Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 388(17): 1582-1596, 2023 Apr 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37099341

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine has immunomodulatory "off-target" effects that have been hypothesized to protect against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). METHODS: In this international, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned health care workers to receive the BCG-Denmark vaccine or saline placebo and followed them for 12 months. Symptomatic Covid-19 and severe Covid-19, the primary outcomes, were assessed at 6 months; the primary analyses involved the modified intention-to-treat population, which was restricted to participants with a negative test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 at baseline. RESULTS: A total of 3988 participants underwent randomization; recruitment ceased before the planned sample size was reached owing to the availability of Covid-19 vaccines. The modified intention-to-treat population included 84.9% of the participants who underwent randomization: 1703 in the BCG group and 1683 in the placebo group. The estimated risk of symptomatic Covid-19 by 6 months was 14.7% in the BCG group and 12.3% in the placebo group (risk difference, 2.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.7 to 5.5; P = 0.13). The risk of severe Covid-19 by 6 months was 7.6% in the BCG group and 6.5% in the placebo group (risk difference, 1.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.2 to 3.5; P = 0.34); the majority of participants who met the trial definition of severe Covid-19 were not hospitalized but were unable to work for at least 3 consecutive days. In supplementary and sensitivity analyses that used less conservative censoring rules, the risk differences were similar but the confidence intervals were narrower. There were five hospitalizations due to Covid-19 in each group (including one death in the placebo group). The hazard ratio for any Covid-19 episode in the BCG group as compared with the placebo group was 1.23 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.59). No safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination with BCG-Denmark did not result in a lower risk of Covid-19 among health care workers than placebo. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others; BRACE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04327206.).


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Vacina BCG , COVID-19 , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Vacina BCG/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , SARS-CoV-2 , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico
2.
JAMA ; 328(1): 48-56, 2022 07 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35788795

RESUMO

Importance: Randomized clinical trials showed that earlier peanut introduction can prevent peanut allergy in select high-risk populations. This led to changes in infant feeding guidelines in 2016 to recommend early peanut introduction for all infants to reduce the risk of peanut allergy. Objective: To measure the change in population prevalence of peanut allergy in infants after the introduction of these new guidelines and evaluate the association between early peanut introduction and peanut allergy. Design: Two population-based cross-sectional samples of infants aged 12 months were recruited 10 years apart using the same sampling frame and methods to allow comparison of changes over time. Infants were recruited from immunization centers around Melbourne, Australia. Infants attending their 12-month immunization visit were eligible to participate (eligible age range, 11-15 months), regardless of history of peanut exposure or allergy history. Exposures: Questionnaires collected data on demographics, food allergy risk factors, peanut introduction, and reactions. Main Outcome and Measures: All infants underwent skin prick tests to peanut and those with positive results underwent oral food challenges. Prevalence estimates were standardized to account for changes in population demographics over time. Results: This study included 7209 infants (1933 in 2018-2019 and 5276 in 2007-2011). Of the participants in the older vs more recent cohort, 51.8% vs 50.8% were male; median (IQR) ages were 12.5 (12.2-13.0) months vs 12.4 (12.2-12.9) months. There was an increase in infants of East Asian ancestry over time (16.5% in 2018-2019 vs 10.5% in 2007-2011), which is a food allergy risk factor. After standardizing for infant ancestry and other demographics changes, peanut allergy prevalence was 2.6% (95% CI, 1.8%-3.4%) in 2018-2019, compared with 3.1% in 2007-2011 (difference, -0.5% [95% CI, -1.4% to 0.4%]; P = .26). Earlier age of peanut introduction was significantly associated with a lower risk of peanut allergy among infants of Australian ancestry in 2018-2019 (age 12 months compared with age 6 months or younger: adjusted odds ratio, 0.08 [05% CI, 0.02-0.36]; age 12 months compared with 7 to less than 10 months: adjusted odds ratio, 0.09 [95% CI, 0.02-0.53]), but not significant among infants of East Asian ancestry (P for interaction = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: In cross-sectional analyses, introduction of a guideline recommending early peanut introduction in Australia was not associated with a statistically significant lower or higher prevalence of peanut allergy across the population.


Assuntos
Arachis , Comportamento Alimentar , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim , Arachis/efeitos adversos , Austrália/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 144(5): 1327-1335.e5, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31401287

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials demonstrate that timely introduction of peanut to infants reduces the risk of peanut allergy. However, much debate remains regarding how to best achieve earlier peanut introduction at the population level. Our previous study in 2007-2011 (HealthNuts, n = 5300) indicated that few infants were consuming peanut in the first year. Australian infant feeding guidelines were updated in 2016 to recommend introducing peanut before 12 months for all infants. There were no data available on the subsequent effect on peanut introduction or peanut reactions. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the consequences of a nonscreening approach to allergenic food introduction in a population-based sample of infants in their first year of life. METHODS: EarlyNuts is a population-based, cross-sectional study of 12-month-old infants in Melbourne, Australia, recruited by using an identical sampling frame and methods to HealthNuts (72% response rate vs 73% response rate in HealthNuts). We report here on the first 860 participants recruited between November 2016 and October 2018. RESULTS: Most infants (88.6%; 95% CI, 86.1% to 90.7%) had introduced peanut by 12 months (median age, 6 months), an increase from 28.4% (95% CI, 27.2% to 29.7%) in the HealthNuts study. By 12 months, the majority of these (76.4%) had consumed peanut more than 4 times, and 28% were eating peanut more than once per week. Preliminary results on parent-reported reactions show that 4.0% of those consuming peanut by 12 months had possible IgE-mediated reactions. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a striking shift toward earlier peanut introduction, with a 3-fold increase in peanut introduction by age 1 year in 2018 compared with 2007-2011.


Assuntos
Dietoterapia , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/epidemiologia , Grupos Populacionais , Alérgenos/imunologia , Arachis/imunologia , Austrália/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/metabolismo , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/imunologia , Prevalência , Testes Cutâneos
4.
Pediatrics ; 151(2)2023 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36704902

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multiple systematic reviews examine the introduction of foods in relation to individual health outcomes, but the balance of harms and benefits has not been overviewed systematically. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to perform an overview of systematic reviews on age of introduction of complementary and allergenic foods to the infant diet and long and short-term health outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed (July 25, 2022). STUDY SELECTION: Included systematic reviews examining the introduction of complementary or allergenic foods before age 1. Outcomes included allergic, autoimmune, and inflammatory diseases, neurodevelopment, nutrition, and weight. DATA EXTRACTION: Extraction and quality assessment were performed in duplicate (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) and strength of evidence was assessed. RESULTS: We screened 4015 articles and included 32 systematic reviews. There was moderate evidence that peanut and egg should be introduced from 4 to 11 months to prevent food allergy (6 of 10 reviews). Complementary food introduction was not associated with food allergy. Moderate certainty evidence suggested age of complementary food introduction was not associated with eczema. Age at introduction of gluten was not associated with celiac disease (high certainty evidence; 3 of 4 reviews). Low certainty evidence indicated that introducing solids before 4 months may increase the risk of childhood obesity, but not growth. There was insufficient evidence regarding an association between any food introduction and bone health, gastrointestinal diseases, autoimmune disorders, asthma, or allergic rhinitis. LIMITATIONS: Gray literature was not included. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports introducing complementary foods around 6 months and allergenic foods before 11 months.


Assuntos
Eczema , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Obesidade Infantil , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Alérgenos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/prevenção & controle , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente , Obesidade Infantil/complicações , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto
5.
Front Digit Health ; 3: 661708, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34713136

RESUMO

Embedding digital technologies in healthcare has the potential to streamline and personalize medical care. However, healthcare systems are often fragmented, and therefore achieving a truly integrated digital health program can be challenging. To promote a streamlined, evidence-based approach to implementing digital health solutions in a healthcare system, the Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI) established the Digital Health Translation and Implementation Program (DHTI) bringing together clinicians, researchers and digital health experts. From the program commencement, frontline clinical innovators have collaborated with DHTI team members to develop and implement digital solutions to address pain-points in the healthcare system. Throughout this program, important lessons have been learnt relating to the development, evaluation and implementation of digital solutions in the healthcare system. This paper explores these lessons and makes recommendations for the successful implementation of digital health solutions in healthcare systems under five main categories: (1) design and usability, (2) stakeholder engagement and uptake, (3) project management and resourcing, (4) process and implementation, and (5) evaluation. Recommendations suggested here are designed to support future healthcare-based digital health programs to maximize the impact digital solutions can have on the healthcare system and patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA