Factors associated with potential over- and undertreatment of hyperglycaemia and annual measurement of HbA1c in type 2 diabetes in norwegian general practice.

AIMS: To identify individual and general practitioner (GP) characteristics associated with potential over- and undertreatment of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes and with HbA1c not being measured. METHODS: A cross-sectional study that included 10233 individuals with type 2 diabetes attending 282 GPs. Individuals with an HbA1c measurement during the last 15 months were categorized as potentially overtreated if they were prescribed a sulphonylurea and/or insulin when the HbA1c was less than 53 mmol/mol (7%) when aged over 75 years or less than 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) when aged between 65 and 75 years. Potential undertreatment was defined as age less than 60 years and HbA1c > 64 mmol/mol (8.0%) or HbA1c > 69 mmol/mol (8.5%) and treated with lifestyle modification and/or monotherapy. We used multilevel binary and multinominal logistic regression models to examine associations. RESULTS: Overall, 4.1% were potentially overtreated, 7.8% were potentially undertreated and 11% did not have HbA1c measured. Characteristics associated with potential overtreatment were as follows: long diabetes duration, prescribed antihypertensive medication, cardiovascular disease and renal failure. Potential undertreatment was associated with male gender, non-western origin and low educational level. Characteristics associated with not having an HbA1c measurement performed were male gender, age < 50 years and cardiovascular diseases. GP specialist status and GPs' use of a Noklus diabetes application reduced the risk of not having an HbA1c measurement performed. CONCLUSION: Potential overtreatment in elderly individuals with type 2 diabetes was relatively low. Nevertheless, appropriate de-intensification or intensification of treatment and regular HbA1c measurement in identified subgroups is warranted.

The roles of healthcare professionals in diabetes care: a qualitative study in Norwegian general practice.

Objective: To explore the experiences of general practitioners (GPs), nurses and medical secretaries in providing multi-professional diabetes care and their perceptions of professional roles.Design, setting and subjects: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six GPs, three nurses and two medical secretaries from five purposively sampled diabetes teams. Interviews were analysed thematically.Main outcome measures: Healthcare professionals' (HCPs') experiences of multi-professional diabetes care in general practice.Results: The involvement of nurses and medical secretaries (collaborating health care professionals) was mainly motivated by GPs' time pressure and their perception of diabetes care as easy to standardize. GPs reported that diabetes care had become more structured and continuous after the involvement of collaborating health care professionals (cHCPs). cHCPs defined their role differently from GPs, emphasizing that their approach included acknowledging patients' need for diabetes education, listening to their stories and meeting their need for emotional support. GPs appeared less involved in patients' emotional concerns and more focused on the biomedical aspects of illness. There was little emphasis on teamwork among GPs and cHCPs, and none of the practices used care plans to involve patients in decisions or unify treatment among professionals. Participants stated that institutional structures including a discriminatory remuneration system, lack of role descriptions and missing procedures for collaborative approaches were an obstacle to MPC.Conclusions: cHCPs worked independently under delegated leadership of the GPs. Although cHCPs had a complementary role, HCPs in general practice may not take full advantage of the potential of sharing patient responsibility and learning with, from and about each other. Contextual barriers for team-based care approaches should be addressed in future research.KEY POINTSIt has been suggested that multi-professional approaches improve quality of care in people with long-term conditions.In this study, nurses and medical secretaries perceived to have a complementary role to general practitioners (GPs) in diabetes care, focusing on patient education, building trusting relationships and providing patients with emotional support.As multi-professional collaboration was minimal, GPs, nurses and medical secretaries in the included practices may not take full advantage of the potential of sharing care responsibility and learning with, from and about each other.

Ethnic and gender differences in the management of type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study from Norwegian general practice.

BACKGROUND: Ethnic minority groups from Asia and Africa living in Western countries have a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) than the general population. We aimed to assess ethnic differences in diabetes care by gender. METHODS: Population-based, cross-sectional study identified 10,161 individuals with T2DM cared for by 282 General Practitioners (GP) in Norway. Ethnicity was based on country of birth. Multilevel regression models adjusted for individual and GP factors were applied to evaluate ethnic differences by gender. RESULTS: Diabetes was diagnosed at a younger mean age in all other ethnic groups compared with Westerners (men: 45.9-51.6 years vs. 56.4 years, women: 44.9-53.8 years vs. 59.1 years). Among Westerners mean age at diagnosis was 2.7 years higher in women compared with men, while no gender difference in age at diagnosis was found in any minority group. Daily smoking was most common among Eastern European, South Asian and Middle East/North African men. In both genders, we found no ethnic differences in processes of care (GPs' measurement of HbA1c, blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol, creatinine). The proportion who achieved the HbA1c treatment target was higher in Westerners (men: 62.3%; women: 66.1%), than in ethnic minorities (men 48.2%; women 53.5%). Compared with Western men, the odds ratio (OR) for achieving the target was 0.45 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.73) in Eastern European; 0.67 (0.51 to 0.87) in South Asian and 0.62 (0.43 to 0.88) in Middle Eastern/North African men. Compared with Western women, OR was 0.49 (0.28 to 0.87) in Eastern European and 0.64 (0.47 to 0.86) South Asian women. Compared with Westerners, the blood pressure target was more often achieved in South Asians and Middle Easterners/North Africans in both genders. Small ethnic differences in achieving the LDL-cholesterol treatment target by gender were found. CONCLUSION: Diabetes was diagnosed at a considerably earlier age in both minority men and minority women compared with Westerners. Several minority groups had worse glycaemic control compared with Westerners in both genders, which implies that it is necessary to improve glucose lowering treatment for the minority groups. Smoking cessation advice should particularly be offered to men in most minority groups.

Are general practitioners characteristics associated with the quality of type 2 diabetes care in general practice? Results from the Norwegian ROSA4 study from 2014.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the associations between general practitioners (GPs) characteristics such as gender, specialist status, country of birth and country of graduation and the quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: The 277 GPs provided care for 10082 patients with T2DM in Norway in 2014. The GPs characteristics were self-reported: 55% were male, 68% were specialists in General Practice, 82% born in Norway and 87% had graduated in Western Europe. Of patients, 81% were born in Norway and 8% in South Asia. Data regarding diabetes care were obtained from electronic medical records and manually verified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance of recommended screening procedures, prescribed medication and level of HbA1c, blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol stratified according to GPs characteristics, adjusted for patient and GP characteristics. RESULT: Female GPs, specialists, GPs born in Norway and GPs who graduated in Western Europe performed recommended procedures more frequently than their counterparts. Specialists achieved lower mean HbA1c (7.14% vs. 7.25%, p < 0.01), a larger proportion of their patients achieved good glycaemic control (HbA1c = 6.0%-7.0%) (49.1% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.018) and lower mean systolic blood pressure (133.0 mmHg vs. 134.7 mmHg, p < 0.01) compared with non-specialists. GPs who graduated in Western Europe achieved lower diastolic blood pressure than their counterparts (76.6 mmHg vs. 77.8 mmHg, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Several quality indicators for type 2 diabetes care were better if the GPs were specialists in General Practice. Key Points Research on associations between General Practitioners (GPs) characteristics and quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes is limited. Specialists in General Practice performed recommended procedures more frequently, achieved better HbA1c and blood pressure levels than non-specialists. GPs who graduated in Western Europe performed screening procedures more frequently and achieved lower diastolic blood pressure compared with their counterparts. There were few significant differences in the quality of care between GP groups according to their gender and country of birth.

Women's information needs about menopause: a cross-sectional survey in Norwegian general practice.

BACKGROUND: Research has indicated that providing women with information about menopause can improve their attitudes towards it and symptom experience. Nevertheless, information shared on the menopause is often arbitrary. AIM: To examine women's information needs about menopause, and understand if, when, and from whom they want information. DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional study was undertaken. A questionnaire survey was distributed to women in the waiting room of 54 general practice clinics in South-Eastern Norway in autumn 2022. METHOD: Medical students recruited women in the clinic waiting rooms. A 1-page study-specific questionnaire was used, focusing on need for information about menopause. A multinominal logistic regression model was used to analyse the association between the desire for information and education level, country of birth, and menopausal status. RESULTS: A total of 625 women were included, with a mean age of 44.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 8.7). In all, 59% answered that they wanted information about menopause, and 81% of these wanted their GP to inform them, from a median age of 45 years. According to the women, only 10% of GPs had initiated a discussion on the menopause. Higher education was a predictor for wanting information. A main driver of information needs was to help oneself in the present and in the future. In all, 33% did not want information. The main reasons were that they already possessed sufficient information, would take menopause as it comes, were too young, or were already postmenopausal. The sex of the GP did not influence the results. CONCLUSION: Most women wanted information about menopause from their GP. The study emphasises the need for GPs to consider prioritising this discussion, and to keep up to date on recommendations and treatment options.

Variation between general practitioners in type 2 diabetes processes of care.

AIMS: To explore variation in general practitioners' (GPs') performance of six recommended procedures in type 2 diabetes patients <75 years without cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of quality of diabetes care in Norway based on electronic health records from 2014. GPs (clustered in practices) were divided in quintiles based on a composite measure of performance of six processes of care. We fitted a multilevel partial ordinal regression model to identify GP factors associated with being in quintiles with better performance. RESULTS: We identified 6015 type 2 diabetes patients from 275 GPs in 77 practices. The GPs performed on average 63.4% of the procedures; on average 46% in the poorest quintile to 81% in the best quintile with a larger range in individual GPs. After adjustments, use of a structured follow-up form was associated with GPs being in upper three quintiles (OR 12.4 (95% CI 2.37-65.1). Routines for reminders were associated with being in a better quintile (OR 2.6 (1.37-4.92). GPs' age >60 years and heavier workload were associated with poorer performance. CONCLUSION: We found large variations in GPs' performance of processes of care. Factors reflecting structure and workload were strongly associated with performance.

Experiences of self-management support in patients with diabetes and multimorbidity: a qualitative study in Norwegian general practice.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to explore how patients with diabetes and multimorbidity experience self-management support by general practitioners (GPs), nurses and medical secretaries in Norwegian general practice. BACKGROUND: Self-management support is recognised as an important strategy to improve the autonomy and well-being of patients with long-term conditions. Collaborating healthcare professionals (cHCPs), such as nurses and medical secretaries, may have an important role in the provision of self-management support. No previous study has explored how patients with diabetes and multimorbidity experience self-management support provided by cHCPs in general practice in Norway. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 11 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with one or more additional long-term condition were performed during February-May 2017. FINDINGS: Patients experienced cHCPs as particularly attentive towards the psychological and emotional aspects of living with diabetes. Compared to GPs, whose appointments were experienced as stressful, patients found cHCPs more approachable and more likely to address patients' questions and worries. In this sense, cHCPs complemented GP-led diabetes care. However, neither cHCPs nor GPs were perceived to involve patients' in clinical decisions or goal setting during consultations.

Exploring the relationship between coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study of secondary prevention among diabetes patients.

BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke are the major causes of death among people with diabetes. AIM: To describe the prevalence and onset of CHD and stroke among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care in Norway, and explore the quality of secondary prevention. DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional study of data was undertaken from electronic medical records (EMRs) of 10 255 patients with T2DM in general practice. The study took place in five counties of Norway (Oslo, Akershus, Rogaland, Hordaland, and Nordland). Quality of care was assessed based on national guideline recommendations. METHOD: Summary statistics with adjustments and binary logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: In total, 2260 patients (22.1%) had CHD and 759 (7.4%) had stroke. South Asians had significantly more CHD than ethnic Norwegians (29.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 26.1 to 33.0 versus 21.5%, CI = 20.6 to 22.3) and other ethnic groups, and experienced onset of CHD or stroke at a mean of 7 years before Norwegians. In 47.9% of the patients, CHD was diagnosed before T2DM. Treatment target for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was reached for 30.0% and for systolic blood pressure (SBP) for 65.1% of the patients with CHD. Further, 20.9% of patients with CHD were present smokers, and only 5.0% of patients reached all four treatment targets (no smoking, HbA1c ≤7.0%, SBP <135 mmHg, LDL-cholesterol <1.8 mmol/l). CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of CHD preceded the diagnosis of T2DM in half of the patients. The prevalence of CHD was highest and onset earlier among ethnic South Asians. More intensive treatment of lipids, blood pressure, and smoking are needed in patients with T2DM and CHD.

[General practitioners' advice on hormone replacement therapy in menopause]. / Allmennlegers råd om hormonbehandling i overgangsalderen.

BACKGROUND: Since 2002, new knowledge has emerged and changed the usage of hormone replacement treatment (HRT); in Norway it has been used significantly less since then. The aim of the study was to investigate Norwegian GPs' assessment of their role in advising women regarding HRT (during and after the menopause), and to identify important factors in the doctor's decision process. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to 400 Norwegian GPs, randomly drawn from the membership list of GPs in the Norwegian Medical Association in May 2004. RESULTS: We received answers from 289 (72 %) of the doctors. 13 % of them answered that the doctor is the one who most frequently takes the initiative to start treatment, 29 % meant that the doctor most often took the initiative to STOP: treatment. The doctors disagreed notably when they were asked to give advice in relation to clinical examples. The most important predictor for the advice given was whether they agreed or disagreed with the question "Does the treatment imply medicalization of a natural ageing process?" INTERPRETATION: Many doctors seem to actively advise women on issues regarding HRT and they more often stop than start treatment. The GPs doctor's attitude to whether the treatment implied increased medicalization was more decisive for their advice than indications, contraindications and effect of treatment. Consideration of such factors are important when guidelines to change clinical practice are implemented.

[The general practitioner's view on hormone replacement therapy during and after menopause]. / Allmennlegenes syn på hormonbehandling i og etter overgangsalderen.

BACKGROUND: The evidence base for hormone replacement therapy of women during and after menopause has been strengthened in recent years. The aim of the study was to investigate Norwegian GPs' attitude to hormone replacement treatment in menopause, their knowledge of effects and indications, the risk of side effects, and the personal use of hormone treatment by female GPs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 400 Norwegian GPs, randomly drawn from the membership list of GPs in the Norwegian Medical Association, in May 2004. RESULTS: We received answers from 72%. The answers imply that most Norwegian GPs know the current evidence base regarding the effects and side effects of hormone replacement therapy. Most of them indicate that they follow the Norwegian recommendations about indications and contra-indications, but that they continue the treatment longer than recommended. A large majority of the respondents agreed to the statements that hormone treatment increases the risk of breast cancer, that it does not prevent heart infarction and that the most important reason to prescribe hormone treatment is bothersome hot flushes. Female GPs seem to be better updated on some aspects of the treatment than men. 14 out of 17 peri- and postmenopausal female GPs were using or had used such treatment. INTERPRETATION: Norwegian GPs are generally well updated regarding new evidence in this field. The proportion of menopausal female GPs who take hormone treatment themselves has remained quite stable and is substantially higher than that for the average for the population. This finding may imply that menopausal female GPs regard the risks of treatment as low, and that most of them find the benefits of treatment greater than the risks.