Real-world effectiveness of golimumab in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis and an inadequate response to initial TNFi therapy in Greece: the GO-BEYOND prospective, observational study.

The impact of golimumab (GLM) on remission or low disease activity (LDA) was evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), progressive psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or severe axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), who failed previous treatment for their rheumatic disease with one initial tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor (TNFi). This is a multicenter, prospective, real-world observational 18-month study, conducted in Greece. The primary endpoint, assessed at 6 months, included the proportion of patients attaining LDA and/or remission (Disease Activity Score for 28 joints based on C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] ≤ 3.2), minimal disease activity (MDA; MDA criteria), and moderate disease activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] score 4-7), respectively. Other endpoints evaluated the persistence to GLM treatment and its impact on patients' work productivity (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI] instrument) and quality of life (QoL; EuroQoL5 dimensions 3 levels [EQ-5D-3L] questionnaire). Descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Kaplan-Meier method were used for analyses. At 6 months, LDA was achieved by 46.4% of patients with RA, MDA by 57.1% of patients with PsA, and BASDAI 4-7 by 24.1% of patients with axSpA. For all study patients, persistence rates on GLM were high (85.1-93.7%) over 18 months; all WPAI domain scores and the EQ-5D-3L index score improved significantly (p < 0.001) from baseline to 18 months. GLM treatment was effective in patients with RA, PsA, or axSpA who had failed previous treatment with one TNFi and led to significant WPAI and QoL improvements. Persistence rates were high. Trial registration number and date of registration: As per the local regulations the study has been registered at the national registry for non-interventional studies https://www.dilon.sfee.gr/studiesp_d.php?meleti_id=MK8259-6995 .

Apremilast for biologic-naïve, peripheral psoriatic arthritis, including patients with early disease: results from the APROACH observational prospective study.

To evaluate the effect of the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast in biologic-naïve patients with early peripheral PsA in terms of disease activity, clinical manifestations, patient-perceived outcomes, as well as apremilast's safety profile in routine care settings of Greece. Non-interventional, multicenter, 52-week prospective cohort study, enrolling biologic-naïve patients with early active peripheral PsA who started apremilast after intolerance or inadequate response (within the first 12 months of treatment) to an initial conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD treatment. Non-responder imputation was applied for missing data.In total, 167 consecutive patients (mean age: 52.5 years; median PsA duration: 0.9 years) were analyzed. At baseline, the median (interquartile range) clinical Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) score was 22.0 (16.0-29.0), with 86.8% of patients having at least moderate (29.3% high) disease activity; 87.4% had skin psoriasis, 37.7% nail psoriasis, 30.7% enthesitis, and 12.4% dactylitis. At 16, 24, and 52 weeks, 28.7, 42.5, and 48.5% of patients, achieved ≥ 50% improvement in their baseline cDAPSA score, respectively. At week 52, 55.6, 50, and 26.8% of evaluable patients achieved complete resolution of enthesitis, dactylitis and nail psoriasis, respectively. Improvements were also observed in patient's health state assessed by the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item questionnaire, and health-related quality of life. The 52-week drug survival rate was 75%, while 13.8% of patients experienced at least one adverse drug reaction.Biologic-naïve patients with early PsA, treated with apremilast experienced significant improvements in disease activity, extra-articular manifestations and patient-centered outcomes, accompanied by a favorable tolerability profile.

A prospective multicenter study assessing humoral immunogenicity and safety of the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in Greek patients with systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate humoral responses and safety of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic disease (SAARD) patients subjected or not to treatment modifications during vaccination. METHODS: A nationwide, multicenter study, including 605 SAARD patients and 116 controls, prospectively evaluated serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibody titers, side-effects, and disease activity, one month after complete vaccination, in terms of distinct treatment modification strategies (none, partial and extended modifications). Independent risk factors associated with hampered humoral responses were identified by data-driven multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with extended treatment modifications responded to vaccines similarly to controls as well as SAARD patients without immunosuppressive therapy (97.56% vs 100%, p = 0.2468 and 97.56% vs 97.46%, p > 0.9999, respectively). In contrast, patients with partial or without therapeutic modifications responded in 87.50% and 84.50%, respectively. Furthermore, SAARD patients with extended treatment modifications developed higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels compared to those without or with partial modifications (median:7.90 vs 7.06 vs 7.1, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0195, respectively). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX) and methotrexate (MTX) negatively affected anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral responses. In 10.5% of vaccinated patients, mild clinical deterioration was noted; however, no differences in the incidence of deterioration were observed among the distinct treatment modification SAARD subgroups. Side-effects were generally comparable between SAARD patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: In SAARD patients, mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are effective and safe, both in terms of side-effects and disease flares. Treatment with MMF, RTX and/or MTX compromises anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses, which are restored upon extended treatment modifications without affecting disease activity.