the Kansas City, Missouri CHIP will be invited to participate in an annual online survey, a series of focus groups, and quarterly implementation logs to assess implementation and sustainability. Results: RE-AIM and PRISM constructs are the primary and secondary outcomes of interest. Results of this study will be available from the first year of implementation in 2023, with future results provided annually. Conclusions: This project will fill a much-needed gap in the literature by understanding how large-scale coalitions implement projects that aim to improve population health and health equity. CHIPs have the potential to improve population health, yet few studies have been conducted on CHIPs, with no studies to date assessing outcomes. To support effective implementation and sustainability as well as improve public health outcomes, researchers need to evaluate CHIPs and develop models of implementation that can quickly be integrated into practice to improve populations' health.

Cardiac Myeloid Sarcoma: A 1-kg Heart.

A 53-year-old man with a background of acute myelomonocytic leukemia in remission presented with pleurisy. Repeat transthoracic echocardiography over several weeks revealed thickening left ventricular walls and decreasing systolic function. He died of decompensated heart failure due to cardiac myeloid sarcoma, with autopsy revealing an enlarged heart weighing >1 kg. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).