Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urology ; 184: 217-223, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38043907

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in opioid prescribing rates following pediatric urologic surgery. METHODS: We queried the TriNetX Research database for patients under age 18 who underwent one of seven common pediatric urology procedures. We identified the proportion of patients that received an oral opioid prescription within 5days of surgery. The primary analysis evaluated the trend in postoperative opioid prescriptions using 3-month intervals from January 2010 to December 2022. We performed an interrupted time series analysis assessing trends in opioid prescribing patterns both before and after the American Academy of Pediatrics challenge. RESULTS: Of the 81,644 pediatric urology procedures, 29,595 (36.2%) received a postoperative opioid prescription, including 29.8% of circumcisions, 25.8% of hydrocelectomies, 39.6% of hypospadias repairs, 42.7% of pyeloplasties, 42.8% of ureteral reimplants. For all procedures we observed rising rates of opioid prescribing, increasing by 0.9% per 3-month interval prior to the challenge statement release from 2010 to 2018. We observed an overall significant decrease in opioid prescribing by 2.2% per 3-month interval following the challenge statement release. Additionally, since 2018, there was a significant decrease in opioid prescribing in all of the race, ethnicity, and age cohorts. CONCLUSION: Opioid prescribing following pediatric urology procedures has sharply decreased following the 2018 American Academy of Pediatrics challenge statement which underscores the value of cross-specialty quality improvement initiatives. Nonetheless, opioid prescribing remains high with potential racial or age disparities that warrant further investigation.


Assuntos
Medicina , Urologia , Masculino , Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica , Academias e Institutos
2.
Int J Impot Res ; 2024 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822168

RESUMO

No study has yet assessed the risk of developing erectile dysfunction (ED) after a diagnosis of long COVID, defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as the persistence or presence of new symptoms at least 4 weeks after initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, when compared to those diagnosed with acute COVID or cases in which more severe treatment is required. To assess these risks, we queried the TriNetX COVID-19 Research Network from December 1st 2020 through June 2023. Men aged ≥ 18 diagnosed with long COVID were compared to those diagnosed with acute COVID and analyses were performed to compare men who were/were not hospitalized within 1 month of acute COVID diagnosis and men who did/did not need vasopressors. Cohorts were propensity score matched and compared for differences in new ED diagnosis and/or prescription of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i). After propensity score matching, the long and acute COVID cohorts included 2839 men with an average age of 54.5±16.7 and 55.1±17.1 years respectively (p = 0.21). Men with long COVID were more likely to develop ED or be prescribed PDE5i (3.63%) when compared to men with only acute COVID infections (2.61%) [RR 1.39; 95% CI 1.04, 1.87]. There was no statistically significant risk of developing ED or being prescribed PDE5i for individuals who received vasopressors [RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.77,1.10] or were hospitalized [RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.82,1.06].

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA